Search

Purpose:This study aims to investigate the relationship between the intensity of the initial treatment given to patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and the impact of their baseline cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels on their long-term survival.Experimental Design:The GOELAMS 075 randomized clinical trial compared rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with high-dose R-chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation (R-HDT) for patients aged ≤60. An interim PET assessment was used to refer patients for salvage therapy. With a median follow-up of more than 5.8 years, we analyzed the effects of the treatment arm, salvage therapy, and cfDNA level at diagnosis on overall survival (OS).Results:In a representative group of 123 patients, a high cfDNA concentration (>55 ng/mL) at diagnosis was associated with poor clinical prognostic factors and constituted a prognostic marker, independently of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index. A cfDNA level above a threshold value of 55 ng/mL at diagnosis was associated with significantly worse OS. In an intention-to-treat analysis, high-cfDNA R-CHOP patients (but not high-cfDNA R-HDT patients) had worse OS [HR (95% confidence interval), 3.99 (1.98–10.74); P = 0.006]. In patients with high cfDNA levels, salvage therapy and transplantation were associated with a significantly higher OS rate. Among 50 patients with complete response 6 months after the end of treatment, for 11 of 24 R-CHOP patients, the cfDNA did not fall back to normal values.Conclusions:In this randomized clinical trial, intensive regimens mitigated the negative influence of high cfDNA levels in de novo DLBCL, relative to R-CHOP.

supplemental methods, tables and figures

BACKGROUND No study has focused on the economic burden in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors, even though this knowledge is essential. This study reports on health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors in a series of 1671 French long-term NHL survivors. METHODS Health care costs were measured from the payer perspective. Only direct medical costs (medical consultations, outpatient treatments, hospitalizations, and medical transport) in the past 12 months were included (reference year 2015). Multiple linear regression was used to search for explanatory factors of health care costs. RESULTS In total, 1100 survivors (66%) reported having used at least 1 health care resource, and 867 (52%) reported having used at least 1 outpatient treatment. After the authors accounted for missing data, the mean health care cost was estimated at €702 ± €2221. Hospitalizations and outpatient treatments were the main cost drivers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. For the 1100 survivors who reported using at least 1 health care resource, the mean health care cost was €1067 ± €2268. Several factors demonstrated statistically significant relationships with health care costs. For instance, cardiovascular disorders increased costs by 66% ± 16%. In contrast, rituximab or autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy had no effect on health care costs. CONCLUSIONS The consideration of economic constraints in health care is now a reality. This retrospective study reports on a better understanding of health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors. It may help health care professionals in their ongoing efforts to design person-centered health care pathways.

Purpose: Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Peripheral T cell Lymphomas (PTCL) have a poor prognosis. Bendamustine (B) and Brentuximab Vedotin (Bv) have shown interesting results in this setting. However, little information is available about their efficacy in combination. Patients and Methods: This multicenter and retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of BBv in patients with non-cutaneous R/R PTCL among 21 LYSA centers in France and Belgium. The primary objective was the overall response rate. Results: Eighty-two patients with R/R PTCL were included. The best ORR was 68%, with 49% of patients in CR. In multivariable analysis, only the relapse status after the last regimen (relapse vs refractory) was associated with the response with an ORR of 83% vs 57% (OR=3.70 (95%CI:1.3-10.5); p=0.014). Median DoR was 15.4 (0.6-50.2) months for patients in CR. With a median follow-up of 22 (0-52) months, the median PFS and OS were 8.3 and 26.3 months respectively. Moreover, patients in CR, who underwent an allogeneic transplant, had a better outcome than patients who did not with a median PFS and OS of 19.3 versus 4.8 months (p=0.0005) and NR versus 12.4 months (p=0.0013) respectively. Fifty-nine percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events which were mainly hematologic. Conclusion: BBv is highly active in patients with R/R PTCL and should be considered as a one of the best option of immunochemotherapy salvage combination in this setting and particularly as a bridge to allogeneic transplant for eligible patients.

