Search

Objective/IntroductionUnemployment can negatively impact quality of life among patients with schizophrenia. Employment status depends on ability, opportunity, education, and cultural influences. A clinician-rated scale of work readiness, independent of current work status, can be a valuable assessment tool. A series of studies were conducted to create and validate a Work Readiness Questionnaire (WoRQ) for clinicians to assess patient ability to engage in socially useful activity, independent of work availability.MethodsContent validity, test–retest and inter-rater reliability, and construct validity were evaluated in three separate studies.ResultsContent validity was supported. Cronbach’s α was 0.91, in the excellent range. Clinicians endorsed WoRQ concepts, including treatment adherence, physical appearance, social competence, and symptom control. The final readiness decision showed good test–retest reliability and moderate inter-rater reliability. Work readiness was associated with higher function and lower levels of negative symptoms. Low positive and high negative predictive values confirmed the concept validity.DiscussionThe WoRQ has suitable psychometric properties for use in a clinical trial for patients with a broad range of symptom severity. The scale may be applicable to assess therapeutic interventions. It is not intended to assess eligibility for supported work interventions.ConclusionsThe WoRQ is suitable for use in schizophrenia clinical trials to assess patient work functional potential.

The PANSS is a valid instrument assessing schizophrenia symptom severity. Analyses have identified a five-factor solution. The negative symptom factor (NSFS) is robust, having been replicated in multiple analyses. The score has superior content validity versus the negative subscale. Aspects of validity in patients with predominant negative symptoms have yet to be established. The present data are from a Phase IIb study of add-on bitopertin therapy in schizophrenia outpatients with prominent negative or disorganized thought symptoms treated with antipsychotics. Analyses were conducted to evaluate reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Test-retest screening to baseline was high (ICC=0.93). This was maintained in-study, for patients with no change in CGI negative symptom severity (CGI-S-N). Internal consistency at baseline was adequate (α=0.71) and increased at later assessments. Pearson correlation at baseline showed a good association between NSFS and CGI-S-N (0.63), but not overall CGI-S (0.31). Association with PSP at baseline was moderate (-0.39) and for change at Week eight good (-0.65). NSFS responders (≥20% improvement) at Week eight showed a significant improvement in function. The analyses demonstrated reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the NSFS, in schizophrenia patients with prominent negative or disorganized thought symptoms.

