Search

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continues to be a major global cause of death, affecting approximately 67 to 170 per 100,000 inhabitants annually in Europe, with a persisting high rate of mortality of up to 90% in most countries. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents one of the most significant cause of cardiac arrest, and therefore invasive coronary angiography (CAG) with subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as a fundamental component in the management of OHCA patients. Recent evidence from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) challenges the routine use of early CAG in the larger subgroup of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Additionally, emerging data suggest that individuals resuscitated from OHCA related to ACS face an elevated risk of thrombotic and bleeding events. Thus, specific invasive coronary strategies and anti-thrombotic therapies tailored to this unique setting of OHCA need to be considered for optimal in-hospital management. We sought to provide an overview of the prevalence and complexity of coronary artery disease observed in this specific population, discuss the rationale and timing for CAG after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), summarize invasive coronary strategies, and examine recent findings on antithrombotic therapies in the setting of ACS complicated by OHCA. By synthesizing the existing knowledge, this review aims to contribute to the understanding and optimization of care for OHCA patients to improve outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Veno-arterial Extracorporeal Life Support (V-A ECLS) has gained increasing place into the management of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Both surgical and percutaneous approach can be used for cannulation, but percutaneous approach has been associated with fewer complications. Angio-guided percutaneous cannulation and decannulation may further decrease the rate of complication. We aimed to compare outcome and complication rates in patients supported with V-A ECLS through percutaneous angio-guided versus surgical approach.Methods: We included all patients with emergent peripheral femoro-femoral V-A ECLS implantation for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest in our center from March 2018 to March 2021. Survival and major complications (major bleeding, limb ischemia and groin infection) rates were compared between the percutaneous angio-guided and the surgical groups.Results: One hundred twenty patients received V-A ECLS, 59 through surgical approach and 61 through angio-guided percutaneous approach. Patients' baseline characteristics and severity scores were equally balanced between the 2 groups. Thirty-day mortality was not significantly different between the 2 approaches. However, angio-guided percutaneous cannulation was associated with fewer major vascular complications (42% vs. 11%, p > 0.0001) and a higher rate of V-A ECLS decannulation. In multivariate analysis, percutaneous angio-guided implantation of V-A ECLS was independently associated with a lower probability of major complications.Conclusion: Compared to surgical approach, angio-guided percutaneous V-A ECLS implantation is associated with fewer major vascular complications. Larger studies are needed to confirm those results and address their impact on mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has recently been replaced by a new entity described as chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). This new entity has been developed based on a better understanding of the pathogenesis, the clinical characteristics, and the morbi-mortality associated to this condition as part of the dynamic spectrum of CAD. This has significant implications in the clinical management of CCS patients, that ranges from lifestyle adaptation, medical therapy targeting all the elements contributing to CAD progression (i.e., platelet aggregation, coagulation, dyslipidaemia, and systemic inflammation), to invasive strategies (i.e., revascularization). CCS is the most frequent presentation of coronary artery disease which is the first cardiovascular disease worldwide. Medical therapy is the first line therapy for these patients; however, revascularization and especially percutaneous coronary intervention remains beneficial for some of them. European and American guidelines on myocardial revascularization were released in 2018 and 2021, respectively. These guidelines provide different scenarios to help physicians choose the optimal therapy for CCS patients. Recently, several trials focusing on CCS patients have been published. We sought to synthetize the place of revascularization in CCS patients according to the latest guidelines, the lessons learnt from recent trials on revascularization and medical therapy, and future perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Acute heart failure (AHF) is frequent and life‐threatening disease. However, innovative AHF therapies have remained limited, and care is based on experts' opinion. Temporal trends and benefits of long‐term oral cardiovascular medications on AHF outcomes remain uncertain. Methods and results: This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018099885). A systematic review ranging from 1980 to 2017, searched AHF studies with more than 100 patients that reported death and/or readmission. Primary outcomes were temporal trends, assessed by meta‐regression, for 30‐day or 1‐year all‐cause death and/or readmission rates. Secondary outcomes were temporal trends of oral cardiovascular therapies and their influence on primary outcomes. Among the 45 143 studies screened, 285 were included, representing 15 million AHFs. In the past decades, though mortality and readmission remain high, there was a decline in 30‐day all‐cause death [odds ratio (OR) for a 10‐year increment: 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.91; P = 0.004] that persisted at 1 year (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.96; P = 0.007), while 30‐day and 1‐year all‐cause readmission rate remained roughly unchanged. Trends of primary outcomes were linear and did not differ among continents. Decline in 1‐year all‐cause death rate correlated with high proportions of oral or beta‐blockers, especially when combined with oral renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, but not with diuretics while trends in readmission remained unchanged with these therapies. Conclusions: Although AHF outcomes remain poor, the present study revealed global favourable trends of survival after AHF episodes probably associated with greater use of oral neurohormonal antagonists. The present study urges to implement the combination of oral renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors and beta‐blockers in patients at risk of AHF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Coronary angiogram (CA) may be useful after resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but data regarding its benefit in patients with non-shockable initial rhythm without ST-segment elevation is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and survival in OHCA patients with non-shockable initial rhythm without ST-segment elevation and compare them to patients with shockable initial rhythm without ST-segment elevation.Methods: Retrospective single-centre study approved by the ethics committee of our institution, including adults successfully resuscitated from OHCA of presumed cardiac cause, undergoing routine CA on admission. Baseline characteristics, angiographic data including presence of ACS and survival were compared between patients with non-shockable and shockable initial rhythm focusing on patients without ST-segment elevation.Results: Among 517 patients included between 2002 and 2018, 311 had no ST-elevation, of whom 179 had non-shockable and 132 shockable initial rhythm. Compared with shockable initial rhythm patients without ST-elevation, non-shockable initial rhythm patients without ST-elevation had longer no-flow duration, 5 (1-10) versus 2 (0-8) min, p = 0.024, more frequent shock requiring vasopressors, 72% versus 47% p < 0.0001, a lower prevalence of ACS, 2 (1%), versus 29 (22%), p < 0.001 and higher mortality, 85% versus 39% (p < 0.0001). Among ACS patients, none survived in the non-shockable without ST-elevation group, while 20 (69%) survived in the shockable rhythm without ST-elevation group.Conclusions: Prevalence of ACS in patients without ST-segment elevation and non-shockable initial rhythm is extremely low, and survival extremely poor, therefore routine emergency CA does not seem beneficial in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Widely spread, and continuously increasing, recreational drug use in general population has been associated with cardiovascular events, as illustrated by clinical studies and supported by a pathophysiological rationale. Understanding the cardiovascular effects of drugs, screening, and secondary prevention are crucial components in the management of those patients in cardiology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]