Search

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by skin pigmentary lesions and multiple cutaneous neurofibromas, is caused by neurofibromin 1 (NF1) loss of function variants. Currently, a molecular diagnosis is frequently established using a multistep protocol based on cDNA and gDNA sequence analysis and/or Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) assay on genomic DNA, providing an overall detection rate of about 95-97%. The small proportion of clinically diagnosed patients, which at present do not obtain a molecular confirmation likely are mosaic, as their pathogenic variant may remain undetected due to low sensitivity of low coverage NGS approaches, or they may carry a type of pathogenic variant refractory to currently used technologies. Here, we report two unrelated patients presenting with two different inversions that disrupt the NF1 coding sequence, resulting in an NF1 phenotype. In one subject, the inversion was associated with microdeletions spanning a few NF1 exons at both breakpoints, while in the other the rearrangement did not cause exon loss, thus testing negative by MLPA assay. Considering the high proportion of repeated regions within the NF1 sequence, we propose that intragenic structural rearrangements should be considered as possible pathogenic mechanisms in patients fulfilling the NIH diagnostic criteria of NF1 but lacking of molecular confirmation and in patients with NF1 intragenic microdeletions.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in NF1. Recently, NF1 testing has been included as a clinical criterion for NF1 diagnosis. Additionally, preconception genetic counselling in patients with NF1 focuses on a 50% risk of transmitting the familial variant as the risk of having a sporadic NF1 is considered the same as the general population.Methods829 individuals, 583 NF1 sporadic cases and 246 patients with NF1 with documented family history, underwent genetic testing for NF1. Genotyping and segregation analysis of NF1 familial variants was determined by microsatellite analysis and NF1 sequencing.ResultsThe mutational analysis of NF1 in 154 families with two or more affected cases studied showed the co-occurrence of two different NF1 germline pathogenic variants in four families. The estimated mutation rate in those families was 3.89×10–3, 20 times higher than the NF1 mutation rate (~2×10−4) (p=0.0008). Furthermore, the co-occurrence of two different NF1 germline pathogenic variants in these families was 1:39, 60 times the frequency of sporadic NF1 (1:2500) (p=0.003). In all cases, the de novo NF1 pathogenic variant was present in a descendant of an affected male. In two cases, variants were detected in the inherited paternal wild-type allele.ConclusionsOur results, together with previous cases reported, suggest that the offspring of male patients with NF1 could have an increased risk of experiencing de novo NF1 pathogenic variants. This observation, if confirmed in additional cohorts, could have relevant implications for NF1 genetic counselling, family planning and NF1 genetic testing.

Non-pathogenic mismatch repair (MMR) gene variants can be associated with decreased MMR capacity in several settings. Due to an increased mutation rate, reduced MMR capacity leads to accumulation of somatic sequence changes in tumour suppressor genes such as in the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene. Patients with autosomal dominant NF1 typically develop neurofibromas ranging from single to thousands. Concerning the number of neurofibromas NF1 patients face a situation that is still not predictable. A few studies suggested that germline non-pathogenic MMR gene variants modify the number of neurofibromas in NF1 and by this mechanism may promote the extent of neurofibroma manifestation. This review represents first evidence that specific non-pathogenic single nucleotide variants of MMR genes act as a modifier of neurofibroma manifestation in NF1, highlighting MSH2 re4987188 as the best analysed non-pathogenic variant so far. In summary, besides MSH2 promotor methylation, specific non-pathogenic germline MSH2 variants are associated with the extent of neurofibroma manifestation. Those variants can serve as a biomarker to facilitate better mentoring of NF1 patients at risk.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is the most frequent disorder associated with multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM) which may either be present at birth or appear during the first year of life. Other NF1-associated features such as skin-fold freckling and Lisch nodules occur later during childhood whereas dermal neurofibromas are rare in young children and usually only arise during early adulthood. The NIH clinical diagnostic criteria for NF1, established in 1988, include the most common NF1-associated features. Since many of these features are age-dependent, arriving at a definitive diagnosis of NF1 by employing these criteria may not be possible in infancy if CALM are the only clinical feature evident. Indeed, approximately 46% of patients who are diagnosed with NF1 later in life do not meet the NIH diagnostic criteria by the age of 1 year. Further, the 1988 diagnostic criteria for NF1 are not specific enough to distinguish NF1 from other related disorders such as Legius syndrome. In this review, we outline the challenges faced in diagnosing NF1 in young children, and evaluate the utility of the recently revised (2021) diagnostic criteria for NF1, which include the presence of pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene and choroidal anomalies, for achieving an early and accurate diagnosis.

