Search

BackgroundRight Ventricular Pacing (RVP) may have detrimental effects in ventricular function. Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) is a new pacing strategy that appears to have better results. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of LBBAP vs RVP in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders.MethodsMedline, Embase and Pubmed databases were searched for studies comparing LBBAP with RVP. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and complications. QRS duration, mechanical synchrony and LVEF changes were also assessed. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using random and fixed effects models.ResultsTwenty-five trials with 4250 patients (2127 LBBAP) were included in the analysis. LBBAP was associated with lower risk for HFH (RR:0.33, CI 95%:0.21 to 0.50;pp=0.003), and AF occurrence (RR:0.43 CI 95%:0.27 to 0.68;pp=0.780). QRSd was shorter in the LBBAP group at follow-up (WMD: -32.20 msec, CI 95%: -40.70 to -23.71;ppp=0.860) and higher R wave amplitudes (p=0.009) than RVP.ConclusionsLBBAP has better clinical outcomes, preserves ventricular electrical and mechanical synchrony and has excellent pacing parameters, with no difference in complications compared to RVP.Clinical PerspectiveWhat is knownLeft bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a method of conduction system pacing with higher procedural success rate and less limitations compared to His bundle pacing (HBP).Right ventricular pacing (RVP) causes electromechanical dyssynchrony, which may result in left ventricular systolic dysfunction in some patients.What the study addsWe examined in a systematic review and meta-analysis whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes, electromechanical synchronization, and safety between LBBAP and RVP in patients with bradyarrhythmia and conduction system disorders.

A bidirectional pathophysiological link connects heart failure and atrial fibrillation, creating a frequent and challenging comorbidity, which includes neurohormonal hyperactivation, fibrosis development, and electrophysiologic remodeling, while they share mutual risk factors. Management for these devastating comorbidities includes most of the established treatment measures for heart failure as well as rhythm or rate control and anticoagulation mostly for atrial fibrillation, which can be achieved with either pharmaceutical or non-pharmaceutical approaches. The current manuscript aims to review the existing literature regarding the underlying pathophysiology, to present the novel trends of treatment, and to predict the future perspective of these two linked diseases with the numerous unanswered questions.

Background SCN5A mutations may present with different clinical phenotypes such as Brugada syndrome, long QT3 syndrome, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, dilated cardiomyopathy, and the least known multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions syndrome. Case summary We report a case of a 29-year-old woman with palpitations due to multifocal premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and a family history of sudden death. The previous electrophysiological study had shown that PVCs arose from Purkinje fibres but catheter ablation was unsuccessful. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging demonstrated non-ischaemic areas of subendocardial fibrosis at multiple left ventricular (LV) segments with concomitant dilatation and mild systolic impairment. Amiodarone suppressed the ectopy but caused hyperthyroidism. Due to recent pregnancy, she received no antiarrhythmics which resulted in PVC burden increase and further deterioration of the ejection fraction (EF). After gestation, amiodarone was reinitiated and switched to flecainide after implantation of a subcutaneous defibrillator as a safety net. At follow-up, LV function had almost normalized. Genetic analysis confirmed an SCN5A mutation. Discussion Multifocal ectopic Purkinje-related premature contractions syndrome is associated with SCN5A mutation which in our case (R222Q) is the most common described. Flecainide can be an appropriate treatment option when ablation is ineffective. Defibrillator—even a subcutaneous type—could be implanted in cases of LV dysfunction or scar. PVCs suppression by flecainide and restoration of EF implies an arrhythmia—induced mechanism of LV impairment.

Patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy have a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease than healthy subjects, but little is known about cardiac function in asymptomatic and treatment-naive patients. We sought to study cardiac function in asymptomatic HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients. We studied 41 HIV-infected and treatment-naive patients and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Patients with cardiac symptoms, history of cardiac disease or NT-proBNP >100 pg/mL were excluded. We addressed cardiac function using standard echocardiography along with tissue Doppler (TDI) measurements, including strain/strain rate assessment. Standard echocardiographic parameters did not differ between groups, except for transmitral E wave velocity (64.8 ± 14 cm/s in HIV vs 76.1 ± 10 cm/s in controls, p = 0.002). In contrast, TDI mitral and tricuspid annulus s velocity and all strain/strain rate measurements were significantly lower in HIV patients: s lateral, 10.2 ± 2.4/11.3 ± 0.7, p = 0.011; s septal, 8.1 ± 1.6/8.7 ± 0.8, p = 0.045; s tricuspid, 13.4 ± 2.3/14.9 ± 1.3, p = 0.002; strain/strain rate, septal (strain/strain rate, 15.1 ± 5.7/−0.9 ± 0.3, 25.3 ± 1.7/−1.9 ± 0.2, p

Aims To evaluate the impact of age on the clinical outcomes in a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) population. Methods and results A retrospective, multicentre analysis of patients aged 60 years and over with primary prevention ICD/CRT-D devices implanted between 1 January 2006 and 1 November 2014 was performed. Survival to follow-up with no therapy (T1), death prior to follow-up with no therapy (T2), delivery of appropriate therapy with survival to follow-up (T3), and delivery of appropriate therapy with death prior to follow-up (T4) were measured. In total, 424 patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis, mean follow-up of 32.6 months during which time 44 patients (10.1%) received appropriate therapy. The sub-hazard ratio (SHR) for the cumulative incidence of appropriate therapy (T3) according to age at implant was 1.00 ( P = 0.851; 95% CI 0.96–1.04). The SHR for cumulative incidence of death (T2) according to age at implant was 1.06 ( P < 0.001; 95% CI 1.03–1.01). Age at implant, ischaemic aetiology, baseline haemoglobin, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were predictors of all-cause mortality. Conclusion Age has no impact on the time to appropriate therapy, but risk of death prior to therapy increases by 6% for every year increment. As the ICD population ages, the proportion who die without receiving appropriate therapy increases due to competing risks. Characterizing competing risks predictive of death independent of ICD indication would focus therapy on those with potential to benefit and reduce unnecessary exposure to ICD-related morbidity.

We congratulate Barra et al. on a thoughtful review of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in the elderly.1 The article is timely given the increasing pressures of caring for an ageing population. It deals well with the issue of survival in elderly ICD recipients and the discussion on cost effectiveness is in line with what we had long suspected. We agree with many of the points raised in this review and would like to make two points: First, the comparison of an octogenarian ICD population with another (e.g. pacemaker) octogenarian ICD population is not valid as it is comparing two distinct entities, one …