Search

Advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is characterised by genomic perturbations of key cell cycle regulators. Oncogenic activation of CDK4/6 results in RB1 inactivation and cell cycle progression. Given that single-agent CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy failed to show clinical activity in advanced GIST, we evaluated strategies for maximising response to therapeutic CDK4/6 inhibition.Targeted next-generation sequencing and multiplexed protein imaging were used to detect cell cycle regulator aberrations in GIST clinical samples. The impact of inhibitors of CDK2, CDK4 and CDK2/4/6 was determined through cell proliferation and protein detection assays. CDK-inhibitor resistance mechanisms were characterised in GIST cell lines after long-term exposure.We identify recurrent genomic aberrations in cell cycle regulators causing co-activation of the CDK2 and CDK4/6 pathways in clinical GIST samples. Therapeutic co-targeting of CDK2 and CDK4/6 is synergistic in GIST cell lines with intact RB1, through inhibition of RB1 hyperphosphorylation and cell proliferation. Moreover, RB1 inactivation and a novel oncogenic cyclin D1 resulting from an intragenic rearrangement (CCND1::chr11.g:70025223) are mechanisms of acquired CDK-inhibitor resistance in GIST.These studies establish the biological rationale for CDK2 and CDK4/6 co-inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced GIST, including metastatic GIST progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Currently, the only approved treatments for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), which eventually lead to the development of secondary resistance mutations in KIT or PDGFRA and disease progression. Herein, we identified G protein–coupled receptor 20 (GPR20) as a novel non–tyrosine kinase target in GIST, developed new GPR20 IHC, and assessed GPR20 expression in cell lines, patient-derived xenografts, and clinical samples from two institutes (United States and Japan). We studied GPR20 expression stratified by treatment line, KIT expression, GIST molecular subtype, and primary tumor location. We produced DS-6157a, an anti-GPR20 antibody–drug conjugate with a novel tetrapeptide-based linker and DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor exatecan derivative (DXd). DS-6157a exhibited GPR20 expression–dependent antitumor activity in GIST xenograft models including a GIST model resistant to imatinib, sunitinib, and regorafenib. Preclinical pharmacokinetics and safety profile of DS-6157a support its clinical development as a potential novel GIST therapy in patients who are refractory or have resistance or intolerance to approved TKIs.Significance:GPR20 is selectively expressed in GIST across all treatment lines, regardless of KIT/PDGFRA genotypes. We generated DS-6157a, a DXd-based antibody–drug conjugate that exhibited antitumor activity in GIST models by a different mode of action than currently approved TKIs, showing favorable pharmacokinetics and safety profiles.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1307

Characteristics for GIST patient samples, GPR20 expression in KIT/PDGFRA wild type GIST, GPR20 expression in normal, malignant and sarcoma tissue microarrays.

Table S2. cBioPortal cancer subtypes.

LEE011 reduced RB phosphorylation in a time-dependent manner.

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a mesenchymal neoplasm with complex copy-number alterations and characteristic loss of tumor suppressor genes without known recurrent activating mutations. Clinical management of advanced LMS relies on chemotherapy and complementary palliative approaches, and research efforts to date have had limited success identifying clinically actionable biomarkers or targeted therapeutic vulnerabilities. To explore the biological underpinning of LMS, we evaluated gene-expression patterns of this disease in comparison with diverse sarcomas, nonmesenchymal neoplasms, and normal myogenic tissues. We identified a recurrent gene-expression program in LMS, with evidence of oncogenic evolution of an underlying smooth-muscle lineage-derived program characterized by activation of E2F1 and downstream effectors. Recurrently amplified or highly expressed genes in LMS were identified, including IGF1R and genes involved in retinoid signaling pathways. Though the majority of expressed transcripts were conserved across LMS samples, three separate subtypes were identified that were enriched for muscle-associated transcripts (conventional LMS), immune markers (inflammatory LMS), or a uterine-like gene-expression program (uterogenic LMS). Each of these subtypes expresses a unique subset of genes that may be useful in the management of LMS: IGF1R was enriched in conventional LMS, worse disease-specific survival was observed in inflammatory LMS, and prolactin was elaborated by uterogenic LMS. These results extend our understanding of LMS biology and identify several strategies and challenges for further translational investigation.Implications:LMS has a recurrent oncogenic transcriptional program and consists of molecular subtypes with biological and possible clinical implications.