Most relapses of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) occur in the brain and are associated with a poor prognosis. Isolated intraocular relapses (IIORs) are rare and poorly described. We retrospectively selected from the French Lymphome Oculo-Cérébral database PCNSL patients who initially presented with cerebral localization and who experienced IIOR during the course of the disease. Of the 1472 patients included in the database, 55 patients presented an IIOR. Their median age was 68 years, and median Karnofsky Performance Status 80. IL-10 levels in the aqueous humor and/or in the vitreous were increased in 42/46 patients. 45/55 patients received systemic chemotherapy, and 11/55 received high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) as consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 69 months, 42/55 patients had relapsed, including 90% of the patients who did not receive HCT-ASCT at IIOR and 40% of the patients who received HCT-ASCT at IIOR (p 0.001). The first relapse after the initial IIOR was exclusively in the eye in 23/42 patients, and 29/42 patients had a subsequent brain relapse during the course of the disease. The median progression-free survival, brain-free survival and overall survival from IIOR were 12.2, 48.6 and 57.1 months, respectively. Isolated intraocular relapse is not exceptional in the course of PCNSL and deserves systematic ophthalmological follow-up. Its prognosis is much better than the prognosis of brain relapse, with an evolution close to that of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma. With the exception of patients who received HCT-ASCT at IIOR, almost all patients subsequently relapsed, often with other IIORs.

International audience; The chimeric antigen receptor T-cells are a new class of anticancer treatment consisting in genetically modifying autologous or allogenic T-cells to make express a CAR directed against a membrane tumor antigen. In Europe, tisagenlecleucel (KymriahTM) has a marketing authorization for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and young adults and of R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The marketing authorization for axicabtagene ciloleucel (YescartaTM) is the treatment of DLBCL and primary R/R mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. The two products are autologous T-cells directed against CD19. This collaborative work, part of a series of expert opinion-based work, aims to give practical advice to help centers in selection of patients for commercially available CAR T-cell treatment.

Rituximab plus polychemotherapy is the standard of care in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). GAINED, a randomized phase 3 trial, compared obinutuzumab to rituximab. Transplant-eligible patients (18-60 years) with an untreated age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aaIPI) score ≥1 DLBCL were randomized (1:1) between obinutuzumab or rituximab and stratified by aaIPI (1; 2-3) and chemotherapy regimen (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone plus vindesine, bleomycin [ACVBP] or vincristine [CHOP]). Consolidation treatment was determined according to response to interim positron emission tomography (PET). Responders after cycle 2 and 4 (PET2−/PET4−) received immunochemotherapy. Responders after only cycle 4 (PET2+/4−) received transplantation. The primary objective was an 8% improvement (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 80% power; α risk, 2.5%; 1-sided) in 2-year event-free survival (EFS) in the obinutuzumab arm. From September 2012, 670 patients were enrolled (obinutuzumab, n = 336; rituximab, n = 334). A total of 383 (57.2%) were aaIPI 2-3, 339 (50.6%) received CHOP. Median follow-up was 38.7 months. The 2-year EFS was similar in both groups (59.8% vs 56.6%; P = .123; HR = 0.88). The 2-year PFS in the whole cohort was 83.1% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 85.8%). PET2−/4− and PET2+/4− had similar 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS): 89.9% vs 83.9% and 94.8% vs 92.8%. The 2-year PFS and OS for PET4+ patients were 62% and 83.1%. Grade 3-5 infections were more frequent in the obinutuzumab arm (21% vs 12%). Obinutuzumab is not superior to rituximab in aaIPI ≥1 DLBCL transplant-eligible patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01659099.

Summary Background Activating mutations of EZH2, an epigenetic regulator, are present in approximately 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma. We investigated the activity and safety of tazemetostat, a first-in-class, oral EZH2 inhibitor, in patients with follicular lymphoma. Methods This study was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial done at 38 clinics or hospitals in France, the UK, Australia, Canada, Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Germany, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed follicular lymphoma (grade 1, 2, 3a, or 3b) that had relapsed or was refractory to two or more systemic therapies, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and had sufficient tumour tissue for central testing of EZH2 mutation status. Patients were categorised by EZH2 status: mutant (EZH2mut) or wild-type (EZH2WT). Patients received 800 mg of tazemetostat orally twice per day in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate based on the 2007 International Working Group criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, assessed by an independent radiology committee. Activity and safety analyses were done in patients who received one dose or more of tazemetostat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01897571 , and follow-up is ongoing. Findings Between July 9, 2015, and May 24, 2019, 99 patients (45 in the EZH2mut cohort and 54 in the EZH2WT cohort) were enrolled in the study. At data cutoff for the analysis (Aug 9, 2019), the median follow-up was 22·0 months (IQR 12·0–26·7) for the EZH2mut cohort and 35·9 months (24·9–40·5) for the EZH2WT cohort. The objective response rate was 69% (95% CI 53–82; 31 of 45 patients) in the EZH2mut cohort and 35% (23–49; 19 of 54 patients) in the EZH2WT cohort. Median duration of response was 10·9 months (95% CI 7·2–not estimable [NE]) in the EZH2mut cohort and 13·0 months (5·6–NE) in the EZH2WT cohort; median progression-free survival was 13·8 months (10·7–22·0) and 11·1 months (3·7–14·6). Among all 99 patients, treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events included thrombocytopenia (three [3%]), neutropenia (three [3%]), and anaemia (two [2%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in four (4%) of 99 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Interpretation Tazemetostat monotherapy showed clinically meaningful, durable responses and was generally well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Tazemetostat is a novel treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma. Funding Epizyme.

