Search

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with limited treatment options due to extensive radiation and chemotherapy resistance. Monotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade showed no survival benefit. A combination of immunomodulation and radiotherapy may offer new treatment strategies, as demonstrated for non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation-induced anti-tumour immunity is mediated through cytosolic nucleic acid sensing pathways that drive the expression of interferon beta-1 (IFNB1) and proinflammatory cytokines. Methods: Human PDAC cell lines (PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2, BxPC-3) were treated with X-rays and protons. Immunogenic cell death was measured based on HMGB1 release. Cytosolic dsDNA and dsRNA were analysed by immunofluorescence microscopy. Cell cycle progression, MHC-I and PD-L1 expression were determined by flow cytometry. Galectin-1 and IFNB1 were measured by ELISA. The expression levels and the phosphorylation status of the cGAS/STING and RIGI/MAVS signalling pathways were analysed by western blotting, the expression of IFNB1 and proinflammatory cytokines was determined by RT-qPCR and genomewide by RNA-seq. CRISPR-Cas9 knock-outs and inhibitors were used to elucidate the relevance of STING, MAVS and NF-kB for radiation-induced IFNB1 activation. Results: We demonstrate that a clinically relevant X-ray hypofractionation regimen (3x8 Gy) induces immunogenic cell death and activates IFNB1 and proinflammatory cytokines. Fractionated radiation induces G2/M arrest and accumulation of cytosolic DNA in PDAC cells, which partly originates from mitochondria. RNA-seq analysis shows a global upregulation of type I interferon response and NF-kB signalling in PDAC cells following 3x8 Gy. Radiation-induced immunogenic response is regulated by STING, MAVS and NF-kB. In addition to immunostimulation, radiation also induces immunosuppressive galectin-1. No significant changes in MHC-I or PD-L1 expression were observed. Moreover, PDAC cell lines show similar radiationinduced immune effects when exposed to single-dose protons or photons. Conclusion: Our findings provide a rationale for combinatorial radiationimmunomodulatory treatment approaches in PDAC using conventional photon-based or proton beam radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with limited treatment options due to extensive radiation and chemotherapy resistance. Monotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade showed no survival benefit. A combination of immunomodulation and radiotherapy may offer new treatment strategies, as demonstrated for non-small cell lung cancer. Radiation-induced anti-tumour immunity is mediated through cytosolic nucleic acid sensing pathways that drive the expression of interferon beta-1 (IFNB1) and proinflammatory cytokines. Methods: Human PDAC cell lines (PANC-1, MIA PaCa-2, BxPC-3) were treated with X-rays and protons. Immunogenic cell death was measured based on HMGB1 release. Cytosolic dsDNA and dsRNA were analysed by immunofluorescence microscopy. Cell cycle progression, MHC-I and PD-L1 expression were determined by flow cytometry. Galectin-1 and IFNB1 were measured by ELISA. The expression levels and the phosphorylation status of the cGAS/STING and RIGI/ MAVS signalling pathways were analysed by western blotting, the expression of IFNB1 and proinflammatory cytokines was determined by RT-qPCR and genome-wide by RNA-seq. CRISPR-Cas9 knock-outs and inhibitors were used to elucidate the relevance of STING, MAVS and NF-κB for radiation-induced IFNB1 activation. Results: We demonstrate that a clinically relevant X-ray hypofractionation regimen (3x8 Gy) induces immunogenic cell death and activates IFNB1 and proinflammatory cytokines. Fractionated radiation induces G2/M arrest and accumulation of cytosolic DNA in PDAC cells, which partly originates from mitochondria. RNA-seq analysis shows a global upregulation of type I interferon response and NF- κB signalling in PDAC cells following 3x8 Gy. Radiation-induced immunogenic response is regulated by STING, MAVS and NF- κB. In addition to immunostimulation, radiation also induces immunosuppressive galectin-1. No significant changes in MHC-I or PD-L1 expression were observed. Moreover, PDAC cell lines show similar radiation-induced immune effects when exposed to single-dose protons or photons. Conclusion: Our findings provide a rationale for combinatorial radiation-immunomodulatory treatment approaches in PDAC using conventional photon-based or proton beam radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This work aimed to characterize a dedicated phantom for assessing the dose near metal implants for radiotherapy with photons and protons. A dosimetry audit phantom was redesigned to position a Gafchromic EBT-3 film within a bisected titanium pedicle screw (6.5 mm diameter). The mass density and the water equivalent thickness (WET) of the phantom material were determined. The phantom was irradiated using a photon arc and a horizontal proton beam in combination with a couch rotation of 20°, with three repeated