Search

Abstract: In this review, we explore the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and other advanced radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, which primarily involves primary and secondary liver cancers and pancreatic cancers. The review examines radiotherapy in both curative and palliative settings, emphasizing the evolution of SBRT and hypofractionation as alternatives to conventional radiotherapy. We review the recent literature evaluating radiotherapy in the management of unresectable, borderline resectable, and metastatic pancreatic cancer, highlighting recent advances in radiotherapy techniques that aim to improve local control, reduce toxicity, and increase resectability in appropriate patients. For primary liver cancers (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma), SBRT has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to surgery, particularly in patients with unresectable tumors or those awaiting liver transplantation. The review also provides insights into ongoing clinical trials, comparative studies between SBRT and other local therapies such as radiofrequency ablation, and the use of radiotherapy in managing liver metastases from various primary cancers. Throughout, we emphasize limitations in the available literature and highlight areas of ongoing and future investigation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective. To develop and validate a dose-of-the-day (DOTD) treatment plan verification procedure for liver and pancreas cancer patients treated with an magnetic resonance (MR)-Linac system. Approach. DOTD was implemented as an automated process that uses 3D datasets collected during treatment delivery. Particularly, the DOTD pipeline's input included the adapt-to-shape (ATS) plan-i.e. 3D-MR dataset acquired at beginning of online session, anatomical contours, dose distribution-and 3D-MR dataset acquired during beam-on (BON). The DOTD automated analysis included (a) ATS-to-BON image intensity-based deformable image registration (DIR), (b) ATS-to-BON contours mapping via DIR, (c) BON-to-ATS contours copying through rigid registration, (d) determining ATS-to-BON dosimetric differences, and (e) PDF report generation. The DIR process was validated by two expert reviewers. ATS-plans were recomputed on BON datasets to assess dose differences. DOTD analysis was performed retrospectively for 75 treatment fractions (12-liver and 5-pancreas patients). Main results. The accuracy of DOTD process relied on DIR and mapped contours quality. Most DIR-generated contours (99.6%) were clinically acceptable. DICE correlated with depreciation of DIR-based region of interest mapping process. The ATS-BON plan difference was found negligible (<1%). The duodenum and large bowel exhibited highest variations, 24% and 39% from fractional values, for 5-fraction liver and pancreas. For liver 1-fraction, a 62% variation was observed for duodenum. Significance. The DOTD methodology provides an automated approach to quantify 3D dosimetric differences between online plans and their delivery. This analysis offers promise as a valuable tool for plan quality assessment and decision-making in the verification stage of the online workflow., (© 2024 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.)

Introduction and Purpose: With a significant global impact, treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers still presents with challenges, despite current multimodality approaches in advanced stages. Clinical trials are expanding for checkpoint inhibition (ICI) combined with radiation therapy (RT). This review intends to offer a comprehensive image of the current data regarding the effectiveness of this association, and to reflect on possible directions to further optimize the results., Results: Several early phase studies demonstrated encouraging potential. However, translating preclinical outcomes to clinical settings proves challenging, especially in immunologically "cold" environments. GI cancers exhibit heterogeneity, requiring tailored approaches based on disease stage and patient characteristics. Current results, though promising, lack the power of evidence to influence the general practice., Conclusions: Finding biomarkers for identifying or converting resistant cancers is essential for maximizing responses, moreover in this context strategic RT parameters need to be carefully considered. Our review emphasizes the significance of having a thorough grasp of how immunology, tumour biology, and treatment settings interact in order to propose novel research avenues and efficient GI cancer therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Radiotherapy (RT) is a frequently used treatment for cervical cancer, effectively decreasing the likelihood of the disease returning in the same area and extending the lifespan of individuals with cervical cancer. Nevertheless, the primary reason for treatment failure in cancer patients is the cancer cells' resistance to radiation therapy (RT). Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) are a subset of RNA molecules that do not code for proteins and are longer than 200 nucleotides. They have a significant impact on the regulation of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers biological processes. Recent research has shown that lncRNAs have a significant impact in controlling the responsiveness of GI cancer to radiation. This review provides a concise overview of the composition and operation of lncRNAs as well as the intricate molecular process behind radiosensitivity in GI cancer. Additionally, it compiles a comprehensive list of lncRNAs that are linked to radiosensitivity in such cancers. Furthermore, it delves into the potential practical implementation of these lncRNAs in modulating radiosensitivity in GI cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest I declare that there is no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

The aim of this analysis is to assess radiotherapy's role and technical aspects in an array of rare gastrointestinal (GI) cancers for adult patients. Collection data pertaining to radiotherapy and digestive rare cancers were sourced from Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved outcomes for patients with esophageal undifferentiated carcinoma compared with esophageal salivary gland types of carcinomas. For rare gastric epithelial carcinoma, perioperative chemotherapy is the common treatment. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy showed no benefice compared with adjuvant chemotherapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Small bowel sarcomas respond well to radiotherapy. By analogy to anal squamous cell carcinoma, exclusive chemoradiotherapy provided better outcomes for patients with rectal squamous cell carcinoma. For anal adenocarcinoma, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by radical surgery, was the most effective regimen. For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, chemoradiotherapy can be a suitable option as postoperative or exclusive for unresectable/borderline disease. The stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a promising approach for hepatobiliary malignancy. Radiotherapy is a valuable option in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) for palliative intent, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistant disease, and unresectable or residual disease. Involved field (IF) radiotherapy for digestive lymphoma provides good results, especially for gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MALT). In conclusion, radiotherapy is not an uncommon indication in this context. A multidisciplinary approach is needed for better management of digestive rare cancers., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Radiation plays an important role in organ preservation for gastrointestinal malignancies, with a watch and wait strategy enabling surgery to be avoided in patients who are not suitable or who are refusing surgery. Brachytherapy boost allows the radiation dose to be escalated, which plays a pivotal role in the successful outcome of achieving organ preservation. Here we describe the role of brachytherapy in two common gastrointestinal malignancies (oesophagus and rectum). Their indications and how the brachytherapy procedures are carried out, together with the dose and fractionation commonly used are discussed. The use of brachytherapy needs to be included in the training curriculum at all academic centres so that its use is developed by the newer generation of radiation oncologists. Its current non-use due to bias, lack of training and availability is no longer justified, given the overwhelming published evidence for the role of brachytherapy to improve organ preservation for both radical treatment and palliation in gastrointestinal malignancies., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Oncological outcomes are improving in gastrointestinal cancer with advancements in systemic therapies, and there is notable potential in combining immunotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) to allow for further improvements. Various preclinical and early phase II studies have shown promising synergy with immunotherapy and RT in gastrointestinal cancer. A few recent phase III studies have shown improved survival with the addition of immunotherapy to standard treatment for gastrointestinal cancer. The timing, duration, sequencing, and integration with other anti-cancer treatments are still areas of ongoing research. We have reviewed the published and ongoing studies of the combinations of immunotherapy and RT in gastrointestinal cancers.