Figure S1. Smooth muscle enriched gene sets and tumor suppressors in LMS. Figure S2. A unique subset of genes differentiates molecular subtypes of LMS. Figure S3. Validation of LMS subtypes in separate cohorts. Figure S4. Expression of previously described differentiating transcripts in LMS subtypes. Figure S5. Kaplan-Meier analysis of LMS subtypes. Figure S6. LMS cell lines lack an LMS-related gene expression program.

S1: Expression of GPR20 in clinical GIST specimens from NCCHE S2: Representative images of GPR20 expression in various sarcoma including GIST in University of Basel derived TMA. S3: GPR20 was not expressed in systemic mastocytosis. S4: Protein expression of human, cynomolgus monkey, rat, and mouse GPR20 on CHO-K1 cells. S5: Lack of DS-6157a efficacy in the GPR20-negative KPL-4 xenograft model. S6: Comparison of tumor growth curve of GIST-T1 and GIST-T1/GPR20 xenograft models.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) accounts for 8%-10% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. Clinical presentation and outcomes vary, yet discrete risk groups based on validated prognostic indices are not defined for the full spectrum of patients with SS.We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the SEER (surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program) database of SS patients who were70 years of age at diagnosis. We constructed a recursive partitioning model of overall survival using a training cohort of 1063 patients with variables: Age at diagnosis, sex, race, ethnicity, primary site, tumor size, tumor grade, and stage. Based on this model, we grouped patients into three risk groups and estimated 5-year overall survival for each group. We then applied these groups to a test cohort (n = 1063).Our model identified three prognostic groups with significantly different overall survival: low risk (local/regional stage with either21 years of age OR tumor7.5 cm and female sex), intermediate-risk (local/regional stage, age ≥ 21 years with either male sex and tumor7.5 cm OR any sex with appendicular anatomic location) and high risk (local/regional stage, age ≥ 21 years, tumor size ≥7.5 cm and non-appendicular location OR distant stage). Prognostic groups were applied to the test cohort, showing significantly different survival between groups (p 0.0001).Our analysis yields an intuitive risk-classification tree with discrete groups, which may provide useful information for researchers, patients, and clinicians. Prospective validation of this model may inform efforts at risk-stratifying treatment.

Sunitinib (A) and Regorafenib (B) plasma concentration (ng/mL) across several timepoints during cycle 1.

Supplementary Table S2 shows LRRC15 IHC expression in tumor and stroma of patients with sarcoma treated ABBV-085 monotherapy at 3.6 or 4.2 mg/kg

Supplementary Figure 3 - PDF file 230K, Effects of PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitor in chondrosarcoma cells

Supplementary Table from Preclinical Modeling of Leiomyosarcoma Identifies Susceptibility to Transcriptional CDK Inhibitors through Antagonism of E2F-Driven Oncogenic Gene Expression