Background/aim Currently, there is no recommendation for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) with bone-marrow cell infiltration (BMI). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly-paclitaxel in this population. Patients and methods This retrospective study included all BC patients with BMI receiving weekly-paclitaxel between January 2014 and May 2018. Overall-survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were progression-free-survival (PFS) and safety. Results BMI was diagnosed in 26 patients. This infiltration was suggested by peripheral blood smear in 73% of cases. All patients had anemia, and 77% had thrombocytopenia. OS and PFS were 7.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI)=2.6-20.7] and 3.3 months (95%CI=1.6-7.2), respectively. Good performance-status, absence of thrombocytopenia and presence of less than 5% of circulating erythroblasts at BMI diagnosis, were associated with better survival. One patient presented grade 5 febrile neutropenia but no episodes of bleeding were reported. Conclusion Weekly-paclitaxel is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity for BC with BMI.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is characterized by abnormal villous lymphoid cells that express CD103, CD123, CD25 and CD11c. HCL-like disorders, including hairy cell leukemia variant (vHCL) and splenic diffuse red pulp lymphoma (SDRPL), have similar morphologic criteria and a distinct phenotypic and genetic profile. We investigated the immunophenotypic features of a large cohort of 82 patients: 68 classical HCL, 5 vHCL/SDRPL and 9 HCL-like NOS. The HCL immunophenotype was heterogeneous: positive CD5 expression in 7/68 (10%), CD10 in 12/68 (18%), CD38 in 24/67 (36%), CD23 in 22/68 (32%) and CD43 in 19/65 (31%) patients. CD26 was expressed in 35/36 (97%) of HCL patients, none of vHCL/SDRPL and one of seven HCL-like NOS (14%). When adding CD26 to the immunologic HCL scoring system (one point for CD103, CD123, CD25, CD11c and CD26), the specificity was improved, increasing from 78.6% to 100%. We used unsupervised analysis of flow cytometry raw data (median fluorescence, percentage of expression) and the mutational profile of BRAF, MAP2K1 and KLF2. The analysis showed good separation between HCL and vHCL/SDRPL. The HCL score is not sufficient, and the use of unsupervised analysis could be promising to achieve a distinction between HCL and HCL-like disorders. However, these preliminary results have to be confirmed in a further study with a higher number of patients.

The optimal consolidation strategy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. Preventing radio-induced neurotoxicity of consolidation treatment through reduced-dose whole-brain radiotherapy (rdWBRT) at a dose of 23.4 Gy is an interesting alternative to conventional WBRT in patients aged

PURPOSE Romidepsin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) as a single agent. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy is widely used as first-line treatment of PTCL; however, it has limited efficacy. Results from a phase Ib and II study showed the feasibility of combining romidepsin with CHOP (Ro-CHOP). METHODS This study is a randomized phase III study of Ro-CHOP versus CHOP in adult patients with previously untreated PTCL. All patients received CHOP in 3-week cycles for six cycles. Romidepsin, 12 mg/m2, was administered intravenously over a 4-hour period on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) according to International Working Group 1999 criteria. RESULTS Between January 2013 and December 2017, 421 patients were enrolled (Ro-CHOP, n = 211; CHOP, n = 210). The median PFS for Ro-CHOP versus CHOP was 12.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 to 25.8) versus 10.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 13.2) with a hazard ratio of 0.81 ( P = .096). In the Ro-CHOP versus CHOP arms, the median overall survival was 51.8 versus 42.9 months and the objective response rate was 63% versus 60% with complete response plus unconfirmed complete response rates of 41% versus 37% ( P > .1 in all comparisons), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 30% of patients in the Ro-CHOP arm included thrombocytopenia (50% v 10% in the Ro-CHOP v CHOP arms, respectively), neutropenia (49% v 33%), anemia (47% v 17%), and leukopenia (32% v 20%). CONCLUSION The addition of romidepsin to CHOP did not improve PFS, response rates, nor overall survival and increased the frequency for grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Ro-CHOP does not represent a significant advance in the standard of care for patients with previously untreated PTCL.

