Search

Background: Women have a higher risk of mortality than men after cardiac surgery independent of other risk factors. The reason for this may not be limited to patient-specific variables. Failure to rescue (FTR) patients from death after a postoperative complication is a nationally endorsed quality care metric. We aimed to identify whether sex disparities exist in the quality of care after cardiac surgery using FTR rates. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 30 973 men (70.4%) and 13 033 women (29.6%) aged over 18 years undergoing coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery in New York (2016–2019) and California (2016–2018) who experienced at least one serious postoperative complication. The primary outcome was the FTR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of death after complication. Propensity matching was used to adjust for baseline differences between sexes and yielded 12 657 pairs. Results: Female patients that experienced complications were older (mean age 67.8 versus 66.7, P P P P 20% (RR, 1.21 [CI, 1.01–1.59]), higher frailty (RR, 2.83 [CI, 1.35–5.93]), undergoing concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgeries (RR, 1.69 [CI, 1.49–1.9]), and higher number of postoperative complications (RR, 16.28 [CI, 14–18.89]). In the propensity-matched cohorts, the FTR rate remained significantly lower among men than women (6.0% versus 8.0%, P Conclusions: Women are less likely to be rescued from death following postoperative complications, independent of socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. Further research is warranted to investigate the clinical practices contributing to this disparity in quality of care following cardiac surgery.

Mitral valve repair is infrequently performed in patients undergoing corrective surgery for failed mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in current United States practice. This article describes surgical techniques for reconstructive surgery after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Nine patients underwent robotic-assisted mitral surgery after failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair between 2008 and 2020 at a single center. Repair was completed in 88.9% (n = 8) patients, and freedom from2+ mitral regurgitation was 87.5% (n = 7) at a median follow-up of 1.9 years.

Background Transcatheter edge-to-edge (TEER) mitral repair may be complicated by residual or recurrent mitral regurgitation. An increasing need for surgical reintervention has been reported, but operative outcomes are ill defined. Objectives This study evaluated national outcomes of mitral surgery after TEER. Methods The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was used to identify 524 adults who underwent mitral surgery after TEER between July 2014 and June 2020. Emergencies (5.0%; n = 26), previous mitral surgery (5.3%; n = 28), or open implantation of transcatheter prostheses (1.5%; n = 8) were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Results In the study cohort of 463 patients, the median age was 76 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 67 to 81 years), median left ventricular ejection fraction was 57% (IQR: 48% to 62%), and 177 (38.2%) patients had degenerative disease. Major concomitant cardiac surgery was performed in 137 (29.4%) patients: in patients undergoing isolated mitral surgery, the median STS-predicted mortality was 6.5% (IQR: 3.9% to 10.5%), the observed mortality was 10.2% (n = 23 of 225), and the ratio of observed to expected mortality was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8 to 1.9). Predictors of mortality included urgent surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3 to 4.6), nondegenerative/unknown etiology (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.5), creatinine of >2.0 mg/dl (OR: 3.8; 95% CI: 1.9 to 7.9) and age of >80 years (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.4). In a volume outcomes analysis in an expanded cohort of 591 patients at 227 hospitals, operative mortality was 2.6% (n = 2 of 76) in 4 centers that performed >10 cases versus 12.4% (n = 64 of 515) in centers performing fewer (p = 0.01). The surgical repair rate after failed TEER was 4.8% (n = 22) and was 6.8% (n = 12) in degenerative disease. Conclusions This study indicates that mitral repair is infrequently achieved after failed TEER, which may have implications for treatment choice in lower-risk and younger patients with degenerative disease. These findings should inform patient consent for TEER, clinical trial design, and clinical performance measures.

Heart donation after circulatory death was recently reintroduced in the United States with hopes of increasing donor heart availability. We examined its national use and outcomes.The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify validated adult patients undergoing heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death donors (n = 266) and donation after brain death donors (n = 5998) between December 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, after excluding heart-lung transplants. Propensity score matching was used to create more balanced groups for comparison.The monthly percentage of donation after circulatory death heart transplant increased from 2.5% in December 2019 to 6.8% in December 2021 (P .001). Twenty-two centers performed donation after circulatory death heart transplants, ranging from 1 to 75 transplants per center. Four centers performed 70% of the national volume. Recipients of donation after circulatory death hearts were more likely to be clinically stable (80.4% vs 41.1% in status 3-6, P .001), to have type O blood (58.3% vs 39.9%, P .001), and to wait longer after listing (55, interquartile range, 15-180 days vs 32, interquartile range, 9-160 days, P = .003). Six-month survival was 92.1% (95% confidence interval, 91.3-92.8) after donation after brain death heart transplants and 92.6% (95% confidence interval, 88.1-95.4) after donation after circulatory death heart transplants (hazard ratio, 0.94, 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.54, P = .79). Outcomes in propensity-matched patients were similar except for higher rates of treated acute rejection in donation after circulatory death transplants before discharge (14.4% vs 8.8%, P = .01). In donation after circulatory death heart recipients, outcomes did not differ based on the procurement technique (normothermic regional perfusion vs direct procurement and perfusion).Heart transplantation with donation after circulatory death donors has short-term survival comparable to donation after brain death transplants. Broader implementation could substantially increase donor organ availability.

