Search

Background : Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) is mainly characterized by renal involvement with progressive bilateral development of renal cysts and volumetric increase in the kidneys, causing a loss of renal function, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and kidney failure. The occurrence of mosaicism may modulate the clinical course of the disease. Mosaicism is characterized by a few cell populations with different genomes. In these special cases, a genetic diagnosis could be challenging. Methods : Herein, we describe the case of a 47-year-old woman presenting with typical ultrasound and computed tomography features of ADPKD. She had stage 3b CKD and hypertension. There was no family history of ADPKD, prompting an investigation with a genetic test. Target next-generation sequencing (NGS) did not detect the presence of any genomic variants. Therefore, we carried out second-level genetic analysis to investigate the presence of a large rearrangement through a multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis of PKD1 and PKD2 genes. Results : MLPA showed a large deletion (portion including exons 2-34 of PKD1) present in the heterozygosis with a percentage of cells close to the resolution limits of the technique used (<25-30%). We concluded that the large deletion identified was mosaicism. This variant is not reported in major ADPKD databases, but due to the type of mutation and the patient's clinical picture, it should be considered as likely pathogenic. Conclusions : A stepwise genetic approach might be useful in those cases where standard methods do not allow one to reach a definitive diagnosis.

Objectives: The study aim was to assess predictors of negative antibody response (AbR) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients after the first booster of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination., Methods: Solid organ transplant recipients receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were prospectively enrolled (March 2021-January 2022) at six hospitals in Italy and Spain. AbR was assessed at first dose (t 0 ), second dose (t 1 ), 3 ± 1 month (t 2 ), and 1 month after third dose (t 3 ). Negative AbR at t 3 was defined as an anti-receptor binding domain titre <45 BAU/mL. Machine learning models were developed to predict the individual risk of negative (vs. positive) AbR using age, type of transplant, time between transplant and vaccination, immunosuppressive drugs, type of vaccine, and graft function as covariates, subsequently assessed using a validation cohort., Results: Overall, 1615 SOT recipients (1072 [66.3%] males; mean age±standard deviation [SD], 57.85 ± 13.77) were enrolled, and 1211 received three vaccination doses. Negative AbR rate decreased from 93.66% (886/946) to 21.90% (202/923) from t 0 to t 3 . Univariate analysis showed that older patients (mean age, 60.21 ± 11.51 vs. 58.11 ± 13.08), anti-metabolites (57.9% vs. 35.1%), steroids (52.9% vs. 38.5%), recent transplantation (<3 years) (17.8% vs. 2.3%), and kidney, heart, or lung compared with liver transplantation (25%, 31.8%, 30.4% vs. 5.5%) had a higher likelihood of negative AbR. Machine learning (ML) algorithms showing best prediction performance were logistic regression (precision-recall curve-PRAUC mean 0.37 [95%CI 0.36-0.39]) and k-Nearest Neighbours (PRAUC 0.36 [0.35-0.37])., Discussion: Almost a quarter of SOT recipients showed negative AbR after first booster dosage. Unfortunately, clinical information cannot efficiently predict negative AbR even with ML algorithms., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

A meeting entitled Renal BIopsy for Kidney Transplantation Therapy (ReBIrth) took place on May 31 st , 2022 in Bologna, Italy. The meeting drew together nephrologists, surgeons, and pathologists and recognized as experts in the field of kidney transplantation in Italy. In this paper, we present our experience working with kidney transplants in the current era of immunosuppression therapy. The primary aim is to report the histopathological characteristics of failed kidney allografts after a consensus of experts reviewed the cases on a wholeslide imaging digital platform. Regardless of the cases discussed, digital pathology was reliable in identifying all the morphological and immunohistochemical features required to improve the correct use of immunosuppressive therapy to prevent graft failure and optimize patient management., (Copyright © 2023 Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citopatologia Diagnostica, Divisione Italiana della International Academy of Pathology.)