International audience; Cytarabine-based immuno-chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidation is standard of care for fit patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Aracytine, Melphalan) is among the most frequently used conditioning regimen. Studies comparing BEAM with Bendamustine-EAM (BeEAM) have suggested that patients treated with BeEAM have a better progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a cross-study analysis to better evaluate BeEAM. Thirty-five patients from a retrospective study who received R-DHAP/BeEAM were compared to 245 patients from the LyMa trial (NCT00921414) who all received R-DHAP followed by R-BEAM. PFS and Overall Survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. At 2 years there was no difference between R-BEAM and BeEAM in either PFS (84.9% versus 87.9%; p = 0.95) or OS (91.8% versus 94.2%; p = 0.30). Analyses were repeated on a propensity score to reduce biases. Each patient from the BeEAM cohort (n = 30) was matched to three patients from the R-BEAM cohort (n = 90) for age, sex, MIPI score, pre-transplant status disease and rituximab maintenance (RM). PFS and OS at 2 years remained similar between R-BEAM and BeEAM with more renal toxicity in BeEAM group. MCL patients who received R-DHAP induction before ASCT have similar outcome after R-BEAM or BeEAM conditioning regimen.

Introduction: We previously reported the results of the PRECIS trial with a median follow-up of 33 months. Both whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ACST) were effective according to the predetermined threshold. However, more relapses occurred in the WBRT arm. The 2-year event-free survival (EFS) from consolidation (relapse or death defined as event) were 69% (95% CI, 57% to 83%) and 87% (95% CI, 77% to 98%) after WBRT and ASCT, respectively (p = 0.03). Overall survival (OS) was similar in both arms. Cognitive impairment was observed after WBRT, whereas cognitive functions were preserved or improved after ASCT. A longer follow-up is required to better assess the impact of the treatment on relapse, survival and late complications. We report here the results of the PRECIS trial with a median follow-up of 98.3 months [min= 4,1 - max= 131.1], focusing on the per protocol population from time of consolidation. Methods: Immunocompetent patients (18 to 60 years of age) with untreated primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) were randomly assigned upfront to receive WBRT (Arm A) or ASCT (Arm B) as consolidation treatment after an induction chemotherapy consisting of two cycles of R-MBVP (rituximab, methotrexate, VP16, BCNU, prednisone) followed by two cycles of R-AraC (rituximab, cytarabine). Intensive chemotherapy consisted of thiotepa (250 mg/m2/d D9; D8; D7), busulfan (8 mg/kg D6 through D4), and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/d D3; D2). WBRT delivered 40 Gy (2 Gy/ fraction). Cognitive functions were prospectively assessed until disease progression and focused on global cognitive function, episodic verbal memory, attention and mental flexibility, and psychoaffective status. Results: 140 patients were randomized (Arm A: N = 70; Arm B: N = 70). Fifty-three and 44 patients completed WBRT and ASCT respectively (per protocol population), including 3 and 5 patients who were in progressive disease (PD) at time of WBRT and ASCT, respectively. 8-y EFS from time of consolidation in the per protocol population was 75.9% [63.3-91.0] and 39.9% [26.8-59.3] after ASCT and WBRT, respectively (p = 0.007) (fig 1a). The risk of relapse was significantly decreased after ASCT compared to WBRT (8-y relapse-free interval 94.1% [86.4-100] vs 47.6% [34.2-66.3], (p Causes of deaths after WBRT (n = 17) were PD (n = 12), neurotoxicity (n = 3), second-line ASCT (n = 2). After ASCT, causes of deaths (n = 14) were treatment-related death (n = 5, including 2 occurring > 100 days post-ASCT, and 2 in patients in PD before ASCT), PD (n = 4), neurotoxicity following salvage WBRT (n = 1), second solid cancer (n = 3) and undetermined in one patient. In multivariate analysis, ECOG, disease status at the end of induction, and protein level in the CSF at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS. Disease status at the end of induction and intraocular involvement at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for EFS. Cognitive decline that could be fatal was only observed in patients who received WBRT. Imaging analysis of post consolidation leukoencephalopathy is ongoing. Conclusions: Consolidation with ASCT after HD-MTX based induction chemotherapy resulted in an excellent disease control but with a higher treatment-related mortality than WBRT. Severe Cognitive decline and late treatment-induced neurotoxic deaths were observed after WBRT. Intensity of the thiotepa-busulfan-cyclophosphamide regimen used before ASCT should be slightly reduced to improve the benefit/risk ratio of ASCT in first-line treatment of young patients with PCNSL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sylvain: Sanofi, Celegene, Roche, Abbvie, Sandoz, Janssen, Takeda: Consultancy. Damaj: takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sanhes: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