In Barlow disease, increased repair complexity drives decreased repair rates. We evaluated outcomes of a simplified approach to robotic mitral repair in Barlow disease.A prospective institutional registry with vital-statistics, statewide admissions and echocardiographic follow-up was used to identify 924 consecutive patients undergoing robotic surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) between 2005 and 2020, including 12% (n = 111) with Barlow disease. Freedom frommoderate (2+) MR was analyzed with death as a competing risk and predictors of failure were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (range, 0-15 years).Patients with Barlow disease were younger (median, age 59 years; interquartile range [IQR], 51-67 vs 62; IQR, 54-70 years, P = .05) than patients without Barlow disease. Replacements were performed in 0.9% (n = 1) of patients with Barlow disease and 0.8% (n = 6) of patients without Barlow disease (P = 1). Repairs comprised simple leaflet resection and annuloplasty band in 73.9% (n = 546) of non-Barlow valves versus 12.7% (n = 14) of patients with Barlow disease who required neochordae (53.6%, n = 59), chordal transfer (20%, n = 22), and commissural sutures (37.3%, n = 41), with longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (median 133; IQR, 117-149 minutes vs 119; IQR, 106-142 minutes, P .01). Survival free from greater than moderate MR at 5 years was 92.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.2%-98.1%) in patients with Barlow disease versus 96.0% (95% CI, 93.3%-98.0%) in patients without Barlow disease (P = .40). Predictors of late failure included Barlow disease (hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.0) and non-Barlow isolated anterior leaflet prolapse (hazard ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.3-13.4).Barlow disease may be reliably and safely repaired with acceptable long-term durability by experienced robotic mitral surgery programs.

National registry data show wide variability in degenerative mitral repair rates and infrequent use of intraoperative repair revision to eliminate residual mitral regurgitation (MR). The consequence of uncorrected mild residual MR is also not clear. We identified factors associated with intraoperative revision of degenerative mitral repair and evaluated long-term effects of intraoperative mild residual MR.A prospective institutional registry of 858 patients with degenerative MR undergoing robotic mitral surgery was linked to statewide databases. Univariate logistic regression identified factors associated with intraoperative repair revision. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted with Cox regression. Late freedom from more-than-moderate MR or reintervention was estimated with death as a competing risk.Repair rate was 99.3%. Repair was revised intraoperatively in 19 patients and was associated with anterior or bileaflet prolapse, adjunctive repair techniques, and annuloplasty band size (all P .05). Intraoperative repair revision did not result in increased postoperative complications. Intraoperative mild residual MR (n = 111) was independently associated with inferior 8-year survival (hazard ratio, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.33-6.23), worse freedom from more than moderate MR (hazard ratio, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.60-7.00), and worse freedom from mitral reintervention (hazard ratio, 6.40; 95% CI, 2.19-18.72) (all P .01).A near 100% repair rate with acceptable durability may be achieved safely with intraoperative revision of postrepair residual MR. Mild residual MR was independently associated with reduced survival, worse freedom from more-than-moderate MR, and worse freedom from mitral reintervention at 8-year follow-up.

Single-center studies have demonstrated excellent results for the Ross procedure in children. We aimed to evaluate national variation in clinical outcomes using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.The database was used to identify 2805 children undergoing the Ross procedure from 2000 through 2018, comprising 163 neonates (30 days, 5.8%), 448 infants (30-365 days, 16.0%), 1444 children (1-12 years, 51.5%), and 750 teenagers (13-17 years, 26.7%). Centers were divided into terciles by procedural volume. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of a composite outcome of operative mortality, neurologic deficit, or renal failure requiring dialysis.Neonates and infants were more likely to present with aortic stenosis than children and teenagers (61.7% [n = 377] vs 34.6% [n = 760]; P.01) and have risk factors including preoperative shock (9.2% [n = 56] vs 0.4% [n = 8]; P.01). Operative mortality was 24.1% (n = 39) in neonates, 11.2% (n = 50) in infants, 1.5% (n = 21) in children , and 0.8% (n = 6) in teenagers (P.01). Independent predictors of the composite outcome in children aged1 year included neonatal age (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.8), low-volume center (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.9), and procedure year (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9 per 5 years). In children aged ≥1 year, no association was found between center volume, procedure year, and outcome.The Ross procedure is being performed with low mortality in children aged ≥1 year throughout North America. High-volume centers have improved outcomes in children aged1 year, who have different anatomic characteristics and risk profiles.