We have created a panel of 29 NF1 variant complementary DNAs (cDNAs) representing missense variants, many with clinically relevant phenotypes, in-frame deletions, splice variants, and nonsense variants. We have determined the functional consequences of the variants, assessing their ability to produce mature neurofibromin and restore Ras signaling activity in NF1 null (-/-) cells. cDNAs demonstrate variant-specific differences in neurofibromin protein levels, suggesting that some variants lead to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene or protein instability or enhanced degradation. When expressed at high levels, some variant proteins are still able to repress Ras activity, indicating that the NF1 phenotype may be due to low protein abundance. In contrast, other variant proteins are incapable of repressing Ras activity, indicating that some do not functionally engage Ras and stimulate GTPase activity. We observed that effects on protein abundance and Ras activity can be mutually exclusive. These assays allow us to categorize variants by functional effects, may help to classify variants of unknown significance, and may have future implications for more directed therapeutics.

To explore the genetic basis for a child with café-au-lait macules and juvenile xanthogranuloma.Clinical data and peripheral blood samples of the patient and her family members were collected and subjected to targeted capture and high-throughput sequencing. Candidate variant was verified by Sanger sequencing.A deletional variant in exon 23 of the NF1 gene was detected in the proband. Sanger sequencing has verified it as a de novo variant, which was highly correlated with the clinical manifestations of the patient and her mother. The diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) was established. The variant was unreported previously.Targeted capture and next-generation sequencing combined with Sanger sequencing can facilitate early diagnosis of NF1 and provide a basis for the clinical treatment, genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis.

ObjectiveBecause clinically validated biomarkers for neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) and neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) have not been identified, we aimed to determine whether genotype-phenotype correlations are useful in clinical trials in NF1 and NF2.MethodsThe Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) Biomarker Group first performed a systematic literature search and reviewed existing data on genetic biomarkers in NF1 and NF2 and in in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. The group then met during a series of consensus meetings to develop a joint report.ResultsWe found that in NF2, the genetic severity score is clearly of potential clinical use. In NF1, despite over 3,000 constitutional variants having been described in the NF1 gene, only 4 actionable genotype-phenotype correlations exist. The diagnosis and treatment decision of these tumors should ideally include histopathology and compilation of some of the genetic markers.ConclusionWe summarized emerging clinical use of genotype-phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is an autosomal-dominant neurogenetic disorder caused by mutations in the gene neurofibromin 1 (NF1). NF1 predisposes individuals to a variety of symptoms, including peripheral nerve tumors, brain tumors and cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive deficits can negatively impact patient quality of life, especially the social and academic development of children. The neurofibromin protein influences neural circuits via diverse cellular signaling pathways, including through RAS, cAMP and dopamine signaling. Although animal models have been useful in identifying cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate NF1-dependent behaviors, translating these discoveries into effective treatments has proven difficult. Clinical trials measuring cognitive outcomes in patients with NF1 have mainly targeted RAS signaling but, unfortunately, resulted in limited success. In this Review, we provide an overview of the structure and function of neurofibromin, and evaluate several cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying neurofibromin-dependent cognitive function, which have recently been delineated in animal models. A better understanding of neurofibromin roles in the development and function of the nervous system will be crucial for identifying new therapeutic targets for the various cognitive domains affected by NF1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal dominant genetic disorder. NF1 is a multisystemic disease and its pathogenesis involves mutations in the NF1 gene on chromosome 17q11.2 causing RAS overactivation to stimulate abnormal cell proliferation. In this article, a Chinese family with neurofibromatosis type 1 was reported and the relationship between the phenotype and gene mutation was analyzed.The patient was a 9-year-old-male child diagnosed with right eye exophthalmos combined with right eye glioma, optic edema, and peripheral visual field defect. There were multiple cafe-au-lait spots in the whole body of the child. His mother had multiple cafe-au-lait spots, and the eye examination showed no abnormalities.The proband was diagnosed with NF1 and a heterozygous frameshift mutation (c. 6641delG p. Arg2214Asnfs*30) in the NF1 gene was identified, and his mother also carried the same pathogenic mutation.To protect the vision of the right eye, he was treated with gamma knife radiotherapy.After therapy, his fundus optic disc edema was decreased and the best corrected visual acuity of the right eye was increased.Gene detection is helpful to diagnose the disease and guide the treatment. Gamma knife radiotherapy can preserve better neurological function.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) belongs to RASopathies, a group of syndromes caused by germline mutations in Ras/MAPK pathway genes. Most NF1 patients exhibit single inactivating pathogenic variants within the NF1 gene. We performed extensive genetic analyses in two NF1 families disclosing the first two cases of double de novo monoallelic NF1 variants. Both index patients described in this study had classical NF1. Probands were born from fathers in their late 30s and presented closely spaced double mutations (100 bp) in NF1 regions showing an excess of somatic mutations. Closely spaced multiple mutations have been reported in RAS/MAPK signaling genes but never in NF1. Mutagenesis is a quasi-random process in humans, therefore two causative variants in the same gene, moreover in the same allele are exceptional. Here, we discuss possible mechanisms for this ultrarare event. Our findings confirm the possibility of a higher risk of concurrent de novo variants in NF1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), one of the most common autosomal dominant genetic disorders, is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. NF1 patients have a wide variety of manifestations with a subset at high risk for the development of tumors in the central nervous system (CNS). Nonsense mutations that result in the synthesis of truncated NF1 protein (neurofibromin) are strongly associated with CNS tumors. Therapeutic nonsense suppression with small molecule drugs is a potentially powerful approach to restore the expression of genes harboring nonsense mutations. Ataluren is one such drug that has been shown to restore full-length functional protein in several models of nonsense mutation diseases, as well as in patients with nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy. To test ataluren's potential applicability to NF1 nonsense mutations associated with CNS tumors, we generated a homozygous Nf1