Summary Background Many patients with schizophrenia require high doses of medication for their ongoing psychotic symptoms. Glutamate theories and findings from studies showing efficacy of sarcosine, an endogenous, non-selective glycine-reuptake inhibitor mediated by GlyT1, offer an alternative approach. We undertook the SearchLyte trial programme to examine the efficacy of bitopertin, a selective GlyT1-mediated glycine-reuptake inhibitor, as an adjunctive treatment to ongoing antipsychotic treatment. Methods SearchLyte consisted of three phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies done in outpatient clinics in Asia, Europe, and North and South America (TwiLyte done at 109 sites, NightLyte at 84, and MoonLyte at 87). Participants were male and female outpatients, aged at least 18 years, meeting DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia with suboptimally controlled positive symptoms despite treatment with antipsychotics. Inclusion criteria included a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of at least 70 and antipsychotic treatment stability for the past 12 weeks before randomisation. Key exclusion criteria included meeting criteria for symptomatic remission or previous treatment with a GlyT1 inhibitor or any other investigational drug. After a screening or 4-week prospective stabilisation period, we randomly assigned participants (1:1:1) to a 12-week, double-blind treatment of either placebo or one of two fixed doses of oral, once-daily bitopertin (10 or 20 mg in TwiLyte and NightLyte; 5 or 10 mg in MoonLyte) added to their current antipsychotic medicine. After completion of 12 weeks' treatment, the study design allowed for additional double-blind treatment for 40 weeks to assess maintenance of the effect, followed by a randomised 4-week washout period to assess withdrawal effects. Subsequently, all patients were offered the opportunity to receive bitopertin treatment in a 3-year follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in the PANSS Positive Symptom Factor Score (PSFS) at week 12, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. The trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (numbers NCT01235520 [TwiLyte], NCT01235585 [MoonLyte], and NCT01235559 [NightLyte]). Findings Between Nov 19, 2010, and Dec 12, 2014, we randomly assigned 1794 patients to treatment, of whom 1772 were treated and analysed. MoonLyte was discontinued in September, 2014, on the basis of results from futility analyses. Across studies and treatment arms, most patients completed 12 weeks of treatment (505 in TwiLyte, 517 in NightLyte, and 506 in MoonLyte). Only one study, NightLyte, met the primary endpoint where the PANSS PSFS significantly differed from placebo at week 12, and only in the 10-mg arm: mean difference in score −1·37, 95% CI −2·27 to −0·47; p=0·0028. Improvements from baseline for the bitopertin 20-mg arm in Nightlyte were not significant compared with placebo: −3·77, 95% CI −4·40 to −3·14; p=0·3142. Results from the other two studies also did not differ from placebo (TwiLyte 0·58, 95% CI −0·34 to 1·50, p=0·22 for 10 mg and 0·43, −0·49 to 1·36, p=0·36 for 20 mg; MoonLyte 0·06, 95% CI −0·79 to 0·92, p=0·88 for 5 mg and 0·44, −0·41 to 1·28, p=0·31 for 10 mg). Placebo responses varied across studies and might have contributed to the differences in efficacy between studies. Four deaths occurred during the 12-week treatment period, three in NightLyte (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, alcohol poisoning and related head injury, and a completed suicide) and one in MoonLyte (myocardial infarction in a patient with pre-existing risk factors). Only the death by suicide was deemed related to the study drug. The incidence of serious adverse events was low across treatment groups in all three studies; psychiatric disorders were the most frequently reported serious adverse events and the most frequent cause of adverse events leading to discontinuation. Interpretation Only one of six active treatment arms across the three studies offered an advantage of adjunctive bitopertin over placebo for the treatment of suboptimally controlled symptoms of schizophrenia. The small improvement associated with bitopertin together with the varying placebo response suggests that adjunctive bitopertin treatment might offer only modest benefit to suboptimal responders to antipsychotics, if any. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Background There is currently no standard of care for treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia, although some previous results with glutamatergic agonists have been promising. Methods Three (SunLyte [WN25308], DayLyte [WN25309], and FlashLyte [NN25310]) phase III, multicenter, randomized, 24-week, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive bitopertin in stable patients with persistent predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics. SunLyte met the prespecified criteria for lack of efficacy and was declared futile. Key inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia, score ≥40 on the sum of the 14 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptoms and disorganized thought factors, unaltered antipsychotic treatment, and clinical stability. Following a 4-week prospective stabilization period, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to bitopertin (5 mg and 10 mg [DayLyte] and 10 mg and 20 mg [FlashLyte]) or placebo once daily for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptom factor score at week 24. Results The intent-to-treat population in DayLyte and FlashLyte included 605 and 594 patients, respectively. At week 24, mean change from baseline showed improvement in all treatment arms but no statistically significant separation from placebo in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative symptom factor score and all other end points. Bitopertin was well tolerated. Conclusions These studies provide no evidence for superior efficacy of adjunctive bitopertin in any of the doses tested over placebo in patients with persistent predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia is a complex, heterogeneous, multidimensional disorder within which negative symptoms are a significant and disabling feature. Whilst there is no established treatment for these symptoms, some pharmacological and psychosocial interventions have shown promise and this is an active area of research. Despite the effort to identify effective interventions, as yet there is no broadly accepted definition of therapeutic success. This article reviews concepts of clinical relevance and reports on a consensus conference whose goal was to apply these concepts to the treatment of negative symptoms. A number of key issues were identified and discussed including: assessment of specific negative symptom domains; defining response and remission for negative symptoms; assessment of functional outcomes; measurement of outcomes within clinical trials; and the assessment of duration/persistence of a response. The group reached a definition of therapeutic success using an achieved threshold of function that persisted over time. Recommendations were agreed upon with respect to: assessment of negative symptom domains of apathy–avolition and deficit of expression symptoms; thresholds for response and remission of negative symptoms based on level of symptomatology; assessing multiple domains of function including social occupation, activities of daily living, and socialization; the need for clinical trial data to include rate of change over time and converging sources of evidence; use of clinician, patient and caregiver perspectives to assess success; and the need for establishing criteria for the persistence of therapeutic benefit. A consensus statement and associated research criteria are offered as an initial step towards developing broad agreement regarding outcomes of negative symptoms treatment.

Varying definitions of apathy in the published literature and a lack of a consensus regarding diagnostic criteria make the identification and quantification of apathy difficult in both clinical trials and clinical practice. The Apathy Evaluation Scale was developed specifically to assess apathy, but variations in the threshold values defined for clinically significant apathy diminish its use as a screening tool in clinical trials, although it has demonstrated sensitivity to changes in treatment in a number of studies. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory contains an Apathy subscale, which has been used to identify clinical trial populations (with a consistent threshold value) and measure changes following treatment. Few of the other assessment tools currently used in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders are specific for apathy or explore it in any depth, most have not been validated in the general population, do not have cut-off points representing clinically significant apathy, and its changes over time and in response to treatment. Further research is required to address these issues in order to facilitate the quantification of apathy and its natural history. Such research should be conducted with the aim of developing new, specific tools for use across neuropsychiatric disorders.