Despite improvements in definitive therapy, many patients with gastrointestinal malignancies experience local recurrences or have unresectable disease making subsequent management often challenging and morbid. Although higher doses of radiation may offer improved local control, the ability for dose escalation of external beam radiation therapy is often limited by adjacent radiosensitive structures. Intraoperative radiation therapy allows for additional radiotherapy to be delivered directly to the tumor or areas at highest risk for local recurrence while minimizing toxicity to adjacent structures, offering potentially improved outcomes for patients with unresectable disease or those with a high risk of local recurrence., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Radiotherapy has become an indispensable and conventional means for patients with advanced solid tumors including gastrointestinal cancer. However, innate or acquired radiotherapy resistance remains a significant challenge and greatly limits the therapeutic effect, which results in cancer relapse and poor prognosis. Therefore, it is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for clarify the biological characteristics and mechanism of radiotherapy resistance. Recently, lots of studies have revealed that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are the potential indicators and regulators of radiotherapy resistance via the mediation of various targets/pathways in different cancers. These findings may serve as a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome radiotherapy resistance. In this review, we will shed light on the recent findings regarding the functions and regulatory mechanisms of ncRNAs following radiotherapy, and comprehensively discuss their potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in radiotherapy resistance of gastrointestinal cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this critical review is to provide an overview of the role and outcomes associated with the use of local therapy for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers., Methods and Materials: A review of clinical data was performed to describe outcomes associated with the use of systemic therapy and/or locoregional therapies for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers including esophagus, gastric, liver, biliary, pancreas, colorectal, and anal canal., Results: This review describes outcomes associated with current first line systemic therapy and oligometastasis directed locoregional therapy for patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Available data suggest that for well-selected patients among each gastrointestinal disease subsite, the use of local therapy is associated with favorable disease control and possible survival benefit., Conclusions: These data emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and consideration of radiation therapy for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers to improve locoregional control and progression-free survival. Multiple trials are ongoing to determine whether metastasis-directed radiation therapy improves overall survival., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Beam gating with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) usually depends on some external surrogate to infer internal target movement, and the exact internal movement is unknown. In this study, we tracked internal targets and characterized residual motion during DIBH treatment, guided by a surface imaging system, for gastrointestinal cancer. We also report statistics on treatment time., Methods and Materials: We included 14 gastrointestinal cancer patients treated with surface imaging-guided DIBH volumetrically modulated arc therapy, each with at least one radiopaque marker implanted near or within the target. They were treated in 25, 15, or 10 fractions. Thirteen patients received treatment for pancreatic cancer, and one underwent separate treatments for two liver metastases. The surface imaging system monitored a three-dimensional surface with ± 3 mm translation and ± 3° rotation threshold. During delivery, a kilovolt image was automatically taken every 20° or 40° gantry rotation, and the internal marker was identified from the image. The displacement and residual motion of the markers were calculated. To analyze the treatment efficiency, the treatment time of each fraction was obtained from the imaging and treatment timestamps in the record and verify system., Results: Although the external surface was monitored and limited to ± 3 mm and ± 3°, significant residual internal target movement was observed in some patients. The range of residual motion was 3-21 mm. The average displacement for this cohort was 0-3 mm. In 19% of the analyzed images, the magnitude of the instantaneous displacement was > 5 mm. The mean treatment time was 17 min with a standard deviation of 4 min., Conclusions: Precaution is needed when applying surface image guidance for gastrointestinal cancer treatment. Using it as a solo DIBH technique is discouraged when the correlation between internal anatomy and patient surface is limited. Real-time radiographic verification is critical for safe treatments., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) is a promising alternative strategy to treat liver tumors and liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC), as it selectively delivers radioactive isotopes to the tumor via the hepatic artery, sparring surrounding liver tissue. The landscape of TARE indications is constantly evolving. This strategy is considered for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with liver-confined disease and preserved liver function in whom neither TACE nor systemic therapy is possible. In patients with liver metastases from CRC, TARE is advised when other chemotherapeutic options have failed. Recent phase III trials have not succeeded to prove benefit in overall survival; however, it has helped to better understand the patients that may benefit from TARE based on subgroup analysis. New strategies and treatment combinations are being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical applications of TARE in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a key role to play at multiple steps of the radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and delivery process. Development of high-precision RT techniques such as intensity-modulated RT, stereotactic ablative RT, and particle beam therapy has enabled oncologists to escalate RT dose to the target while restricting doses to organs at risk (OAR). MRI plays a critical role in target volume delineation in various disease sites, thus ensuring that these high-precision techniques can be safely implemented. Accurate identification of gross disease has also enabled selective dose escalation as a means to widen the therapeutic index. Morphological and functional MRI sequences have also facilitated an understanding of temporal changes in target volumes and OAR during a course of RT, allowing for midtreatment volumetric and biological adaptation. The latest advancement in linear accelerator technology has led to the incorporation of an MRI scanner in the treatment unit. MRI-guided RT provides the opportunity for MRI-only workflow along with online adaptation for either target or OAR or both. MRI plays a key role in post-treatment response evaluation and is an important tool for guiding decision making. In this review, we briefly discuss the RT-related applications of MRI in the management of brain, prostate, and GI malignancies., Competing Interests: Shashank SrinivasanEmployment: GlaxoSmithKlineNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

While radiotherapy treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies has historically involved 5-6 weeks of low dose fractions of radiation, hypofractionated radiation over 1-4 weeks has emerged as an efficacious alternative in treatment of many cancer types, including GI cancers. Hypofractionation is of particular relevance in the treatment of older adult patients, wherein the balance between cancer cure, toxicity, goals of care and convenience must be carefully weighed. The role of hypofractionated radiation in the definitive treatment of GI malignancies remains an active area of investigation in sites such as the esophagus, anus, and pancreas, an efficacious alternative for unresectable cases hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma and standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. Meanwhile, hypofractionated radiation therapy represents an efficacious method of palliation for all GI cancers. In this review, we will discuss the application of hypofractionation in gastrointestinal malignancies by disease subsite, with a focus on caring for older adults., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Previous studies have found that patients with lung cancer report worse patient experience compared to other tumour groups. Reasons that may negatively impact patient experience include delays in diagnosis as well as inadequate symptom management. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic timelines and symptom reports of patients with lung and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers., Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with lung or GI cancers who attended a radiation oncology (RO) consultation and/or received radiation treatment between May and August 2019 at the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Data collected included demographics, dates of diagnostic time points, and self-reported symptom scores across 3 time points. A descriptive analysis was completed, and the median number of days between time points was compared between tumour groups., Results: Patients with lung cancer had longer diagnostic timelines compared to GI patients. The median number of days between the first investigative test and biopsy was 21 days longer for patients with lung cancer (p < 0.05). From RO consultation to the first treatment review appointment, 25% and 4% of lung and GI patients, respectively, reported worsening of symptoms. A greater proportion of lung patients reported worse symptom scores during treatment compared to GI patients. This varied by specific symptom., Conclusions: Patients with lung cancer experienced delays in receiving a diagnosis and worse symptom burden during radiation therapy in this study. We identified potential targets to improve patient experience., (© 2021. Crown.)