We analysed the therapeutic outcomes of all consecutive patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) registered in the prospective French database for PCNSL and treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (IC-ASCT) between 2011 and November 2019 (271 patients recruited, 266 analysed). In addition, treatment-related complications of thiotepa-based IC-ASCT were analysed from the source files of 85 patients from 3 centers. Patients had received IC-ASCT either in first-line treatment (n = 147) or at relapse (n = 119). The median age at IC-ASCT was 57 years (range: 22-74). IC consisted of thiotepa-BCNU (n = 64), thiotepa-busulfan (n = 24), BCNU-etoposide-cytarabine-melphalan (BEAM, n = 36) and thiotepa-busulfan-cyclophosphamide (n = 142). In multivariate analysis, BEAM and ASCT beyond the first relapse were adverse prognostic factors for relapse risk. The risk of treatment-related mortality was higher for ASCT performed beyond the first relapse and seemed higher for thiotepa-busulfan-cyclophosphamide. Thiotepa-BCNU tends to result in a higher relapse rate than thiotepa-busulfan-cyclophosphamide and thiotepa-busulfan. This study confirms the role of IC-ASCT in first-line treatment and at first-relapse PCNSL (5-year overall survival rates of 80 and 50%, respectively). The benefit/risk ratio of thiotepa-busulfan/thiotepa-busulfan-cyclophosphamide-ASCT could be improved by considering ASCT earlier in the course of the disease and dose adjustment of the IC.

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare type of aggressive lymphoma typically affecting young female patients. The first-line standard of care remains debated. We performed a large multicenter retrospective study in 25 centers in France and Belgium to describe PMBL patient outcomes after first-line treatment in real-life settings. A total of 313 patients were enrolled and received rituximab (R) plus ACVBP (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone) (n = 180) or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) delivered every 14 days (R-CHOP14, n = 76) or 21 days (R-CHOP21, n = 57) and consolidation strategies in modalities that varied according to time and institution, mainly guided by positron emission tomography. Consolidation autologous stem cell transplantation was performed for 46 (25.6%), 24 (31.6%), and 1 (1.8%) patient in the R-ACVBP, R-CHOP14, and R-CHOP21 groups, respectively (P < .001); only 17 (5.4%) patients received mediastinal radiotherapy. The end-of-treatment complete metabolic response rates were 86.3%, 86.8%, and 76.6% (P = .23) in the R-ACVBP, R-CHOP14, and R-CHOP21 groups. The median follow-up was 44 months, and the R-ACVBP, R-CHOP14, and R-CHOP21 three-year progression-free survival probabilities were 89.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.8-94.2), 89.4% (95% CI, 82.7-96.6), and 74.7% (95% CI, 64-87.1) (P = .018). A baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) ≥360 cm3 was associated with a lower progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.05-4.53). Excess febrile neutropenia (24.4% vs 5.3% vs 5.3%; P < .001) and mucositis (22.8% vs 3.9% vs 1.8%; P < .001) were observed with R-ACVBP compared with the R-CHOP regimens. Patients with PMBL treated with dose-dense immunochemotherapy without radiotherapy have excellent outcomes. R-ACVBP acute toxicity was higher than that of R-CHOP14. Our data confirmed the prognostic importance of baseline TMTV.

Mast cells are key actors of innate immunity and Th2 adaptive immune response which counterbalance Th1 response, critical for anti-viral immunity. Clonal Mast Cells Activation Disorders (cMCADs) such as mastocytosis and clonal mast cells activation syndrome are characterized by an abnormal mast cells accumulation and/or activation. No data have been published on the anti-viral immune response of patients with cMCADs. The aims of the study were to collected, in a comprehensive way, outcomes of cMCADs patients who experienced a biologically-proven COVID-19 and to characterize both anti-endemic coronaviruses and specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in these patients. Clinical follow-up and outcome data were collected prospectively for one year within the French rare disease network CEREMAST encompassing patients from all over the country. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and anti-endemic coronaviruses specific T-cells were assessed with an enzyme-linked immunospot assay (EliSpot) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response with dosage of circulating levels of specific IgG, IgA and neutralizing antibodies. Overall, 32 cMCADs patients were identified. None of them required non-invasive or mechanical ventilation; two patients were hospitalized to receive oxygen and steroid therapy. In 21 patients, a characterization of the SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response has been performed. A majority of patients showed a high proportion of circulating SARS-CoV-2-specific interferon (IFN)-γ producing T-cells and high levels of anti-Spike IgG antibodies with neutralizing activity. In addition, no defects in anti-endemic coronaviruses responses were found in patients with cMCADs compared to non-cMCADs controls. Patients with cMCADs frequently showed a spontaneous IFN-γ T-cell production in absence of any stimulation that correlated with circulating basal tryptase levels, a marker of mast cells burden. These findings underscore that patients with cMCADs might be not at risk of severe COVID-19 and the spontaneous IFN-γ production might explain this observation.Author SummaryMast cells are immune cells involved in many biological processes including the anti-microbial response. However, previous studies suggest that mast cells may have a detrimental role in the response against viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, responsible for COVID-19. When a mutation occurs in mast cells, it can lead to a group of diseases called clonal mast cells activation disorders (cMCADs), characterized by deregulated activation of these cells. Hence, patients with cMCADs might be more susceptible to severe COVID-19 than general population.We therefore conducted a 1-year study in France to collect data from all cMCADs patients included in the CEREMAST rare disease French network and who experienced COVID-19. Interestingly, we did not find any severe COVID-19 (i.e. requiring non-invasive or mechanical ventilation) in spite of well-known risk factors for severe COVID-19 in a part of cMCADs patients.We then have studied the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 and other endemic coronaviruses in these patients. We did not observe any abnormalities in the immune response either at the level of T and B lymphocytes. These findings underscore that these patients might not be at risk of severe COVID-19 as one might have feared.

