Search

Bakgrund: Patientdelaktighet är en viktig aspekt inom hälso- och sjukvården. Det är sjuksköterskors ansvar att göra patienterna delaktiga i sin egen vård och behandling. Forskning lyfter vikten av att göra patienten delaktig i vården och hur delaktigheten främjas. Samtidigt lyfts hindrande faktorer som gör att patientdelaktigheten inte alltid fungerar i verkligheten. Syfte: Syftet med studien var att beskriva patientens delaktighet; utifrån sjuksköterskans perspektiv. Metod:En allmän kvalitativ litteraturstudie med strukturerad informationssökning utfördes. Resultat: I resultatet redovisas en sammanställning av tio kvalitativa artiklar och ur analysen framkom fyra teman: Ömsesidig relation och engagemang, delad makt och kompetens, tid och förmåga och andra hindrande och främjande faktorer. För att patientdelaktighet ska fungera krävs det ömsesidig respekt och en god relation mellan sjuksköterska och patient. Något som visade sig påverka patientmedverkan var tidsbristen hos sjuksköterskorna men även den fysiska eller kognitiva förmågan hos patienten. Konklusion: Patientdelaktighet förespråkar en jämställd relation mellan sjuksköterskor och patienter. Sjuksköterskorna upplevde att det fanns bidragande faktorer som utgjorde hinder till patientdelaktighet. Patienters brist på kunskap gällande hälsan hade negativ effekt eller hindrade patientensmedverkan. Något som upplevdes otillfredsställande var den begränsade tiden som sjuksköterskorna hade att ägna till patienterna då andra arbetsuppgifter också krävde tid., Backgroud: Patient participation is an important aspect in healthcare. It is the nurses' responsibility to involve patients in their own care and treatment. Research raises the importance of involving the patient in care and how participation is prometed. At the same time, hindering factors are raised that mean that patientparticipation does not always work in reality.Aim: The aim of the study was to describe the patient's participation; from the nurse's perspective. Method: A general qualitative literature review with structured information retrieval was performed. Results: The results present a compilation of ten qualitative articles and the analysis revealed four themes: mutual relationship and engament, shared power and competence, time and ability and other hindering and promoting factors. For patient participation to work, mutual respect and a good relationship between nurse and patient are required. Something that affect patient participation was the lack of time among the nurses but also the physical or cognitive ability of the patient. Conclusion: Patient participation advocates an equal relationship between nurses and patients. The nurses experienced that there were contributing factors that constituted obstacles to patient participation. Patients' lack of knowledge about health had a negative effect or hindered patient participation. Something that was unsatisfying was the limited time that the nurses had to devote to the patients as other tasks also required time.

Background The work as a radiographer includes both nursing care and technology, this means combining advanced technology with good nursing for patients. The work includes performing different technology modalities. This means being responsible for the technical equipment and the patient’s well-being. Purpose The aim in this study is to describe the radiographer’s need for further education seen from a radiographer’s perspective. Methods A qualitative approach with semi-structured interview questions was used to answer the aim of this study. Graneheim and Lundman (2008) description of analysis method was used in this study to process and analyze the content of the interviews. The study includes 11 radiographers from a university hospital in Sweden with participant with over five years of professional experience. Results Three categories where identified: conditions for further education, limited career opportunities and conditions for development, with seven subcategories. The identified subcategories where: opportunity for education, lack of time, lack of information, more specializations, unchanged working conditions, support available, interest available. These categories with the subcategories were identified from the analyzed interviews. The radiographer experienced a lack of career opportunities, lack of time and lack of information. All participants answered yes to the question “do you think a further education is needed”. There was a willingness in further education among all participant especially within intervention, radiation physics and leadership. ConclusionThis study resulted that the radiographer experiencing a lot of difficulties when it comes to further education. The participant also expressed the wishes to be able to get their own title after a further education. This is something that should be introduced and regulated by states where a status or title is guaranteed.