Background: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has significantly improved the precision in which radiotherapy is delivered in cancer treatment. Typically, IGRT uses bony landmarks and key anatomical structures to locate the tumor. Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of peri-tumor fiducials in enabling even more accurate delineation of target and normal tissue. The use of gold coils as fiducials in gastrointestinal tumors has been extensively studied. However, placement requires expertise and specialized endoscopic ultrasound equipment. This article reports the long-term outcomes of using a standard gastroscopy to inject liquid fiducials for the treatment of oesophageal and gastric tumors with IGRT., Aim: To assess the long-term outcomes of liquid fiducial-guided IGRT in a cohort of oesophageal and gastric cancer patients., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive adults with Oesophagogastric cancers referred for liquid fiducial placement before definitive/neo-adjuvant or palliative IGRT between 2013 and 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia was conducted. Up to four liquid fiducials were inserted per patient, each injection consisting of 0.2-0.5mL of a 1:1 mixture of iodized oil (Lipiodol; Aspen Pharmacare) and n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl ® ; B. Braun). A 23-gauge injector (Cook Medical) was used for the injection. All procedures were performed by or under the supervision of a gastroenterologist. Liquid fiducial-based IGRT (LF-IGRT) consisted of computer-assisted direct matching of the fiducial region on cone-beam computerised tomography at the time of radiotherapy. Patients received standard-IGRT (S-IGRT) if fiducial visibility was insufficient, consisting of bone match as a surrogate for tumor position. Radiotherapy was delivered to 54Gy in 30 fractions for curative patients and up to 45Gy in 15 fractions for palliative treatments., Results: 52 patients were referred for liquid fiducial placement within the study period. A total of 51 patients underwent liquid fiducial implantation. Of these a total of 31 patients received radiotherapy. Among these, the median age was 77.4 years with a range between 57.5 and 88.8, and 64.5% were male. Twenty-seven out of the 31 patients were able to have LF-IGRT while four had S-IGRT. There were no complications after endoscopic implantation of liquid fiducials in our cohort. The cohort overall survival (OS) post-radiotherapy was 19 mo (range 0 to 87 mo). Whilst the progression-free survival (PFS) post-radiotherapy was 13 mo (range 0 to 74 mo). For those treated with curative intent, the median OS was 22.0 mo (range 0 to 87 mo) with a PFS median of 14.0 mo (range 0 to 74 mo). Grade 3 complication rate post-radiotherapy was 29%., Conclusion: LF-IGRT is feasible in 87.1% of patients undergoing liquid fiducial placement through standard gastroscopy injection technique. Our cohort has an overall survival of 19 mo and PFS of 13 mo. Further studies are warranted to determine the long-term outcomes of liquid-fiducial based IGRT., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: Dr. BE on behalf of all authors has nothing to disclose., (©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

The European SocieTy for Radiation and Oncology -Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) endorsed a project to provide guidelines (GL) for the identification and delineation of clinically negative lymph-nodal stations (LNs) involved in upper gastrointestinal clinical scenarios. The presented GL is focused on preoperative (or definitive) setting. The project aim is to improve the consistency of clinical target volume (CTV) delineation by providing: a description of the anatomical boundaries of the LNs; a radiological computed tomography-based atlas depicting the LNs areas; a free, web-based, interactive example case for independent training of radiation oncologists on LNs delineation according to the presented GL, by both qualitative and quantitative analysis (through the FALCON EduCase platform). This project was carried out with the intention to facilitate and improve uniformity of future upper gastrointestinal guidelines on nodal CTV delineation. We report methodology and results from the collaboration of a working group panel selected by the ESTRO-ACROP., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer frequently experience unplanned hospitalizations, but predictive tools to identify high-risk patients are lacking. We developed a machine learning model to identify high-risk patients., Methods and Materials: In the study, 1341 consecutive patients undergoing GI (abdominal or pelvic) radiation treatment (RT) from March 2016 to July 2018 (derivation) and July 2018 to January 2019 (validation) were assessed for unplanned hospitalizations within 30 days of finishing RT. In the derivation cohort of 663 abdominal and 427 pelvic RT patients, a machine learning approach derived random forest, gradient boosted decision tree, and logistic regression models to predict 30-day unplanned hospitalizations. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and prospectively validated in 161 abdominal and 90 pelvic RT patients using Mann-Whitney rank-sum test. Highest quintile of risk for hospitalization was defined as "high-risk" and the remainder "low-risk." Hospitalizations for high- versus low-risk patients were compared using Pearson's χ 2 test and survival using Kaplan-Meier log-rank test., Results: Overall, 13% and 11% of patients receiving abdominal and pelvic RT experienced 30-day unplanned hospitalization. In the derivation phase, gradient boosted decision tree cross-validation yielded AUC = 0.823 (abdominal patients) and random forest yielded AUC = 0.776 (pelvic patients). In the validation phase, these models yielded AUC = 0.749 and 0.764, respectively (P < .001 and P = .002). Validation models discriminated high- versus low-risk patients: in abdominal RT patients, frequency of hospitalization was 39% versus 9% in high- versus low-risk groups (P < .001) and 6-month survival was 67% versus 92% (P = .001). In pelvic RT patients, frequency of hospitalization was 33% versus 8% (P = .002) and survival was 86% versus 92% (P = .15) in high- versus low-risk patients., Conclusions: In patients with GI cancer undergoing RT as part of multimodality treatment, machine learning models for 30-day unplanned hospitalization discriminated high- versus low-risk patients. Future applications will test utility of models to prompt interventions to decrease hospitalizations and adverse outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT) and cancer treatment, patients still experience adverse effects. Proton therapy (PT) has emerged as a valuable RT modality that can improve treatment outcomes. Normal tissue injury is an important determinant of the outcome; therefore, for this review, we analyzed 2 databases: (1) clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and (2) the literature on PT in PubMed, which shows a steady increase in the number of publications. Most studies in PT registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with results available are nonrandomized early phase studies with a relatively small number of patients enrolled. From the larger database of nonrandomized trials, we listed adverse events in specific organs/sites among patients with cancer who are treated with photons and protons to identify critical issues. The present data demonstrate dosimetric advantages of PT with favorable toxicity profiles and form the basis for comparative randomized prospective trials. A comparative analysis of 3 recently completed randomized trials for normal tissue toxicities suggests that for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, no meaningful comparison could be made between stereotactic body RT and stereotactic body PT due to low accrual (NCT01511081). In addition, for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a comparison of intensity modulated RT with passive scattering PT (now largely replaced by spot-scanned intensity modulated PT), PT did not provide any benefit in normal tissue toxicity or locoregional failure over photon therapy. Finally, for locally advanced esophageal cancer, proton beam therapy provided a lower total toxicity burden but did not improve progression-free survival and quality of life (NCT01512589). The purpose of this review is to inform the limitations of current trials looking at protons and photons, considering that advances in technology, physics, and biology are a continuum, and to advocate for future trials geared toward accurate precision RT that need to be viewed as an iterative process in a defined path toward delivering optimal radiation treatment. A foundational understanding of the radiobiologic differences between protons and photons in tumor and normal tissue responses is fundamental to, and necessary for, determining the suitability of a given type of biologically optimized RT to a patient or cohort., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: This communication reports the identification of a new panel of transcriptional changes in inflammation-associated genes observed in response to ionising radiation received by radiotherapy patients., Methods: Peripheral blood samples were taken with ethical approval and informed consent from a total of 20 patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy for breast, lung, gastrointestinal or genitourinary tumours. Nanostring nCounter analysis of transcriptional changes was carried out in samples prior and 24 h post-delivery of the 1st radiotherapy fraction, just prior to the 5th or 6th fraction, and just before the last fraction., Results: Statistical analysis with BRB-ArrayTools, GLM MANOVA and nSolver, revealed a radiation responsive panel of genes which varied by patient group (type of cancer) and with time since exposure (as an analogue for dose received), which may be useful as a biomarker of radiation response., Conclusion: Further validation in a wider group of patients is ongoing, together with work towards a full understanding of patient specific responses in support of personalised approaches to radiation medicine.

