Search

Background: Nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, has been approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants. In France, more than 210 000 single doses were administered in infants younger than 1 year during the 2023-24 season. In this context, the selection and spread of escape variants might be a concern. Here, we aimed to characterise RSV associated with breakthrough infection., Methods: We did a multicentre, national, observational study in France during the 2023-24 RSV season in RSV-infected infants (aged <1 year) who either received or did not receive a dose of nirsevimab before their first RSV season. We excluded infants with insufficient information about nirsevimab treatment or without parental consent. We used respiratory samples collected in each laboratory for full-length RSV RNA sequencing to analyse changes in the nirsevimab binding site Ø. We tested clinical RSV isolates for neutralisation by nirsevimab. We analysed F candidate substitutions by fusion-inhibition assay., Findings: Of the 695 RSV infected infants, we analysed 545 (78%) full-length RSV genome sequences: 260 (48%) from nirsevimab-treated breakthrough infections (236 [91%] RSV-A and 24 [9%] RSV-B) and 285 (52%) from untreated RSV-infected infants (236 [83%] RSV-A and 49 [17%] RSV-B). Analysis of RSV-A did not reveal any substitution in site Ø known to be associated with resistance to nirsevimab. Two (8%) of 24 RSV-B breakthrough infections had resistance-associated substitutions: F:N208D (dominant resistance-associated substitution) and a newly described F:I64M plus F:K65R combination (minority resistance-associated substitution), both of which induced high levels of resistance in the fusion-inhibition assay., Interpretation: This study is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest genotypic and phenotypic surveillance study of nirsevimab breakthrough infections to date. Nirsevimab breakthrough variants remain very rare despite the drug's widespread use. The detection of resistance-associated substitutions in the RSV-B F protein highlights the importance of active molecular surveillance., Funding: ANRS Maladies Infectieuses Emergentes and the French Ministry of Health and Prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SF has served as a speaker for GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Cepheid, and Moderna. IE received support by R-Biopharm for attending meetings. CR has served as a speaker for Pfizer and received support by Tecan for attending meetings. J-MP has served as an advisor or speaker for Abbott, Abbvie, Gilead, and GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, France underwent several lockdown periods during 2020. Our aim was to evaluate its clinical and social impact on lung transplant (LT) patients treated at Strasbourg University Hospital, by comparing three periods: first lockdown (T1: March-May 2020), end of the first lockdown (T2: May-October 2020), and second lockdown (T3: November-December 2020) and the incidence of COVID-19 infections. A cohort of patients with rare lung disease (RLD) was also studied during T2., Methods: We used clinical and paraclinical data collected during routine follow-up. A questionnaire was submitted to each patient at each period to assess their lifestyle, adherence to protective measures against COVID-19, contacts with their family and friends, and contagion risk. The incidence of new COVID-19 cases was also assessed., Results: Overall, 283 LT and 57 RLD patients were included. We observed only eight COVID-19 cases over the three periods (n = 4 during T1, n = 0 during T2, and n = 4 during T3) in LT patients, with 37.5 % of patients hospitalized, no ICU transfers, and 100 % favorable outcomes. No case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in the RLD cohort. When comparing the three periods in the LT group, fewer patients limited their out-of-home activities during T2 (p < 0.0001). The frequency of these activities increased after the first lockdown, for the purchase of basic necessities (p < 0.0001), and professional activity continued (p = 0.008). We observed a significant increase in unscheduled medical consultations and in the prescription of anti-infective treatments during the end of the lockdown (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.005, respectively). Adherence to lockdown and to protective measures was high in both groups of patients., Conclusion: COVID-19 incidence remained low in both groups and there were significant lifestyle evolutions in LT patients and in those with RLD between first and second lockdown., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Transplant recipients display poor responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. In this retrospective study, we investigate torque teno virus (TTV) viral load (VL), a ubiquitous virus reflecting global immune response levels, as a predictive factor of vaccine response in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Four hundred and fifty-nine KTR having received two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine doses were enrolled, and 241 of them subsequently received a third vaccine dose. Antireceptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG response was assessed after each vaccine dose and TTV VL was measured in pre-vaccine samples. Prevaccine TTV VL > 6.2 log 10 copies (cp)/mL was independently associated with nonresponse to two doses (odds ratio (OR) = 6.17, 95% confidence interval (CI95) = 2.42-15.78) as well as to three doses (OR = 3.62, 95% CI95 = 1.55-8.49). In nonresponders to the second dose, high TTV VL in prevaccine samples or measured before the third dose were equally predictive of lower seroconversion rates and antibody titers. High TTV VL before and during SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedules are predictive of poor vaccine response in KTR. This biomarker should be further evaluated regarding other vaccine responses., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)