Search

• FM/FFM is associated with different clinical outcomes (factors) in adults with asthma. • Factors are corticosteroids, medication steps, lung function and physical activity. • Those with higher FM/FFM are more likely to be in stages 4–5 and physically inactive. Fat mass to fat-free mass ratio (FM/FFM) assesses the combined effect of the balance between fat mass and fat-free mass. Aims: to evaluate the associations beetween FM/FFM and clinical outcomes in asthma and to compare clinical characteristics between individuals with higher and lower FM/FFM. 128 participants with asthma underwent anthropometric, spirometry and bioelectrical impedance assessments. Physical activity in daily life (PADL) was assessed by the Actigraph for 7 days. Daily dose of inhaled medication, steps of pharmacological treatment, Asthma Control Questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were also assessed. Participants were classified into two groups according to the 50th percentile of reference values for FM/FFM. Individuals with higher FM/FFM (n=75) used higher daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids, had worse lung function and fewer steps/day when compared to those with lower FM/FFM (n=53) (P≤0.021). Associations were found between absolute values of FM/FFM with lung function (FEV 1 and FVC [liters]): R2=0.207 and 0.364;P<0.0001), and between the categories of lower or higher FM/FFM with steps of medication treatment (Cramer's V=0.218;P=0.016) and level of PADL (Cramer's V=0.236;P=0.009). The highest FM/FFM was a determining factor of physical inactivity (OR: 3.21;95%CI:1.17–8.78) and highest steps of pharmacological treatment (OR: 8.89;95%CI:1.23–64.08). Higher FM/FFM is significantly associated with worse clinical characteristics in individuals with asthma, such as higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids, worse lung function and fewer steps/day. Moreover, higher FM/FFM is a determining factor of physical inactivity and the highest steps of pharmacological treatment for asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The fast spread of SARS-CoV-2 presented a worldwide challenge to public health, economy, and educational system, affecting wellbeing of human society. With high transmission rates, there are increasing evidences of COVID-19 spread via bioaerosols from an infected person. The current review was conducted to examine airborne pollen impact on COVID-19 transmission and to identify the major gaps for post-pandemic research. The study used all key terms to identify revenant literature and observation were collated for the current research. Based on existing literature, there is a potential association between pollen bioaerosols and COVID-19. There are few studies focusing the impact of airborne pollen on SARS-CoV-2, which could be useful to advance future research. Allergic rhinitis and asthma patients were found to have pre-modified immune activation, which could help to provide protection against COVID-19. However, does airborne pollen acts as a potent carrier for SARS-CoV-2 transport, dispersal and its proliferation still require multidisciplinary research. Further, a clear conclusion cannot be drawn due to limited evidence and hence more research is needed to show how pollen bioaerosols could affect virus survivals. The small but growing literature review focuses on searching for every possible answer to provide additional security layers to overcome near future corona-like infectious diseases., Competing Interests: The authors report no declarations of interest., (© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: MP-AzeFlu (Dymista®; spray of azelastine/fluticasone propionate) is the most effective allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment available. Its effect on asthma outcomes in patients with AR and asthma is unknown., Methods: This pre-post historical cohort study, using the Optimum Patient Care Research Database, included patients aged ≥12 years, from UK general practice with active asthma (defined as a recorded diagnosis, with ≥1 prescription for reliever or controller inhaler) in the year before or at the initiation date. The primary study outcome was change in number of acute respiratory events (i.e. exacerbation or antibiotic course for a respiratory event) between baseline and outcome years. The effect size of MP-AzeFlu was quantified as the difference in % of patients that improved and worsened., Results: Of the 1,188 patients with AR and asthma included, many had a record of irreversible obstruction (67%), and uncontrolled asthma (70.4%), despite high mean daily doses of reliever/controller therapy and acute oral corticosteroid use, in the year pre-MP-AzeFlu initiation. MP-AzeFlu initiation was associated with fewer acute respiratory events (effect size (e) = 5.8%, p = 0.0129) and a reduction in daily use of short-acting β 2 -agonists, with fewer patients requiring >2 SABA puffs/week (e = 7.7% p < 0.0001). More patients had well-controlled asthma 1-year post-MP-AzeFlu initiation (e = 4.1%; p = 0.0037), despite a reduction in inhaled corticosteroids (e = 4.8%; p = 0.0078)., Conclusions: This study provides the first direct evidence of the beneficial effect of MP-AzeFlu on asthma outcomes in co-morbid patients