Radiotherapy remains one of the contemporary cornerstones of cancer treatment in the neoadjuvant, curative, adjuvant and palliative settings, either in isolation or as a multimodal approach. Moreover, recent advances in targeted immune checkpoint therapy have firmly established immunotherapy as the fourth pillar in cancer therapy alongside surgery, chemotherapy and notably radiotherapy. There is emerging evidence to suggest both radioresistance and reduced efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) are potentiated by the tumour microenvironment (TME) and in fact modulating aspects of this immunosuppressive milieu is instrumental to unlocking anti-tumour immunity. The response rates of Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) malignancies to ICB remains modest at 10-15%, compared to melanoma at 20-40%. Harnessing the effects of radiotherapy through remodelling of the TME using ICB as a radiosensitisor is an avenue showing promise. Here we explore the rationale behind combining radiotherapy with ICB, as a symbiotic relationship in shifting the balance in favour of anti-tumour immunity. We discuss the effects of radiotherapy on immunogenic cell death, the concept of the abscopal effect, the importance of the cGAS STING pathway, and their relevance in the context of the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, dosing and timing of radiotherapy and ICB is now being evaluated for its synergistic effects on host tumour immunity, and we review the ongoing efforts and current available literature for single agent and dual agent ICB in combination multimodal therapy for both locally advanced operable and metastatic disease of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Purpose: In March 2014, we reported the activity and safety of 177 Lu-DOTA-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (Lu-PRRT) at two different dosages (18.5 GBq and 27.5 GBq in 5 cycles) in patients with progressive metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). Disease control rate (DCR) and toxicity were addressed. Herein, we report the late toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in the same cohort after a 10-year follow-up., Methods: We conducted an open-label, disease-oriented prospective phase II trial. From March 2008 to June 2011, 43 patients received 3.7 GBq or 5.5 GBq of Lu-PRRT every 6 to 8 weeks, each cycle repeated 5 times. All patients showed 68 Gallium-DOTA-peptide PET/Octreoscan® positivity (score 3-4 Rotterdam scale) in known lesions. Tumor burden was estimated radiologically. Time-to-event data (PFS and OS) were described using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test., Results: Forty-three patients (28 males and 15 females) were evaluable and were monitored for a median period of 118 months (range 12.6-139.6). Median PFS in patients receiving 18.5 GBq was 59.8 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 14.3-79.6), identical to that of patients treated with 27.5 GBq (59.8 months, 95% CI 23.4-82.0). Median OS was 71.0 months (95% CI 46.1-107.3) in the group who received 18.5 GBq and 97.6 months (95% CI 64.3-not reached) in the group treated with 27.5 GBq (P = 0.22). Patients with progression limited to lymph nodes showed significantly longer median PFS and OS than those with hepatic lesions (P = 0.02 for PFS and P = 0.04 for OS). Age over 65 years at the time of PRRT was also significant for OS. Of note, no late hematological or renal toxicity was observed in either group., Conclusions: The long-term follow-up of the IRST phase II study shows that Lu-PRRT is a safe and effective therapy for patients with advanced GI-NET, the most important prognostic factor being tumor burden, hepatic lesions, and age. We believe that Lu-PRRT should be offered to patients with early-stage disease.

Purpose: This article aims to describe and list the clinical trials that have changed our practices in breast cancer, urological cancer, gynecological cancer, cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract and digestive cancer in the last ten years., Material and Methods: We listed and selected the studies published between 2010 and 2020. The articles were identified on the basis of a Medline search with PubMed and knowledge of the authors., Results: Five to six trials were selected in breast cancer, urological cancers, gynecological cancers, cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract and digestive cancers asking the different fundamental questions in radiotherapy., Conclusion: Depending on the pathologies, the questions raised over the past 10 years remain fundamental questions such as the place of neoadjuvant treatment, the place of hypofractionation or the type of chemotherapy concomitant with radiotherapy., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: To assess predictors of local control (LC) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) in pulmonary oligometastatic disease (OMD) from gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies., Patients and Methods: Patients with pulmonary OMD treated with SAbR from January 2016 to December 2018 were included in this observational analysis. Primary endpoint was LC. Uni- and multivariate analyses to assess variable correlations were conducted., Results: Thirty-seven patients and 59 lung metastases were evaluated. The delivered dose was 30-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions. After a median follow-up of 23.0 months (range=6.3-50.4 months), LC rate at 1/2 years was 89.7%/85.0%, and increased to 96.0%/91.0% for lesions treated with a biologically effective dose (BED 10 ) ≥100 Gy (p=0.03). RECIST response at 6 months was predictive for LC (p=0.002)., Conclusion: SAbR is an effective option for pulmonary OMD from GI malignancies. A BED 10 ≥100 Gy and radiological response at 6 months can affect LC., (Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Dose escalation radiation therapy such as those delivered by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has shown to improve local disease control in multiple types of malignancies. This requires fiducial placement to improve accuracy of treatment and avoid adverse events to adjacent radiosensitive organs during respiration phases. The purpose of this review is to provide updates of recent high-quality articles related to endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fiducial placement for gastrointestinal malignancies, particularly in pancreatic cancer, which is expected to be the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA within this decade., Recent Findings: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that EUS-guided fiducial placement for gastrointestinal malignancies has excellent technical success and safety profile. Comparative studies of most commercially available fiducial types via a 22-gauge needle system showed that a 0.035 mm diameter and 10 mm long gold fiducial with coiled configuration, hollow core and external helical design might be favoured due to its most balanced performance of visibility, artifact and migration., Summary: A fine balance of performance characteristics of fiducials should be discussed with radiation oncologists to select a suitable and preferred type of fiducials. The comparative studies of other newly developed platinum fiducials and liquid fiducial are pending.