Purpose:Leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma are common subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma or dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) typically have worse outcomes compared with localized leiomyosarcoma or well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS). A better understanding of genetic changes between primary/metastatic leiomyosarcoma and between WDLPS/DDLPS may provide insight into their genetic evolution.Experimental Design:We interrogated whole-exome sequencing (WES) from “trios” of normal tissue, primary tumor, and metastatic tumor from individual patients with leiomyosarcoma (n = 9), and trios of normal tissue, well-differentiated tumor, and dedifferentiated tumor from individual patients with liposarcoma (n = 19). Specifically, we performed mutational, copy number, and tumor evolution analyses on these cohorts and compared patterns among leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma trios.Results:Leiomyosarcoma cases harbored shared drivers through a typical parent/child relationship where the metastatic tumor was derived from the primary tumor. In contrast, while all liposarcoma cases shared the characteristic focal chromosome 12 amplicon, most paired liposarcoma cases did not share additional mutations, suggesting a divergent evolutionary pattern from a common precursor. No highly recurrent genomic alterations from WES were identified that could be implicated as driving the progression of disease in either sarcoma subtype.Conclusions:From a genomic perspective, leiomyosarcoma metastases contain genetic alterations that are also found in primary tumors. WDLPS and DDLPS, however, appear to divergently evolve from a common precursor harboring 12q amplification, rather than as a transformation to a higher-grade tumor. Further efforts to identify specific drivers of these distinct evolutionary patterns may inform future translational and clinical research in STS.

Supplementary Figure 2 - PDF file 49K, Example Western Blot Showing that IPI 504 above 150 mg/m2 Induces an Increase in Hsp70 in PBLs from GIST Patients PBLs were purified from GIST patient samples, and lysed. Ten microg of protein lysates were run on an SDS-PAGE minigel. After transfer, the membrane was labeled using anti-Hsp70 antibody and chemiluminescence

CCR Translation for the Article from Circulating Levels of Soluble KIT Serve as a Biomarker for Clinical Outcome in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients Receiving Sunitinib following Imatinib Failure

BARX1-/HAND1- GIST

Supplementary Table 1 - PDF file 74K, Mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters of IPI-504 and metabolites on Cycle 1, Day 1

Supplementary Figure 4 - PDF file 240K, Time-dependent effects of PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors on the activation of AKT and MAPK signaling pathways

Purpose: To evaluate sunitinib activity and potential cellular and molecular correlates in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients after imatinib failure, in addition to assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of different dose schedules.Experimental Design: In this open-label, dose-ranging, phase I/II study, 97 patients with metastatic imatinib-resistant/intolerant GIST received sunitinib at doses of 25, 50, or 75 mg/d on one of three schedules. Serial tumor imaging was done using computed tomography and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography scanning. PK and cell proliferation and KIT phosphorylation status in tumor biopsies were also analyzed.Results: Clinical benefit was observed in 52 patients (54%: 7 objective partial responses, 45 stable disease ≥6 months). Decreased tumor glycolytic activity was shown in most patients within 7 days of starting sunitinib using [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography. Sunitinib treatment was associated with reduced tumor cell proliferation by >25% in 52% of cases analyzed and reduced levels of phospho-KIT in tumor biopsies (indicating target modulation). The recommended dose schedule was 50 mg/d for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off treatment. On the 50-mg dose across all schedules, 79% of PK-evaluable patients achieved total drug trough concentrations above the target concentration (50 ng/mL) within 14 days of dosing. In addition, adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity.Conclusion: Cellular and molecular analyses showed that sunitinib clinical activity is associated with inhibition of KIT in GIST following imatinib failure, illustrating the rational approach used to develop a therapy aimed at the underlying oncogenic signaling pathway aberrancy. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(18):5902–9)

