Search

Aroma is closely related to the food product acceptability and an important product quality indicator. Electronic-nose (E-nose) systems are an interesting alternative to traditional methods of aroma analyses. A lab-made E-nose system equipped with an array of sensing units comprised by gold interdigitated microelectrodes (IDEs) using polyaniline (Pani) as sensitive layers deposited by the in situ and Layer-by-layer (LbL) methods was used to analyze aromas in gummy candies. Different concentrations from artificial aromas (apple, strawberry and grape), added to the gummy candies were evaluated. Our system presented 21.6 mV.ppb -1 sensitivity, ppb range detection limit, and good reversibility, around 97.6%. The sensitive layers of Pani films was adequate deposited on IDEs observed by the Attenuated Total Reflection/Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR/FTIR). Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) was able to classify apple, strawberry, and grape aromas added to gummy candies using saturation potential values from the E-nose system, demonstrating its applicability in food matrices., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that D-dimer (D-D), a cross-linked fibrin degradation product of an ongoing thrombotic event, could be a marker for incomplete aneurysm exclusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair., Methods: In a multicenter study, 83 venous blood samples were collected from 74 AAA endograft patients and controls. Twenty subjects who were >6 months postimplantation and had evidence of an endoleak and/or an unmodified or increasing AAA sac diameter formed the test group. Controls were 10 nondiseased subjects >65 years old, 18 AAA surgical candidates, and 26 postoperative endograft patients with no endoleak and a shrinking aneurysm. Blood samples were analyzed for D-D through a latex turbidimetric immunoassay. The endograft patients were stratified into 5 clinical groups for analysis: no endoleak and decreasing sac diameter, no endoleak and increasing/unchanged sac diameter, type II endoleak and decreasing sac diameter, type II endoleak and increasing/unchanged sac diameter, and type I endoleak., Results: Individual D-D values were highly variable, but differences among clinical groups were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). D-D values did not vary significantly between patients with stable, untreated AAAs and age-matched controls (238 +/- 180 ng/mL versus 421 +/- 400 ng/mL, p > 0.05). Median D-D values increased at 4 days postoperatively (963 ng/mL versus 382 ng/mL, p > 0.05) and did not vary thereafter if there was no endoleak and the aneurysm sac decreased. D-D mean values were higher in patients with type I endoleak (1931 +/- 924 ng/mL, p < 0.005) and those with unchanged/increasing sac diameters (1272 +/- 728 ng/mL) than in cases with decreasing diameters (median 638 +/- 238 ng/mL) despite the presence of endoleak (p < 0.0005)., Conclusions: Elevated D-D may prove to be a useful marker for fixation problems after endovascular AAA repair and may help rule out type I endoleak, thus excluding patients from unnecessary invasive tests.