Background: Early-stage primary gastrointestinal (GI) low-grade B-cell lymphoma shows good therapeutic response to primary radiotherapy. However, there is no clear guideline for the evaluation of response to radiation therapy currently. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between the best response time and the clinical course after radiotherapy., Methods: Patients who underwent radiotherapy for treatment of primary GI low-grade B-cell lymphoma from September 2007 to December 2018 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital were included. Early responders were defined by best response within 6 months after radiotherapy, and delayed responders after 6 months. Clinical and pathological factors associated with delayed response and survival analyses were performed to investigate the recurrence and survival during follow-up., Results: A total of 43 patients were evaluated and the number of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and duodenal follicular lymphoma was 36 and 7, respectively. All of 43 patients showed complete remission to radiotherapy and the best response time after radiotherapy was a median of 3 months. There were 8 delayed responders with a median duration of 8.9 months. Early and delayed responders were characterized by a significant difference in depth of invasion beyond the mucosal layer., Conclusions: Delayed responders did not show differences in oncological outcomes compared with early responders. They were allowed to watch and wait for an additional 6 to 12 months without further treatment.

Background: The comparative risks of a second cancer diagnosis are uncertain after primary cancer treatment with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT)., Methods: Pediatric and adult patients with a first cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2015 who received 3DCRT, IMRT, or PBRT were identified in the National Cancer Database from 9 tumor types: head and neck, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, lymphoma, lung, prostate, breast, bone/soft tissue, and brain/central nervous system. The diagnosis of second cancer was modeled using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, follow-up duration, radiotherapy (RT) dose, chemotherapy, sociodemographic variables, and other factors. Propensity score matching also was used to balance baseline characteristics., Results: In total, 450,373 patients were identified (33.5% received 3DCRT, 65.2% received IMRT, and 1.3% received PBRT) with median follow-up of 5.1 years after RT completion and a cumulative follow-up period of 2.54 million person-years. Overall, the incidence of second cancer diagnosis was 1.55 per 100 patient-years. In a comparison between IMRT versus 3DCRT, there was no overall difference in the risk of second cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02; P = .75). By comparison, PBRT had an overall lower risk of second cancer versus IMRT (adjusted OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.26-0.36; P < .0001). Results within each tumor type generally were consistent in the pooled analyses and also were maintained in propensity score-matched analyses., Conclusions: The risk of a second cancer diagnosis was similar after IMRT versus 3DCRT, whereas PBRT was associated with a lower risk of second cancer risk. Future work is warranted to determine the cost-effectiveness of PBRT and to identify the population best suited for this treatment., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

As of April 6, 2020, there are over 1,200,000 reported cases and 70,000 deaths worldwide due to COVID-19, the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and these numbers rise exponentially by the day [1]. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the most effective means of minimizing the spread of the virus is through reducing interactions between individuals [2]. We performed a review of the literature, as well as national and international treatment guidelines, seeking data in support of the RADS principle (Remote visits, Avoid radiation, Defer radiation, Shorten radiation) [3] as it applies to gastrointestinal cancers. The purpose of the present work is to guide radiation oncologists managing patients with gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 crisis in order to maintain the safety of our patients, while minimizing the impact of the pandemic on cancer outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cancer in elderly patients represents a global health challenge due to the increase in its incidence and its associated mortality. In our country it is the second leading cause of death in people over 65 years. In the coming years, the problem will increase, with a prognosis of people over 65 years of 35% in 2050. Radiotherapy is an essential part of the multidisciplinary treatment of cancer in elderly patients, where sometimes it is considered as the first therapeutic option and others, as an alternative to surgery and/or chemotherapy if they pose too much risk. The technological development of Radiation Oncology in recent years has allowed optimizing treatments and reducing side effects in elderly patients, who tend to have a higher incidence of comorbidities. It is essential that professionals involved in the multidisciplinary treatment of cancer know the possible toxicity and its management in oncogeriatric patients; otherwise, the percentage of patients who do not receive radiotherapy despite of an adequate indication will not decrease. In this sense, it is necessary to recognize those patients who may suffer from malnutrition or are at risk of suffering it, to initiate a nutritional intervention that minimizes weight loss that alters or even causes the suspension of the planned treatment.

Radiotherapy is used in the treatment of approximately 50% of all malignancies including gastrointestinal cancers. Radiation can be given prior to surgery (neoadjuvant radiotherapy) to shrink the tumour or after surgery to kill any remaining cancer cells. Radiotherapy aims to maximize damage to cancer cells, while minimizing damage to healthy cells. However, only 10-30% of patients with rectal cancer or oesophageal cancer have a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, with the rest suffering the negative consequences of toxicities and delays to surgery with no clinical benefit. Furthermore, in pancreatic cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy results in a pathological complete response in only 4% of patients and a partial pathological response in only 31%. Resistance to radiation therapy is polymodal and associated with a number of biological alterations both within the tumour itself and in the surrounding microenvironment including the following: altered cell cycle; repopulation by cancer stem cells; hypoxia; altered management of oxidative stress; evasion of apoptosis; altered DNA damage response and enhanced DNA repair; inflammation; and altered mitochondrial function and cellular energetics. Radiosensitizers are needed to improve treatment response to radiation, which will directly influence patient outcomes in gastrointestinal cancers. This article reviews the literature to identify strategies - including DNA-targeting agents, antimetabolic agents, antiangiogenics and novel immunotherapies - being used to enhance radiosensitivity in gastrointestinal cancers according to the hallmarks of cancer. Evidence from radiosensitizers from in vitro and in vivo models is documented and the action of radiosensitizers through clinical trial data is assessed.