Supplementary Tables 11-12

Purpose:Receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in colorectal cancers are rare, but potentially therapeutically relevant. We describe clinical, molecular, and pathologic attributes of RTK fusion–associated colorectal cancer.Experimental Design:We identified all cases with RTK fusions in patients with colorectal cancer seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) who underwent OncoPanel testing between 2013 and 2018. Clinical, histologic, and molecular features were extracted from the patient charts and molecular testing results.Results:We identified 12 driver oncogenic fusions in various RTKs. These fusions occurred exclusively in BRAF and RAS wild-type tumors and were enriched in right-sided and mismatch repair–deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancers. All of the MMR-D colorectal cancers with RTK fusions were found in tumors with acquired MMR-D due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and one was associated with a sessile serrated polyp. Molecular profiles of MMR-D colorectal cancer with RTK fusions largely resembled BRAF V600E–mutated MMR-D colorectal cancer, rather than those secondary to Lynch syndrome. We describe two patients with fusion-associated microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer who derived clinical benefit from therapeutic targeting of their translocation. The first harbored an ALK-CAD fusion and received sequential crizotinib and alectinib therapy for a total of 7.5 months until developing an ALK L1196Q gatekeeper mutation. The second patient, whose tumor contained an ROS1-GOPC fusion, continues to benefit from entrectinib after 9 months of therapy.Conclusions:RTK fusions in colorectal cancer are a rare, but important disease subgroup that occurs in RAS and BRAF wild-type tumors. Despite enrichment in acquired MMR-D tumors, RTK fusions also occur in MSS colorectal cancer and provide an important therapeutic target.

Purpose:Polyclonal emergence of KIT secondary mutations is a main mechanism of imatinib progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Approved KIT inhibitors sunitinib and regorafenib have complementary activity against KIT resistance mutations. Preclinical evidence suggests that rapid alternation of sunitinib and regorafenib broadens the spectrum of imatinib-resistant subclones targeted.Patients and Methods:Phase Ib study investigating continuous treatment with cycles of sunitinib (3 days) followed by regorafenib (4 days) in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-refractory GIST. A 3+3 dosing schema was utilized to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Plasma samples were analyzed for pharmacokinetics and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) studies using targeted error correction sequencing (TEC-seq) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).Results:Of the 14 patients enrolled, 2 experienced dose-limiting toxicities at dose level 2 (asymptomatic grade 3 hypophosphatemia). Sunitinib 37.5 mg/day and regorafenib 120 mg/day was the RP2D. Treatment was well-tolerated and no unexpected toxicities resulted from the combination. Stable disease was the best response in 4 patients, and median progression-free survival was 1.9 months. Combined assessment of ctDNA with TEC-seq and ddPCR detected plasma mutations in 11 of 12 patients (92%). ctDNA studies showed that KIT secondary mutations remain the main mechanism of resistance in TKI-refractory GIST, revealing effective suppression of KIT-mutant subpopulations in patients benefiting from the combination.Conclusions:Sunitinib and regorafenib combination is feasible and tolerable. Rapid alternation of TKIs with complementary activity might be effective when combining drugs with favorable pharmacokinetics, potentially allowing active doses while minimizing adverse events. Serial monitoring with ctDNA may guide treatment in patients with GIST.

Supplementary Figure from Preclinical Modeling of Leiomyosarcoma Identifies Susceptibility to Transcriptional CDK Inhibitors through Antagonism of E2F-Driven Oncogenic Gene Expression

Primer/probe mix for KIT-resistant mutations.

Supplementary Data from Updated Integrated Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Entrectinib in Patients With NTRK Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors

Supplementary Materials and Methods - PDF file 21K, Antibodies, Inhibitors, and siRNA

Supplementary Figure S1 shows the study design.

Supplementary Data from Phase I Dose-Escalation and Pharmacokinetic Study of Dasatinib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Supplementary Figure 1 - PDF file 170K, Effects of RTK inhibition in chondrosarcoma cells