Background There is growing research interest in studying motivational deficits in different neuropsychiatric disorders because these symptoms appear to be more common than originally reported and negatively impact long-term functional outcomes. However, there is considerable ambiguity in the terminology used to describe motivational deficits in the scientific literature. For the purposes of this manuscript, the term “amotivation” will be utilised in the context of mood disorders, since this is considered a more inclusive/appropriate term for this patient population. Other challenges impacting the study of amotivation in mood disorders, include: appropriate patient population selection; managing or controlling for potential confounding factors; the lack of gold-standard diagnostic criteria and assessment scales; and determination of the most appropriate study duration. Methods This paper summarises the search for a consensus by a group of experts in the optimal approach to studying amotivation in mood disorders. Results The consensus of this group is that amotivation in mood disorders is a legitimate therapeutic target, given the magnitude of the associated unmet needs, and that proof-of-concept studies should be conducted in order to facilitate subsequent larger investigations. The focus of this manuscript is to consider the study of amotivation, as a residual symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression (BD), following adequate treatment with a typical antidepressant or mood stabiliser/antipsychotic, respectively. Discussion There is a paucity of data studying amotivation in mood disorders. This manuscript provides general guidance on the most appropriate study design(s) and methodology to assess potential therapeutic options for the management of residual amotivation in mood disorders.

In schizophrenia, the severity of negative symptoms is a key predictor of long-term disability. Deficient signaling through the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor is hypothesized to underlie many signs and symptoms associated with schizophrenia in particular negative symptoms. Glycine acts as an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor coagonist. Blockade of the glycine transporter type 1 to inhibit glycine reuptake and elevate synaptic glycine concentrations represents an effective strategy to enhance N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor transmission.To determine the efficacy and safety of bitopertin (RG1678), a glycine reuptake inhibitor, in patients with schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms who were stable while taking an antipsychotic treatment.This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 proof-of-concept trial involved 323 patients with schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms across 66 sites worldwide.Bitopertin (10, 30, or 60 mg/d) or placebo added to standard antipsychotic therapy for a treatment duration of 8 weeks.Change from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale negative factor score.In the per-protocol population, 8 weeks of treatment with bitopertin was associated with a significant reduction of negative symptoms in the 10-mg/d (mean [SE] reduction in negative symptoms score, -25% [2%]; P = .049) and 30-mg/d (mean [SE], -25% [2%]; P = .03) bitopertin groups, a significantly higher response rate and a trend toward improved functioning in the 10-mg/d group when compared with placebo (mean [SE], -19% [2%]). Results reached trend-level significance in the intent-to-treat population. Estimates of bitopertin binding to glycine transporter type 1 showed that low to medium levels of occupancy yielded optimal efficacy in patients, consistent with findings in preclinical assays.Bitopertin-mediated glycine reuptake inhibition may represent a novel treatment option for schizophrenia, with the potential to address negative symptoms.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00616798.

Effective treatments for cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) remain an unmet need. Nicotinic α7 receptor agonists may be effective in CIAS. This 8-week (week 1, inpatient; weeks 2-8, outpatient), double-blind, randomized study used Measurement And Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) guidelines to investigate the nicotinic α7 partial agonist RG3487 (formerly MEM3454) in CIAS; 215 patients with chronic stable schizophrenia received placebo or RG3487 (5, 15, or 50 mg) added to ongoing treatment with risperidone, paliperidone, or aripiprazole. Primary end point was baseline to week 8 change in MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) composite t-score. Secondary outcomes were change in MCCB domain and negative symptom assessment (NSA) scores. The study did not allow for evaluation of nonsmokers. Each RG3487 dose was evaluated using a mixed-effects model repeated measures approach. Mean (SD) baseline MCCB composite t-score was 28.3 (12.0). No significant effect on MCCB composite t-scores was observed with RG3487 (adjusted mean difference (SE) vs placebo: 5 mg: 0.11 (1.39); 15 mg: -1.95 (1.39); 50 mg: -1.13 (1.37); p = 0.2-0.9). RG3487 did not improve MCCB domain scores. In a post hoc analysis of patients with moderate negative symptoms, 5 and 50 mg RG3487 vs placebo significantly improved NSA total (-4.45 (p = 0.04) and -4.75 (p = 0.02), respectively) and global (-0.39 (p = 0.04) and -0.55 (p = 0.003), respectively) scores. The MCCB did not lead to higher than expected patient withdrawal. RG3487 was generally well tolerated. In patients with stable schizophrenia, RG3487 did not improve cognitive deficits, as assessed by the MCCB; however, in patients with moderate negative symptoms, a post hoc analysis revealed significant improvement of negative symptoms.