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colon carcinoma are two of the most common clinical malignancies along with high morbidity and mortality. As low-power laser irradiation (LPLI) can induce cytotoxicity or cell apoptosis on several types of hyperplasia, LPLI may be a potential alternative treatment for gastroenterological cancers. The current in vitro study focused on LPLI-induced apoptosis and mechanism after 532-nm laser irradiation on two different carcinoma cells. Squamous cell carcinoma (VX2) and murine colon carcinoma (CT26) cells were cultured to test the feasibility of LPLI. The applied fluence varied from 0 to 600 J/cm 2 . 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide analysis, fluorescence imaging, wound healing assay, and cell apoptosis tests were performed 24 h post-irradiation to monitor cellular responses. The current results demonstrated a dose-dependent stimulatory effect of LPLI on the cell viability, migration, and apoptosis of VX2 and CT26 cells. The therapeutic fluence of 600 J/cm 2 induced statistically significant inhibition in cell viability. Both the wound healing assay and the cell apoptosis tests confirmed that LPLI with high fluences could inhibit cell migration as well as induce cell apoptosis. The current findings demonstrate that LPLI might be a potential treatment for the carcinoma cells. Further studies will be performed to evaluate the feasibility of LPLI in in vivo tumor models.

Purpose: Older patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for pelvic malignancies are at increased risk for pelvic fracture, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. RT techniques such as brachytherapy or intensity modulated RT (IMRT) allow for more conformal dose distributions, but it is not known whether the risk for pelvic fracture varies by RT modality., Methods and Materials: This observational cohort study involved 28,354 patients ≥65 years old, treated with RT for pelvic malignancies. We evaluated the relative risk of pelvic fracture by type of RT when accounting for baseline factors. To test for nonspecific effects, we also evaluated risk of nonpelvic fractures in the same population., Results: The 5-year incidence of pelvic fractures was 12.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6%-13.8%), 11.8% (10.8%-12.8%), and 3.7% (3.4%-4.0%) for patients with gastrointestinal, gynecologic, and prostate cancer, respectively. On multivariable analysis, being treated with IMRT (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73-0.99) or brachytherapy therapy alone (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.54) was associated with a reduced hazard for pelvic fractures compared with 3D conformal radiation therapy in female patients. In contrast, there was no association with RT modality and the hazard for nonpelvic fractures among females. There was no significant association between pelvic fractures and IMRT or brachytherapy for male patients. White race, advanced age, and higher comorbidity were associated with an increased hazard for pelvic fracture., Conclusions: IMRT and brachytherapy were associated with a reduced risk of pelvic fractures in older women undergoing RT for pelvic malignancies. Pelvic insufficiency fracture risk should be considered when treating with pelvic RT., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate a new prognostic model (GI-GPA) originally derived from a multi-center database (USA, Canada, Japan)., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study included 92 German and Norwegian patients treated with individualized approaches, always including brain radiotherapy. Information about age, extracranial spread, number of brain metastases, performance status and other variables was collected. The GI-GPA score was calculated as described by Sperduto et al. RESULTS: Median survival was 4 months. The corresponding figures for the 4 different prognostic strata were 2.3, 4.4, 9.4 and 12.7 months, respectively (p = 0.0001). Patients whose management included surgical resection had longer median survival than those who were treated with other approaches (median 11.9 versus 3.0 months, p = 0.002). Comparable results were seen for additional systemic therapy (median 8.5 versus 3.5 months, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: These results confirm the validity of the GI-GPA in an independent dataset from a different geographical region, despite the fact that overall survival was shorter in all prognostic strata, compared to Sperduto et al. Potential explanations include differences in molecular tumor characteristics and treatment selection, both brain metastases-directed and extracranially. Long-term survival beyond 5 years is possible in a small minority of patients.

Over the past 2 decades, major technical advances in radiation therapy planning and delivery have made it possible to deliver higher doses to select high-risk volumes. This has helped to expand the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Whereas dose escalation was previously limited by the radiosensitivity of normal tissues within and adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract, advances in target delineation, patient immobilization, treatment planning, and image-guided treatment delivery have greatly improved the therapeutic ratio. More conformal radiation modalities can offer further dose optimization to target volumes while sparing normal tissue from toxicity., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The duodenum is a critical organ at risk while planning radiation for gastrointestinal cancers or para-aortic nodes from gynaecological cancers due to the close proximity to the target volumes. The aim of this study was to assess the dosimetric parameters of the duodenum received during radiotherapy to upper gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies and their correlation with clinical toxicity., Materials and Methods: All adult patients who were treated with radiotherapy for primary upper gastrointestinal cancers (liver, stomach, pancreas, gall bladder) and patients with gynaecological cancers who were treated with extended fields in view of para-aortic nodal involvement from 1 January 2010 to 31 July 2015 were considered for the study. The radiation dose prescription was 45 Gy to the elective clinical target volume and 52.5-60 Gy to the gross nodal volume. The planning computed tomography scan was retrieved and the dose-volume histogram parameters for the duodenum were extracted. The relative volumes of duodenum receiving a dose from 40 to 55 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V40Gy, V45Gy, V50Gy, V55Gy) were also noted., Results: Of the 258 patients assessed, 30 patients (12.1%) were detected to have grade 2-4 toxicities related to the duodenum as detected on endoscopy. Most had grade 3 toxicity - 18 patients were diagnosed with grade 3 toxicity and four patients had grade 4 toxicity. The most common toxicity noted was duodenal ulceration seen in 16 patients. The other toxicities were duodenal stricture in eight patients, duodenal perforation in five patients and one patient was reported to have duodenal fistula. The patients with duodenum receiving V55Gy ≥ 1 cm 3 (7.7% versus 3.8%, P = 0.014) and V50Gy ≥ 4 cm 3 (7.7% versus 3.8%, P = 0.014) had higher grade ≥2 duodenal toxicity., Conclusion: A threshold level of V55Gy ≥ 1 cm 3 and V50Gy ≥ 4 cm 3 for the duodenum is predictive of clinically significant grade 2 and higher toxicity and could serve as valid dose constraints for the duodenum., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