Neurofibromatosis type 1(NF1) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease in which a mutation in the NF1 gene on chromosome 17q11.2 results in inactivation or down-regulation of neurofibromin. This results in a series of neurocutaneous lesions characterized by neurofibromatosis. Patients with plexiform neurofibromas(PN), as one of the main manifestations of NF1, often experience pain, dysfunction, skeletal deformities, changes in appearance and other symptoms. In severe cases, compression of the airways and vital organs occurs, and the PN is at risk of malignancy progression. At present, its treatment is still challenging. Surgery is the primary treatment for PN, but complete resection is often difficult. In recent years, chemotherapy for PN has become a hot topic. This article reviews the research progress in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of PN in recent years.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common genetic tumor predisposition syndrome, caused by mutations in the

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a heritable cancer predisposition syndrome resulting from mutations in the NF1 tumor suppressor gene. Genotype-phenotype correlations for NF1 are rare due to the large number of NF1 mutations and role of modifier genes in manifestations of NF1; however, emerging reports suggest that persons with NF1 display a distinct anthropometric and metabolic phenotype featuring short stature, low body mass index (BMI), increased insulin sensitivity, and protection from diabetes. Nf1 heterozygous (Nf1+/−) mice accurately reflect the dominant inheritance of NF1 and are regularly employed as a model of NF1. Here, we sought to identify whether Nf1+/− mice recapitulate the anthropometric and metabolic features identified in persons with NF1. Littermate 16–20 week-old male wildtype (WT) and Nf1+/− C57B/6J mice underwent nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), indirect calorimetry, and glucose/insulin/pyruvate tolerance testing. In some experiments, tissues were harvested for NMR and histologic characterization. Nf1+/− mice are leaner with significantly reduced visceral and subcutaneous fat mass, which corresponds with an increased density of small adipocytes and reduced leptin levels. Additionally, Nf1+/− mice are highly reliant on carbohydrates as an energy substrate and display increased glucose clearance and insulin sensitivity, but normal response to pyruvate suggesting enhanced glucose utilization and preserved gluconeogenesis. Finally, WT and Nf1+/− mice subjected to high glucose diet were protected from diet-induced obesity and hyperglycemia. Our data suggest that Nf1+/− mice closely recapitulate the anthropometric and metabolic phenotype identified in persons with NF1, which will impact the interpretation of previous and future translational studies of NF1.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical manifestations and brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) analysis in 60 genetically confirmed NF1 patients. The results of next-generation sequencing (NGS), Sanger sequencing, and MLPA of NF1 gene were evaluated. A total of 54 different variants were identified. Fourteen out of them were novel variants (25.9%). Patients who complied with NIH criteria had most frequently frameshift variants (11/32 patients), and those with only CALMs had missense variants (9/28 patients). Neurofibromatosis type 1 bright objects (NBOs) on T2-weighted MRI were detected in 42 patients (42/56; 75%). These brain lesions were detected mostly in basal ganglia and in cerebellar vermis. NBOs were detected more in the patients who complied with NIH criteria (80.6%) compared to those who were only CALMs (68%). While frameshift variants (33.3%) were the most common type variants in the patients who had NBOs, the most common variants were splicing (35.7%) and missense (35.7%) variants in the patients whose MRIs were normal. Frameshift variants (11/28 patients; 39.3%) were the most common in the patients with more than one brain locus involvement. Therefore, we consider that frameshift variants may be associated with increased incidence of NBOs and involvement of more than one brain locus. In addition, NBOs may occur less frequently in the patients with splicing variants. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluated the relationship between NF1 gene variants and NBOs. Future studies may help us understand the etiology of NBOs.

