Search

[EN] This work is focused on the modeling and analysis of soot formation and oxidation in the pressurized ethylene-based model burner investigated at DLR. This burner features a dual swirler configuration for the primary air supply and includes secondary dilution jets inside the combustion chamber, showing reacting flow characteristics representative of the RQL combustor technology. Large-eddy simulations (LES) of the DLR burner are conduced here to assess a coupling approach between flamelet generated manifold (FGM) chemistry and discrete sectional method (DSM) based soot model with clustering method. First, a validation of the numerical results is conducted for the gas velocity and temperature fields, and good agreement is obtained for both mean and fluctuating quantities. The Soot Volume Fraction (SVF) computed from LES shows a satisfactory agreement with the experimental data in both SVF distribution and magnitude. The analysis also includes a numerical investigation of the soot production and the Particle Size Distributions (PSD). Finally, the configuration without secondary air is evaluated and an accurate prediction of the SVF field is also obtained. In this case, the absence of dilution air strongly influences the central region of the combustion chamber, and soot distribution and PSD are mainly affected by transport and dilution, not oxidation. It is finally concluded the proposed modeling framework is capable of predicting the soot field and particle size distributions inside the combustor for both operating conditions.

[EN] Synthetic fuels will play a major role on the reduction of pollutant emissions and carbon footprint of ICE engines. The use of renewable energy and CO2 for its production maps out a promising route to achieve ICE carbon neutrality. Among these fuels, oxymethylene ethers are also interesting for their potential to drastically reduce soot formation. However, a proper characterization of their properties and behaviour is mandatory to reach full implementation in commercial engines. For this reason, this work presents a detailed characterization of the flame structure of two types of oxymethylene ethers (OMEX and OME1) using high-speed chemiluminescence imaging and Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF). Test were performed in a constant-pressure combustion vessel, with the operating conditions and two different injector nozzles from the Engine Combustion Network (Spray A and Spray D). Regions associated with low-temperature chemical reactions are observed thanks to the formaldehyde PLIF while evolution of the high-temperature reactions has been analysed based on hydroxyl excited state (OH*) chemiluminescence and hydroxyl PLIF. On-resonant and off-resonant measurements were performed for OH PLIF with a dye laser in order to remove other radiation sources not linked to OH fluorescence, whilst 355 nm radiation from the third harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser are used to excite CH2O molecules. On the one hand, the results show that the combustion of OME1 with Spray A is characterized by a flame structure very different to that of a diffusion flame. It is characterized by large cool flame region followed by a short hightemperature zone. On the other hand, the combustion of OMEX with both nozzles and OME1 with Spray D show more similarities with a diffusion flame structure. The stoichiometry of the fuel and the equivalence ratio fields achieved strongly affect the structure and latter evolution of the flames.

[EN] Poly-Oxymethylene Dimethyl Ethers (OMEx) are being intensively investigated because of their potentially renewable synthesis path, which make them suitable as liquid fuels for low-carbon transport applications. In the present contribution, a computational study on the difference in combustion characteristics between dodecane and OMEx-type fuels under Engine Combustion Network (ECN) Spray A conditions is reported. In particular, a blend of different OMEx fuels have been investigated and compared to dodecane, which is a more conventional diesellike fuel. The modelling framework consists of a high-fidelity LES approach together with a Eulerian-Lagrangian spray model and flamelet-based turbulent combustion model. Results indicate ignition delay time and lift-off length according to the fuel reactivity properties, with the OMEx fuel performing similarly to dodecane. Flamelet calculations show that ignition of the oxygenated fuels is in general similar to that of dodecane, but it occurs at higher mixture fraction values due to the differences in stoichiometry. One of the most relevant outcomes of the study is the important effect that the oxygenated characteristics of OMEx has on the flame structure. Results show that for OMEx the reaction front is stabilized at distances closer to the nozzle than for dodecane, and that the flame shape as well as its internal structure is clearly affected.