At present, the strongest evidence for the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is to rule out distant metastatic disease at diagnosis, radiation treatment planning for anal malignancies, and disease recurrence monitoring in colorectal and anal malignancies. Use of PET/CT for GI malignancies continues to evolve over time, with new studies evaluating prognostic abilities of PET/CT and with increasing sensitivity and spatial resolution of more modern PET/CT scanners. The authors encourage future applications and prospective evaluation of the use of PET/CT in the staging, prognostication, and recurrence prediction for GI malignancies., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Abdominal recurrences of gastrointestinal malignancies are common. Evidence in clinical studies has shown that re-irradiation (Re-I) is tolerable and efficient in different tumor locations. In contrast, little clinical data are available on normal long-term Re‑I tolerance doses. A systematic review of upper abdominal Re‑I was performed with the aim of exploring the cumulative dose, toxicity, and outcomes., Methods: A computerized search was undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and the Cochrane database. Only studies reporting toxicity and/or outcomes were taken into consideration. To improve the comparability of the different Re‑I regimens and assess the relationship between Radiotherapy (RT) dose and toxicity, the equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions was calculated according to the linear quadratic model., Results: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with the total patients numbering 408. Median follow-up Re‑I ranged from 5.9 to 45 months. The median time elapsed since previous RT treatment was 15 months (2-162 months). Re‑I prescription doses were variable (22.5 Gy in 3 fractions to 126.5 Gy with 125 I). Cumulative doses calculated for acute- and late-responding tissues ranged from 67.25 to 136 Gy and 30.3 to 188.38 Gy, respectively. Comprehensively, the pooled ≥G3 toxicity was 12% (95%CI: 7.6-19%). The overall 1‑year survival and local recurrence-free survival rates were 53.7% (95%CI: 45.6-63.2%) and 66.5% (95% CI: 58.7-75.4%), respectively. Pain improvement was reported in 66.9% of patients., Conclusion: Due to limited evidence as a result of the retrospective design of the majority of the studies, our review suggests that upper abdominal Re‑I is effective in terms of local control and palliation, with a moderate rate of severe toxicities.

The 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference was held in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 28-29 September 2018. This interactive multidisciplinary conference is attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. In addition, invited speakers from other provinces participate. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, and allied health care professionals participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancers., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and we declare that we have none., (2019 Multimed Inc.)

Background: Intracranial metastasis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) is rare but presents unique treatment challenges. We present a case of intracranial metastasis of GIST with a systematic review of the literature. A literature search using key terms "'gastrointestinal stromal tumor' AND brain AND metastasis"" was conducted through May 2019 via Embase and Pubmed according to PRISMA guidelines. Only cases describing intradural metastases rather than calvarial or intraorbital metastases were included., Case Presentation: A 57-year-old woman with history of GIST metastatic to the liver presented with a six-week history of left facial weakness, left hearing loss, and left facial numbness, and a one-week history of headaches, gait disturbance, and dizziness. MRI revealed a contrast-enhancing dural-based left middle cranial fossa mass measuring 2.9 cm × 3.1 cm × 3.4 cm with extension into the internal auditory canal and cerebral edema. A left temporal craniotomy was performed to excise the lesion, and the patient was discharged to a rehabilitation facility at her preoperative baseline. Intraoperative pathology revealed a spindle cell neoplasm, postoperative MRI demonstrated gross total resection of the lesion, and microscopic analysis demonstrated sheets of spindled tumor cells with short ovoid, irregular, hyperchromatic nuclei and scattered large atypical nuclei without extensive necrosis. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for KIT proto-oncogene (CD117, c-KIT), and the patient was put on imatinib (400 mg/day)., Conclusions: Of the 18 cases analyzed and our present case, metastasis typically involved the cerebrum with only one in infratentorial elements. The tumors in seven of the cases involved the dura, and one case metastasized to the pituitary. Eight patients died following treatment. Surgery remains the mainstay of intracranial metastatic GIST, however there are many reports of good responses to radiation or chemotherapy alone. More investigation is required to determine the best treatment course for these patients.

Introduction : 177 Lutetium-[DOTA°,Tyr 3 ]octreotate ( 177 Lu-DOTATATE) is a type of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy that garnered FDA approval in January 2018 for the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients. The therapy approval was based on findings from the randomized international phase III NETTER-1 trial as well as outcome data from a large European registry. The mechanism of the drug stems directly from its structure: a somatostatin analog (octreotate) selectively binding to somatostatin receptor expressing cells and being internalized, along with a chelated beta-emitting isotope 177 Lu. Areas Covered : Herein we describe the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and adverse event data from prospective and retrospective studies with 177 Lu-DOTATATE. We discuss the role of 177 Lu-DOTATATE within the current treatment landscape for GEP NET patients. Expert Opinion : 177 Lu-DOTATATE represents a unique addition to the treatment armamentarium for GEP NETs because of its potential to elicit tumor cytoreduction, which is rare among other existing treatment options, and prolonged disease control. Where 177 Lu-DOTATATE fits into the treatment sequence for GEP NET patients remains an area of active investigation.

