Search

Hypothesis We hypothesize that patients with a positive tangent sign will have rotator cuff tears that are not able to be repaired primarily. Methods We performed a retrospective review of the charts of patients who had undergone surgery for repair of a rotator cuff tear. The operative note was reviewed to determine whether the cuff tear was primarily repaired. The magnetic resonance imaging study of each patient was reviewed to assess for a positive or negative tangent sign. The reviewer was blinded to the result of each measurement. Results Eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the 79 included in our analyses, 17 had a positive tangent sign and 62 had a negative tangent sign. There was only 1 patient with a negative tangent sign who had an irreparable rotator cuff tear. There were 3 patients with a positive tangent sign who had a repairable rotator cuff. With a pretest prevalence of irreparable tears of 18.9%, a positive finding suggested a post-test probability of 82.3% with a positive tangent sign and a post-test probability of only 1.6% when the tangent sign was negative. Conclusion Our results showed decision-making value in both a negative tangent sign and a positive tangent sign. The tangent sign is an easily performed and reproducible tool with good intraobserver and interobserver reliability that is a powerful predictor of whether a rotator cuff tear will be repairable.

We hypothesize that the degree of supraspinatus atrophy, as assessed with the tangent sign will significantly correlate with increasing rotator cuff tear size.A retrospective review was performed assessing presence of muscle atrophy using the tangent sign, fatty atrophy based on Goutallier classification, and size of rotator cuff tear in 34 patients. A correlation analysis was performed.All agreement measures among both evaluators were statistically significant (P.05). Agreement among the 2 physicians for the tangent sign was consider almost perfect k = 87.2 (95%CI = 51.7, 87.2). Weighted kappa agreement using the Goutallier sign was 75.1 (95%CI = 58.7, 91.4), suggesting substantial agreement. The relationship between the positive tangent sign and coded tear grade was very good with a correlation of R = .84 and R = .87, respectively, showing a strong correlation between the presence of a tangent sign and a larger rotator cuff tear. A strong relationship was also found when comparing the tangent sign to a Goutallier's classification of 2 or greater with a correlation of R = .92 and R = .94 for the 2 physicians. The lowest correlation was found between the Goutallier sign and tear grade from both physicians. All of these findings were statistically significant (P.05).The tangent sign shows good interobserver reliability and is easily performed to measure rotator cuff atrophy and a positive tangent sign shows an excellent correlation with the size of the rotator cuff tear and may be predictive of the ability of the cuff to be primarily repaired.

Background: Hamstring autograft size Purpose: To determine whether preoperative ultrasound (US) measurements of hamstring tendons can predict intraoperative graft diameter during ACL reconstruction. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing unilateral isolated ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled in the study (10 males, 10 females; mean ± SD age, 22.8 ± 6.6 years; height, 175.1 ± 7.1 cm; weight, 81.4 ± 14.2 kg; body mass index, 26.5 ± 4.1 kg/m2). Hamstrings were assessed by US, and double-looped semitendinosus-gracilis hamstring size was independently calculated with a freehand selection method on a nonmagnified US image by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. Intraoperative autograft size was determined with a standard graft-sizing tool. Intra- and interrater reliability was measured with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of the measure (SEM). A receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to assess the ability of the US measurement to predict intraoperative measurements. Results: The mean autograft diameter by US was 8.9 ± 0.98 mm, while the mean intraoperative hamstring graft size was 8.1 ± 0.89 mm. There was excellent intrarater (ICC2,1 = 0.95, SEM = 0.32 mm) and interrater (ICC2,1 = 0.88, SEM = 0.55 mm) reliability for US measurements. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that US did not consistently quantify graft size. Graft size did not significantly correlate with height, weight, or body mass index in our sample ( P > .05). Conclusion: These results suggest that preoperative US imaging of the hamstring tendons is unreliable in predicting intraoperative graft diameter.