In the autosomal dominant hereditary disease neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), lesions of the jaw develop in isolated cases, which are diagnosed as central giant cell granuloma (CGCG). This study aimed to clarify the genetic basis of a bone lesion in a syndromic patient.The NF1 patient had developed a CGCG that recurred after local excision. Blood and tumor tissue were studied for NF1 mutations using advanced molecular genetic methods. Examinations of blood and tumor tissue provided evidence of the constitutive mutation in both samples. A further mutation was detected in the tumor, which was interpreted as a somatic mutation. The detection of somatic mutation in the tissue was successful both on native and routinely fixed material.The study supports current assessments of CGCG as a benign neoplasm. In NF1 patients, the phenotype seems to imply bi-allelic loss of the NF1 gene. The detection of both mutations in routinely fixed tissue allows studies of archived tissue samples with this diagnosis.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) are the deadliest cancer that arises in individuals diagnosed with neurofibromatosis and account for nearly 5% of the 15,000 soft tissue sarcomas diagnosed in the United States each year. Comprised of neoplastic Schwann cells, primary risk factors for developing MPNST include existing plexiform neurofibromas (PN), prior radiotherapy treatment, and expansive germline mutations involving the entire NF1 gene and surrounding genes. PN develop in nearly 30–50% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and most often grow rapidly in the first decade of life. One of the most important aspects of clinical care for NF1 patients is monitoring PN for signs of malignant transformation to MPNST that occurs in 10–15% of patients. We perform aneuploidy analysis on ctDNA from 883 ostensibly healthy individuals and 28 patients with neurofibromas, including 7 patients with benign neurofibroma, 9 patients with PN and 12 patients with MPNST. Overall sensitivity for detecting MPNST using genome wide aneuploidy scoring was 33%, and analysis of sub-chromosomal copy number alterations (CNAs) improved sensitivity to 50% while retaining a high specificity of 97%. In addition, we performed mutation analysis on plasma cfDNA for a subset of patients and identified mutations in NF1, NF2, RB1, TP53BP2, and GOLGA2. Given the high throughput and relatively low sequencing coverage required by our assay, liquid biopsy represents a promising technology to identify incipient MPNST.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 is a rare neurogenetic syndrome, characterized by pigmentary abnormalities, learning and social deficits, and a predisposition for benign and malignant tumor formation caused by germline mutations in the NF1 gene. With the cloning of the NF1 gene and the recognition that the encoded protein, neurofibromin, largely functions as a negative regulator of RAS activity, attention has mainly focused on RAS and canonical RAS effector pathway signaling relevant to disease pathogenesis and treatment. However, as neurofibromin is a large cytoplasmic protein the RAS regulatory domain of which occupies only 10% of its entire coding sequence, both canonical and non-canonical RAS pathway modulation, as well as the existence of potential non-RAS functions, are becoming apparent. In this Special article, we discuss our current understanding of neurofibromin function.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common genetic tumor predisposition syndrome, caused by mutations in the NF1. To date, few genotype-phenotype correlations have been discerned in NF1, due to a highly variable clinical presentation. We aimed to study the molecular spectrum of NF1 and genotype-phenotype correlations in a monocentric study cohort of 85 NF1 patients (20 relatives, 65 sporadic cases). Clinical data were collected at the time of the mutation analysis and reviewed for accuracy in this investigation. An internal phenotypic categorization was applied. The 94% of the patients enrolled showed a severe phenotype with at least one systemic complication and a wide range of associated malignancies. Spine deformities were the most common complications in this cohort. We also reported 66 different NF1 mutations, of which 7 are novel mutations. Correlation analysis identified a slight significant inverse correlation between age at diagnosis and delayed acquisition of psychomotor skills with residual multi-domain cognitive impairment. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval showed a higher prevalence of learning disabilities in patients carrying frameshift mutations. Overall, our results aim to offer an interesting contribution to studies on the genotype–phenotype of NF1 and in genetic management and counselling.