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a complexe image-guided radiotherapy modality that comprises multiple planning to account for anatomical variations occurring during irradiation. Schematically, two strategies of RTA can be distinguished and combined according to tumor locations. One or more replanning can be proposed to correct systematic variations such as tumor shrinkage. A library of treatment plans with day-to-day plan selection from cone-beam CT imaging can also be proposed to correct random variations such as uterine motion or bladder/rectum volume changes. Because of strong anatomical variations occurring during irradiation, RTA appears therefore particularly justified in head and neck, lung, bladder, cervical and rectum and pancreas tumors, and to a lesser extent for prostate tumors and other digestive tumors. For these tumor locations, ART provides a fairly clear dosimetric benefit but a clinical benefit not yet formally demonstrated. ART cannot be proposed in a routine practice but must be evaluated medico-economically in the context of prospective trials. A rigorous quality control must be associated., (Copyright © 2019 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Insertion of fiducials to outline the targeted lesion allows image-guided radiotherapy, and is best achieved by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This study is a performance comparison of the new EUS-guided preloaded fiducial needle against Visicoil fiducials., Methods: Technical success, visibility score, procedural time, costs, and complications for patients who underwent EUS-guided fiducial placement in upper gastrointestinal malignancies were prospectively collected., Results: 60 patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers had fiducials (14 Visicoil; 46 preloaded fiducials) inserted for image-guided radiotherapy. Technical success was 100 %, with a shorter mean (standard deviation) insertion time of 0.94 minutes (0.28 minutes) vs. 5.5 minutes (1.9 minutes; P  < 0.001) and higher visibility score on fluoroscopy of 2 vs. 1.18 ( P  < 0.001) in the preloaded group. Neither group had major complications related to fiducial insertion. The cost of consumables per patient was lower in the preloaded group at US$480 (US$124) vs. US$643 (US$123; P  < 0.001)., Conclusion: Fiducial insertion for image-guided radiotherapy using the new preloaded needle is associated with 100 % technical success, shorter insertion time, and higher visibility, and is more cost-effective than the Visicoil system., Competing Interests: None., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background and Aims: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) allows the delivery of radiation with high precision to a target lesion while minimizing toxicity to surrounding tissues. EUS provides excellent visualization of GI tumors and consequently is being used for fiducial placement with increased frequency. Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the technical aspects, safety, and efficacy of EUS fiducial placement for IGRT in GI malignancies., Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out in the following databases: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, using Medical Subject Headings terms combined with text words. A random effects model was used to determine pooled proportions of technical success, migration, and adverse event rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed visually using a funnel plot and by the Begg and Egger tests., Results: Nine full articles and 5 abstracts reporting on 1155 patients, 49% from a single study by Dhadham et al, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of technical success was 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96-99). Moderate heterogeneity (I 2  = 34.18) was present, which appeared to be due to variable sample sizes. Publication bias was present, suggesting that studies with less-substantial outcomes may have not been reported (Begg test, P = .87; Egger test, P < .01). Pooled rates for fiducial migration and adverse events were 3% (95% CI, 1.0-8.0) and 4% (95% CI, 3-7), respectively., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed that EUS-guided insertion of gold fiducials for IGRT is technically feasible and safe. Further controlled studies assessing its long-term effectiveness in GI malignancies are needed., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The disease-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancer brain metastases (BM) suggests Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) as the only pertinent prognostic factor. We evaluated the prognostic importance of cumulative intracranial tumor volume (CITV)., Methods: KPS, CITV, and overall survival were collected from consecutive patients with stereotactic radiosurgery-treated GI BM. Patients were grouped into 2 independent cohorts for development and validation of the model (termed "exploratory" and "validation" cohorts). Analyses were performed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, Net Reclassification Index (NRI >0), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI >0), and Akaike information criterion., Results: In univariable logistic regression models, both CITV and KPS were independently associated with patient survival. The association between CITV and overall survival remained robust after controlling for KPS (P < 0.001) in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Based on NRI analysis of the exploratory cohort, we found that a CITV cutoff of 12 cm 3 best augments the prognostic accuracy of GI-ds-GPA. In this analysis, incorporation of CITV (as < or ≥12 cm 3 ) improved prognostication of the GI-specific GPA model by NRI >0 of 0.397 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.165-0.630; P < 0.001) and IDI of 0.019 (95% CI, 0.004-0.033; P = 0.013). We confirmed the prognostic usefulness of the CITV-incorporated GI-ds-GPA in an independent validation cohort, in which CITV incorporation improved prognostic usefulness with an NRI >0 of 0.478 (95% CI, 0.257-0.699; P < 0.001) and IDI of 0.028 (95% CI, 0.014-0.043; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: CITV is an important prognostic variable in patients with stereotactic radiosurgery-treated GI BM and augments the prognostic accuracy of the GI-ds-GPA index., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment regimens for gastrointestinal, peritoneal and pelvic tumours can disrupt the intestinal microbiome and intestinal epithelia. Such disturbances can provoke symptoms such as diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced gastrointestinal toxicity aggravating intestinal microbiome dysbiosis is postulated to adversely alter the intestinal microbiome, with a consequent induced pro-inflammatory effect that disrupts the intestinal microbiome-epithelia-mucosal immunity axis. Although not widely recognised, the intestinal mucosa is the largest and most densely and dynamically populated immune-environment. Cancer treatment adverse effects that affect intestinal and mucosal cells inadvertently target and disrupt resident intestinal macrophages, the cells that marshal immune activity in the intestinal mucosa by shaping pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory activities to control and eradicate infectious insults and maintain local homeostasis. Pathobionts (bacteria capable of pathogenic pro-inflammatory activity) and noxious environmental and bacterial antigens use the intestinal epithelia and gap junctions as a point of entry into the systemic circulation. This translocation movement promotes toxic sequelae that obstruct intestinal macrophage functions resulting in uncontrolled local and systemic pro-inflammatory activity, loss of phagocytic function and loss of expression of tight junction proteins. Probiotic bacteria as an adjunctive treatment shows efficacy in ameliorating enteropathies such as mucositis/diarrhoea resulting from chemotherapy or radiotherapy regimens. As such we posit that an important benefit that warrants a further focused research effort is the administration of adjuvant probiotics to help reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia.

The RTGene study was focused on the development and validation of new transcriptional biomarkers for prediction of individual radiotherapy patient responses to ionizing radiation. In parallel, for validation purposes, this study incorporated conventional biomarkers of radiation exposure, including the dicentric assay. Peripheral blood samples were taken with ethical approval and informed consent from a total of 20 patients undergoing external beam radiotherapy for breast, lung, gastrointestinal or genitourinary tumors. For the dicentric assay, two samples were taken from each patient: prior to radiotherapy and before the final fraction. Blood samples were set up using standard methods for the dicentric assay. All the baseline samples had dicentric frequencies consistent with the expected background for the normal population. For blood taken before the final fraction, all the samples displayed distributions of aberrations, which are indicative of partial-body exposures. Whole-body and partial-body cytogenetic doses were calculated with reference to a 250-kVp X-ray calibration curve and then compared to the dose to blood derived using two newly developed blood dosimetric models. Initial comparisons indicated that the relationship between these measures of dose appear very promising, with a correlation of 0.88 ( P = 0.001). A new Bayesian zero-inflated Poisson finite mixture method was applied to the dicentric data, and partial-body dose estimates showed no significant difference ( P > 0.999) from those calculated by the contaminated Poisson technique. The next step will be further development and validation in a larger patient group.

Introduction: Radiotherapy is a cornerstone in the multimodality treatment of several gastrointestinal (GI) tumors. Positron-emission tomography (PET) has an established role in the diagnosis, response assessment and (re-)staging of these tumors. Nevertheless, the value of PET in adaptive radiotherapy remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of PET in adaptive radiotherapy, i.e. during the treatment course and in the delineation process., Evidence Acquisition: The MEDLINE database was searched for the terms ("Radiotherapy"[Mesh] AND "Positron-Emission Tomography"[Mesh] AND one of the site-specific keywords, yielding a total of 1710 articles. After abstract selection, 27 papers were identified for esophageal neoplasms, 1 for gastric neoplasms, 9 for pancreatic neoplasms, 6 for liver neoplasms, 1 for biliary tract neoplasms, none for colonic neoplasms, 15 for rectal neoplasms and 12 for anus neoplasms., Evidence Synthesis: The use of PET for truly adaptive radiotherapy during treatment for GI tumors has barely been investigated, in contrast to the potential of the PET-defined metabolic tumor volume for optimization of the target volume. The optimized target definition seems useful for treatment individualization such as focal boosting strategies in esophageal, pancreatic and anorectal cancer. Nevertheless, for all GI tumors, further investigation is needed., Conclusions: In general, too little data are available to conclude on the role of PET imaging during radiotherapy for ART strategies in GI cancer. On the other hand, based on the available evidence, the use of biological imaging for target volume adaptation seems promising and could pave the road towards individualized treatment strategies.