Search

The maximal probability of being in an active state (PA,max) is a measure of gating efficacy for a given agonist acting on a given receptor channel. In macroscopic electrophysiological recordings, PA,max is typically estimated by comparing the amplitude of the current response to a saturating concentration of a test agonist to that of a reference agonist with known PA. Here, we describe an approach to estimate the PA,max for low-efficacy agonists at subsaturating concentrations. In this approach, the amplitude of the response to a high-efficacy control agonist applied alone is compared with the amplitude of the response to a control agonist coapplied with the low-efficacy test agonist that binds to the same site(s). If the response to the combination is larger than the response to the control agonist alone, then the PA,max of the test agonist is greater than the PA of the control response. Conversely, if the response to the control agonist is reduced upon exposure to the test agonist, then the PA,max of the test agonist is smaller than the PA of the control response. The exact PA,max of the test agonist can be determined by testing its effect at different concentrations of the control agonist to estimate the PA at which the effect changes direction. The main advantage of this approach lies in the ability to use low, subsaturating concentrations of the test agonist. The model-based predictions are supported by observations from activation of heteromeric and homomeric GABAA receptors by combinations of high- and low-efficacy orthosteric agonists., (© 2024 Germann et al.)

Background and Purpose: Neurosteroids are allosteric modulators of GABA A currents, acting through several functional binding sites although their affinity and specificity for each site are unknown. The goal of this study was to measure steady-state binding affinities of various neurosteroids for specific sites on the GABA A receptor., Experimental Approach: Two methods were developed to measure neurosteroid binding affinity: (1) quenching of specific tryptophan residues in neurosteroid binding sites by the neurosteroid 17-methylketone group, and (2) FRET between MQ290 (an intrinsically fluorescent neurosteroid) and tryptophan residues in the binding sites. The assays were developed using ELIC-α1GABA A R, a chimeric receptor containing transmembrane domains of the α 1 -GABA A receptor. Tryptophan mutagenesis was used to identify specific interactions., Key Results: Allopregnanolone (3α-OH neurosteroid) was shown to bind at intersubunit and intrasubunit sites with equal affinity, whereas epi-allopregnanolone (3β-OH neurosteroid) binds at the intrasubunit site. MQ290 formed a strong FRET pair with W246, acting as a site-specific probe for the intersubunit site. The affinity and site-specificity of several neurosteroid agonists and inverse agonists was measured using the MQ290 binding assay. The FRET assay distinguishes between competitive and allosteric inhibition of MQ290 binding and demonstrated an allosteric interaction between the two neurosteroid binding sites., Conclusions and Implications: The affinity and specificity of neurosteroid binding to two sites in the ELIC-α1GABA A R were directly measured and an allosteric interaction between the sites was revealed. Adaptation of the MQ290 FRET assay to a plate-reader format will enable screening for high affinity agonists and antagonists for neurosteroid binding sites., (© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

The γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptor is modulated by a number of neuroactive steroids. Sulfated steroids and 3 β -hydroxy steroids inhibit, while 3 α -hydroxy steroids typically potentiate the receptor. Here, we have investigated inhibition of the α 1 β 3γ2L GABA A receptor by the endogenous neurosteroid 3 α -hydroxy-5 β -pregnan-20-one (3 α 5 β P) and the synthetic neuroactive steroid 3 α -hydroxy-5 α -androstane-17 β -carbonitrile (ACN). The receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. All experiments were done using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology. In the presence of low concentrations of GABA, 3 α 5 β P and ACN potentiate the GABA A receptor. To reveal inhibition, we conducted the experiments on receptors activated by the combination of a saturating concentration of GABA and propofol to fully activate the receptors and mask potentiation, or on mutant receptors in which potentiation is ablated. Under these conditions, both steroids inhibited the receptor with IC 50 s of ∼13 μ M and maximal inhibitory effects of 70-90%. Receptor inhibition by 3 α 5 β P was sensitive to substitution of the α 1 transmembrane domain (TM) 2-2' residue, previously shown to ablate inhibition by pregnenolone sulfate. However, results of coapplication studies and the apparent lack of state dependence suggest that pregnenolone sulfate and 3 α 5 β P inhibit the GABA A receptor independently and through distinct mechanisms. Mutations to the neurosteroid binding sites in the α 1 and β 3 subunits statistically significantly, albeit weakly and incompletely, reduced inhibition by 3 α 5 β P and ACN. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The heteromeric GABA A receptor is inhibited by sulfated steroids and 3 β -hydroxy steroids, while 3 α -hydroxy steroids are considered to potentiate the receptor. We show here that 3 α -hydroxy steroids have inhibitory effects on the α 1 β 3γ2L receptor, which are observed in specific experimental settings and are expected to manifest under different physiological conditions., (Copyright © 2024 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