[EN] Soot production (including formation and oxidation) is studied in the transient, high-pressure and turbulent n -dodecane Spray A flames from the Engine Combustion Network (ECN) using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. A two-equation soot-in-flamelet modeling approach is applied within the framework of the Unsteady Flamelet Progress Variable (UFPV) model and results are validated against experimental data. Equations for soot mass fraction and soot number density derived in the mixture fraction space are solved in the context of detailed flamelet calculations. Source terms for the different steps in the soot chemistry are tabulated and incorporated in the flamelet manifold. For the reference condition, the modeling approach based on the tabulated flamelet manifold reduces the computational cost of a CFD calculation by approximately 40 times compared to a non-tabulated well-mixed (WM) modeling approach. The soot-in-flamelet approach is then extended to study the effect of ambient oxygen concentration, ambient mixture composition and ambient temperature on soot production. Results show that the modeling approach is able to capture the experimental trends for the soot volume fraction (SVF) with good quantitative agreement, especially in the soot ramp-up region.

This is the author¿s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Engine Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published as https://doi.org/10.1177/14680874211031200., [EN] The decarbonization process of the automotive industry and the road transport sector has raised the interest on the development of cleaner fuels. A proper characterization of their properties and behavior under different operating conditions is mandatory to achieve an effective implementation in commercial engines. With this objective, the current work presents a comparison of two injectors from the Engine Combustion Network (ECN), namely Spray A and Spray D injectors, in terms of spray characteristics and combustion behavior for different fuels: diesel, dodecane, Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO), and two types of oxymethylene ethers (OME1 and OME x ). The aim is to analyze how differences in nozzle geometry affect the behavior of different types of fuels. The experiments were carried out in a High Temperature and High Pressure test rig and operating conditions were chosen following ECN guidelines. Visualization techniques such as high speed schlieren imaging, OH* chemiluminescence and diffused back illumination were implemented to analyze the differences in liquid length, vapor penetration, auto ignition, flame lift-off length, and soot formation for both nozzles. In general, results showed the same trend for all the fuels tested: longer liquid length and faster vapor penetration for Spray D, as well as higher ignition delay and longer lift-off length. However, it was found that these parameters were less sensitive to the nozzle diameter for the oxygenated fuels tested. Furthermore, a different trend was observed for OME1, in terms of ignition behavior, in comparison to the other fuels. In terms of soot production, the Spray D nozzle increases its formation with the non-oxygenated fuels. In contrast, no soot was observed with the oxygenated ones under any operating conditions.

[EN] The pre-blending of low- and high-reactivity fuels for a single direct injection system has been proven to be an effective way to control the reactivity of mixtures in compression ignition engines, having the potential to simultaneously reduce fuel consumption and pollutant emissions. However, there is not much knowledge about the complex physical-chemical phenomena in the turbulent sprays with fuels having widely different autoignition qualities, although this information is critical for the design and development of cleaner combustion systems based on this concept. For this reason, a computational analysis of ignition behavior, flame structure, and soot production for reacting sprays with five primary reference fuels (PRFs), from PRF0 (n-heptane) to PRF80 (20% n-heptane, 80% iso-octane) with 20% increment in iso-octane mass fraction, was first performed using the Tabulated Flamelet Progress Variable (TFPV) approach based on the tabulation of diffusion flamelets for different scalar dissipation rates. The temporal and spatial features of the flame structure and soot formation for different fuels were investigated with the so-called intensity-axial distance-time (IXT) plots. Then, ten PRFs, from RRF0 to PRF90 with 10% increment in iso-octane mass fraction, were investigated and compared in a heavy-duty Diesel engine operating at the conventional high-temperature, short-ignition delay (HTSID) condition. The injection timing was altered from -5 to -13 degrees ATDC to optimize the combustion phase and engine performance for different fuels. The results showed that PRF70 exhibited the best performance at the tested condition, which reduced the soot mass to 5% of the baseline value without sacrificing fuel efficiency.