Search

Supplemental Figure 1. Characterization of the resistant cell lines. Supplemental Figure 2. Quantification of the cell invasion from figure 1D. Supplemental Figure 3. Model showing ligand dependent and independent ephrin signaling. Supplemental Figure 4. Acute drug treatment does not induce ligand independent ephrin signaling. Supplemental Figure 5. Quantification of matrigel invasion data from Figure 2E. Supplemental Figure 6. knockdown of EphA2 does not resensitize to BRAF inhibition. Supplemental Figure 7. PI3K and AKT inhibitors block AKT signaling. Supplemental Figure 8. Removal of drug increases cell doubling time. Supplemental Figure 9. Removal of drug reverses the resistance phenotype. Supplemental Figure 10. Removal of drug reverses EphA2 signaling and melanoma invasion. Supplemental Figure 11. Time course of EphA2 induction following chronic BRAF inhibition Supplemental Table 1. Levels of EphA2 staining in primary and metastatic melanoma lesions Supplemental Table 2. Increased EphA2 staining observed in melanoma patient specimens on BRAF inhibitor trial Supplemental Table 3. Incidence of new metastases in patients treated with either vemurafenib or dacarbazine.

Supplementary Data from First-in-Human Phase I/II ICONIC Trial of the ICOS Agonist Vopratelimab Alone and with Nivolumab: ICOS-High CD4 T-Cell Populations and Predictors of Response

Purpose:The first-in-human phase I/II ICONIC trial evaluated an investigational inducible costimulator (ICOS) agonist, vopratelimab, alone and in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and Methods:In phase I, patients were treated with escalating doses of intravenous vopratelimab alone or with nivolumab. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, MTD, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Phase II enriched for ICOS-positive (ICOS+) tumors; patients were treated with vopratelimab at the monotherapy RP2D alone or with nivolumab. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and predictive biomarkers of response to vopratelimab were assessed.Results:ICONIC enrolled 201 patients. Vopratelimab alone and with nivolumab was well tolerated; phase I established 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks as the vopratelimab RP2D. Vopratelimab resulted in modest objective response rates of 1.4% and with nivolumab of 2.3%. The prospective selection for ICOS+ tumors did not enrich for responses. A vopratelimab-specific peripheral blood pharmacodynamic biomarker, ICOS-high (ICOS-hi) CD4 T cells, was identified in a subset of patients who demonstrated greater clinical benefit versus those with no emergence of these cells [overall survival (OS), P = 0.0025]. A potential genomic predictive biomarker of ICOS-hi CD4 T-cell emergence was identified that demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes, including OS (P = 0.0062).Conclusions:Vopratelimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile alone and in combination with nivolumab. Efficacy was observed only in a subset of patients with a vopratelimab-specific pharmacodynamic biomarker. A potential predictive biomarker of response was identified, which is being prospectively evaluated in a randomized phase II non–small cell lung cancer trial.See related commentary by Lee and Fong, p. 3633

Purpose: Standard-dose pembrolizumab plus alternative-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses) were tolerable and had robust antitumor activity in advanced melanoma in cohort B of the phase 1 KEYNOTE-029 study. Cohort C evaluated standard-dose pembrolizumab with two other alternative ipilimumab regimens. Patients and Methods: Patients with treatment-naive unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤24 months plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W for 4 doses (PEM200+IPI50), or the same pembrolizumab regimen plus ipilimumab 100 mg Q12W for 4 doses (PEM200+IPI100). Primary end points were incidence of grade 3–5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. Per protocol-defined thresholds, grade 3–5 TRAE incidence ≤26% indicated meaningful toxicity reduction and ORR ≥48% indicated no decrease in efficacy versus data reported for other PD-1 inhibitor/ipilimumab combinations. Results: Median follow-up on February 18, 2019, was 16.3 months in PEM200+IPI50 (N = 51) and 16.4 months in PEM200+IPI100 (N = 51). Grade 3–5 TRAEs occurred in 12 (24%) patients in PEM200+IPI50 and 20 (39%) in PEM200+IPI100. One patient in PEM200+IPI50 died from treatment-related autoimmune myocarditis. Immune-mediated AEs or infusion reactions occurred in 21 (42%) patients in PEM200+IPI50 and 28 (55%) in PEM200+IPI100. ORR was 55% in PEM200+IPI50; 61% in PEM200+IPI100. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W or 100 mg Q12W demonstrated antitumor activity above the predefined threshold; pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W had lower incidence of grade 3–5 TRAEs than the predefined threshold, suggesting a reduction in toxicity. See related commentary by Jameson-Lee and Luke, p. 5153

BRAF mutations are relatively common in many cancers, particularly melanoma, colorectal cancer, and thyroid cancer and to a lesser extent in lung cancer. These mutations can be targeted by BRAF and MEK inhibitors, which exhibit good clinical activity. There are conflicting reports of the various relative rates of BRAF Class I mutations (V600 locus), defined as those that exhibit extremely strong kinase activity by stimulating monomeric activation of BRAF, Class II, define as non-V600 mutations that activate BRAF to signal as a RAS-independent dimer, and Class III mutations, defined as “kinase-dead” with low kinase activity as compared to wild type BRAF. Prospective studies have largely focused on patients with tumors harboring Class I BRAF mutations (limited to the V600 locus) where response rates up to 70% with BRAF plus MEK inhibition have been demonstrated. We report on the relative prevalence of various types of BRAF mutations across human cancers in a cohort of 114,662 patients that received comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing. Of these patients, 4517 (3.9%) a pathogenic or presumed pathogenic BRAF mutation (3.9%). Of these, 1271 were seen in melanoma, representing 39.7% of all melanomas sequenced, representing the highest rate in all tumors. Class I (V600) mutations were seen overall in 2841 patients (62.1% of BRAF mutations, 2.4% of total cancers). Class II mutations were seen in 746 tumors (16.5% of BRAF mutant, 0.7% of total), and Class III mutations were seen in 801 tumors (17.7% of BRAF, 0.7% of total). Knowledge of the relative prevalence of these types of mutations can aid in the development of agents that might better address non-V600 mutations in cancer. Impact statement These data represent the largest aggregation of BRAF mutations within a single clinical database to our knowledge. The relative proportions of both BRAF V600 mutations and non-V600 mutations are informative in all cancers and by malignancy, and can serve as a definitive gold-standard for BRAF mutation cancer incidence by malignancy. The rate of BRAF mutation in human cancer in a real-world large database is lower than previously reported likely representing testing more broadly across tumor types. The relative percentages of Class II and Class III BRAF mutations are higher than previously reported, representing almost 35% of BRAF mutations in cancer. These findings provide support for the development of effective treatments for non-V600 BRAF mutations in cancer.

