Search

Background Infections are important complications of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with few studies having investigated oral antibiotic use. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing can contribute to multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridioides difficile infections seen in ESRD. This study investigates antibiotic prescribing practices in ESRD across New York State (NYS). Methods Retrospective case-control study from 2016 to 2017 of NYS ESRD and non-ESRD patients analyzing Medicare part B billing codes, 7 days before and 3 days after part D claims. Frequencies of each infection, each antibiotic, dosages, and the antibiotics associated with infections were assessed using χ 2 analysis. A NYS small dialysis organization comprising approximately 2200 patients was also analyzed. Outcomes measured were the frequencies of infections and of each antibiotic prescribed. Incidence measures included antibiotics per 1000 and individuals receiving antibiotics per 1000. Results A total of 48 100 infections were treated in 35 369 ESRD patients and 2 544 443 infections treated in 3 777 314 non-ESRD patients. ESRD patients were younger, male, and African American. ESRD and non-ESRD patients receiving antibiotics was 520.29/1000 and 296.48/1000, respectively (P Conclusions This study identifies issues with appropriate antibiotic usage stressing the importance of antibiotic education to nephrologist and nonnephrologist providers. It provides support for outpatient antibiotic stewardship programs.

Background:Point-of-care ultrasound in end-stage renal disease is on the rise. Presently the decision to cannulate an arteriovenous fistula is based on its duration since surgery and physical exam. This study examines the effects of point-of-care ultrasound on decreasing the time to arteriovenous fistula cannulation, time spent with a central venous catheter, and the complications and infections that arise.Methods:Prospective point-of-care ultrasound patients were recruited between January 2015 and January 2018, while retrospective data (non-point-of-care ultrasound) were collected via chart review from patients who had fistula creation between November 2011 and May 2014. Patients had point-of-care ultrasound within 3 weeks after arteriovenous fistula creation and were followed for 1 year. Arteriovenous fistula cannulation was initiated when the following parameters were met: diameter > 6 mm (with no depreciable narrowing of more than 20% throughout), depth 6 cm. Demographic data, as well as time to cannulation and central venous catheter removal, number of infections, complications, and interventions were compared between point-of-care ultrasound and non-point-of-care ultrasound groups using unpaired t-test, chi-square, and Fisher exact test statistical analysis.Results:A total of 37 patients with new arteriovenous fistulas were followed by point-of-care ultrasound compared to 29 non-point-of-care ultrasound patients. Point-of-care ultrasound patients had earlier cannulations (35.5 vs 63.3 days, p Conclusion:Point-of-care ultrasound facilitates early and safe arteriovenous fistula cannulation leading to a reduction in central venous catheter time and risk of infection. Point-of-care ultrasound may also aid in earlier identification of complications and difficult cannulations.

OBJECTIVES Disparities in traumatic brain injury outcomes for ethnic minorities and the uninsured have previously been demonstrated; however, outcomes in undocumented immigrants have not been examined. We wanted to determine whether ethnicity, insurance, and documentation status served as risk factors for disparities in traumatic brain injury outcomes between undocumented immigrants and documented residents. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury admitted to the surgical/trauma ICU at a level 1 trauma center serving a large immigrant population in New York City from 2009 to 2016. PATIENTS Four-hundred seventy-one traumatic brain injury patients requiring surgical/trauma ICU admission. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Undocumented immigrants constituted 29% of the population, were younger (39 vs 57 yr old, respectively; p < 0.0001), Hispanic (83%; p < 0.0001), and uninsured (87%; p < 0.0001). Falls resulted in the majority of traumatic brain injuries in the total population, however, undocumented immigrants were almost twice as likely to be assaulted (p = 0.0032). There was no difference in presence of midline shifts, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Score, hypotension, hypoxia, and pupillary reactions between undocumented immigrants and documented residents. Undocumented immigrants presented with significantly more effaced basilar cisterns (p = 0.0008). There was no difference in hospital care between undocumented immigrants and documented residents as determined by emergency department to surgical/trauma ICU transfer times (p = 0.967). Undocumented immigrants were more likely to be discharged home (53% vs 33%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and less likely to be sent to rehabilitation (25% vs 32%, respectively; p = 0.0009). After adjusting length of stay and mortality for covariates, undocumented immigrants had shorter length of stay (p < 0.05) and there was no difference in hospital mortality between undocumented immigrants and documented residents. CONCLUSIONS Undocumented immigrants with traumatic brain injuries were more likely to be younger, have shorter length of stay, and experience similar mortality rates to documented residents. Social economic status may play a role in events prior to hospitalization and likely does in disposition outcomes.