Mutations in the NF1 gene cause the familial genetic disease neurofibromatosis type I, as well as predisposition to cancer. The NF1 gene product, neurofibromin, is a GTPase-activating protein and acts as a tumor suppressor by negatively regulating the small GTPase, Ras. However, structural insights into neurofibromin activation remain incompletely defined. Here, we provide cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures that reveal an extended neurofibromin homodimer in two functional states: an auto-inhibited state with occluded Ras-binding site and an asymmetric open state with an exposed Ras-binding site. Mechanistically, the transition to the active conformation is stimulated by nucleotide binding, which releases a lock that tethers the catalytic domain to an extended helical repeat scaffold in the occluded state. Structure-guided mutational analysis supports functional relevance of allosteric control. Disease-causing mutations are mapped and primarily impact neurofibromin stability. Our findings suggest a role for nucleotides in neurofibromin regulation and may lead to therapeutic modulation of Ras signaling.

Bone fracture is one of the most common injuries. Despite the high regenerative capacity of bones, failure of healing still occurs to near 10% of the patients. Herein, we aim to investigate the modulatory role of neurofibromatosis type I gene (NF1) to osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and new bone formation after fracture in a rat model. We studied the NF1 gene expression in normal and non‐union bone fracture models. Then, we evaluated how NF1 overexpression modulated osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs, autophagy activity, mTORC1 signalling and osteoclastic bone resorption by qRT‐PCR, Western blot and immunostaining assays. Finally, we injected lentivirus‐NF1 (Lv‐NF1) to rat non‐union bone fracture model and analysed the bone formation process. The NF1 gene expression was significantly down‐regulated in non‐union bone fracture group, indicating NF1 is critical in bone healing process. In the NF1 overexpressing BMSCs, autophagy activity and osteogenic differentiation were significantly enhanced. Meanwhile, the NF1 overexpression inhibited mTORC1 signalling and osteoclastic bone resorption. In rat non‐union bone fracture model, the NF1 overexpression significantly promoted bone formation during fracture healing. In summary, we proved the NF1 gene is critical in non‐union bone healing, and NF1 overexpression promoted new bone formation after fracture by enhancing autophagy and inhibiting mTORC1 signalling. Our results may provide a novel therapeutic clue of promoting bone fracture healing.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a frequent autosomal dominant disorder characterised by cafe-au-lait maculae (CALM), skinfold freckling, iris Lisch nodules and benign peripheral nerve sheath tumours (neurofibromas). The NF1 gene is a tumour suppressor gene and NF1 individuals have an increased risk for a long list of tumours, all resulting from a second hit in the normal copy of the NF1 gene. Remarkably, some non-tumour phenotypes such as CALM and pseudarthrosis are also caused by a “second hit”. Germline mutations inactivating the NF1 gene show a large variability in genetic mechanisms ranging from single-nucleotide substitutions and somatic mosaicism to large deletions affecting neighbouring genes. Molecular confirmation of the clinical diagnosis is becoming increasingly more important to differentiate NF1 from other syndromes such as Legius syndrome, to investigate genotype-phenotype correlations relevant in 10% of cases and to detect somatic mosaicism. Some degree of learning difficulties, attention deficit and social problems are observed in most children and affect quality of life. There is a large individual variability in complications and the evolution of the disease is difficult to predict. Specialised outpatient clinics for children have been widely established and are important for surveillance and guidance. Regular surveillance is also important for adolescents and adults because many tumour complications can be detected by whole-body MRI and treated even before symptoms develop and irreversible damage occurs. Recent data on nodular plexiform neurofibromas with continued growth in adolescents and young adults show that many of these tumours are premalignant lesions called atypical neurofibromatous neoplasm of uncertain biological potential (ANNUBP). Specific surveillance and timely local resection of these benign peripheral nerve sheath tumours might be important to prevent malignant degeneration. In the last years, targeted therapy with MEK inhibitors has shown promise to treat unresectable and symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas. Many more challenges remain to find the best way to monitor children and adults for potential complications and to find a satisfying cure for many complications in this disorder.