Background Brain metastases are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity for patients with melanoma. We hypothesize that the development of brain metastases may be explained by molecular heterogeneity between primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM) or extracranial (ECM) and brain (MBM) melanoma metastases. Materials and methods We compared next-generation sequencing, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 expression, among 132 MBM, 745 PCM, and 1190 ECM. Results The most common genetic alterations among MBM included: BRAF (52.4%), NRAS (26.6%), CDKN2A (23.3%), NF1 (18.9%), TP53 (18%), ARID2 (13.8%), SETD2 (11.9%), and PBRM1 (7.5%). Four genes were found with higher frequency among MBM compared to PCM or ECM: BRAF (52.4% v 40.4% v 40.9%), SETD2 (11.9% v 1.9% v 3.9%), PBRM1 (7.5% v 1.6% v 2.6%), and DICER1 (4.4% v 0.6% v 0.4%). MBM showed higher TMB (p = .04) and higher PD-L1 expression (p = .002), compared to PCM. PD-L1 expression was slightly higher among MBM compared to ECM (p = .042), but there was no difference between TMB (p = .21). Conclusions Our findings suggest a unique molecular profile for MBM, including higher rates of BRAF mutations, higher TMB and higher PD-L1 expression, and also implicate chromatin remodeling in the pathogenesis of MBM.

Purpose: The first-in-human phase I/II ICONIC trial evaluated an investigational inducible costimulator (ICOS) agonist, vopratelimab, alone and in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: In phase I, patients were treated with escalating doses of intravenous vopratelimab alone or with nivolumab. Primary objectives were safety, tolerability, MTD, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Phase II enriched for ICOS-positive (ICOS+) tumors; patients were treated with vopratelimab at the monotherapy RP2D alone or with nivolumab. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and predictive biomarkers of response to vopratelimab were assessed. Results: ICONIC enrolled 201 patients. Vopratelimab alone and with nivolumab was well tolerated; phase I established 0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks as the vopratelimab RP2D. Vopratelimab resulted in modest objective response rates of 1.4% and with nivolumab of 2.3%. The prospective selection for ICOS+ tumors did not enrich for responses. A vopratelimab-specific peripheral blood pharmacodynamic biomarker, ICOS-high (ICOS-hi) CD4 T cells, was identified in a subset of patients who demonstrated greater clinical benefit versus those with no emergence of these cells [overall survival (OS), P = 0.0025]. A potential genomic predictive biomarker of ICOS-hi CD4 T-cell emergence was identified that demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes, including OS (P = 0.0062). Conclusions: Vopratelimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile alone and in combination with nivolumab. Efficacy was observed only in a subset of patients with a vopratelimab-specific pharmacodynamic biomarker. A potential predictive biomarker of response was identified, which is being prospectively evaluated in a randomized phase II non–small cell lung cancer trial. See related commentary by Lee and Fong, p. 3633

BackgroundThere are limited therapeutic options for patients with progressive disease (PD) on or after PD-1–blocking antibody therapy. Vidutolimod (CMP-001) is a first-in-class, immunostimulatory virus-like particle containing a CpG-A Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist. This phase 1b study evaluated the safety and clinical activity of intratumoral vidutolimod with and without pembrolizumab in patients with refractory melanoma.MethodsThis two-part, open-label, multicenter, phase 1b study (NCT02680184) enrolled adults with histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable cutaneous melanoma who had stable disease after ≥12 weeks or PD on anti−PD-1 treatment, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS 0/1, and ≥1 lesion accessible for intratumoral injection. Part 1 evaluated vidutolimod + pembrolizumab and Part 2 evaluated vidutolimod monotherapy. Key objectives included assessment of safety and clinical activity, and exploratory analyses were performed on available tumor biopsies using immunohistochemistry and RNAseq.ResultsAt data cutoff (August 17, 2021), 159 patients had enrolled in Part 1 and 40 patients in Part 2. The median age was 64 years in Part 1 (range, 30-90) and 68 years in Part 2 (range, 30-89). Most patients had PD as their last response to prior anti–PD-1 therapy (Part 1, 93.1%; Part 2, 80.0%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 37.1% of patients treated with vidutolimod + pembrolizumab and in 22.5% of patients treated with vidutolimod monotherapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Based on the efficacy data presented in Table 1, vidutolimod polysorbate 20 (PS20) A was selected for further development as this formulation in combination with pembrolizumab had a best objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) of 23.5%, with a median duration of response (DOR) of 25.2 months. Vidutolimod monotherapy had an ORR of 20.0%, with a median DOR of 5.6 months. Exploratory translational analyses identified association of unique biomarkers with response among patients with T cell–inflamed versus non-T cell–inflamed tumors at baseline.Abstract 950 Table 1Safety and clinical activity of vidutolomod ± pembrolizumabConclusionsPromising clinical activity was observed with vidutolimod + pembrolizumab and vidutolimod monotherapy in patients with PD-1 blockade–refractory melanoma. A manageable safety profile was observed. The DOR with vidutolimod + pembrolizumab was substantially longer than with vidutolimod monotherapy. Clinical studies to confirm the efficacy of vidutolimod + PD-1 blockade in patients with previously untreated unresectable/metastatic melanoma (phase 2/3, NCT04695977) or PD-1 blockade–refractory melanoma (phase 2, NCT04698187) are ongoing.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by Checkmate Pharmaceuticals. Medical writing assistance was provided by Steffen Biechele, PhD (ApotheCom, San Francisco, CA, USA), and funded by Checkmate Pharmaceuticals.Trial RegistrationNCT02680184Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the WCG-WIRB; WIRB approval tracking number: 20152597.

The world of molecular profiling has undergone revolutionary changes over the last few years as knowledge, technology, and even standard clinical practice have evolved. Broad molecular profiling is now nearly essential for all patients with metastatic solid tumors. New agents have been approved based on molecular testing instead of tumor site of origin. Molecular profiling methodologies have likewise changed such that tests that were performed on patients a few years ago are no longer complete and possibly inaccurate today. As with all rapid change, medical providers can quickly fall behind or struggle to find up‐to‐date sources to ensure he or she provides optimum care. In this review, the authors provide the current state of the art for molecular profiling/precision medicine, practice standards, and a view into the future ahead.

Background The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is increasing in cancer therapy today. It is critical that treatment teams become familiar with the organ systems potentially impacted by immune-related adverse events associated with these drugs. Here, we report adverse skeletal effects of immunotherapy, a phenomenon not previously described. Case presentations In this retrospective case series, clinical, laboratory and imaging data were obtained in patients referred to endocrinology or rheumatology with new fractures (n = 3) or resorptive bone lesions (n = 3) that developed while on agents targeting PD-1, CTLA-4 or both. The average age of patients was 59.3 (SD 8.6), and five were male. Cancer types included melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer. All fracture patients had vertebral compression, and two of the three had multiple fracture sites involved. Sites of resorptive lesions included the shoulder, hand and clavicle. Biochemically, elevated or high-normal markers of bone resorption were seen in five of the six patients. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated in three of the four patients where checked. Conclusions This case series represents the first description of potential skeletal adverse effects related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. These findings are important for providers caring for patients who experience musculoskeletal symptoms and may merit additional evaluation.

Five years ago, the Melanoma Research Foundation (MRF) conducted an assessment of the challenges and opportunities facing the melanoma research community and patients with melanoma. Since then, remarkable progress has been made on both the basic and clinical research fronts. However, the incidence, recurrence, and death rates for melanoma remain unacceptably high and significant challenges remain. Hence, the MRF Scientific Advisory Council and Breakthrough Consortium, a group that includes clinicians and scientists, reconvened to facilitate intensive discussions on thematic areas essential to melanoma researchers and patients alike, prevention, detection, diagnosis, metastatic dormancy and progression, response and resistance to targeted and immune-based therapy, and the clinical consequences of COVID-19 for patients with melanoma and providers. These extensive discussions helped to crystalize our understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing the broader melanoma community today. In this report, we discuss the progress made since the last MRF assessment, comment on what remains to be overcome, and offer recommendations for the best path forward.