Background Factors associated with poor prognosis following receipt of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in adults with cardiac arrest remain unclear. We aimed to identify predictors of mortality in adults with cardiac arrest receiving ECMO in a nationally representative sample. Methods and Results The US Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was used to identify 782 adults hospitalized with cardiac arrest who received ECMO between 2006 and 2014. The primary outcome of interest was all‐cause in‐hospital mortality. Factors associated with mortality were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The overall in‐hospital mortality rate was 60.4% (n=472). Patients who died were older and more often men, of non‐White race, and with lower household income than those surviving to discharge. In the risk‐adjusted analysis, independent predictors of mortality included older age, male sex, lower annual income, absence of ventricular arrhythmia, absence of percutaneous coronary intervention, and presence of therapeutic hypothermia. Conclusions Demographic and therapeutic factors are independently associated with mortality in patients with cardiac arrest receiving ECMO. Identification of which patients with cardiac arrest may receive the utmost benefit from ECMO may aid with decision‐making regarding its implementation. Larger‐scale studies are warranted to assess the appropriate candidates for ECMO in cardiac arrest.

Variation in degenerative mitral morphology may contribute to suboptimal repair rates. This study evaluates outcomes of a standardized mitral repair technique.An institutional clinical registry was used to identify 1036 consecutive patients undergoing robotic mitral surgery between 2005 and 2020: 87% (n = 902) had degenerative disease. Calcification, failed transcatheter repair, and endocarditis were excluded, leaving 582 (68%) patients with isolated posterior leaflet and 268 (32%) with anterior or bileaflet prolapse. Standardized repair comprised triangular resection and true-sized flexible band in posterior leaflet prolapse. Freedom from greater than 2+ moderate mitral regurgitation stratified by prolapse location was assessed using competing risk analysis with death as a competing event. Median follow-up was 5.5 (range 0-15) years.Of patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse, 87% (n = 506) had standardized repairs and 13% (n = 76) had additional or nonresectional techniques vs 24% (n = 65) and 76% (n = 203), respectively, for anterior or bileaflet prolapse (P.001). Adjunctive techniques in the isolated posterior leaflet group included chordal reconstruction (8.6%, n = 50) and commissural sutures (3.4%, n = 20). Overall, median clamp time was 80 (interquartile range, 68-98) minutes, 17 patients required intraoperative re-repair, and 6 required mitral replacement. Freedom from greater than 2+ regurgitation or reintervention at 10 years was 92% for posterior prolapse (vs 83% for anterior or bileaflet prolapse). Anterior or bileaflet prolapse was associated with late greater than 2+ regurgitation (hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-7.0).Posterior leaflet prolapse may be repaired in greater than 99% of patients using triangular resection and band annuloplasty, with satisfactory long-term durability. Increased risk of complex repairs and inferior durability highlights the value of identifying anterior and bileaflet prolapse preoperatively.

Purpose As donor criteria expand to meet increasing demand for transplantable hearts, increased focus has fallen on mitigating risk associated with extended criteria donors. It has been postulated that warm ischemic time may be as significant a factor as total ischemic time, and reduction is associated with better outcomes. This study investigates the impact of warm ischemic time on post-operative events and survival in orthotopic heart transplantation patients at a high-volume center. Methods From 2015 to 2020, patients who underwent heart transplantation were identified at a single institution in a prospectively maintained database with long-term clinical outcomes. After excluding heart-lung transplants and those with missing warm ischemic time, 388 patients were identified. Patients were classified in to three groups: Results Between warm ischemic time groups, there were significant differences in recipient sex, age, and body mass index (BMI), all p 0.05, as was 30-day freedom from PGD, 80.2% (85) vs 82.9% (141) vs 76.8% (86), 30-day survival, 98.1% (104) vs 98.2% (167) vs 97.3% (109), and one-year survival, 92.5% (98) vs 93.5% (159) vs 91.1% (102) (all p > 0.05). Warm ischemic time was not a predictor of one-year mortality, odds ratio (OR) 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.02). In subgroup analysis with over 4 hours of total ischemic time, warm ischemic time was not a predictor of PGD, OR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.82-1.07), or one-year survival, OR 0.94 (95% CI, 0.82-1.07). Conclusion Although increased warm ischemic time did not predict increased adverse post-operative outcomes, continued emphasis on reducing total ischemic time is paramount.