BackgroundThe hereditary predisposition to diabetes is only partially explained by genes identified so far. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a rare monogenic dominant syndrome caused by aberrations of the NF1 gene. Here, we used a cohort of 1410 patients with NF1 to study the association of the NF1 gene with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsA total of 1410 patients were confirmed to fulfil the National Institutes of Health diagnostic criteria for NF1 by individually reviewing their medical records. The patients with NF1 were compared with 14 017 controls matched for age, sex and area of residence as well as 1881 non-NF1 siblings of the patients with NF1. Register-based information on purchases of antidiabetic medication and hospital encounters related to diabetes were retrieved. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the relative risk for diabetes in NF1.ResultsPatients with NF1 showed a lower rate of T2D when compared with a 10-fold control cohort (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.43) or with their siblings without NF1 (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.47). The estimates remained practically unchanged after adjusting the analyses for history of obesity and dyslipidaemias. The rate of T1D in NF1 was decreased although statistically non-significantly (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.25).ConclusionHaploinsufficiency of the NF1 gene may protect against T2D and probably T1D. Since NF1 negatively regulates the Ras signalling pathway, the results suggest that the Ras pathway may be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes.

Recent studies have demonstrated circular RNAs (circRNAs) to be widely expressed and to have important physiological functions. However, the expression, regulation, and function of circRNAs in neuroglial cells are unknown. Herein, we characterized the expression, regulation, and function of circRNAs in astrocytes. Astrocyte circRNAs were identified by computational analysis of newborn SD rat primary astrocytes cultured with 20 g/L D-galactose. In this manner, 7376 circRNAs were identified, among which most circRNAs (5754) were derived from annot_exons, whereas 27 were antisense, 853 were exon/intron, 329 were intergenic, 41 were intronic, and 372 were one exon. Among these, circNF1-419 was demonstrated to regulate autophagy, in over-expressing circNF1-419 transfected astrocytes, through the PI3K-I/Akt-AMPK-mTOR and PI3K-I/Akt-mTOR signaling pathways. An adenovirus associated virus packaging system (virus titer 1 ×1012), over-expressing circNF1-419 and injected into mouse cerebral cortex, showed autophagy enhancing activity by binding the proteins Dynamin-1 and Adaptor protein 2 B1 (AP2B1). This binding regulated aging markers (p21, p35/25, and p16) and inflammatory factors (TNF-α and NF-κB), and reduced the expression of Alzheimer’s disease marker proteins (Tau, p-Tau, Aβ1-42, and APOE), which delayed senile dementia. Transcriptome analysis of the brain showed that circNF1-419 improved other signaling pathways, especially those related to the synapses of SAMP8 mice. These findings provide novel insights into circNF1-419 and its potential usefulness for the diagnosis and treatment of dementia by regulating Dynamin-1 and AP2B1 mediated autophagy.

Segmental neurofibromatosis (SNF) is a rare subtype of neurofibromatosis (NF). The disease is characterized by features circumscribed to one or more body cutaneous and/or subcutaneous segments. This is a classic example of somatic mosaicism which occurs by postzygotic mut ation of the NF1 gene late in the course of embryonic development affecting localized neural crest lines in the fetus. Spinal neurofibromatosis, on the other hand, is characterized by histologically proven bilateral neurofibromas of the spinal roots.Hereby we describe a novel manifestation of spinal SNF.Our case report demonstrated one patient who had segmental spinal expression of the disease classified as true mosaic/segmental NF1 along with its management plan treated at one of the largest NF1 centers to exist.This will aid in understanding the rare clinical presentation and treatment options for this novel phenotype.

BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the most common cancer type worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer being the most frequently studied. Identifying of cancer-related genes in non-small cell lung cancer is crucial for developing individualized treatment, particularly as mutation profiles can vary by country and ethnicity. AIMS To identify comprehensive mutation profiles in a cohort of Turkish patients with non-small cell lung cancer using the next-generation sequencing. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS In total, 72 cancer-related genes and 4149 variants were recorded in the non-small cell lung cancer panel, and their relationship with clinical and histopathological features was investigated through next-generation sequencing. RESULTS Among 507 patients, 420 (82.8%) were males and 87 (17.2%) were females. Percentages of phosp hatid ylino sitol -4,5- bisph ospha te 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (11%), B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (8%), and neurofibromatosis type 1 (6%) mutations were higher than those reported in the literature. Males had a higher rate of Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog mutations (P = .102), whereas epidermal growth factor receptor mutations were statistically more common in females (P = .001). Multiple variants of strong significance were identified in 6.3% patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, most of whom were smokers. Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog and phosp hatid ylino sitol -4,5- bisph ospha te 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha mutations were most commonly observed. CONCLUSION This study shows that Turkish patients have higher rates of PIK3CA, BRAF and NF1 mutations compared to the literature. Studies to determine the molecular profile specific to Turkish people will guide clinicians in treatment and contribute significantly to determining priorities in diagnosis.