Objectives: Due to the rarity of vulvar/vaginal melanoma (VVM), current therapeutic strategies mimics that of cutaneous melanoma (CM) without scientific rationale. Currently, immuno-oncology (IO) is a front-line treatment option for advanced melanoma, however data are limited for IO outcomes in advanced VVM. Considering 5-year survival for vulvar (58%) and vaginal (27%) melanoma is significantly inferior to cutaneous melanoma (81%), this calls into question the assumed similarity of these malignancies. As such, our goal is to compare molecular profiles of VVM with CM and explore the significance of IO agents on survival. Methods: Samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NextSeq, 592 Genes and WES, NovaSEQ), IHC and WTS (NovaSeq) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). PD-L1 expression was tested by IHC using 28-8 (Agilent) and SP-142 (Spring Biosciences) (positive cut-off ≥1%). MSI was tested by FA, IHC and NGS. TMB was measured by totaling somatic mutations per tumor (TMB-high cut-off ≥10 mutations per MB). Immune cell fraction was calculated by QuantiSeq (Finotello 2019, Genome Medicine). Survival was extracted from insurance claims data and calculated from time of IO treatment to last contact using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum test and adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: Molecular analysis was performed on 171 VVM and 5255 CM between 1998 and 2020. Median age for VVM and CM was 65 and 63, respectively. A total of 114 (66.7%) VVM and 3538 (67.3%) CM were metastatic at time of diagnosis. Immunogenicity of VVM was significantly lower than CM, demonstrated by an absence of high tumor mutation burden (0% vs 48%) and a decrease in PD-L1 expression (34.1% vs 45.2%) (Fig 1A). Adaptive immune gene expression was lower in VVM compared to CM (Fig 1B). By QuantiSeq, the cell fractions for type I macrophages and C8+ T-cells were significantly lower in VVM compared to CM (Fig 1C). Median survival was shorter for VVM than for CM (19 vs 37 months, p=.058; Fig 1D). VVM also demonstrated significantly (p Download : Download high-res image (316KB) Download : Download full-size image Conclusions: VVM represents a distinct molecular profile from CM with a less favorable immune phenotype demonstrated by absence of TMB-high, lower rates of PD-L1 positivity, and lower adaptive immune gene expression and cell fractions of effector T-cells and immune promoting macrophages. Compared with CM, patients with VVM were found to have significantly worse survival when treated with IO therapy. Though IO has been a mainstay of treatment in recent years, these findings suggest that new therapeutic strategies are needed.

Background The objective of this work was to characterize outcomes of patients with isolated brain metastases managed with local therapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Materials and Methods Patients from four medical centers were included if they presented with isolated brain metastases treated with local therapy and received adjuvant treatment with ICIs. Results Eleven patients with median size of largest brain metastasis of 3.9 cm, treated with surgical resection (n = 8) and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS; n = 6), were included. Ipilimumab/nivolumab was the adjuvant ICI used in four patients, of whom one recurred (25%) and none died, compared with three of seven (43%) who recurred and two of seven (29%) who died following adjuvant treatment with ICI monotherapy. All recurrences were intracranial. Conclusion Patients with isolated brain metastases treated with surgery or SRS appeared to benefit from adjuvant ICI therapy, particularly with combination therapy. Recurrences in this setting appear to largely occur intracranially.

Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is considered an immunogenic tumor based on the high tumor mutational burden (TMB), increased incidence in immunocompromised patients, and responsiveness to imiquimod, a toll-like receptor agonist therapy. However, anti-PD-1 immunotherapy response rates in patients with advanced BCC appear less than that seen with other advanced cutaneous malignancies. Molecular profiles of BCC tumors were analyzed to determine immune phenotypes and resistance mechanisms in comparison to other anti-PD-1 therapy responsive cutaneous malignancies. Methods Next generation sequencing on DNA (NGS; NextSeq and Novaseq), PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (SP-142 and 28–8 antibody clones, cutoff >5% tumor staining) and mRNA gene expression level (Whole Transcriptome Sequencing, NovaSeq) data from BCC (N=69), melanoma (N=914), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) tumors (N=165) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) were analyzed. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated by counting all non-synonymous missense mutations that had not been previously described as germline alterations. Microenvironment cell population counter1 was used to estimate cell population abundance in the TME. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed on transcriptomes.2 Statistical significance was set at P value or false discovery rate (FDR) Results Of the 69 BCC tumors with NGS data, the most frequent mutations were in PTCH1 (82%), P53 (73%) and ARID1A (42%); additional relevant mutations included SMO (18%), JAK1 (9%), PI3KCA (6%), APC (4%), and CTNNB1 (3%). TMB was significantly greater in BCC compared to melanoma (median 30.5 vs 12 mut/Mb, P Conclusions While BCC tumors demonstrated a high TMB, a markedly lower level of adaptive anti-tumor immunity in comparison to other cutaneous malignancies was observed. T-cell exclusion mechanisms mediated through CAFs and desmoplasia, with upregulation of TGF-beta and angiogenic signaling, may play a role. Further investigation into abrogation of these mechanisms is warranted to develop improved anti-PD-1 based therapies for BCC. References Becht E, Giraldo NA, Lacroix L, Buttard B, Elarouci N, Petitprez F, Selves J, Laurent-Puig P, Sautes-Fridman C, Fridman WH, de Reynies A. Estimating the population abundance of tissue-infiltrating immune and stromal cell populations using gene expression. Genome Biol 2016; 17(1):218. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102(43):15545–50.

Background Therapeutic options are limited for patients with advanced melanoma that is refractory to PD-1 blockade. This study was performed in this patient population to assess the safety and antitumor activity of CMP-001, a CpG-A TLR9 agonist packaged within a virus-like particle. Methods Patients were eligible for this 2-part, open-label, multicenter, phase 1b study if they had metastatic/unresectable melanoma and stable disease after =12 weeks or progressive disease (PD) on/after anti-PD-1 therapy. Part 1 evaluated CMP-001 plus pembrolizumab dose-escalation and dose-expansion. Part 2 evaluated CMP-001 monotherapy. Accessible lesion(s) were injected intratumorally with CMP-001, at a polysorbate 20 (PS20) concentration of either 0.01% or 0.00167%. The Part 1 primary objective was to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and schedule of CMP-001 plus pembrolizumab, while the Part 2 primary objective was to assess the safety of CMP-001 monotherapy. Secondary objectives for both parts were a preliminary assessment of antitumor activity of CMP-001 plus pembrolizumab and CMP-001 monotherapy, and the overall safety profile and pharmacodynamics of the combination. Results In Part 1 (N=159) and Part 2 (N=40), 93.1% and 80.0% of patients had PD as their last response to prior anti–PD-1 therapy, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; >25%) were flu-like symptoms (Parts 1 and 2) and injection-site reactions (Part 1). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 36.5% (Part 1) and 22.5% (Part 2) of patients, the most common being hypotension (Part 1: 6.9%; Part 2: 5.0%). No Grade 5 TRAEs were observed. In Part 1, the best objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) in patients treated with pembrolizumab and CMP-001 (PS20 0.01%) was 23.5% (23/98), while CMP-001 PS20 (0.00167%) resulted in a lower ORR of 11.5% (7/61). Seven additional patients had a delayed response after initial PD (table 1). The median duration of response was >1 year. In the 37 RECIST v1.1 and post-progression responders, the mean regression in injected and noninjected target lesions was 54.7% and 52.7%, respectively. In Part 2, the best ORR with CMP-001 monotherapy was 17.5% (7/40 patients); the response duration was shorter than in Part 1. Intratumoral CMP-001 PS20 0.01% 10 mg was selected as the RP2D. Conclusions Intratumoral CMP-001 was well-tolerated and provided both local and distant responses in patients with advanced melanoma with disease progression on prior PD-1 blockade. CMP-001 monotherapy induced systemic tumor regression in some patients, but duration of response was substantially increased by the addition of pembrolizumab. Acknowledgements This work was supported by Checkmate Pharmaceuticals. Medical writing assistance was provided by Cindy Rigby, PhD, of ApotheCom (San Francisco, CA) and was funded by Checkmate Pharmaceuticals. Trial Registration NCT02680184 Ethics Approval This study was approved by the WCG-WIRB, WIRB approval tracking number 20152597. Consent N/A References N/A