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and recommended phase II dose of dasatinib in metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapies or for which no effective standard therapy exists.Experimental Design: In this phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study, patients received 35 to 160 mg of dasatinib twice daily in 28-day cycles either every 12 hours for 5 consecutive days followed by 2 nontreatment days every week (5D2) or as continuous, twice-daily (CDD) dosing.Results: Sixty-seven patients were treated (5D2, n = 33; CDD, n = 34). The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg twice daily 5D2 and 70 mg twice daily CDD. DLTs with 160 mg 5D2 were recurrent grade 2 rash, grade 3 lethargy, and one patient with both grade 3 prolonged bleeding time and grade 3 hypocalcemia; DLTs with 120 mg twice daily CDD were grade 3 nausea, grade 3 fatigue, and one patient with both grade 3 rash and grade 2 proteinuria. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities across all doses were nausea, fatigue, lethargy, anorexia, proteinuria, and diarrhea, with infrequent hematologic toxicities. Pharmacokinetic data indicated rapid absorption, dose proportionality, and lack of drug accumulation. Although no objective tumor responses were seen, durable stable disease was observed in 16% of patients.Conclusion: Dasatinib was well tolerated in this population, with a safety profile similar to that observed previously in leukemia patients, although with much less hematologic toxicity. Limited, although encouraging, preliminary evidence of clinical activity was observed. Doses of 120 mg twice daily (5D2) or 70 mg twice daily (CDD) are recommended for further studies in patients with solid tumors. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(19):6232–40)

Supplementary Figure Legend - PDF file 74K, Supplementary figure legend

Purpose: Chondrosarcomas are notoriously resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. We sought to identify critical signaling pathways that contribute to their survival and proliferation, and which may provide potential targets for rational therapeutic interventions.Experimental Design: Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) was surveyed using phospho-RTK arrays. S6 phosphorylation and NRAS mutational status were examined in chondrosarcoma primary tumor tissues. siRNA or small-molecule inhibitors against RTKs or downstream signaling proteins were applied to chondrosarcoma cells and changes in biochemical signaling, cell cycle, and cell viability were determined. In vivo antitumor activity of BEZ235, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/mTOR inhibitor, was evaluated in a chondrosarcoma xenograft model.Results: Several RTKs were identified as critical mediators of cell growth, but the RTK dependencies varied among cell lines. In exploration of downstream signaling pathways, strong S6 phosphorylation was found in 69% of conventional chondrosarcomas and 44% of dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. Treatment with BEZ235 resulted in dramatic reduction in the growth of all chondrosarcoma cell lines. Tumor growth was similarly inhibited in a xenograft model of chondrosarcoma. In addition, chondrosarcoma cells with an NRAS mutation were sensitive to treatment with a mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal–regulated kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor. Functional NRAS mutations were found in 12% of conventional central chondrosarcomas.Conclusions: RTKs are commonly activated in chondrosarcoma, but because of their considerable heterogeneity, targeted inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway represents a rational therapeutic strategy. Chondrosarcomas with NRAS mutations may benefit from treatment with MEK inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 19(14); 3796–807. ©2013 AACR.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a mesenchymal neoplasm characterized by activating mutations in the related receptor tyrosine kinases KIT and PDGFRA. GIST relies on expression of these unamplified receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) genes through a large enhancer domain, resulting in high expression levels of the oncogene required for tumor growth. Although kinase inhibition is an effective therapy for many patients with GIST, disease progression from kinase-resistant mutations is common and no other effective classes of systemic therapy exist. In this study, we identify regulatory regions of the KIT enhancer essential for KIT gene expression and GIST cell viability. Given the dependence of GIST upon enhancer-driven expression of RTKs, we hypothesized that the enhancer domains could be therapeutically targeted by a BET bromodomain inhibitor (BBI). Treatment of GIST cells with BBIs led to cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and cell death, with unique sensitivity in GIST cells arising from attenuation of the KIT enhancer domain and reduced KIT gene expression. BBI treatment in KIT-dependent GIST cells produced genome-wide changes in the H3K27ac enhancer landscape and gene expression program, which was also seen with direct KIT inhibition using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Combination treatment with BBI and TKI led to superior cytotoxic effects in vitro and in vivo, with BBI preventing tumor growth in TKI-resistant xenografts. Resistance to select BBI in GIST was attributable to drug efflux pumps. These results define a therapeutic vulnerability and clinical strategy for targeting oncogenic kinase dependency in GIST.Significance:Expression and activity of mutant KIT is essential for driving the majority of GIST neoplasms, which can be therapeutically targeted using BET bromodomain inhibitors.