in primary care in the United Kingdom., Trial Registration: EUPAS30940. Registered August 13, 2019., Competing Interests: Hilda J.I. De Jong, Jaco Voorham, and Victoria A. Carter are employees of the Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI). Glenis K.Scadding has received funding for talks and for advice from Mylan, GSK, ALK-Abello, Sanofi and Stallergenes. She chaired the BSACI Rhinitis Guidelines and chairs the EAACI Ethics Committee. Claus Bachert has received fees for lectures, advisory board meetings or search grants from Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, GSK, Astra-Zeneca, Genzyme, Regeneron, Mylan, Uriach, ALK, Asit Biotech and Stallergenes. Giorgio Walter Canonica has received research grants, as well as lecture or advisory board fees from A. Menarini, Alk-Abello, Allergy Therapeutics, Anallergo, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Circassia, Danone, Faes, Genentech, Guidotti-Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, Hal Allergy, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, Stallergenes, UCB Pharma, Uriach Pharma, Teva, Thermo Fisher, and Valeas. Peter Smith has received an investigator initiated grant and funding for talks and advice from Mylan, has done talks for GSK, AZ, Novartis, Bayer, and Abbott, and has been on advisory boards for Nestle and Seqirus. Ulrich Wahn received honoraria for consultation and lectures from ALK, Stallergenes, Allergopharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Roxall, Pfizer, UCB, Biomay, Berlin-Chemie. Dermot Ryan has (in the last 3 years) lectured on behalf of, received sponsorship from, or acted as a paid advisor to Mylan, AZ, Chiesi, Novartis, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim and Regeneron. Jose A. Castillo reports receipt of fees for lectures, advisory board meetings or research grants from MSD, ALK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Uriach, GSK, Leti and ALK. He has chaired the Normativa SEPAR on Asthma, Rhinitis and Nasal Polyp Multimorbidities and chairs The Rhinitis Committee in Asthma Area from SEPAR. Ruth B. Murray reports no conflict of interest. David B. Price has board membership with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Thermofisher; consultancy agreements with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theravance; grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theravance, UK National Health Service; payment for lectures/speaking engagements from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals; payment for the development of educational materials from Mundipharma, Novartis; payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, Thermofisher; funding for patient enrolment or completion of research from Novartis; stock/stock options from AKL Research and Development Ltd which produces phytopharmaceuticals; owns 74% of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd (Australia and UK) and 74% of Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd (Singapore); 5% shareholding in Timestamp which develops adherence monitoring technology; is peer reviewer for grant committees of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, and Health Technology Assessment; and was an expert witness for GlaxoSmithKline., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: Allergy to olive pollen is one of the primary causes of allergic asthma in Spain. Even though allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has shown clinical benefits in patients sensitized to different allergens, studies in asthmatic patients sensitized to olive pollen are insufficient., Objective: To assess the effectiveness and safety of an ultra-short course of AIT with an L-tyrosine-adsorbed and monophosphoryl lipid A-adjuvanted olive pollen and olive/grass pollen extract (Pollinex Quattro®) in patients with allergic asthma in the real-world setting., Methods: Retrospective, controlled study including patients with asthma, with and without allergic rhinitis, caused by sensitization to olive pollen from 11 centers in Spain. Patients received out-of-season (October-March) treatment with AIT in addition to their pharmacological treatment (active group) or pharmacological treatment (control group). Effectiveness variables, including unscheduled visits to the healthcare center, emergency room admissions, symptoms of asthma and rhinitis (following GEMA and ARIA classifications, respectively), and use of medication to treat asthma and rhinitis during the subsequent pollen season were compared between treatment groups., Results: Of 131 study patients, 42 were treated with their usual asthma medication (control group) and 89 were treated with AIT (active group), either Pollinex Quattro® 100% olive pollen (n = 43, 48.3%) or 50% olive pollen/50% grass pollen (n = 46, 51.7%). Patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. The mean (SD) number of unscheduled visits to a healthcare center and emergency room admissions due to allergy symptoms was 2.19 (1.40) and 0.43 (0.63) in the control group, and 1.09 (1.25) and 0.11 (0.51) in the active group ( P  = 0.001 and P  = 0.006, respectively). Severity and control of asthma symptoms remained unchanged ( P  = 0.347 and P  = 0.179, respectively), rhinitis type improved ( P  = 0.025), and severity remained unchanged in the active compared to the control group. The use of short-acting beta-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids to treat asthma symptoms decreased in the active vs. the control group ( P  = 0.001 and P  = 0.031, respectively). Twelve (13.5%) and two (2.2%) patients in the active group experienced local adverse reactions (edema, swelling, erythema, hives, pruritus, and heat), and systemic adverse reactions (hypertensive crisis and low-grade fever) to AIT, respectively; none was serious., Conclusion: AIT with Pollinex Quattro® specific for olive pollen and olive/grass pollens resulted in reduced visits to the healthcare center and emergency room and the use of asthma medication during the pollen season, indicating that this treatment was safe and effective in treating asthma in patients sensitized to these pollens., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: Primary care practitioners (PCPs), being the front liners, play an important role in treating allergic rhinitis (AR). As there is no proper tool to assess their perception, attitude, and practice in utilizing the guidelines, we aimed to develop and validate a new questionnaire for such purpose., Methods: The development phase consists of both literature and expert panel review. The validation phase consists of content validity, face validity, and construct validity. Cronbach's alpha was used to verify internal consistency. The development phase produced a questionnaire with 3 domains: perception, attitude, and practice consisting of 60 items (PAP-PCP questionnaire). Item response theory analysis for perception demonstrated the difficulty and discrimination values were acceptable except for 3 items. Exploratory factor analysis for attitude and practice domains showed the psychometric properties were good except for 3 items in practice domain. Experts judgement was used to decide on the final selection of questionnaire which consists of 59 items., Results: The final validated questionnaire has 3 domains with 59 items. All domains had Cronbach's alpha above 0.65 which was reliable. 302 physicians completed the questionnaire. 98% PCPs diagnosed AR based on clinical history. Although, majority agree AR guidelines is useful (67%), they had difficulty in using it to classify AR (54.9%) and determine AR severity (73.9%). Oral anti-histamines (first and second generation) were the most prescribed (>75%) followed by intranasal corticosteroids (59%) and combined intranasal corticosteroid and oral anti-histamine (51%). Majority agreed that treatment efficacy (81.8%), adverse effects (83.8%), fear of adverse effects (73.5%), route of administration (69.4%), dosing frequency (72.5%), taste (64.6%) and cost (73.5%) affect treatment compliance., Conclusions: The newly developed and validated questionnaire is a promising instrument in understanding the treatment gap in AR. Although further testing and refinement are needed, it provides an initial means for evaluating knowledge and understanding of PCPs in treating AR., (© 2020 The Authors.)

According to the data derived from several national and international registries, including SANI (Severe Asthma Network Italy), and considering the strong impact that frequent or regular use of oral corticosteroid has on quality of life (QoL) of severe asthmatics, as well as on the costs for managing corticosteroid-related diseases, oral corticosteroid sparing up to withdrawal should be considered a primary outcome in the management of severe asthma. New biologics have clearly demonstrated that this effect is possible, with concomitant reduction in the rate of exacerbations and in symptom control. Then, there is no reason for using so frequently oral corticosteroid before having explored all alternatives currently available for a large part of severe asthmatics., Competing Interests: GW Canonica received in the last three years research grants as well as lecture or advisory board fees from: A. Menarini, Alk-Abello, Allergy Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Genentech, Guidotti-Malesci, Glaxo Smith Kline, Hal Allergy, Mylan, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, StallergenesGreer, UCB pharma, Uriach Pharma, Valeas, ViborPharma. F Blasi received grants and/or personal fees from: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chiesi, Guidotti, Glaxo Smith Kline, Grifols, Insmed, Menarini, Mundifarma, Novartis, Pfizer, Zambon. PL Paggiaro received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Guidotti, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi. S Aliberti received grants and/or personal fees from Actavis UK Ltd, Aradigm Corporation, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Bayer Healthcare, Chiesi, Grifols, Horizon, INSMED, Novartis, Raptor, Zambon. L Cosmi received personal fees from Glaxo Smith Kline and Novartis. S Centanni received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boheringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Guidotti, Menarini, Novartis, Valeas. ME Conte received personal fees from Glaxo Smith Kline. S D’Alò received fees for clinical trials from Glaxo Smith Kline. S Del Giacco received grants and/or personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Menarini. Novartis. F