measurements each. Treatment plans utilizing a single field covering the screw and the EBT-3 film were optimized to deliver a physical dose of 2 Gy using a collapsed cone and Monte Carlo dose engine for photons and protons, respectively. The mass density and the WET of the phantom were determined as (1.033 ± 0.010) gcm-3 and (1.022 ± 0.013), respectively. Ionisation chamber measurements agreed within 1% (photons) and 0.5% (protons) with the calculated dose values. Relative photon dosimetry measurements using EBT-3 films revealed an agreement between measured and calculated horizontal profiles within the confidence interval for areas beyond 5 mm from the center. For photon plans, significant deviations of more than 10% were found at the interfaces between phantom material and screw. The proton measurements showed a gradual decrease of 3% across both profiles. In contrast to photon plans, no dose increase was measured within the screw, but significant dose fluctuations (>5%) in the beam's exit region. This study showed that the behavior of dose engine is affected by metal implants and thus dosimetric measurements are highly recommended. The presented phantom can serve as foundation for dedicated end-2-end phantoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Carbon ion beams are well accepted as densely ionizing radiation with a high linear energy transfer (LET). However, the current clinical practice does not fully exploit the highest possible dose‐averaged LET (LETd) and, consequently, the biological potential in the target. This aspect becomes worse in larger tumors for which inferior clinical outcomes and corresponding lower LETd was reported. Purpose: The vicinity to critical organs in general and the inferior overall survival reported for larger sacral chordomas treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), makes the treatment of such tumors challenging. In this work it was aimed to increase the LETd in large volume tumors while maintaining the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)‐weighted dose, utilizing the LETd optimization functions of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Methods: Ten reference sequential boost carbon ion treatment plans, designed to mimic clinical plans for large sacral chordoma tumors, were generated. High dose clinical target volumes (CTV‐HD) larger than 250cm3$250 \,{\rm cm}^{3}$ were considered as large targets. The total RBE‐weighted median dose prescription with the local effect model (LEM) was DRBE,50%=73.6Gy$\textrm {D}_{\rm RBE, 50\%}=73.6 \,{\rm Gy}$ in 16 fractions (nine to low dose and seven to high dose planning target volume). No LETd optimization was performed in the reference plans, while LETd optimized plans used the minimum LETd (Lmin) optimization function in RayStation 2023B. Three different Lmin values were investigated and specified for the seven boost fractions: Lmin=60keV/μm$\textrm {L}_{\rm min}=60 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$, Lmin=80keV/μm$\textrm {L}_{\rm min}=80 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$ and Lmin=100keV/μm$\textrm {L}_{\rm min}=100 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$. To compare the LETd optimized against reference plans, LETd and RBE‐weighted dose based goals similar to and less strict than clinical ones were specified for the target. The goals for the organs at risk (OAR) remained unchanged. Robustness evaluation was studied for eight scenarios (±3.5%$\pm 3.5\%$ range uncertainty and ±3mm$\pm 3 \,{\rm mm}$ setup uncertainty along the main three axes). Results: The optimization method with Lmin=60keV/μm$\textrm {L}_{\rm min}=60 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$ resulted in an optimal LETd distribution with an average increase of LETd,98%${\rm {LET}}_{{\rm {d,}}98\%}$ (and LETd,50%${\rm {LET}}_{{\rm {d,}}50\%}$) in the CTV‐HD by 8.9±1.5keV/μm$8.9\pm 1.5 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$ (27%$27\%$) (and 6.9±1.3keV/μm$6.9\pm 1.3 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$ (17%$17\%$)), without significant difference in the RBE‐weighted dose. By allowing ±5%$\pm 5\%$ over‐ and under‐dosage in the target, the LETd,98%${\rm {LET}}_{{\rm {d,}}98\%}$ (and LETd,50%${\rm {LET}}_{{\rm {d,}}50\%}$) can be increased by 11.3±1.2keV/μm$11.3\pm 1.2 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$ (34%$34\%$) (and 11.7±3.4keV/μm$11.7\pm 3.4 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$ (29%$29\%$)), using the optimization parameters Lmin=80keV/μm$\textrm {L}_{\rm min}=80 \,{\rm keV}/{\umu }{\rm m}$. The pass rate for the OAR goals in the LETd optimized plans was in the same level as the reference plans. LETd optimization lead to less robust plans compared to reference plans. Conclusions: Compared to conventionally optimized treatment plans, the LETd in the target was increased while maintaining the RBE‐weighted dose using TPS LETd optimization functionalities. Regularly assessing RBE‐weighted dose robustness and acquiring more in‐room images remain crucial and inevitable aspects during treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]