Purpose: To analyze final long-term survival and clinical outcomes from the randomized phase III study of sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients after imatinib failure; to assess correlative angiogenesis biomarkers with patient outcomes.Experimental Design: Blinded sunitinib or placebo was given daily on a 4-week-on/2-week-off treatment schedule. Placebo-assigned patients could cross over to sunitinib at disease progression/study unblinding. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using conventional statistical methods and the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) method to explore cross-over impact. Circulating levels of angiogenesis biomarkers were analyzed.Results: In total, 243 patients were randomized to receive sunitinib and 118 to placebo, 103 of whom crossed over to open-label sunitinib. Conventional statistical analysis showed that OS converged in the sunitinib and placebo arms (median 72.7 vs. 64.9 weeks; HR, 0.876; P = 0.306) as expected, given the cross-over design. RPSFT analysis estimated median OS for placebo of 39.0 weeks (HR, 0.505, 95% CI, 0.262–1.134; P = 0.306). No new safety concerns emerged with extended sunitinib treatment. No consistent associations were found between the pharmacodynamics of angiogenesis-related plasma proteins during sunitinib treatment and clinical outcome.Conclusions: The cross-over design provided evidence of sunitinib clinical benefit based on prolonged time to tumor progression during the double-blind phase of this trial. As expected, following cross-over, there was no statistical difference in OS. RPSFT analysis modeled the absence of cross-over, estimating a substantial sunitinib OS benefit relative to placebo. Long-term sunitinib treatment was tolerated without new adverse events. Clin Cancer Res; 18(11); 3170–9. ©2012 AACR.

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Data from Preclinical Modeling of Leiomyosarcoma Identifies Susceptibility to Transcriptional CDK Inhibitors through Antagonism of E2F-Driven Oncogenic Gene Expression

Supplementary Data from Circulating Levels of Soluble KIT Serve as a Biomarker for Clinical Outcome in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients Receiving Sunitinib following Imatinib Failure

Supplementary Figure 1 - PDF file173K, Mean (plus-minus SD) Plasma Concentrations of IPI-504, 17-AAG and 17-AG following a Single Dose of IPI-504 400 mg/m2

Supplementary Figure 1. Pan-TRK IHC in four cases identified as having NTRK fusions by OncoPanel analysis shows strong cytoplasmic staining confirming the presence of functional TRK fusion protein (40Ã-). Top left image demonstrates the specificity of TRK staining, which is present only in neoplastic cells, whereas adjacent normal crypts are negative. Supplementary Figure 2A. Two cases of ALK fusion in our cohort shared clinical and molecular features but differed in their microsatellite status. Both tumors were APC wild-type (wt) and contained biallelic RNF43 frameshift (fs) mutations. B. Copy number variation by chromosome is color-coded for two ALK fusion-associated colon cancers in our cohort. ALK+MMR-D cancer (top) displays a diploid genome, whereas ALK+MSS cancer (bottom) displays frequent copy number gains and losses. ALK fusion breakpoints are shown in both profiles (arrow). The vertical axis is the ratio of the number of reads for each specimen and a panel of normals in log base 2 scale. A value of 0 denotes no difference from normal (diploid). Supplementary Figure 3A. MMR-D RTK fusion CRC cases display a diploid genome similar to those in other MMR-D cases: BRAF V600E+mutated and Lynch syndrome. Copy number profile plots of RTK fusions or Wnt fusions with MSS CRC show extensive gains and losses and are shown for comparison. 3B. All MMR-D subgroups: BRAF V600E+, Lynch syndrome and RTK fusion show a significantly higher homopolymer indel rate (top) and TMB (bottom) than do MSS tumors with either RTK fusions or Wnt fusions. Supplementary Figure. 4. Histologic analysis with hematoxylin and eosin stained slides for two patients with NTRK1-LMNA fusions. Morphological analysis shows: A. mucinous and B. medullary histology.