Puggioni received personal fees from Allergy therapeutics, Almirall, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Guidotti, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi, Valeas. FLM Ricciardolo received grants, personal fees and/or other supports from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Glaxo Smith Kline, Guidotti, Lusofarmaco, Menarini, Neopharmed, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva. L Richeldi received personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, FibroGen, Promedior, RespiVant, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis. P Santus received grants and/or personal fees from ALK Abellò, AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, Boheringer Ingheleim, Menarini International, Novartis, Sanofi, Valeas, Zambon. E Heffler received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boheringer Ingheleim, Circassia, Glaxo Smith Kline, Nestlè Purina, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, Valeas. GE Senna, G Passalacqua, A Spanevello, D Bagnasco, M Bonavia, M Bonini, L Brussino, C Bucca, MF Caiaffa, C Calabresi, G Camiciottoli, M Caminati, GE Carpagnano, C Caruso, AG Corsico, MT Costantino, N Crimi, M D'Amato, A Farsi, E Favero, MP Foschino Barbato, G Guarneri, G Guida, M Latorre, S Lo Cicero, C Lombardi, L Macchia, F Mazza, F Menzella, M Milanese, M Montagni, P Montuschi, E Nucera, R Parente, V Patella, G Pelaia, L Pini, L Ricciardi, E Ridolo, G Rolla, N Scichilone, G Spadaro, A Vianello, V Viviano, MR Yacoub, MC Zappa have nothing to disclose., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: Data on mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (EA) and comorbidities are needed to assess whether randomized controlled trial results are applicable in the real world., Objective: To evaluate real-life effectiveness and the presence/absence of predictors of treatment response in patients with one or more comorbidities (nasal polyps, allergic rhinitis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, nonallergic rhinitis with eosinophilia syndrome, obesity, bronchiectasis) who received mepolizumab (MEPO) for the treatment of severe EA., Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study in patients with severe asthma and presence of comorbidities treated with mepolizumab at the respiratory outpatient clinic, Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele, Catania, Italy. Health records of 31 severe asthmatic patients were retrieved and analyzed. Asthma control test (ACT) score, blood eosinophil count, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), FEV 1 % of predicted and FEV 1 /FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) ratio, oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage, and exacerbations were recorded at baseline (T0), after 3 (T1), 6 (T3), 9 (T6), and 12 months (T12). Clinical response was defined when 3 of these 4 criteria were fulfilled: i) 30% exacerbation decrease; ii) 80% blood eosinophilia reduction; iii) 3 point ACT increase; iv) FEV 1 increase ≥200 mL., Results: 83.87% of patients were classified as responsive to MEPO treatment. Substantial depletion of the blood eosinophils (>80%) was found in 87.1% of patients, FEV 1  > 200 mL was seen in 54.84% of patients, a 3-point ACT improvement from baseline was recorded in 80.65% 25 of patients and a 30% reduction of exacerbations rates was seen in 96.77% of patients. Moreover, the majority 38.71% of patients met 3/4 parameters after 12 months. Neither the comorbidities nor other characteristics (sex, BMI, age, smoking) influenced treatment response., Conclusions: MEPO in patients with severe EA is effective regardless of the presence of comorbidities., Competing Interests: All the authors declare no competing interests., (© 2020 The Author(s).)

Background: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has a longstanding history and still remains the only disease-changing treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma. Over the years 2 different schools have developed their strategies: the United States (US) and the European. Allergen extracts available in these regions are adapted to local practice. In other parts of the world, extracts from both regions and local ones are commercialized, as in Mexico. Here, local experts developed a national AIT guideline (GUIMIT 2019) searching for compromises between both schools., Methods: Using ADAPTE methodology for transculturizing guidelines and AGREE-II for evaluating guideline quality, GUIMIT selected 3 high-quality Main Reference Guidelines (MRGs): the European Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (EAACI) guideines, the S2k guideline of various German-speaking medical societies (2014), and the US Practice Parameters on Allergen Immunotherapy 2011. We formulated clinical questions and based responses on the fused evidence available in the MRGs, combined with local possibilities, patient's preference, and costs. We came across several issues on which the MRGs disagreed. These are presented here along with arguments of GUIMIT members to resolve them. GUIMIT (for a complete English version, Supplementary data) concluded the following., Results: Related to the diagnosis of IgE-mediated respiratory allergy, apart from skin prick testing complementary tests (challenges, in vitro testing and molecular such as species-specific allergens) might be useful in selected cases to inform AIT composition. AIT is indicated in allergic rhinitis and suggested in allergic asthma (once controlled) and IgE-mediated atopic dermatitis. Concerning the correct subcutaneous AIT dose for compounding vials according to the US school: dosing tables and formula are given; up to 4 non-related allergens can be mixed, refraining from mixing high with low protease extracts. When using European extracts: the manufacturer's indications should be followed; in multi-allergic patients 2 simultaneous injections can be given (100% consensus); mixing is discouraged. In Mexico only allergoid tablets are available; based on doses used in all sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) publications referenced in MRGs, GUIMIT suggests a probable effective dose related to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) might be: 50-200% of the monthly SCIT dose given daily, maximum mixing 4 allergens. Also, a table with practical suggestions on non-evidence-existing issues, developed with a simplified Delphi method, is added. Finally, dissemination and implementation of guidelines is briefly discussed, explaining how we used online tools for this in Mexico., Conclusions: Countries where European and American AIT extracts are available should adjust AIT according to which school is followed., Competing Interests: All authors declared or they have no potential conflicts of interest. The following authors, indicated relations with the pharmaceutical industry: Dr. Larenas Linnemann reports personal fees from Allakos, Amstrong, 10.13039/100004325Astrazeneca, 10.13039/100001003Boehringer Ingelheim, 10.13039/100007560Chiesi, DBV Technologies, Grunenthal, 10.13039/100004330GSK, MEDA, Menarini, 10.13039/100007054MSD, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100004319Pfizer, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100004339Sanofi, Siegfried, 10.13039/100011110UCB, Gossamer, grants from 10.13039/100004319Sanofi, 10.13039/100004325Astrazeneca, Novartis, 10.13039/100011110UCB, GSK, 10.13039/100006259TEVA, 10.13039/100001003Boehringer Ingelheim, 10.13039/100007560Chiesi, Purina institute., outside the submitted work; Dr. Moncayo Coello reports personal fees from 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, personal fees from 10.13039/100004339Sanofi, personal fees from 10.13039/100004330Grünenthal, personal fees from 10.13039/100011218Sandoz, outside the submitted work; Dr. Partida-Gaytan reports personal fees from 10.13039/100012690Nestlé Nutrition Institute, personal fees from 10.13039/100004330GlaxoSmithKline Mexico, personal fees from Instituto Nacional de Pediatria, personal fees from Healthy Kids Polanco S.C., outside the submitted work., (© 2020 The Authors.)

India is the second most populous country in the world with a population of nearly 1.3 billion, comprising 20% of the global population. There are an estimated 37.5 million cases of asthma in India, and recent studies have reported a rise in prevalence of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Overall, 40-50% of paediatric asthma cases in India are uncontrolled or severe. Treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma is sub-optimal in a significant proportion of cases due to multiple factors relating to unaffordability to buy medications, low national gross domestic product, religious beliefs, myths and stigma regarding chronic ailment, illiteracy, lack of allergy specialists, and lack of access to allergen-specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and biologics for severe asthma. High quality allergen extracts for skin tests and adrenaline auto-injectors are currently not available in India. Higher postgraduate specialist training programmes in Allergy and Immunology are also not available. Another major challenge for the vast majority of the Indian population is an unacceptably high level of exposure to particulate matter (PM) 2.5 generated from traffic pollution and use of fossil fuel and biomass fuel and burning of incense sticks and mosquito coils. This review provides an overview of the burden of allergic disorders in India. It appraises current evidence and justifies an urgent need for a strategic multipronged approach to enhance quality of care for allergic disorders. This may include creating an infrastructure for education and training of healthcare professionals and patients and involving regulatory authorities for making essential treatments accessible at subsidised prices. It calls for research into better phenotypic characterisation of allergic disorders, as evidence generated from high income western countries are not directly applicable to India, due to important confounders such as ethnicity, air pollution, high rates of parasitic infestation, and other infections., Competing Interests: MTKs department received educational grant from ALK Abello, MEDA, Thermo Fisher and other companies for annual PracticAllergy course in recent years. MTK received funds from ALK Abello to attend EAACI conference. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of World Allergy Organization.)