Background Intratumoral (IT) injection of CMP-001, a CpG-A TLR9 agonist packaged within a virus-like particle, is designed to activate tumor-associated plasmacytoid dendritic cells, inducing an interferon-rich tumor microenvironment and anti-tumor CD8+ T cell responses. Methods CMP-001-001 is an ongoing Phase 1b trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of CMP-001 in combination with pembrolizumab (Part 1; N = 144) or alone (Part 2; N = 23) in patients with advanced melanoma resistant to prior anti-PD-1 therapy (Tables 1). CMP-001 is administered IT into accessible lesion(s) either with, or without on-site saline dilution (table 1), and response assessed by RECIST v1.1. Monotherapy patients who progress can be rolled over onto combination therapy and continue on study. Baseline and on-therapy serum is analyzed for cytokines, and immunohistochemistry and RNA-Seq are performed on available tumor biopsies. Results Adverse events (AEs) attributed to CMP-001 in combination with pembrolizumab or as monotherapy consisted predominately of transient low-Grade flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions: Grade 3+ related AEs were reported in 33% of patients treated with combination therapy and 22% of patients with monotherapy. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) with undiluted CMP-001 in combination with pembrolizumab was 24% (18/75; 95% confidence interval: 15%-35% (table 1); on-site dilution of CMP-001 was associated with a substantial decrease in ORR to 12% (7/61; 95% confidence interval: 5%-22% (table 1). Three additional patients had a delayed partial response after an initial period of disease progression. Anti-tumor response was comparable between injected and uninjected lesions. The median duration of response to combination therapy has not been reached. The ORR to CMP-001 monotherapy was 22% (5/23; 95% confidence interval: 7%-44% (table 1); time from last anti-PD-1 therapy before CMP-001 was 1.5 to >20 months in responders; 3 of the patients responding to CMP-001 monotherapy achieved PR at the first evaluation, but progressed by the second evaluation. Serum and tumor biopsy translational studies in the patients receiving combination therapy supported the proposed mechanism of TLR9 activation and identified a possible association between induction of serum CXCL10 and response. Conclusions IT CMP-001 alone and in combination with pembrolizumab appears well tolerated, can reverse resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy, and can produce deep and durable clinical responses in patients with advanced melanoma. Ethics Approval CMP-001-001 was centrally approved by the WCG-WIRB, WIRB approval tracking number 20152597.

Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) represents an infrequently occurring and distinct histologic pattern of melanomas, often lacking mutations in genes typically altered in conventional melanomas including BRAF , NRAS , and KIT . We aimed at better characterizing the genetic profile of this subgroup of melanomas to match patients with available therapies. Pathology reports were reviewed for 1,240 consecutive melanoma cases sequenced by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) using a hybrid-capture based next generation sequencing during the course of clinical care. The mutational profile of the 12 DM identified was compared with the remaining 1,228 melanomas examined. We report a median tumor mutational burden (TMB) of 77 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) in DM, which was significantly greater than a median of 35 mut/Mb in non-DM. A UV DNA damage signature was detected in 10/12 (83%) DM. For a subset of patients with available clinical course, we report that 100% (5/5) had clinical benefit from treatment with PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy. TMB and UV signature show significant promise as an approach to identify patients who are likely to benefit from PD-1 targeted immunotherapy.

BackgroundPatients with advanced cutaneous melanoma and persistent disease after checkpoint inhibitor therapy have poor outcomes and limited treatment options, highlighting a significant unmet medical need.1 Autologous TIL cell therapies have shown promise in this population attributable, in part, to their intrinsic and patient-specific antitumor activity2; however, no such therapies are approved. Made from each patient‘s digested and cryopreserved tumor, ITIL-168 is an autologous TIL cell therapy manufactured to offer an unrestricted T-cell receptor repertoire. A single-center compassionate use clinical series demonstrated the feasibility and clinical utility of an earlier version of ITIL-168.3 DELTA-1 is a global, multicenter phase 2 study to evaluate efficacy and safety of ITIL-168. DELTA-1 will enroll patients with melanoma relapsed after or refractory to PD-1 inhibitors (PD-1i), patients intolerant to PD-1i, and patients whose best response to PD-1i was stable disease.MethodsPatients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced cutaneous melanoma, ECOG performance status 0–1, and adequate organ function will be enrolled in 1 of 3 cohorts. Cohort 1 (n≈80) will include patients who relapsed after or were refractory to ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy, including a PD-1i and, if BRAF-mutated, a BRAFi ± MEKi. Cohorts 2 and 3 (n≈25 each) will include patients intolerant to PD-1i and those with stable disease after ≥4 doses of PD-1i, respectively. After tumor resection for TIL harvest, patients must have ≥1 remaining measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. Patients with uveal, acral, or mucosal melanoma, prior allogeneic transplant or cell therapy, and with central nervous system (CNS) disorder or symptomatic and/or untreated CNS metastases are ineligible. Patients will receive 5 days of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide ×2 days overlapping with fludarabine ×5 days) followed by a single ITIL-168 infusion (≥5×109 cells) and supportive short course high-dose IL-2. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) per central review. Key secondary endpoints include duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, disease control rate, TIL persistence, and safety. Hypothesis testing of ORR will be performed for cohort 1. Two interim analyses will occur after 20 patients in cohort 1 have been followed for ≥28 days (safety) and evaluated for response ≥3 months after ITIL-168 infusion (futility). The primary analysis will occur when all patients in the cohort 1 modified intent-to-treat population have been followed for ≥6 months after the first posttreatment disease assessment.AcknowledgementsMedical writing support was provided by Christopher Waldapfel, PharmD, of Instil Bio, Inc, and Phylicia Aaron, PhD, of Nexus GG Science, with funding from Instil Bio, Inc.ReferencesSchadendorf D, van Akkoi ACJ, Berking C, et al. Melanoma. Lancet 2018;392(10151):971–984.Borch TH, Anderson R, Ellebaek E, et al. Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8(2):e000668.Hawkins RE, Jiang Y, Lorigan PC, et al. Clinical feasibility and treatment outcomes with unselected autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Res 2021;81(13):LB150.Ethics ApprovalAll patients will provide written informed consent. The study will be approved by the Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee at each site and conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonisation.ConsentN/A; the abstract does not contain sensitive or identifiable patient information.

