1. Pertuzumab as second‑ or later‑line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‑positive metastatic breast cancer: A clinical experience.
- Author
-
Biskup E, Sartorius CM, Müller A, Leo C, Nussbaum CU, Georgescu Margarint EL, Koychev D, Schreiber A, Taverna C, Thorn D, and Vetter M
- Abstract
Trastuzumab and pertuzumab with taxane-based chemotherapy are considered the first-line standard therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2 )-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Pertuzumab is also a later-line therapy for mBC in Switzerland, although limited safety and efficacy data are available. The present study assessed the therapeutic regimens, toxicities and clinical outcomes after second- or later-line pertuzumab therapy in patients with mBC who did not receive pertuzumab as a first-line therapy. Physicians from nine major Swiss oncology centers retrospectively completed a questionnaire for each pertuzumab-naive patient who was treated with pertuzumab as a second- or later-line therapy. Of 35 patients with HER2-positive mBC (median age, 49 years; range, 35-87 years), 14 received pertuzumab as a second-line therapy, 6 as a third-line therapy, and 15 as a fourth- or later-line therapy. A total of 20 patients (57%) died during the study period. The median overall survival was 74.2 months (95% confidence interval, 47.6-139.8 months). Grade (G) 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 14% of patients, with only 1 patient discontinuing therapy due to pertuzumab-related toxicities. The most common AE was fatigue (overall, 46%; G3, 11%). Overall, congestive heart disease occurred in 14% of patients (G3, 6%), nausea in 14% of patients (all G1), and myelosuppression in 12% of patients (G3, 6%). In conclusion, the median overall survival of patients who underwent second- or later-line pertuzumab treatment was similar to that reported for patients who underwent first-line pertuzumab treatment, and the safety profile was acceptable. These data support the use of pertuzumab for second- or later-line therapy when it was not administered as first-line therapy., Competing Interests: AM: Honoraria: Roche Switzerland, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, and Tesaro; Consulting/advisory role: Roche Switzerland, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Amgen; Expert testimony: Roche Switzerland; CL: Honoraria: Pfizer and AstraZeneca; Consulting/advisory role: Pfizer and AstraZeneca; AS: Honoraria: Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Lilly, Celgene, and Merck; CT: Consulting/advisory role: Celgene, Amgen, and Janssen; Research funding: Celgene. DT: Honoraria: Roche; Consulting/advisory role: Roche; MV: Honoraria: Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer; Consulting/advisory role: Roche, Novartis, and Pfizer; Research funding: Roche. EB was supported by Krebsliga Schweiz, BIL KFS 4261-08-2017. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright: © Biskup et al.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF