Search

This article discusses problems of corruption which until now hasn’t been completed in its eradication process. Every effort is made to find both internal and external causes in order to get the solution. The problem that is studied sociologically is, why is corruption incomplete? If corruption isn’t yet complete, and work isn’t finished yet, then how can work be completed? Understanding Corruption can be called work is complete, must be understood from the anti-corruption values and principles contained therein. It’s include honesty, independence, discipline, responsibility, hard work, simple, courage, and justice. It’s need to be applied by each individual to be able to overcome external factors so that corruption doesn’t occur. To prevent the occurrence of external factors, in addition to having it, each individual needs to deeply understand the anti-corruption principles of accountability, transparency, fairness, policy, and policy control. Therefore the relationship between anti-corruption principles and values is an inseparable unity. Success or failure to solve the problem of corruption is expected in the legal system that makes the handle in solving corruption cases, namely strengthening the legal structure, legal substance and legal culture of the community.

Abstract The purpose of this study is to examine the unregulated Organs of Commissioners in Individual Limited Liability Companies in the Job Creation Act, and to examine the organs authorized to take over the duties and responsibilities of the organs of Commissioners in Individual Limited Liability Companies according to the Job Creation Act. This research is classified as a normative juridical research that uses 3 types of approaches, including the statutory approach, legal interpretation and analysis of legal concepts. The results of the study indicate that the existence of a Commissioner in a Limited Liability Company is not regulated in the work copyright law to avoid a conflict of authority between the Commissioner and the Director who is also the sole shareholder. It is impossible for the supervisory process to be carried out by the Commissioner against the board of directors as well as the sole shareholder who has absolute power. Meanwhile, those who are then authorized to take over the duties and responsibilities of the organs of the Commissioner in an Individual Limited Liability Company are the shareholders, because there is only one personal figure in Individual Limited Liability Companies, namely the Sole Shareholders, who concurrently serves as Director. The organs of Commissioners in a private company must be regulated and still exist, although in the process of implementation its function is only as a complement, but the void of norms can be avoided. Further regulation is needed to create legal harmonization in order to ensure legal certainty. Abstrak Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji tidak diaturnya Organ Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan dalam Undang-undang Cipta Kerja, dan mengkaji organ yang berwenang untuk mengambil alih tugas dan tanggungjawab organ Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan menurut Undang-undang Cipta Kerja. Penelitian ini tergolong jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yang menggunakan 3 jenis pendekatan, antara lain pendekatan perundang-undangan, penafsiran hukum dan analisa konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak diaturnya keberadaan Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan di dalam undang-undang cipta kerja adalah untuk menghindari konflik kewenangan antara Komisaris terhadap Direktur yang sekaligus pemegang saham tunggal. Mustahil proses pengawasan dapat dilakukan oleh Komisaris terhadap direksi sekaligus pemegang saham tunggal yang memiliki kekuasaan mutlak Sedangkan yang kemudian berwenang untuk mengambil alih tugas dan tanggungjawab daripada organ Komisaris dalam Perseroan Terbatas Perseorangan adalah Pemegang saham, karena hanya ada satu sosok personal dalam PT Perseorangan yaitu Pemegang Saham Tunggal, yang dirangkapkan jabatannya sekaligus sebagai Direktur. Organ Komisaris dalam PT Perseorangan wajib diatur dan tetap ada, walaupun dalam proses pelaksanaannya fungsinya hanya sebagai pelengkap, tetapi kekosongan norma dapat dihindari. Perlu pengaturan lebih lanjut untuk menciptakan harmonisasi hukum demi menjamin kepastian hukum.

Diversion has become the starting point that legitimizes the settlement of criminal cases outside the judiciary in Indonesia. There are many benefits of diversion but it is very risky because it is not implemented optimally; therefore, the implementation and the constraints in the diversion application in Denpasar need to be studied and solutions to optimize the application to be sought. This research is empirical legal research. The results of the study show that the Departmental Police of Denpasar City, the Denpasar District Attorney, and the Denpasar District Court have attempted to implement diversion while remaining within the corridor of law, it shall only be implemented in respect of criminal acts of children who are punishable by imprisonment of under 7 years and not a recidivist. Obstacles encountered are the regulations regarding the ages of children based on the Law of SPPA, lack of coordination and supervision, law enforcers who have an inadequate understanding of the meaning and spirit of diversion, as well as lack of public awareness and understanding of the urgency of diversion. Optimization taken is reformulation of regulations, increased coordination, training, and socialization to law enforcers. Providing socialization and approaches to the community to increase understanding and awareness. Keywords: diversion, restorative justice, optimization . Abstrak Diversi telah menjadi awal yang meletigitimasi penyelesaian kasus pidana di luar peradilan di Indonesia. Banyak manfaat yang diberikan melalui diversi namun sangat riskan tidak dilaksanakan secara optimal, sehingga perlu dikaji terkait pelaksanaan dan kendala penerapan diversi di Denpasar serta solusi untuk mengoptimalkan penerapan diversi. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Polresta Denpasar, Kejaksaan Negeri Denpasar, dan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar telah mengupayakan diversi dengan tetap pada koridor hukum yakni hanya dapat dilakukan terhadap tindak pidana anak yang diancam dengan pidana penjara di bawah 7 tahun dan bukan residivis. Kendala yang dialami adalah pengaturan umur anak berdasarkan UU SPPA (substansi hukum), kurangnya koordinasi dan pengawasan (struktur hukum), dan masih bisa ditemukan penegak hukum yang tidak memahami makna dan spirit diversi, serta kurangnya kesadaran dan pemahaman masyarakat akan urgensi diversi (budaya hukum). Optimalisasi yang dapat dilakukan adalah dengan reformulasi aturan, meningkatkan koordinasi, pelatihan, serta sosialisasi ke penegak hukum. Mengadakan sosialisasi dan pendekatan ke masyarakat untuk meningkatan pemahaman dan kesadaran penyelesaikan kasus melalui diversi. Kata Kunci: diversi, keadilan restoratif, optimalisasi.

Abstract Thus this paper’s purpose is to find out and review the duties, authorities of notaries and PPAT and to know and study about the responsibilities of notaries and PPAT in relation to the land sale and purchase deed they have made. The research method uses normative juridical. The results of this research state that notaries and PPATs are public officials who have an important function in making authentic deeds related to legal issues regarding land rights and ownership rights to apartment units and the responsibility of notaries and PPAT is responsible for the sale and purchase deeds made which causes deliberate loss and liability for unintentional losses, both civil and administrative. Abstrak Adapun tujuan dari tulisan ini yakni untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji tentang tugas, wewenang notaris dan PPAT dan untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji tentang tanggung jawab notaris dan PPAT terkait dengan akta jual beli tanah yang dibuatnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil riset ini menyatakan bahwa notaris dan PPAT ialah pejabat umum yang memiliki fungsi penting dalam membuat akta otentik terkait tentang persoalan hukum terhadap Hak atas tanah dan Hak Milik atas satuan rumah susun dan tanggung jawab notaris serta PPAT adalah bertanggung jawab atas akta jual beli tanah yang dibuat yang menyebabkan terjadinya kerugian yang disengaja dan tanggung jawab terjadinya kerugian yang tidak disengaja baik secara perdata dan administratif.

This research is motivated by the existence of conflict norms in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a UUJN with Article 16 paragraph (1) letter e UUJN. The notary is obliged to behave honestly in checking certificates at the land office, and to be careful in carrying out the sale and purchase agreement process, so as not to cause losses and problems in the future. At this writing, there are two problem formulations: what is the basis for the Notary for canceling the sale and purchase agreement of land rights and what is the legal protection for the criminalization of the Notary by the seller due to the cancellation of the sale and purchase agreement for land rights. The research objective is to find out the basis for the notary to cancel the sale and purchase agreement of land rights and to protect the notary from criminalization by the seller from the cancellation of the sale and purchase agreement of land rights. The legal research method uses normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the basis for the notary to cancel the sale and purchase agreement process is to act honestly, thoroughly, independently, and to protect the interests of the parties involved in legal actions and legal protection for criminalization of notaries by the seller because the cancellation of the sale and purchase agreement is a notary. can exercise his denial.

Tujuan Studi ini untuk menganalisis mengenai pertanggungjawaban pidana serta pemidanaan yang ideal bagi orang dengan gangguan seksual saat melakukan tindak pidana. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dengan jenis pendekatan yakni pendekatan kasus, perundang-undangan, analisis konsep hukum, serta juga perbandingan hukum. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa orang dengan gangguan seksual ketika melakukan tindak pidana sesungguhnya tidak mampu untuk dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana. Hal tersebut didasarkan pada alasan bahwa jiwa atau diri orang tersebut sedang mengalami sakit atau cacat jiwanya. Pasal 44 ayat (1) KUHP sendiri menjelaskan bahwa seseorang tidak mungkin untuk dimintai pertanggungjawaban atau dipidana bila ternyata jiwanya sakit atau terganggu. Lebih lanjut seharusnya bagi mereka yang sedang mengalami sakit akan jiwanya terganggu saat melakukan tindak pidana, sejatinya tidak cocok untuk diberikan pidana penjara melainkan sanksi tindakan seperti rehabilitasi, perawatan, atau bahkan pengobatan. Sebagai bahan perbandingan di Jerman orang yang jiwanya terganggu atau tidak mampu untuk bertanggungjawab maka orang tersebut layak untuk dibawa ke rumah sakit bukan ke penjara. The purpose of this study was to analyze criminal responsibility and ideal punishment for people with sexual disorders when committing a crime. The writing is done using empirical legal research methods, with the type of approach namely the case approach, the statute approach, analytical and conseptual approach, and also comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that people with sexual disorders when committing a crime are actually not able to be held responsible for the crime. This is based on the reason that the person's soul or self is experiencing mental illness or disability. Article 44 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code itself explains that it is impossible for a person to be held accountable or sentenced if his soul is sick or disturbed. Furthermore, it should be that those who are experiencing mental illness have been disturbed when they commit a criminal act, in fact it is not suitable for imprisonment but for sanctions such as rehabilitation, treatment, or even medication. As a comparison, in Germany, a person whose soul is disturbed or unable to be responsible, then that person deserves to be taken to the hospital not to prison.

The Act Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary (hereinafter abbreviated as UUJNP) Article 16 paragraph (1) letters (a) and (f) determine that the notary in carrying out his obligations, must act trustfully, honestly, safeguard the interests of parties involved in legal actions, and keep the contents confidential deed as well as information obtained for making the deed, unless the law stipulates otherwise, while Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights number 9 of 2017 (hereinafter abbreviated Permenkumham) Article 24 paragraph (2) specifies, that the notary is obliged to report to PPATK regarding the existence of a transaction finance conducted by service users. It appears that between these rules there is a norm conflict between UUJNP and Permenkum. The results of this study prove the fact that the notary is required to apply the principle of service users, consider there are nonconformities, or consider the facts of money laundering. The notary is also required to report users of the service to PPATK if requesting the transaction is suspected. Article 16 paragraph (1) Subparagraph f of the UUJNP, because the actions taken have been regulated in Article 28 of the Law of the UUTTPU. Second, legal permission for a Notary regarding the notary summons for a case in court, then there must be prior approval of the Notary Honorary Council (MKN) in advance and the notary public can also use the right to deny if there is a support for the material or the contents of the deed. Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 30 tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris (selanjutnya disingkat UUJNP) Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf (a) dan (f) menentukan bahwa notaris dalam menjalankan kewajibannya, wajib bertindak amanah, jujur, menjaga kepentingan pihak yang terkait dalam perbuatan hukum, dan merahasiakan isi akta serta keterangan yang diperoleh untuk pembuatan akta, kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain, sedangkan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia nomor 9 tahun 2017 (selanjutnya disingkat Permenkumham) Pasal 24 ayat (2) menentukan, bahwa notaris wajib melaporkan kepada PPATK mengenai adanya transaksi keuangan yang dilakukan oleh pengguna jasa. Tampak antara aturan-aturan tersebut terjadi konflik norma antara UUJNP dan Permenkum. Inti pemasalahannya yaitu mengenai wewenang notaris dalam mengidentifikasi pengguna jasa yang diatur dalam Permenkumham dan upaya perlindungan notaris secara hukum apabila terjadi kejahatan pencucian uang oleh pengguna jasanya. Metode penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa notaris wajib menerapkan prinsip mengenali pengguna jasa, apabila ada ketidaksesuaian atau diduga adanya tindak pidana pencucian uang. Notaris juga wajib melaporkan pengguna jasa tersebut kepada PPATK jika diduga transaksi tersebut mencurigakan. Tindakan yang dilakukan notaris ini tidaklah melanggar ketentuan Pasal 16 ayat (1) hurup f UUJNP, karena tindakan yang dilakukan tersebut telah diatur pada Pasal 28 UUTTPU. Kedua, perlindungan hukum kepada Notaris terkait pemanggilan notaris dalam perkara di pengadilan, maka harus ada persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN) terlebih dahulu dan juga notaris dapat menggunakan hak ingkar jika ada hubungannya dengan materi atau isi akta.

Law Number 2 of 2014 on Notary Function (UUJN) governs on Civil and Administrative sanctions to Notary violating obligations and prohibition as set forth in Article 16 and 17 of UUJN, however criminal sanction is not governed in the UUJN, therefore the application of criminal sanction itself has not been able to be imposed to a Notary violating the obligations and prohibitions of UUJN. And there is no arrangement to the mechanism of civil sanction imposition related to the cancellation of deed in the event of the authentic deed in the UUJN. Based on the background, the problems arising, namely, first How is the setting of legal sanctions against Notary violating Obligations and Prohibition of UUJN and second, what is the mechanism of handing down sanction (pursuant to the procedural law) to the Notary violating obligations and prohibitions UUJN how is the settlement mechanism of legal sanctions against Notary violating UUJN-P? This study is qualified as a normative legal research. The source of legal materials for this study was obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of this thesis are civil sanction is governed in Article 16 paragraph (9 and 12), Article 41, Article 44 paragraph (5), Article 48 paragraph (3), Article 49 paragraph (4), Article 50 paragraph (5) and Article 51 paragraph (4) of UUJN. The administrative sanction is governed in Article 7 paragraph (2), Article 16 paragraph (11 and 13), Article 17 paragraph (2), Article 19 paragraph (4), Article 32 paragraph (4) Article 37 paragraph (2), Article 54 paragraph (2) and Article 65A of UUJN. Criminal sanctions are not governed, but a notary may be charged with criminal sanction pursuant to the provisions of Penal Code, providing that the act of the notary has complied with the formulation of breaches set forth in the UUJN, ethic codes and Penal Code. Second, the mechanism of application of civil sanction related to the cancellation of authentic deed into under hand deed should go through civil lawsuit process at general court lodged by the parties whose names are stipulated in the deed and suffer from damages as the effect of such deed. The mechanism of application of administrative sanctions to a notary should be directly imposed by the Supervisory Board, where the sanctions are gradually applied. The mechanism of application of criminal sanction to a notary if proved to commit the criminal act, the Notary shall be penalized and generally Penal Code can be applied to the Notary pursuant to the principle of lex spcialist derogate legi generali interpreted in a contrario manner.