BackgroundLimited data exist on safe discontinuation of antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy in responding patients with advanced melanoma. The use of 18fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-PET/CT scan and tumor biopsy for assessment of active disease may be an effective predictive biomarker to guide such treatment decisions.MethodsA retrospective study of 122 patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1/anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 combination therapy at Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center was conducted. Uveal melanoma patients and those receiving concurrent experimental therapy were excluded. Baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival were analyzed. Patients who decided to come off treatment typically after 12 months using CT scan radiographic complete response (CR), 18FDG-PET/CT scan complete metabolic response (CMR) or tumor biopsy of a non-CR/CMR tumor site negative for active disease (possible pathological CR) were identified and compared with patients who discontinued treatment due to toxicity while their disease was in control. Event-free survival (EFS) was assessed from the last dose of anti-PD-1 therapy to progression requiring subsequent treatment (surgery, radiation, and/or systemic therapy) or referral to hospice/death due to melanoma.Results24 (20%) patients discontinued treatment by choice with no active disease and 28 (23%) patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity with disease control after 12-month and 4-month median treatment durations, respectively. Similar baseline characteristics were observed between cohorts except higher prior receipt of ipilimumab (29% vs 7%; p=0.036) and fewer BRAF mutant positive disease (17% vs 41%; p=0.064) in patients off treatment by choice. Three-year EFS rates were 95% and 71%, respectively. No significant associations between EFS and sex, disease stage, lactate dehydrogenase elevation, BRAF status, prior systemic therapy, ECOG performance status, presence of brain metastases, or combination versus monotherapy were observed. Tumor biopsies led to alternative management in 3/10 patients due to active metastatic melanoma or second malignancy.ConclusionsAnti-PD-1 therapy discontinuation after 12 months when no active disease is observed on CT scan, PET/CT scan or tumor biopsy may have low rates of disease relapse in patients with advanced melanoma. Biopsy of residual disease may frequently lead to a change in management. These findings are undergoing validation in the EA6192 trial.

Targeted therapies have revolutionized cancer care, but the development of resistance remains a challenge in the clinic. To identify rational targets for combination strategies, we used an established melanoma mouse model and selected for resistant tumors following genetic suppression of NRAS expression. Complete tumor regression was observed in all mice, but 40% of tumors recurred. Analysis of resistant tumors showed that the most common mechanism of resistance was overexpression and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Interestingly, the most commonly overexpressed RTK was Met and inhibition of Met overcame NRAS resistance in this context. Analysis of NRAS mutant human melanoma cells showed enhanced efficacy of cytotoxicity with combined RTK and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibition. In this study, we establish the importance of adaptive RTK signaling in the escape of NRAS mutant melanoma from inhibition of RAS and provide the rationale for combined blockade of RAS and RTK signaling in this context.

BRAF mutations are found in ~50% of metastatic melanomas, most commonly in codon V600. Vemurafenib improves progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. The results of a descriptive study evaluating vemurafenib in patients with advanced melanoma harbouring BRAF mutations other than V600E are reported. Eligible patients with stage IIIC or IV melanoma and non-V600E BRAF mutations received vemurafenib (960 mg, twice daily). End points included investigator-assessed best overall response rate (primary), time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Planned (V600K vs. non-V600K mutations) subgroup analyses were carried out. Thirty-one patients were enrolled; 13 (42%) had V600K mutations and 18 (58%) had other mutations. Investigator-assessed confirmed that the best overall response rate was 23% (95% confidence interval=10-41%) in the overall population, and was similar between patients with V600K mutations (23%; 95% confidence interval=5-54%) versus other mutations (22%; 95% confidence interval=6-48%). Responses were observed in patients with V600K (n=3), V600E2 (n=1), V600R (n=1), L597S (n=1) and D594G (n=1) mutations. No new safety signals were reported. Vemurafenib showed activity in patients with advanced melanoma with rarer BRAF mutations.

BACKGROUND The development of brain metastases is common for systemic treatment failure in patients with melanoma and has been associated with a poor prognosis. Recent advances with BRAF and immune checkpoint therapies have led to improved patient survival. Herein, the authors evaluated the risk of de novo brain metastases and survival among patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) since the introduction of more effective therapies. METHODS Patients with unresectable AJCC stage III/IV melanoma who received first-line systemic therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2000 and 2012 were identified. Data were collected regarding patient characteristics, stage of disease, systemic therapies, MBM status/management, and overall survival (OS). The risk of de novo MBM was calculated using a generalized estimating equation model and survival comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional analyses. RESULTS A total of 610 patients were included, 243 of whom were diagnosed with MBM (40%). Patients with MBM were younger, with a lower frequency of regional metastasis. No significant differences were noted with regard to sex, BRAF status, or therapeutic class. The risk of de novo MBM was found to be similar among patients treated with chemotherapy, biochemotherapy, BRAF-targeted therapy, ipilimumab, and anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 regimens. The median OS of patients with MBM was significantly shorter when determined from the time of first regional/distant metastasis but not when determined from the time of first systemic therapy. The median OS from the time of MBM diagnosis was 7.5 months, 8.5 months, and 22.7 months, respectively, for patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2008, 2009 to 2010, and 2011 to the time of last follow-up (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Brain metastases remain a common source of systemic treatment failure. The OS for patients with MBM has improved significantly. Further research into MBM prevention is needed. Cancer 2017. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Introduction: Oncogenic gene fusions are frequently identified in different cancers; however, the exact incidence of oncogenic fusions in melanoma is not well defined. Several targeted therapies are approved and considered the standard of care for patients whose solid or hematologic tumors harbor particular gene fusions, but their role as targets in melanoma also remains undelineated. We sought to determine the prevalence of oncogenic fusions in metastatic or locally advanced melanoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples sent to a commercial CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences) from February 2019 to July 2020. Samples were profiled by next-generation sequencing of a 592-gene DNA panel, whole transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Melanoma specimens were analyzed from 1,255 subjects, of whom 478 (38.1%) were female and 777 (61.9%) were male, with a median age of 67 years. Of these specimens, 780 (63.1%) were from metastatic sites. We identified 33 (2.6%) cases with in-frame oncogenic fusions (14 novel) including 21 BRAF fusions and 4 RAF1 fusions, as well as fusions involving PRKCA (n=4), TERT (n=2), AXL (n=1), and FGFR3 (n=1). PD-L1 expression by IHC (SP142 or 28-8 antibody) was detected in 512 (42.5%) specimens, including 10 (32.3%) of the fusion-positive tumors, while 572 (47.4%) specimens were TMB-High (≥10 mutations/Mb), including 11 (33.3%) of the fusion-positive tumors, suggesting these patients may respond to immunotherapy. We identified 796 (63.4%) cases with RAS/RAF pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations, including 373 (30.0%) BRAF p.V600X mutations. With the exception of a single BRAF p.S467L (Class 3, “kinase-dead”) mutation, the absence of BRAF mutations in BRAF fusion-positive tumors suggests these fusions are oncogenic drivers. However, tumors harboring PRKCA and TERT fusions were each detected with at least one MAPK pathway co-alteration (NRAS, NF1, or BRAF p.V600E mutation). Fusion transcripts with unknown pathogenicity were also detected in 668 (53.2%) cases. RNA expression analysis of key molecular pathways (including Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT/MTOR, DNA repair, INFG, and JAK/STAT) showed a high degree of variability among fusion-positive tumors and other mutational subgroups, which may reflect the heterogeneity common to melanoma, prior treatments or development of various resistance mechanisms. Conclusions: Oncogenic gene fusions are rare in melanoma when compared with other genetic variants. We identified potentially actionable fusions as well as co-alterations in fusion-positive cases, with notably mutual exclusivity of BRAF fusions and p.V600X mutations. The data suggest that targetable variants, including oncogenic fusions, may be identified in melanoma with comprehensive tumor profiling and provide patients with personalized treatment or clinical trial options. Citation Format: Sourat Darabi, Andrew Elliott, David R. Braxton, Jia Zeng, Kelsey Poorman, Jeffrey Swensen, Geoffrey T. Gibney, Justin C. Moser, Thuy Phung, Michael B. Atkins, Gino K. In, Wolfgang Michael Korn, Burton L. Eisenberg, Michael J. Demeure. Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals oncogenic fusions in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2221.

Background In the treatment-naive setting, PD-1 blockade is associated with greater response in T cell-inflamed vs non-T cell-inflamed tumors. CMP-001 is a CpG-A oligonucleotide TLR9 agonist in a virus-like particle that is hypothesized to activate tumor-associated plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) to secrete type I interferons. Through this activity, CMP-001 may convert the tumor microenvironment to a Th1-like chemokine milieu (eg, increased CXCL10) and induce an antitumor CD8+ T-cell response. We have recently reported that intratumoral injection of CMP-001 + IV pembrolizumab (pembro) had an acceptable safety profile and can reverse PD-1 blockade resistance in patients (pts) with melanoma (Milhem et al, SITC 2019). Regression was observed in injected and uninjected lesions. Herein we report pharmacodynamic and translational data. Methods This 2-part, open-label, multicenter, phase 1b study (NCT02680184) enrolled pts with metastatic/unresectable melanoma and stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) on/after anti−PD-1 therapy. In part 1 (3+3 dose-escalation and dose-expansion), pts received CMP-001 + pembro. In part 2, pts received CMP-001 monotherapy. Determination of safety and clinical activity were the study's main objectives. Prespecified pharmacodynamic and translational studies evaluated serum chemokines and evaluated tumor biopsies using RNA and/or whole exome sequencing and immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 (reported as H-score), CD8, and CD303 (pDC marker). Results As of September 30, 2020, 159 pts (part 1) and 40 pts (part 2) have been treated. A greater median fold increase of serum CXCL10 (a marker of innate immunity, n=40) was observed in responders (R) to CMP-001 + pembro (18.8x) vs nonresponders (NR) after treatment (9.9x in SD; 6.15x in PD; differences were not statistically significant). Preliminary analyses showed that interferon gene expression distinguished R vs NR. Tumor biopsy analyses (part 1, n=139; part 2, n=34) showed that pts with high PD-L1, high CD8+ T cells, or inflamed transcriptional signatures at baseline were less likely to respond to CMP-001 + pembro vs pts without inflammation markers at baseline. Baseline mean PD-L1 expression (H-score) was 8.1 in R (n=10) vs 21.8 in NR (n=49). Posttreatment biopsies generally showed increased PD-L1, CD8+ T cells, and inflamed transcriptional signatures in R vs NR. Neither tumor mutational burden nor baseline pDC density distinguished R vs NR. Conclusions In pts with anti-PD-1 refractory melanoma, intratumoral CMP-001 ± pembro appears to disproportionately induce antitumor responses in noninflamed tumors. Clinical response to CMP-001 ± pembro was associated with induction of markers of both innate and adaptive antitumor immunity. Citation Format: Jason John Luke, Riyue Bao, John M. Kirkwood, Yousef Zakharia, Diwakar Davar, Elizabeth Buchbinder, Theresa Medina, Adil Daud, Antoni Ribas, Jiaxin Niu, Geoffrey Gibney, Kim Margolin, Anthony J. Olszanski, Inderjit Mehmi, Takami Sato, Montaser Shaheen, Aaron Morris, Dmitri Bobilev, Katie Campbell, George Weiner, James E. Wooldridge, Arthur M. Krieg, Mohammed Milhem. CMP-001 demonstrates improved response in noninflamed anti-PD-1 refractory melanoma and response is associated with serum CXCL10 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT032.

11512 Background: Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) have been reported to have immunohistochemical (IHC) and gene expression signatures suggestive of an immune-responsive tumor microenvironment. Despite this, immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated minimal activity in LMS. We examined molecular profiles of LMS specimens from multiple institutions to explore mechanisms of immunotherapy (IO) resistance. Methods: LMS specimens (n = 1115), including 701 uterine (uLMS) and 414 soft tissue site (stLMS) samples, underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome, n = 537) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). A threshold of 10 mut/Mb was used to identify high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H). IHC was performed for PD-L1 (SP142; 2+|5% positive). Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) was tested by IHC and NGS, respectively. RNA expression was analyzed using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and Microenvironment Cell Populations-counter, with results compared to melanoma (n = 1255) as a representative immunogenic tumor type. P-values were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: TMB-H was observed in 3.8% (n = 41) of LMS specimens, with a median of 5 mut/Mb (IQR 3.3-6.7). dMMR/MSI-H was rarely detected (1.5%, n = 17), whereas 8.2% (n = 88) were positive for PD-L1 expression. uLMS and stLMS did not differ in TMB-H (3.4 vs 4.5%, p = 0.277), PD-L1 expression (8.6 vs 7.4%, p = 0.322), or dMMR/MSI-H (2.0 vs 0.7% p = 0.207). stLMS demonstrated upregulation of immune-related gene sets, including interferon γ (p = 0.035) and α (p = 0.033) response, inflammatory response (p = 0.038), interleukin-6/STAT3 signaling (p = 0.030), and TNFα signaling (p = 0.026) compared to uLMS. Immune cell infiltration was increased in stLMS over uLMS, most notably for CD8 T-cell and B-cell abundance ( > 2-fold increase, p < 0.0001). Compared to melanoma, all LMS had lower abundance of CD8 T cells, cytotoxic lymphocytes, and B-cells ( > 2-fold decrease, p < 0.0001). Fibroblasts were more prevalent in LMS relative to melanoma (3.2-fold increase, p < 0.0001). Interestingly, while higher CD8 T-cell infiltration was positively associated with dMMR/MSI-H among LMS specimens (p = 0.032), TMB-H and PD-L1 expression were associated with lower CD8 T-cell infiltration (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Only a small proportion of LMS are TMB-H or MSI-H, suggesting that the neoantigen burden in LMS may be insufficient to promote a robust anti-tumor response, even in the presence of PD-L1 positive tumor cells. Traditional predictive biomarkers of response to IO are unlikely to be useful in LMS. Furthermore, both uLMS and stLMS have an immune microenvironment characterized by a high fibroblast and low T cell abundance relative to melanoma. Future IO trials in LMS should focus on combination therapies that may reverse the observed T-cell exclusion/desmoplastic phenotype.