A number of pharmacological agents for treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia are currently in development. Unresolved questions regarding the design of clinical trials in this area were discussed at an international meeting in Florence, Italy in April 2012. Participants included representatives from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Prior to the meeting, participants submitted key questions for debate and discussion. Responses to the questions guided the discussion during the meeting. The group reached agreement on a number of issues: (1) study subjects should be under the age of 65; (2) subjects should be excluded for symptoms of depression that do not overlap with negative symptoms; (3) functional measures should not be required as a co-primary in negative symptom trials; (4) information from informants should be included for ratings when available; (5) Phase 2 negative symptom trials should be 12weeks and 26weeks is preferred for Phase 3 trials; (6) prior to entry into a negative symptom study, subjects should demonstrate clinical stability for a period of 4 to 6months by collection of retrospective information; and (7) prior to entry, the stability of negative and positive symptoms should be confirmed prospectively for four weeks or longer. The participants could not reach agreement on whether predominant or prominent negative symptoms should be required for study subjects.

Increased attention has been given to treatment of negative symptoms and its potential impact on functional outcomes, however previous inferences have been confounded by the fact that measures of functional outcomes often use items similar to those of negative symptoms. We attempted to discern the relative effects of negative symptoms on functioning, as compared to other symptoms, using data from the National Institute of Mental Health CATIE trial of chronic schizophrenia (n=1447) by examining correlations of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale factors, Calgary Depression Rating Scale and select items from Heinrich's and Lehman's Quality of Life Scales measuring aspects of functioning that did not overlap with negative symptoms. Baseline functioning and change in functioning were more strongly related to PANSS negative factor than any of the other symptoms - though the amount of variance explained by symptom changes in general was small. The data suggests that improvement in negative symptoms may have a distinctive and independent effect on functional outcome relative to other symptoms. This should be further tested in studies where negative symptoms improve without concomitant improvement of other symptoms.

article i nfo Increased attention has been given to treatment of negative symptoms and its potential impact on functional outcomes, however previous inferences have been confounded by the fact that measures of functional out- comes often use items similar to those of negative symptoms. We attempted to discern the relative effects of negative symptoms on functioning, as compared to other symptoms, using data from the National Institute of Mental Health CATIE trial of chronic schizophrenia (n=1447) by examining correlations of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale factors, Calgary Depression Rating Scale and select items from Heinrich's and Lehman's Quality of Life Scales measuring aspects of functioning that did not overlap with negative symp- toms. Baseline functioning and change in functioning were more strongly related to PANSS negative factor than any of the other symptoms — though the amount of variance explained by symptom changes in general was small. The data suggests that improvement in negative symptoms may have a distinctive and indepen- dent effect on functional outcome relative to other symptoms. This should be further tested in studies where negative symptoms improve without concomitant improvement of other symptoms.

Validity and utility of the PANSS negative symptoms factor score as a clinical trial outcome☆ Chris J. Edgar , Thomas Blaettler , Dragana Bugarski-Kirola , Stephanie Le Scouiller , George M. Garibaldi , Stephen R. Marder d a Roche Products Ltd., United Kingdom b Department of Neuroscience, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Switzerland c F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Switzerland d Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Semel Institute for Neuroscience at UCLA, United States

Results: Young people living with psychosis had high rates of most WHOdefined risk factors for death and disability. Their rates of tobacco use were more than double the general population, and virtually all were sedentary or had very low rates of physical activity. Most did not eat daily recommended amounts of fruit and vegetables. Obesity was common, and comparison with the AusDiab sample showed that the psychosis population had higher rates of obesity even from the age of 25 years. In addition, from age 25 years, people with psychosis had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides and glucose (in women), and lower HDL-cholesterol. There were gender differences, for example tobacco use was more common in young men whilst young women were more likely to meet criteria for at-risk waist circumference. Conclusions: Many of the risk factors for premature death are present from a young age in people with psychosis. It is therefore likely that people with these disorders will continue to experience poor physical health and premature mortality, unless measures are put in place to address these risk factors. Such measures need to be an integral component of early intervention services for young people with psychotic disorders, and to continue to be provided as an essential part of comprehensive mental health care across the lifespan.