Background: Tazemetostat, a first-in-class, oral, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after demonstrating single-agent, antitumor activity in patients with wild-type (WT) or mutant (MT) EZH2. Progression of disease within 24 months (POD24), exposure to multiple lines of prior therapy, and refractoriness to rituximab therapy have been shown to adversely affect the prognosis of patients receiving second- or third-line regimens for R/R FL, including chemoimmunotherapy. We performed a post hoc exploratory analysis to better understand how these factors impact the outcomes in patients receiving tazemetostat. Methods: This open-label, multicenter study (NCT01897571) evaluated tazemetostat 800 mg administered orally twice daily in patients with MT or WT EZH2 R/R FL. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; complete response + partial response) as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC); secondary efficacy endpoints included duration of response (DOR) by IRC, progression-free survival (PFS) by IRC, and overall survival (OS) by investigator assessment. Predictive modeling using baseline demographic and disease characteristic variables combined from patients with MT or WT EZH2 R/R FL was performed to identify variables predictive of response (ORR, DOR, PFS, and OS). Models were fitted for variables that were categorical and had no missing observations; they also were fitted with/without Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria and with the number of prior lines of therapy (1, 2, or >2, and 1 or 2 vs >2). Due to incomplete data collection, GELF criteria were analyzed with missing observations (n=28) set to "no." Stepwise logistic and Cox regression was used to determine possible predictors; inclusion at a specified step was based on P≤0.40. Final model inclusion was based on P≤0.20. A final model was run using the possible predictors identified from the previous stepwise regressions. Contingency tables and Kaplan-Meier plots were used to examine significant variables (P≤0.05). Results: In the phase 2 study, the efficacy outcomes by IRC in combined WT and MT EZH2 populations (N=99) were: ORR, 51% (n=50); median DOR, 11 months (95% CI: 7, 19); and median PFS, 12 months (95% CI: 8, 15). Median OS was not reached (95% CI: 38.2, not estimable). Predictive modeling using 17 baseline variables identified possible predictors of efficacy outcome. For ORR, the number (1 or 2 vs >2) of prior lines of therapy was identified as possibly predictive (Table). Patients with 1 line of prior therapy had an ORR of 66% (n=27) vs 40% (n=23) in patients with 2 prior lines of therapy. Disease refractory to rituximab and number (1, 2, or >2) of prior lines of therapy (Table) were identified as possible predictors for DOR. Disease refractory to rituximab, GELF criteria, disease refractory to any treatment, and sex (Table) were possibly predictive for PFS. However, the percentage of subjects that met GELF criteria may be underestimated due to retrospective collection of qualifying data points; therefore, the translation of GELF criteria as a predictive factor for PFS should be interpreted with caution. Other baseline demographic and disease characteristics, including patient age (≤65 y, >65 y), double refractory disease, ECOG performance status, myelosuppression, POD24, disease refractory to last therapy, prior stem cell transplant, and time since last therapy, were not found to be predictive of response, as measured by ORR, DOR, PFS, and OS. Conclusions: In this post hoc exploratory analysis of patients with R/R FL (WT and MT EZH2 cohorts combined), variables associated with heavily pretreated patients (ie, refractory to rituximab, treatment-refractory disease, and number of prior treatments) were identified as possible predictors of response. However, in these analyses other high-risk disease characteristics, such as POD24, were not predictive, although the results may be confounded by the small number of patients in some of the groups. In addition to reinforcing the efficacy of tazemetostat in heavily pretreated patients, these data also suggest that ORR is greater in patient populations who receive treatment as an earlier line of therapy. Prospective confirmatory studies are warranted to confirm these post hoc observations. Disclosures Salles: Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Autolus: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Participation in educational events; Genmab: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Debiopharm: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Tilly:BMS: Honoraria. McKay:Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board: Current Employment; Roche, Gilead, Takeda, Janssen: Other: For lectures etc; TAKEDA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Phillips:Beigene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel expenses; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Cardinal Health: Consultancy. Assouline:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Batlevi:Janssen, Novartis, Epizyme, Xynomics, Bayer, Autolus, Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Life Sci, GLG, Juno/Celgene, Seattle Genetics, Kite: Consultancy. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Ribrag:BAY1000394 studies on MCL: Patents & Royalties; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; argenX: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Institut Gustave Roussy: Current Employment; Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses; arGEN-X-BVBA: Research Funding; Nanostring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AZD: Honoraria, Other; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Damaj:Roche, Takeda, Accord: Honoraria; Roche, Takeda, Iqone, Accord: Consultancy; Abbevie, Pfizer, Takeda, Roche: Other: Travel. Dickinson:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Epizyme: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland: Current Employment; Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Sandoz-Novartis: Consultancy; European Medicines Agency,: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Afimed: Research Funding; Janssen China R&D: Consultancy, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Kaźmierczak:Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Poznan University of Medical Sciences: Current Employment. Opat:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZenca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Research Funding. Radford:GlaxoSmithKline: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Spouse; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; ADCT: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Spouse. Schmitt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Janssen: Honoraria. Whalen:TESARO (ended employment Nov 2018): Ended employment in the past 24 months; Epizyme, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hamlett:Epizyme, Inc.: Current Employment, Research Funding; Sanofi: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Kamp:Karyopharm: Consultancy; Epizyme, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Adib:Epizyme, Inc.: Consultancy; Alacrita: Current Employment. Morschhauser:Janssen: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of chemoimmunotherapy followed by either whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as a first-line treatment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Immunocompetent patients (18 to 60 years of age) with untreated PCNSL were randomly assigned to receive WBRT or ASCT as consolidation treatment after induction chemotherapy consisting of two cycles of R-MBVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 day (D) 1, methotrexate 3 g/m2 D1; D15, VP16 100 mg/m2 D2, BCNU 100 mg/m2 D3, prednisone 60 mg/m2/d D1-D5) followed by two cycles of R-AraC (rituximab 375 mg/m2 D1, cytarabine 3 g/m2/D, D1, and D2). Intensive chemotherapy consisted of thiotepa (250 mg/m2/d D9; D8; D7), busulfan (8 mg/kg D6 through D4), and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/d D3; D2). WBRT delivered 40 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival. Cognitive outcome was the main secondary end point. Analysis was intention to treat in a noncomparative phase II trial. RESULTS Between October 2008 and February 2014, 140 patients were recruited from 23 French centers. Both WBRT and ASCT met the predetermined threshold (among the first 38 patients in each group, at least 24 patients were alive and disease free at 2 years). The 2-year progression-free survival rates were 63% (95% CI, 49% to 81%) and 87% (95% CI, 77% to 98%) in the WBRT and ASCT arms, respectively. Toxicity deaths were recorded in one and five patients after WBRT and ASCT, respectively. Cognitive impairment was observed after WBRT, whereas cognitive functions were preserved or improved after ASCT. CONCLUSION WBRT and ASCT are effective consolidation treatments for patients with PCNSL who are 60 years of age and younger. The efficacy end points tended to favor the ASCT arm. The specific risk of each procedure should be considered.