Ben C Creelan,1 Dmitry I Gabrilovich,2 Jhanelle E Gray,1 Charles C Williams,1 Tawee Tanvetyanon,1 Eric B Haura,1 Jeffrey S Weber,3 Geoffrey T Gibney,4 Joseph Markowitz,5 Joel W Proksch,6 Scott A Reisman,6 Mark D McKee,7 Melanie P Chin,6 Colin J Meyer,6 Scott J Antonia11Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA; 2The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 3Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; 4Department of Medicine, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA; 5Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, USA; 6Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Irving, TX, USA; 7AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USABackground: Omaveloxolone is a semisynthetic oleanane triterpenoid that potently activates Nrf2 with subsequent antioxidant function. Weconducted a first-in-human Phase I clinical trial (NCT02029729) with the primary objectives to determine the appropriate dose for Phase II studies, characterize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, and assess antitumor activity.Methods: Omaveloxolone was administered orally once daily continuously in a 28-day cycle for patients with stage 4 relapsed/refractory melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. An accelerated titration design was employed until a grade 2-related adverse event (AE) occurred. A standard 3+3 dose escalation was employed. Single-dose and steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of the drug were characterized. Downstream Nrf2 activation was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by quantification of target gene mRNA expression.Results: Omaveloxolone was tested at four dose levels up to 15 mg given orally once daily. No dose-limiting toxicities were detected, and the maximum tolerated dose was not determined. All drug-related AEs were either grade 1 or 2 in severity, and none required clinical action. The most common drug-related AEs were elevated alkaline phosphatase (18%) and anemia (18%). No drug interruptions or reductions were required. Omaveloxolone was rapidly absorbed and exhibited proportional increases in exposure across dose levels. With some exceptions, an overall trend toward time-dependent and dose-dependent activation of Nrf2 antioxidant genes was observed. No confirmed radiologic responses were seen, although one lung cancer subject did have stable disease exceeding 1 year.Conclusions: Omaveloxolone has favorable tolerability at biologically active doses, although this trial had a small sample size which limits definitive conclusions. These findings support further investigation of omaveloxolone in cancer.Keywords: antioxidant inflammation modulator, nitrotyrosine, nitric oxide synthase, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, immuno-oncology, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, bardoxolone methyl

The clinical development of checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy has ushered in an exciting era of anticancer therapy. Durable responses can be seen in patients with melanoma and other malignancies. Although monotherapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 agents are typically well tolerated, the risk of immune-related adverse events increases with combination regimens. The development of predictive biomarkers is needed to optimise patient benefit, minimise risk of toxicities, and guide combination approaches. The greatest focus has been on tumour-cell PD-L1 expression. Although PD-L1 positivity enriches for populations with clinical benefit, PD-L1 testing alone is insufficient for patient selection in most malignancies. In this Review, we discuss the status of PD-L1 testing and explore emerging data on new biomarker strategies with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, mutational burden, immune gene signatures, and multiplex immunohistochemistry. Future development of an effective predictive biomarker for checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy will integrate multiple approaches for optimal characterisation of the immune tumour microenvironment.

The prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) melanoma metastases is poor. Surgery renders select patients disease free and/or palliates symptoms. We reviewed our single-institution experience of resection with GI melanoma metastases. A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent surgery for GI melanoma metastases from 2007 to 2013. Fifty-four patients were identified and separated based on completeness of resection into curative 13 (24%) and palliative 41 (75.9%) groups. Thiry-six (63.2%) were symptomatic preoperatively with bleeding and/or obstruction/pain with 91.7 per cent achieving objective symptom relief. Thirty-day operative mortality was 0 per cent. The most common complication was wound infection (n = 5); major complications like anastomotic leak (n = 1) were uncommon. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months (range 0.2–75.8), median overall survival was not reached (curative) versus 9.53 months (palliative group). Median recurrence-free and progression-free survival after resection were 18.89 and 1.97 months in the curative versus palliative groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, resection to no clinical evidence of disease (P = 0.012) and presence of single metastases (P = 0.031) were associated with improved overall survival. Surgery for GI metastases from melanoma provides symptomatic relief without major morbidity. Fewer metastases and curative resection were associated with improved survival.

s Background Patients with chronic viral infections including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) are at increased risk of developing malignancies. The safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with both cancer and chronic viral infections is not well established as most clinical trials of ICIs excluded these patient populations. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced-stage cancers and HIV, HBV, or HCV infection treated with ICI therapy at 5 MedStar Health hospitals from January 2011 to April 2018. Results We identified 50 patients including 16 HIV, 29 HBV/HCV, and 5 with concurrent HIV and either HBV or HCV. In the HIV cohort (n = 21), any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were 24% with grade ≥ 3 irAEs 14%. Among 5 patients with matched pre/post-treatment results, no significant changes in HIV viral load and CD4+ T-cell counts were observed. RECIST confirmed (n = 18) overall response rate (ORR) was 28% with 2 complete responses (CR) and 3 partial responses (PR). Responders included 2 patients with low baseline CD4+ T-cell counts (40 and 77 cells/ul, respectively). In the HBV/HCV cohort (n = 34), any grade irAEs were 44% with grade ≥ 3 irAEs 29%. RECIST confirmed ORR was 21% (6 PR). Among the 6 patients with known pre/post-treatment viral titers (2 HCV and 4 HBV), there was no evidence of viral reactivation. Conclusions Our retrospective series is one of the largest case series to report clinical outcomes among HIV, HBV and HCV patients treated with ICI therapy. Toxicity and efficacy rates were similar to those observed in patients without chronic viral infections. Viral reactivation was not observed. Tumor responses occurred in HIV patients with low CD4 T-cell counts. While prospective studies are needed to validate above findings, these data support not excluding such patients from ICI–based clinical trials or treatment.

Immunotherapy has advanced the treatment of solid organ malignancies. Although generally well tolerated, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be complicated by immune-related adverse events, some of which are relatively uncommon. We report the first case of gingival linear immunoglobulin A disease related to treatment with an antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 antibody. A 73-year-old male with advanced non-small cell lung cancer achieved a durable response to nivolumab monotherapy. After 1 year of treatment, he developed gingival swelling and pain. Biopsy revealed linear immunoglobulin A disease of the gingiva which was effectively treated with systemic steroids. Ongoing vigilance for immune-mediated toxicity is paramount during and after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background Epacadostat is a potent inhibitor of the immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) enzyme. We present phase 1 results from a phase 1/2 clinical study of epacadostat in combination with ipilimumab, an anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody, in advanced melanoma (NCT01604889). Methods Only the phase 1, open-label portion of the study was conducted, per the sponsor’s decision to terminate the study early based on the changing melanoma treatment landscape favoring exploration of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 inhibitor-based combination strategies. Such decision was not related to the safety of epacadostat plus ipilimumab. Patients received oral epacadostat (25, 50, 100, or 300 mg twice daily [BID]; 75 mg daily [50 mg am, 25 mg pm]; or 50 mg BID intermittent [2 weeks on/1 week off]) plus intravenous ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Results Fifty patients received ≥1 dose of epacadostat. As of January 20, 2017, 2 patients completed treatment and 48 discontinued, primarily because of adverse events (AEs) and disease progression (n = 20 each). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 11 patients (n = 1 each with epacadostat 25 mg BID, 50 mg BID intermittent, 75 mg daily; n = 4 each with epacadostat 50 mg BID, 300 mg BID). The most common immune-related treatment-emergent AEs included rash (50%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (28%), pruritus (28%), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (24%), and hypothyroidism (10%). Among immunotherapy-naive patients (n = 39), the objective response rate was 26% by immune-related response criteria and 23% by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. No objective response was seen in the 11 patients who received prior immunotherapy. Epacadostat exposure was dose proportional, with clinically significant IDO1 inhibition at doses ≥25 mg BID. Conclusions When combined with ipilimumab, epacadostat ≤50 mg BID demonstrated clinical and pharmacologic activity and was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced melanoma. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01604889. Registration date, May 9, 2012, retrospectively registered. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0562-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Colitis is a frequent, clinically-significant immune-related adverse event caused by anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1). The clinical features, timing, and management of colitis with anti-PD-1-based regimens are not well-characterized. Patients with advanced melanoma that received either anti-PD-1 monotherapy (“monotherapy”) or combined with ipilimumab (“combination therapy”) were screened from 8 academic medical centers, to identify those with clinically-relevant colitis (colitis requiring systemic steroids). Of 1261 patients who received anti-PD-1-based therapy, 109 experienced colitis. The incidence was 3.2% (30/937) and 24.4% (79/324) in the monotherapy and combination therapy cohorts, respectively. Patients with colitis from combination therapy had significantly earlier symptom onset (7.2 weeks vs 25.4 weeks, p

The checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab is active in patients with metastatic melanoma who have failed ipilimumab. In this phase I/II study, we assessed nivolumab's safety in 92 ipilimumab-refractory patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, including those who experienced grade 3–4 drug-related toxicity to ipilimumab. We report long-term survival, response duration, and biomarkers in these patients after nivolumab treatment (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, then every 12 weeks for up to 2 years, with or without a multipeptide vaccine. The response rate for ipilimumab-refractory patients was 30% (95% CI, 21%–41%). The median duration of response was 14.6 months, median progression-free survival was 5.3 months, and median overall survival was 20.6 months, when patients were followed up for a median of 16 months. One- and 2-year survival rates were 68.4% and 31.2%, respectively. Ipilimumab-naïve and ipilimumab-refractory patients showed no significant difference in survival. The 21 patients with prior grade 3–4 toxicity to ipilimumab that was managed with steroids tolerated nivolumab well, with 62% (95% CI, 38%–82%) having complete or partial responses or stabilized disease at 24 weeks. High numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) were associated with poor survival. Thus, survival and long-term safety were excellent in ipilimumab-refractory patients treated with nivolumab. Prior grade 3–4 immune-related adverse effects from ipilimumab were not indicative of nivolumab toxicities, and patients had a high overall rate of remission or stability at 24 weeks. Prospectively evaluating MDSC numbers before treatment could help assess the expected benefit of nivolumab. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(4); 345–53. ©2016 AACR.

14 Background: ICOS is a costimulatory molecule upregulated on activated T cells. Vopra is an investigational ICOS agonist antibody that results in activation and proliferation of primed CD4 T effector cells. Vopra was assessed in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with nivolumab (nivo) in the Phase 1/2 ICONIC trial (NCT02904226). Emergence of a distinct ICOS high (hi) population of peripheral CD4 T effector cells, not seen with PD-1 inhibitors alone, was associated with improved ORR, PFS and OS with vopra mono and combo therapy (AACR 2019). Baseline tumor and blood biomarkers were assessed for ability to predict ICOS hi CD4 T cell emergence and clinical outcomes. Methods: Fresh pre-treatment tumor biopsies were assessed by RS, a gene signature describing immune cell infiltration, and other biomarkers, including PD-L1 TPS by IHC. Pts were classified as RS1 and RS2 based on medium and high cutoffs. Associations between potential predictive biomarkers, ICOS hi CD4 T cell emergence and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Baseline RS is significantly higher in patients with emergence of ICOS hi CD4 T cells. High RS was associated with increased emergence of ICOS hi CD4 T cells, accompanied by improved RECIST response, PFS, and OS. In contrast, no association was noted with PD-L1 IHC. Clinical trial information: NCT02904226. Conclusions: In this retrospective subset analysis, the RS score, but not PD-L1, in baseline tumor biopsies was predictive of emergence of an ICOS hi CD4 T cell population and improved RECIST response, PFS, and OS in patients treated with vopra alone and in combination with nivo. Clinical evaluation of vopra and investigational PD-1 inhibitor JTX-4014 in cancer patients with RS selection is planned. [Table: see text]

Merlin/NF2 is a bona fide tumor suppressor whose mutations underlie inherited tumor syndrome neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), as well as various sporadic cancers including kidney cancer. Multiple Merlin/NF2 effector pathways including the Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway have been identified. However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning the growth and survival of NF2-mutant tumors remain poorly understood. Using an inducible orthotopic kidney tumor model, we demonstrate that YAP/TAZ silencing is sufficient to induce regression of pre-established NF2-deficient tumors. Mechanistically, YAP/TAZ depletion diminishes glycolysis-dependent growth and increases mitochondrial respiration and reactive oxygen species (ROS) buildup, resulting in oxidative-stress-induced cell death when challenged by nutrient stress. Furthermore, we identify lysosome-mediated cAMP-PKA/EPAC-dependent activation of RAF-MEK-ERK signaling as a resistance mechanism to YAP/TAZ inhibition. Finally, unbiased analysis of TCGA primary kidney tumor transcriptomes confirms a positive correlation of a YAP/TAZ signature with glycolysis and inverse correlations with oxidative phosphorylation and lysosomal gene expression, supporting the clinical relevance of our findings.

The mechanisms by which some melanoma cells adapt to Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF) inhibitor therapy are incompletely understood. In the present study, we used mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics to determine how BRAF inhibition remodeled the signaling network of melanoma cell lines that were BRAF mutant and PTEN null. Short-term BRAF inhibition was associated with marked changes in fibronectin-based adhesion signaling that were PTEN dependent. These effects were recapitulated through BRAF siRNA knockdown and following treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs. Increased fibronectin expression was also observed in mouse xenograft models as well as specimens from melanoma patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor treatment. Analysis of a melanoma tissue microarray showed loss of PTEN expression to predict for a lower overall survival, with a trend for even lower survival being seen when loss of fibronectin was included in the analysis. Mechanistically, the induction of fibronectin limited the responses of these PTEN-null melanoma cell lines to vemurafenib, with enhanced cytotoxicity observed following the knockdown of either fibronectin or its receptor α5β1 integrin. This in turn abrogated the cytotoxic response to BRAF inhibition via increased AKT signaling, which prevented the induction of cell death by maintaining the expression of the pro-survival protein Mcl-1. The protection conveyed by the induction of FN expression could be overcome through combined treatment with a BRAF and PI3K inhibitor.

Brain metastases are a common and serious complication among patients with metastatic melanoma. The selective BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We examined the real-world application and clinical outcomes of vemurafenib in this patient population. Demographic, treatment patterns, response, and survival data were collected from medical charts. Clinical data on 283 patients with active BRAF V600E-mutant MBM treated with vemurafenib were provided by 70 US oncologists. Mean age was 57.2 years, 60.8% were male, 67.5% had ECOG performance status of 0–1, and 43.1% used corticosteroids at vemurafenib initiation. Median follow-up was 5.7 months. Following vemurafenib initiation, 48.1% of patients experienced intracranial response and 45.6% experienced extracranial response. The Kaplan–Meier estimate for overall survival was 59% at 12 months. Multivariate analyses showed associations between intracranial response and both corticosteroid use and vemurafenib as initial therapy after MBM diagnosis. Larger size (5–10 mm vs.