Search

Background: Self-management support is essential to perform self-management behavior. To provide this support in an effective way, insight in the needs for self-management support is necessary. Objective: To give an overview of self-management support needs from the perspective of rheumatoid arthritis patients to help nurses to improve self-management. Design: We conducted a scoping review for the period of January 2002 to May 2013 using the following inclusion criteria: (1) studies on adult patients aged 18 years and older, (2) studies from the perspective of rheumatoid arthritis patients, (3) studies reporting results on support needs, and (4) empirical studies using any design. Data sources: We searched in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Review methods: Following the steps of a scoping review, we (1) identified the research question, (2) identified relevant studies, (3) selected studies, (4) charted the data, and (5) collated, summarized, and reported results. We incorporated the optional sixth step of consultation of a multidisciplinary panel of professionals and patients to validate our findings. Results: Seventeen articles were included. Our review shows that rheumatoid arthritis patients have informational, emotional, social and practical support needs. We found an information need for various topics, e.g. exercises and medication. Patients express a need for emotional support in daily life, given through other RA patients, colleagues and supervisors and nurses. For information needs, emotional and social support it is important that it is tailored to the individual needs of the patient. Conclusion: The most important support needs for self-management mentioned by rheumatoid arthritis patients are more informational, social and practical support and emotional support. Considering patients' perspective as a starting point for delivering support for self-management can lead to the development of nursing interventions tailored to the needs of rheumatoid arthritis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are successfully implemented in different surgical specialties, but a specific protocol for autologous breast reconstruction is missing. The aim of this study was to determine whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol contributes to a reduced length of stay without an increase in postoperative complications for patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction., Materials En Methods: The effect of the ERAS protocol was examined using a single-center patient-control study comparing two groups of patients. Patients who underwent surgery between November 2017 and November 2018 using the ERAS protocol were compared with a historical control group (pre-ERAS) who underwent surgery between November 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain and postoperative complications., Results: 152 patients were included (ERAS group, n = 73; control group, n = 79). Mean hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (5 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). The average pain score was 1.73 in de the ERAS group compared to 2.17 in the control group (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complications. The ERAS group experienced less constipation (41 vs. 25 patients, p = 0.028)., Conclusion: An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol contributes an accelerated postoperative recovery of patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. In this study a significant decrease was found in hospital length of stay, patient-reported pain score and adverse health issues., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aims to explain the earlier findings of a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), which showed that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients did not benefit from an online self-management program. Moreover, less patients than expected used the program., Methods: As part of an explorative RCT, patients were interviewed to explore their (non) usage of the program. Purposive sampling (n = 21) was used to select patients from four groups of patients (n = 49): 1) non-users; 2) low users; 3) high users basic; 4) high users plus., Results: The program supported only a small group of patients because: 1) not all patients were motivated to use the program, 2) patients had no clear expectation or had differing expectations of the program, 3) there was a mismatch between individual patients' support needs and the needs included in the program, 4) reminders were only sent to fill in the diaries for pain and fatigue, not to use the program modules., Conclusion: This study offers insights in the (non-) usage of online programs and how usage could be increased in practice., Practical Implications: Health professionals should be involved in the implementation of this online programs and should inform patients what the program could bring them., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Provide insight into the concept of stress in the context of challenging behaviour of nursing home residents with dementia and its causes and consequences., Background: Challenging behaviour is frequent in residents with dementia, but consequences for nursing staff are unclear., Introduction: Challenging behaviour of residents can be enervating for nurses and may lead to stress. Although stress in general is associated with negative outcomes, an overview of stress in this context would be a welcome addition to the field., Method: Concept analysis according to Walker and Avant., Results: Identified antecedents of stress: physical and verbal aggression, conflicts, excessive demands and being unresponsive (residents), age, experience, tenure, nursing level and training (nursing staff). Defining attributes: disturbed homoeostasis and the personal appraisal of the situation. Identified consequences regard health, psychological aspects and behaviour., Discussion: Intervening in the identified factors may contribute to prevention of stress in nursing staff., Limitations: Given a lack of strong empirical studies, our analysis is not based on a high level of evidence and needs to be tested. Papers from before 1990 might have been missed., Conclusion: The concept analysis revealed that nursing staff stress in the context of challenging behaviour may result from resident and nursing staff factors. Besides health and psychological consequences, behavioural consequences can enormously impact the well-being of residents., Implications: Application in daily care to support teams in influencing resident and nursing staff factors could prevent stress, for instance using behavioural management training or recruiting higher educated nursing staff. Given the increasing complexity of care, creating specialized units with specifically trained staff for different groups of people with dementia may be desirable., (© 2016 International Council of Nurses.)