Previous studies assessing the antibody response (AbR) to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are limited by short follow-up, hampering the analysis of AbR kinetics. We present the ORCHESTRA SOT recipients cohort assessed for AbR at first dose (t0), second dose (t1), and within 3 ± 1 month (t2) after the first dose. We analyzed 1062 SOT patients (kidney, 63.7%; liver, 17.4%; heart, 16.7%; and lung, 2.5%) and 5045 health care workers (HCWs). The AbR rates in the SOTs and HCWs were 52.3% and 99.4%. The antibody levels were significantly higher in the HCWs than in the SOTs (p < 0.001). The kinetics showed an increase (p < 0.001) in antibody levels up to 76 days and a non-significant decrease after 118 days in the SOT recipients versus a decrease up to 76 days (p = 0.02) and a less pronounced decrease between 76 and 118 days (p = 0.04) in the HCWs. Upon multivariable analysis, liver transplant, ≥3 years from SOT, mRNA-1273, azathioprine, and longer time from t0 were associated with a positive AbR at t2. Older age, other comorbidities, mycophenolate, steroids, and impaired graft function were associated with lower AbR probability. Our results may be useful to optimize strategies of immune monitoring after COVID-19 vaccination and indications regarding timing for booster dosages calibrated on SOT patients’ characteristics.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease, responsible for 10% of patients on renal replacement therapy. The disease is well known to be associated with many extrarenal manifestations. Leukopenia may also be present, even if it is not commonly identified as a typical extrarenal manifestation. Herein we describe two case reports of ADPKD patients with leukopenia. The first case is about a 47-year-old patient affected by ADPKD, regularly treated with peritoneal dialysis, who showed a progressive reduction of white blood cell count, mostly of lymphocytes. Lymphocytic leukopenia was so severe that, when he was called for transplantation from a deceased donor, he was considered temporarily not eligible. We then describe a second ADPKD patient regularly treated with peritoneal dialysis, who had stable lymphopenia for years. Six years after starting PD, it was necessary to perform bone marrow aspirate to investigate the simultaneous presence of hypogammaglobulinemia together with M-protein and to exclude monoclonal gammopathy. All the exams performed did not show any significant results, the patients were re-included in the waiting list and one of them was transplanted. Given our experience and what is reported in the literature, there seems to be enough evidence to consider leukopenia as an extrarenal manifestation of ADPKD. However, the clinical significance of leukopenia in ADPKD patients is not known. It could be interesting to investigate the leucocytes' function and if ADPKD patients with leukopenia are more susceptible to infection, or not. Moreover, it would be very useful to analyze the relationship between such manifestation and genotype/phenotype., (Copyright by Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN, Rome, Italy.)

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease and accounts for∼10% of patients on renal replacement therapy. In the last decade, no specific treatment was available and only preventive measures could be put in place to delay the onset of ESRD. Following the results of the TEMPO 3:4 study, tolvaptan was approved in many countries, for the purpose of slowing the progression of renal insufficiency. In Italy tolvaptan is available since 2016 for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 1-3, and since 2020 for patients with CKD stage 4, who fulfil the criteria of "rapid disease progression", according to the European recommendations. After this approval, Italian nephrology units have had to change their organization to be able to identify the patients eligible for the drug and to guarantee frequent patient monitoring. In this paper, we present our three-year experiences with tolvaptan, focusing on its safety profile and tolerability, but also on the high burden of care that such therapy represents not only for doctors, but also for patients. Strategies to implement remote monitoring may be useful to reduce the burden of assistance on one side, and the medicalization of ADPKD patients in the early stage of the disease, on the other., (Copyright by Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN, Rome, Italy.)

