Search

AIM We conducted a prospective, randomized comparison of endoscopic variceal ligation, sclerotherapy and metoclopramide injection in order to evaluate their early effect on lower oesophageal sphincter pressure. METHODS Twenty-six patients with established cirrhosis and an episode of variceal bleeding controlled by one session of endoscopic therapy were randomized to undergo an oesophageal manometry. The patients' lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was evaluated, prior to and immediately after a single session of ligation (n = 10), a single session of sclerotherapy (n = 8) or a bolus injection of 20 mg metoclopramide hydrochloride (n = 8). RESULTS Ligation produced a higher early increase in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (from 12.3 +/- 2.3 to 27.8 +/- 3.0 mmHg) as compared with sclerotherapy (from 13.6 +/- 2.5 to 22.4 +/- 4.5 mmHg) or metoclopramide injection (from 14.6 +/- 3.2 to 22.5 +/- 2.9 mmHg); (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION Our data indicate that ligation of oesophageal varices produces an early increase in lower oesophageal sphincter pressure in cirrhotic patients.

Background: Octreotide is a potent inhibitor of pancreatic secretion, and corticosteroids suppress humoral and cellular activity. Both agents may reduce the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of octreotide and hydrocortisone in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis. Methods: Three hundred fifty-four patients were entered in to a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 100 μg subcutaneous octreotide (Group 1) versus 100 mg intravenous hydrocortisone (Group 2) versus normal saline solution as placebo (Group 3). All medications were administered approximately 30 minutes before the procedure. Patients were assessed clinically and serum amylase was also measured before the procedure and 3, 12, and 24 hours after the procedure. Results: Three hundred forty patients were included in the analysis. Pancreatitis was observed in 11 of 112 patients (9.8%) in Group 1, 8 of 113 (7.1%) patients in Group 2, and in 15 of 115 (13.0%) patients in Group 3 ( p = 0.32). The mean length of hospitalization in days was similar in all 3 groups: mean (SD) for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were, respectively, 3.6 (1.6) versus 2.9 (0.6) versus 4.3 (1.8) ( p = 0.13). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that number of pancreatic injections, suspicion of sphincter dysfunction, therapeutic procedure, and age were risk factors for pancreatitis. Conclusions: The results of this trial indicate that octreotide and hydrocortisone do not prevent ERCP-induced pancreatitis. (Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:470-5.)

AIM Endoscopic methods are currently the most widely used techniques for the treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices (BOV). However, a number of complications may limit their usefulness. We conducted a prospective, randomized comparison of variceal ligation versus sclerotherapy in cirrhotics after the control of variceal haemorrhage to study the relative short-term risks of these two procedures with respect to oesophageal motility and gastro-oesophageal reflux. METHODS Seventy-three patients with established cirrhosis and an episode of variceal bleeding controlled by one session of endoscopic therapy were randomized to treatment with sclerotherapy or ligation until variceal eradication. In 60 of these patients, oesophageal manometry and 24-h intra-oesophageal pH monitoring were performed at inclusion and 1 month after variceal eradication. RESULTS After variceal eradication with sclerotherapy, peristaltic wave amplitude decreased from 76.2 +/- 14.7 mmHg to 61.6 +/- 17.7 mmHg (P = 0.0001), simultaneous contractions increased from 0% to 37.9% (P = 0.0008), and the percentage of time with pH < 4 increased from 1.60 +/- 0.25 to 4.91 +/- 1.16% in channel 1 (P = 0.0002) and from 1.82 +/- 0.27 to 5.69 +/- 1.37% in channel 2 (P = 0.0006). In contrast, the above parameters were not disturbed with ligation. CONCLUSION Our data define the advantages of ligation over sclerotherapy with respect to post-treatment oesophageal dysmotility and associated gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Background: Analysis of primary prevention studies of the use of β-blockers has shown clear reductions in variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with varices. In contrast, the usefulness of prophylactic endoscopic sclerotherapy, alone or in combination with propranolol, in the management of these patients is still under investigation. The present study compared the efficacy of combined sclerotherapy and propranolol versus propranolol alone in the primary prevention of hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients with varices and high (greater than 18 mm Hg) intraesophageal variceal pressure. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to propranolol (42 patients) or to propranolol plus sclerotherapy (44 patients). The mean duration of follow-up was 26.8 ± 7.7 and 24.6 ± 9.8 months, respectively. Results: During this period 23% of the patients in the combination group experienced at least 1 episode of bleeding due to varices or congestive gastropathy as compared with 14% in the propranolol group (not significant). Twenty-three patients (52%) in the combination group developed complications as compared with 8 (19%) in the propranolol group (p = 0.002). The mortality rate was similar in both groups (14% and 18%, respectively). The only independent factor predictive of survival was the level of serum albumin. Conclusions: Endoscopic sclerotherapy should not be used for the primary prevention of hemorrhage in cirrhotic patients at high risk of variceal bleeding who are undergoing treatment with propranolol. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:652-8.)