Background: Improved understanding of the normal range of blood eosinophil counts (BEC) and conditions that influence them in non-asthmatic individuals should allow more accurate estimation of the threshold at which eosinophilic disease should be considered, diagnosed, and treated. This analysis investigated the impact of atopy, smoking, and parasitic infection on BEC., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of non-asthmatic subjects from a case-control study (CONEP 450/10) conducted at the Program for Control of Asthma in Bahia (ProAR). Participant BECs were measured at baseline; correlations between predefined risk factors and BEC were assessed via univariate and stratified analysis., Results: Of the 454 participants included, 3% were helminth parasite-positive, 18% were non-helminth parasite-positive; and 450 had BEC data. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) BEC was 152 (96, 252) cells/μL. Any positive skin prick test, elevated total immunoglobulin E, allergic rhinitis, and being a current smoker were all individually associated with higher BEC (p < 0.05) compared with BEC in participants without these factors, but having a non-helminthic parasitic infection was not. Participants with all 4 risk factors that were associated with higher BEC had a median (IQR) BEC of 192 cells/μL (94, 416) versus 106 cells/μL (70, 164) for those with no risk factors., Conclusions: In non-asthmatic subjects, atopy, allergic rhinitis, and current smoking status were associated with higher BEC compared with subjects without these factors, but BEC values were well below the threshold commonly accepted as normal. Therefore, BEC should be interpreted in the context of an individual's medical conditions and other BEC-influencing factors., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Managing patients with severe asthma during the coronavirus pandemic and COVID-19 is a challenge. Authorities and physicians are still learning how COVID-19 affects people with underlying diseases, and severe asthma is not an exception. Unless relevant data emerge that change our understanding of the relative safety of medications indicated in patients with asthma during this pandemic, clinicians must follow the recommendations of current evidence-based guidelines for preventing loss of control and exacerbations. Also, with the absence of data that would indicate any potential harm, current advice is to continue the administration of biological therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with asthma for whom such therapies are clearly indicated and have been effective. For patients with severe asthma infected by SARS-CoV-2, the decision to maintain or postpone biological therapy until the patient recovers should be a case-by-case based decision supported by a multidisciplinary team. A registry of cases of COVID-19 in patients with severe asthma, including those treated with biologics, will help to address a clinical challenge in which we have more questions than answers., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma are collectively called unified airway diseases. Periostin has been implicated in the pathophysiologic link of these conditions but only by serum measurements. We sought to investigate sputum levels of periostin and their association with upper airway inflammation and olfactory function in CRS patients., Methods: We prospectively recruited 56 CRS patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (20 with and 36 without comorbid asthma), and 28 healthy controls between October 2015 and December 2017. Lower and upper airway indices such as sputum periostin levels and eosinophil and neutrophil counts, exhaled fractional nitric oxide (FeNO) levels, and olfactory function were evaluated in the three groups. Radiological severity of CT images and tissue eosinophilia of surgical specimens were also assessed in the CRS patients., Results: Sputum periostin levels were highest, and olfactory function was most impaired, in the CRS patients with comorbid asthma, followed by those without asthma and controls in this order. CRS with asthma group showed higher sputum eosinophils and FeNO levels than the other two groups, while CRS patients without asthma showed significantly higher neutrophils in sputum than the other two groups. When confined to CRS patients, olfactory dysfunction was correlated with sputum eosinophil counts. Eosinophil counts of nasal polyps showed a significant positive correlation with sputum periostin and FeNO levels. Radiological severity of CRS was correlated with sputum eosinophil counts and FeNO levels., Conclusions: Periostin levels and inflammatory cells such as eosinophils and neutrophils in the lower airways are increased in patients with CRS, suggesting the presence of mutual interactions between upper and lower airways even if asthma does not coexist. Olfactory dysfunction and eosinophilic nasal polyps may be potential indicators of Th2-driven inflammation in the lower airways., Trial Registration: This study was registered on the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (Registry ID UMIN000018672)., (© 2019 The Author(s).)

Nigella sativa L. (NS) seeds, known as black seed, is a spice and a traditional herbal medicine used in various diseases including bronchial asthma. This review aimed to assess the studies supporting the medicinal use of NS in asthma and to highlight future research priorities. Various medical databases were searched for the effects of NS and its active secondary metabolites in asthma inflammation and outcomes. There were fourteen preclinical studies describing multiple effects of NS in animal or cellular models of asthma including bronchodilation, anti-histaminic, anti-inflammatory, anti-leukotrienes and immunomodulatory effects. Furthermore, seven clinical studies showed improvements in different asthma outcomes including symptoms, pulmonary function and laboratory parameters. However, often these studies are small and used ill-defined preparations. In conclusion, NS could be therapeutically beneficial in alleviating airway inflammation and the control of asthma symptoms, but the evidence remains scanty and is often based on poorly characterised preparations. Accordingly, well-designed large clinical studies using chemically well characterised NS preparation are required.