Background Epidemiologic studies have shown that undocumented immigrants (UIs) display characteristics of having a low socioeconomic status and are primarily of ethnic minorities. These social determinants of health are known to be associated with diminished health care access and poor clinical outcomes. We therefore investigated the impact of documentation status on the clinical outcomes of patients with traumatic injuries. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective review of the trauma registry at our safety net institution for all adult patients who were admitted from 2010 to 2014. UIs were identified by the absence of a valid social security number within their medical records. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the impact of documentation status on in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and the odds of rehab placement. Results 4924 trauma patients met the study criteria, of which 1050 (21.3%) were UIs. There was no significant difference in mortality rates between the two populations. Multivariate regression analyses revealed a longer average LOS and a decreased likelihood for placement in an in-patient rehabilitation facility following hospitalization for UIs, even after accounting for insurance, age, injury severity, and other possible confounders known to affect these outcomes. Conclusions There was no association between in-hospital mortality and documentation status; however, UIs had a longer average LOS and were less likely to be placed into rehab following their hospitalization. A longer LOS and a decreased likelihood for rehabilitation placement suggest that disparities in trauma care exist for UIs, putting them at risk for worse clinical and functional outcomes.

We aimed to investigate the incidence of electrolyte abnormalities, acute kidney injury (AKI), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and infections in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) treated with hypertonic saline (HTS) as osmolar therapy. We retrospectively studied 205 TBI patients, 96 with HTS and 109 without, admitted to the surgical/trauma intensive care unit between 2006 and 2012. Hemodynamics, electrolytes, length of stay (LOS), acute physiological assessment and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), injury severity scores (ISS) and mortality were tabulated. Infection, mechanical ventilation, DVT and AKI incidence were reviewed. HTS was associated with increased LOS and all infections (p = 0.0001). After correction for the Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and ventilator need, pulmonary infections (p = 0.001) and LOS remained higher with HTS (p = 0.0048). HTS did not result in increased blood pressure, DVT, AKI or neurological benefits. HTS significantly increased the odds for all infections, most specifically pulmonary infections, in patients with GCS < 8. Due to these findings, HTS in TBI should be administered with caution regardless of acuity.

Few data have been reported on anemia management practices in hospital-based dialysis centers (HBDCs), which are uniquely different from other freestanding dialysis centers. Examining data from HBDCs would help determine if HBDCs and the general US dialysis population have similar trends related to how anemia is managed in dialysis patients.Given recent changes in the prescribing information of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and in end-stage renal disease-related health policy and reimbursement, this study describes trends in anemia management practices in HBDCs from January 2010 through March 2013.Electronic medical records of 5404 adult hemodialysis patients in 50 US-based HBDCs were analyzed retrospectively. Patients included in the study cohort were aged ≥18 years and had at least 1 hemoglobin (Hb) measurement and 1 dose of an ESA between January 2010 and March 2013. End points included Hb concentration, darbepoetin alfa dosing, epoetin alfa dosing, and iron biomarkers (transferrin saturation and ferritin) and dosing.From 2010 to 2013, mean monthly Hb levels declined from 11.4 to 10.7 g/dL; the percentage of patients with mean monthly Hb levels10 g/dL increased from 11.3% to 24.4%; and the percentage of patients with mean monthly Hb levels12 g/dL declined from 30.1% to 11.2%. The median darbepoetin alfa cumulative 4-week dose also declined 38.8%, and the weekly epoetin alfa dose declined 24%. From January 2010 to March 2013, the percentage of patients with transferrin saturation30% increased from 35.8% to 43.6%, the percentage of patients with ferritin levels500 ng/mL increased from 62.0% to 77.9%, the percentage of patients with ferritin levels ≥800 ng/mL increased from 28.9% to 47.3%, and the median cumulative 4-week intravenous iron dose increased 50%.These study results support growing evidence that meaningful changes have occurred over the last 3 years in how anemia is clinically managed in US hemodialysis patients. Study limitations include that changes in patient clinical/demographic characteristics over time were not controlled for and that study findings may not be applicable to HBDCs that have different patient populations and/or do not use an electronic medical record system. Continuing to evaluate anemia management practices in HBDCs would provide additional information on the risks and benefits of anemia care. Consistent with national data, the findings from this study indicate that from 2010 to 2013, HBDCs modified anemia management practices for dialysis patients, as evidenced by reductions in mean monthly Hb levels and ESA dosing and by increases in iron biomarkers and dosing.

Understanding proper management of acute kidney injury (AKI) is important given that studies consistently demonstrate an increasing incidence rate of AKI in the critically ill. AKI carries a significant risk for mortality, which only increases if dialysis becomes a necessary treatment. It is not clear whether modalities other than conventional intermittent hemodialysis improve outcomes in AKI. Sustained low-efficiency daily dialysis (SLEDD) is a more recent extracorporeal treatment whose distinguishing characteristic is its hybrid integration of both continuous and intermittent hemodialysis modalities. Besides providing comparable hemodynamic stability through its decreased blood flow rate and extended hours of use, SLEDD is less complicated, is less expensive, and is convenient for staff and patient. As a result, its use in critical care is on the rise.