Background/Aims: Long-term endoscopic injection sclerotherapy of oesophageal varices prevents rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis surviving an acute variceal bleeding episode. However, this treatment is associated with a substantial complication rate. Endoscopic band ligation is a newly developed technique in an attempt to provide a safer alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of injection sclerotherapy versus variceal ligation in the management of patients with cirrhosis after variceal haemorrhage. Methods: Seventy-seven patients with cirrhosis who proved to have oesophageal variceal bleeding were studied. After initial control of haemorrhage by sclerotherapy, 40 of the patients were randomly assigned to sclerotherapy and 37 to ligation. Both procedures were performed under midazolam sedation at intervals of 7–14 days until all varices in the distal oesophagus were eradicated or were too small to receive further treatment. Results: The eradication of varices required a lower mean number of sessions with ligation (3.7±1.9) than with sclerotherapy (5.8±2.7, p =0.002). The mean duration of follow-up was similar in both groups (15.6 months±7.3 and 15±7.4, respectively). The proportion of patients remaining free from recurrent bleeding against time was significantly higher in the ligation group as compared to the sclerotherapy group (χ 2 =3.86, p =0.05). Only 13 patients (35%) developed complications in the ligation group as compared to 24 (60%, p =0.05) in the sclerotherapy group. The mortality rate was similar in both groups (20% and 21%, respectively). Conclusions: Variceal ligation is better than sclerotherapy in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after variceal haemorrhage which was initially controlled with sclerotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible value of continuous administration of propranolol in the prevention of recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis undergoing chronic endoscopic sclerotherapy. Among 239 patients admitted for acute variceal bleeding, 85 with cirrhosis were randomized to receive sclerotherapy either alone (40) or in combination with propranolol (45). Sclerotherapy was carried out with an intravariceal injection of 5% ethanolamine oleate through a fiberoptic endoscope. The procedure was performed every week, until the esophageal varices at the gastroesophageal junction were too small for any further injections. Varices were reinjected if they recurred. Propranolol was given orally twice a day until heart rate was reduced by 25% in the resting position. The mean follow-up period was 23.2 and 24.2 months for sclerotherapy and the sclerotherapy plus propranolol groups, respectively. During this period a significant (P = 0.001) reduction in the recurrence of esophageal varices was observed in patients treated with the combination of sclerotherapy plus propranolol compared with those treated with sclerotherapy alone. However, the time of rebleeding from any source or from esophageal varices did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the sclerotherapy group 21 patients rebled (35 bleeding episodes) compared with 14 (22 episodes) in the combination therapy group. Patients in the sclerotherapy group were more prone to bleed from gastric varices and congestive gastropathy than patients treated with the combination of sclerotherapy plus propranolol (P = 0.012). Twenty-five patients in the endoscopic sclerotherapy group developed complications attributed to sclerotherapy compared with 23 patients in the sclerotherapy plus propranolol group. Complications directly attributable to propanolol were observed in 11 patients. Three of these patients stopped taking the drug due to heart failure (1) and flapping tremor (2). Eight patients (17.8%) died in the latter group while the corresponding figure in the sclerotherapy group was nine (22.5%). It is concluded that the continuous administration of propranolol may reduce incidences of recurrent upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from gastric sources in patients with cirrhosis undergoing chronic sclerotherapy.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of: (i) somatostatin infusion, (ii) balloon tamponade with the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube and (iii) the combination of both methods, in the management of acute variceal haemorrhage. Ninety-two consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis who proved to have active variceal bleeding on emergency endoscopy were studied. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned to an intravenous infusion of 250 micrograms/h of somatostatin (Group I), 30 to the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube (Group II) and 31 to the combination of both methods (Group III). Somatostatin was administered for 24 h, while the gastric and esophageal balloons remained inflated for 48 and 24 h, respectively, then deflated. Patients were under observation for a further 24-h period after withdrawal of treatment. If bleeding recurred, the same treatment was repeated in each group. Following treatment the bleeding was controlled initially in 22 patients (71%) in Group I, in 24 (80%) in Group II and in 25 (80.6%) in Group III. In Group II a significantly (p less than 0.05) higher proportion of patients (14/24) rebled as compared to Groups I (5/22) and III (6/25). Bleeding was controlled following retreatment in four, ten and five patients of the three respective groups. There were marked differences, in the number of complications noticed with each form of therapy. Only three patients (9.7%) in Group I developed complications (p less than 0.05) as compared to ten (33%) in Group II and ten (32%) in Group III. Hospital mortality in all three treatment groups was not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)