A series of selenylated-oxadiazoles were prepared and their interaction with DNA was investigated. The photophysical studies showed that all the selenylated compounds presented absorption between 270 and 329 nm, assigned to combined n→π* and π→π* transitions, and an intense blue emission (325-380 nm) with quantum yield in the range of Φ F  = 0.1-0.4. DFT and TD-DFT calculations were also performed to study the likely geometry and the excited state of these compounds. Electrochemical studies revealed the ionization potential energies (-5.13 to -6.01 eV) and electron affinity energies (-2.25 to -2.83 eV), depending directly on the electronic effect (electron-donating or electron-withdrawing) of the substituent attached to the product. Finally, the UV-Vis DNA interaction experiments indicated that the compounds can interact with the DNA molecule due to intercalation, except for 3g (which interacted via electrostatic interaction). Plasmid cleavage assay presented positive results only for 3f that presented the strongest interaction results. These results made the tested selenylated-oxadiazoles as suitable structures for the development of drugs and the design of structurally-related therapeutics., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Intraperitoneal volume (IPV) should be individualized and aimed to maintain an intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) lower than 17 cm H2O. IPP is very variable, given its relation with body size. However, it is not yet fully understood which anthropometric variable mostly affects IPP and the relation between IPP and organomegaly in polycystic kidney disease (PKD) patients is not known., Objectives: The aim of the present study was to analyse the relation between antropometric variables and IPP in a large cohort of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and to identify if a relation between nephromegaly and IPP exists in PKD patients., Methods: IPP was measured in PD patients and data was retrospectively collected. In PKD patients, total kidney volumes were measured in CT scans, and normalized with height (hTKV)., Results: Seventy-seven patients were included in the study, 18% affected by PKD. Mean IPP was 14.9 ± 2.9 cm H2O and it showed significant positive correlation with body mass index (BMI; ρ = 0.42, p < 0.001). No correlation was found between IPP and absolute IPV; conversely, IPP has a significant inverse correlation with IPV normalized with BMI and body surface area (ρ -0.38, p = 0.001 and ρ -0.25, p = 0.02, -respectively). Patients with IPP >17 cm H2O have significant larger BMI and lower IPV/BMI compared to those with IPP <17 cm H2O (29 ± 3.6 vs. 26 ± 4 kg/m2, p < 0.05 and 97 ± 15.5 vs. 109 ± 22 mL/kg/m2, p < 0.05). PKD patients have a wide variability in hTKV (range 645-3,787 mL/m2) and it showed a significant correlation with IPP/IPV (ρ = 0.6, p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Patients with larger BMI have greater IPP, irrespectively to IPV. In PKD patients, hTKV correlate with IPP/IPV ratio. However, given the wide range of distribution of hTKV, increased IPP cannot be presumed because of pre-existing polycystic kidney, but need to be quantified., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is one of the most common genetic diseases with a reported prevalence of 1:400 to 1:1000. Since the intact kidneys can compensate for the loss of glomerular filtration in ADPKD patients, renal insufficiency usually remains undetected until almost the fourth decade of life. Hereafter, reliable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers to identify ADPKD progression are urgently needed. Several studies and systematic reviews tried to identify markers or predictors of rapid disease progression of ADPKD. The aim of this study is to review predictors of rapid disease progression of ADPKD that can be useful to the clinician. We will describe several factors associated with rapid progression of ADPKD derived from retrospective or cross-sectional studies, suggesting the best and most useful predictors that may help to patients management in clinical practice. We will attempt to identify the most useful predictors of rapid disease progression of ADPKD: established TKV growth rate >5% per year, annual estimated glomerular filtration rate decline >5 mL/min/1.73 m2, truncating PKD1 mutations and elevated plasma copeptin level. The combination of several factors that can predict the rapid ADPKD progression is more accurate than a single-marker strategy. The "PRO-PKD" risk scoring system combined with TKV, can be useful in order to evaluate the ADPKD patients and they appear to be appropriate predictors of progression disease. Moreover levels of copeptin and some urinary markers can be matched to these factors for improved patient assessment in rapid progression.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease, accounting for 10% of European patients on renal replacement therapy. In the previous years, many approaches to slow the progression of ADPKD were studied and many clinical trials published. In addition to having diagnostic role, the description of the genotype is even important to predict the progression of the disease and contributes, combined with several other factors, to a more precise patients classification. With the availability of disease-modifying drugs, "fast progression factors" are needed to early recognize those patients who would likely progress, before cyst growth reaches a critical value. ERA-EDTA working group on inherited kidney disorders included a series of recommendations resulting in a hierarchical decision algorithm to select patients who are most likely to benefit from the treatment. Beyond diagnosis, we will also discuss the important role of genetics in ADPKD progression and management., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

The hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is one of the thrombotic microangiopathies and it consists of the triad of nonimmune microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. The atypical form of HUS (aHUS) is related to causative mutations in complement genes. Some conditions act as a trigger for aHUS in individuals that have a genetic background predisposing to complement activation. Interferon β is a recombinant-protein therapy approved to treat multiple sclerosis (MS), and can be a causative agent in the occurrence of HUS through anti-angiogenic activity. In this paper, we briefly review aHUS clinical and genetic characteristics. Furthermore, we present a case of a 48-year-old woman, diagnosed with MS and treated with INFβ-1b from 2008. In December 2015, she presented with asthenia and loss of muscular strength in the legs and she quickly developed aHUS. Our case suggests that INFβ is a possible triggering factor for HUS., (© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease. Studies have suggested a possible prognostic role of copeptin in determining the rate of progressive kidney function decline in ADPKD patients. However, it remains unresolved whether the changes in copeptin levels are specific for ADPKD or merely reflect a decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) regardless of the etiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: We performed a case-control study in ADPKD and non-ADPKD (control) patients. Patients were categorized based on the GFR-category (G-stage, KDIGO). We evaluated urea, creatinine, cystatin C, and copeptin in plasma and correlated these levels with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (CKD-EPI). All p-values were two sided, and p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant., Results: We enrolled 112 ADPKD and 112 control patients. The median copeptin level was 10.72 (interquartile range (IQR) 5.21 - 26.21) pmol/L in the ADPKD group and 12.32 (IQR 4.47 - 30.73) pmol/L in the control group. The median copeptin level increased according to the G-stage in a progressive fashion and remained statistically significant across all G-stages and in both groups. Copeptin levels were not significantly different between ADPKD and control groups. We found a significant inverse correlation between copeptin level and eGFR (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)) in the ADPKD, r = -0.81 (p < 0.001), and in the control group, r = -0.76 (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Copeptin levels seem to be strongly correlated with renal function rather than the presence of ADPKD. Further prospective studies need to evaluate its role as a prognostic marker in the early stage of CKD for ADPKD progression.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetic disease with variable rate of progression. It is associated with inter- and intra-familial variability. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been implicated in pathological conditions and it is proposed as a biomarker for CKD progression. Our aim was to evaluate whether NGAL could be a good marker for progression of ADPKD, as we hypothesized. ADPKD patients with confirmed mutations (PKD1 n=33; PKD2 n=17) were enrolled and followed in a prospective study. Creatinine (sCr) and NGAL values were measured at baseline and on follow-up. Plasma NGAL was measured by Triage point of care test. CKD progression was defined as 15% decrease in eGFR from baseline to follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on median baseline NGAL and compared by the Kaplan-Meier curve. We enrolled 50 ADPKD pts (60%M age 41 yrs); mean sCr 1.30.7 mg/dl and median eGFR was 62 mL/min/1.73 m2. NGAL values are inversely correlated with baseline eGFR (r=-0.64, p<0.001). There was weak correlation between baseline NGAL and subsequent change in eGFR (r=0.28, p=0.05). 9/50 of patients had NGAL below limits of detection (60 pg/ml); median NGAL level was 79 pg/ml. At follow-up, 12 patients (24%) had progression as defined. No statistically significant relationship between higher NGAL and ADPKD progression was observed. We did not observe a relationship between NGAL and CKD progression in ADPKD patients; however 18% of patients had undetectable plasma NGAL levels. This raises doubt about the utility of the current NGAL assay as a biomarker for CKD progression in this population.