Prediction of which intensive care unit (ICU) patients are likely to develop acute renal failure (ARF) would be useful. However, scoring systems such as APACHE have been disappointing in this regard. We previously developed a bedside formula to predict ARF using only 3 parameters: serum albumin, urine osmolality, and presence of sepsis.We prospectively evaluated 115 consecutive medical ICU (MICU) patients, comparing the bedside formula to APACHE II AND APACHE III as predictors of ARF or death and looking at nutritional parameters such as iron binding capacity, triceps skin fold, mid-arm circumference, and total lymphocyte count. We then evaluated 123 additional consecutive MICU and 98 consecutive surgical ICU (SICU) patients, comparing the bedside formula to APACHE II.The bedside formula was consistently more accurate than APACHE II in predicting ARF or in-hospital death in MICU patients. However, in SICU neither formula predicted ARF, and APACHE II predicted in-hospital death slightly better. No nutritional parameter other than albumin correlated with ARF.The bedside formula appears superior to APACHE II in predicting ARF or death in MICU but not SICU. This suggests that these two ICU populations are different.

In most US states, taxpayers are paying, either directly or indirectly, for years of dialysis therapy for undocumented immigrants with end-stage renal disease who lack resources to pay for care themselves. Living donor transplant is a less expensive long-term alternative, but it is unknown what percentage of these patients have potential living donors.We conducted a cross-sectional survey of undocumented immigrant patients receiving dialysis at our outpatient center between March and May 2010. Forty-five patients completed the survey. The survey focused on the availability of potential living donors, perceived health status of those donors, and potential recipients' outlook on remaining on dialysis therapy versus receiving a kidney transplant. We gathered demographic and health status data for the survey participants and the 82 documented resident patients receiving care in the same dialysis unit.The average age of our undocumented immigrant patients was 44 years. The undocumented patients were healthier than their legal resident counterparts, with a lower incidence of coronary artery disease (7% vs 33%; P0.005) and diabetes mellitus (40% vs 68%; P0.005). Approximately half the undocumented immigrants were working when they were surveyed. Of the half who had stopped working, 82% said they would seek work if they had a kidney transplant. 60% had at least one potential kidney donor. Most donors were reported to reside in the United States or Canada.Undocumented immigrants treated with dialysis in the United States are relatively young and healthy, and many have at least one potential living kidney donor. Given the societal cost-savings associated with transplant, we suggest that policy makers should consider extending coverage to pay for living donor transplant for undocumented immigrants with end-stage renal disease.

Background and objectives: Patients with ESRD have an increased incidence of coronary events with a relatively higher risk for mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated whether it is safer to delay dialysis in AMI or if delay poses separate risks. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: We conducted a retrospective review of 131 long-term hemodialysis patients who had AMI and were admitted between 1997 and 2005 at three New York City municipal hospitals. Patients were separated into three groups on the basis of time between cardiac symptoms and first dialysis ( 48 h). Results: A total of 17 (13%) patients died, 10 (59%) of whom had either hypotension or an arrhythmia during their first cardiac care unit dialysis. Although these groups were comparable in acuity and cardiac status, there were no findings of increased morbidity (26, 36, and 20%, respectively) or mortality (11, 18, and 13%, respectively), despite differences in the timing of each group's dialysis. We found that previous cardiac disease, predialysis K+, ΔK+ after dialysis, and APACHE scores were significantly higher in patients with peridialysis morbidity. Conclusions: We conclude that there is no increased morbidity with early dialysis in AMI, but rather close attention needs to be paid to the rate of decrease in serum potassium in patients with ESRD and their level of acuity when undergoing dialysis.

A previously healthy 16-year-old boy with a closed, severe traumatic brain injury was admitted to a surgical and trauma intensive care unit. He was given a continuous infusion of propofol for sedation and to control intracranial pressure. About 3 days after the propofol infusion was started, metabolic acidosis and rhabdomyolysis developed. Acute renal failure ensued as a result of the rhabdomyolysis. Tachycardia with wide QRS complexes developed without hyperkalemia. The patient died of refractory cardiac dysrhythmia and circulatory collapse approximately 36 hours after the first signs of propofol infusion syndrome appeared. Propofol infusion syndrome is a rare but frequently fatal complication in critically ill children who are given prolonged high-dose infusions of the drug. The syndrome is characterized by severe metabolic acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure, refractory myocardial failure, and hyperlipidemia. Despite several publications on the subject in the past decade, most cases still seem to remain undetectable.

SURVEYING THE IMPACT OF THE END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (PPS) ON HOSPITAL BASED DIALYSIS CENTERS (HBDCS) George Coritsidis, Anjali Acharya, Ross Miller, Kelly Ko, Akhtar Ashfaq, Irene Agodoa; NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC), New York, NY, USA; Cerner Life Sciences, Beverly Hills, CA, USA; Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; The ESRD PPS will begin on January 1, 2011 and has the potential to impact HBDC financial stability, quality and patient access to care. This survey was designed to collect data related to HBDC’s perceptions of the PPS. Between Oct 2009 and Feb 2010, an online baseline questionnaire was sent to all HBDCs in the US (N=910) using the 2006 CMS provider file. Of the 910 HBDCs included in the CMS provider file, 669 were successfully contacted and 128 (19%) of facilities completed the survey. Respondents from dialysis centers affiliated with smaller hospitals (