The use of antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in the setting of transplantation from an HLA-matched related donor is still much debated. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease are the main causes of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in a large cohort of patients with myelofibrosis (n=287). The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease among patients who were or were not given antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin were 26% and 41%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of chronic graft-versus-host disease were 52% and 55%, respectively. Non-adjusted overall survival, disease-free survival and non-relapse mortality rates were 55% versus 53%, 49% versus 45%, and 32% versus 31%, respectively, among the patients who were or were not given antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin. An adjusted model confirmed that the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease was lower following antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin (hazard ratio, 0.54; P=0.010) while it did not decrease the risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The hazard ratios for overall survival and non-relapse mortality were 0.66 and 0.64, with P-values of 0.05 and 0.09, respectively. Antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin did not influence disease-free survival, graft-versus-host disease, relapse-free survival or relapse risk. In conclusion, in the setting of matched related transplantation in myelofibrosis patients, this study demonstrates that antihuman T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin decreases the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease without increasing the risk of relapse. ispartof: HAEMATOLOGICA vol:104 issue:6 pages:1230-1236 ispartof: location:Italy status: published

Resume Les facteurs environnementaux ont un impact sur l’efficacite des traitements de la leucemie lymphoide chronique : vulnerabilite, organisation de l’offre de soins et proximite du patient aux professionnels de sante. La disparite de la prise en charge a ete evaluee : la vulnerabilite par l’indice europeen de defavorisation, l’offre de soins par les valeurs d’accessibilite potentielle localisee aux medecins generalistes, infirmiers et pharmaciens d’officine et l’offre hospitaliere par la densite d’hematologistes et le temps d’acces au centre. Les donnees, extraites des bases de donnees publiques pour chaque ilot regroupe pour l’information statistique, ont ete croisees pour leur appliquer une analyse en composante principale et les regrouper en 4 clusters. Le cluster 1 a un EDI (European Deprivation Index) moyen, un acces facile aux professionnels de ville, un acces eloigne du centre de reference et une densite d’hematologistes bonne. Le cluster 2 a un EDI faible, un acces satisfaisant aux professionnels, une proximite satisfaisante au centre de reference et une densite d’hematologistes moyenne. Le cluster 3 a un EDI bon, un acces aux professionnels difficile, un temps d’acces au centre de reference allonge, la densite d’hematologistes restant moyenne. Le cluster 4 a un EDI bon, un acces aux professionnels plus facile que dans le cluster 3 mais neanmoins difficile. Le temps d’acces au centre de reference est meilleur que celui du cluster 3 mais reste allonge, la densite d’hematologistes restant moyenne. La cartographie est un outil permettant aux hopitaux et institutions d’evaluer la prise en charge et de la comparer aux autres territoires.

Standard first-line therapy for younger patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma consists of six courses of CHOP or CHOEP consolidated by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (AutoSCT). We hypothesized that consolidative allogeneic transplantation (AlloSCT) could improve outcome. 104 patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma except ALK+ ALCL, 18 to 60 years of age, all stages and IPI scores except stage 1 and aaIPI 0, were randomized to receive 4 x CHOEP and 1 x DHAP followed by high-dose therapy and AutoSCT or myeloablative conditioning and AlloSCT. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) at three years. After a median follow-up of 42 months, 3-year EFS of patients undergoing AlloSCT was 43% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29%; 57%) as compared to 38% (95% CI: 25%; 52%) after AutoSCT. Overall survival at 3 years was 57% (95% CI: 43%; 71%) versus 70% (95% CI: 57%; 82%) after AlloSCT or AutoSCT, without significant differences between treatment arms. None of 21 responding patients proceeding to AlloSCT as opposed to 13 of 36 patients (36%) proceeding to AutoSCT relapsed. Eight of 26 patients (31%) and none of 41 patients died due to transplant-related toxicity after allogeneic and autologous transplantation, respectively. In younger patients with T-cell lymphoma standard chemotherapy consolidated by autologous or allogeneic transplantation results in comparable survival. The strong graft-versus-lymphoma effect after AlloSCT was counterbalanced by transplant-related mortality. CHO(E)P followed by AutoSCT remains the preferred treatment option for transplant-eligible patients. AlloSCT is the treatment of choice for relapsing patients also after AutoSCT.

International audience; The treatment of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) remains controversial regarding the use of local, systemic, or combined treatments. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of intravenous high-dose methotrexate (IV HD-MTX) based systemic therapy in a uniformly treated population of PVRL patients. From a nationwide French database, we retrospectively selected 59 patients (median age: 70 years, median Karnofsky Performance Status: 90%) with isolated PVRL at diagnosis who received first-line treatment with HD-MTX between 2011-2018. 8/59 patients also received a local treatment. No deaths or premature discontinuations of MTX due to toxicity were reported. A complete response was obtained in 40/57 patients after chemotherapy. Before treatment, IL-10 was elevated in the aqueous humor (AH) or in the vitreous in 89% of patients. After treatment, AH IL-10 was undetectable in 87% of patients with a CR/uCR/PR and detectable in 92% of patients with PD/SD. After a median follow-up of 61 months, 41/59 (69%) patients had relapsed, including 29 isolated ocular relapses as the first relapse and a total of 22 brain relapses. The median overall survival, progression-free survival, ocular-free survival and brain-free survival were 75, 18, 29 and 73 months, respectively. IV HD-MTX based systemic therapy as a first-line treatment for isolated PVRL is feasible, with acceptable toxicity, even in an elderly population. This strategy seems efficient to prevent brain relapse with prolonged overall survival. However, the ocular relapse rate remains high. New approaches are needed to improve local control of this disease, and ocular assessment could be completed by monitoring AH IL-10.