The properties of a potentiator are typically evaluated by measuring its ability to enhance the magnitude of the control response. Analysis of the ability of drugs to potentiate responses from receptor channels takes place in the context of particular models to extract parameters for functional effects. In the often-used coagonist model, the agonist generating control activity and the potentiator enhancing the control activity make additive energetic contributions to stabilize the active state of the receptor. The energetic contributions are fixed and, once known, enable calculation of predicted receptor behavior at any concentration combination of agonist and potentiator. Here, we have examined the applicability of the coagonist model by measuring the relationship between the magnitude of receptor potentiation and the level of background activity. Ternary αβγ GABA A receptors were activated by GABA or the allosteric agonist propofol, or by a gain-of-function mutation, and etiocholanolone- or propofol-mediated potentiation of peak responses was measured. We show that the free energy change contributed by the modulators etiocholanolone or propofol is reduced at higher levels of control activity, thereby being in disagreement with basic principles of the coagonist model. Possible mechanisms underlying this discrepancy are discussed., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Activation of the GABA A receptor is associated with numerous behavioral end points ranging from anxiolysis to deep anesthesia. The specific behavioral effect of a GABAergic compound is considered to correlate with the degree of its functional effect on the receptor. Here, we tested the hypothesis that a low-efficacy allosteric potentiator of the GABA A receptor may act, due to a ceiling effect, as a sedative with reduced and limited action. We synthesized a derivative, named (3α,5β)-20-methyl-pregnane-3,20-diol (KK-235), of the GABAergic neurosteroid 5β-pregnane-3α,20α-diol. Using electrophysiology, we showed that KK-235 is a low-efficacy potentiator of the synaptic-type α1β2γ2L GABA A receptor. In the zebrafish larvae behavioral assay, KK-235 was found to only partially block the inverted photomotor response (PMR) and to weakly reduce swimming behavior, whereas the high-efficacy GABAergic steroid (3α,5α,17β)-3-hydroxyandrostane-17-carbonitrile (ACN) fully blocked PMR and spontaneous swimming. Coapplication of KK-235 reduced the potentiating effect of ACN in an electrophysiological assay and dampened its sedative effect in behavioral experiments. We propose that low-efficacy GABAergic potentiators may be useful as sedatives with limited action.

The γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABAergic) system participates in many aspects of organismal physiology and disease, including proteostasis, neuronal dysfunction, and life-span extension. Many of these phenotypes are also regulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), but the redox mechanisms linking the GABAergic system to these phenotypes are not well defined. Here, we report that GABAergic redox signaling cell nonautonomously activates many stress response pathways in Caenorhabditis elegans and enhances vulnerability to proteostasis disease in the absence of oxidative stress. Cell nonautonomous redox activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mitoUPR) proteostasis network requires UNC-49, a GABA A receptor that we show is activated by hydrogen peroxide. MitoUPR induction by a spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) C. elegans neurodegenerative disease model was similarly dependent on UNC-49 in C. elegans . These results demonstrate a multi-tissue paradigm for redox signaling in the GABAergic system that is transduced via a GABA A receptor to function in cell nonautonomous regulation of health, proteostasis, and disease.

Acrylamide-derived compounds have been previously shown to act as modulators of members of the Cys-loop transmitter-gated ion channel family, including the mammalian GABA A receptor. Here we have synthesized and functionally characterized the GABAergic effects of a series of novel compounds (termed "DM compounds") derived from the previously characterized GABA A and the nicotinic α 7 receptor modulator (E)-3-furan-2-yl- N -p-tolyl-acrylamide (PAM-2). Fluorescence imaging studies indicated that the DM compounds increase apparent affinity to the transmitter by up to 80-fold in the ternary αβγ GABA A receptor. Using electrophysiology, we show that the DM compounds, and the structurally related (E)-3-furan-2-yl- N -phenylacrylamide (PAM-4), have concurrent potentiating and inhibitory effects that can be isolated and observed under appropriate recording conditions. The potentiating efficacies of the DM compounds are similar to those of neurosteroids and benzodiazepines (ΔG ∼ -1.5 kcal/mol). Molecular docking, functionally confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis experiments, indicate that receptor potentiation is mediated by interactions with the classic anesthetic binding sites located in the transmembrane domain of the intersubunit interfaces. Inhibition by the DM compounds and PAM-4 was abolished in the receptor containing the α 1(V256S) mutation, suggestive of similarities in the mechanism of action with that of inhibitory neurosteroids. Functional competition and mutagenesis experiments, however, indicate that the sites mediating inhibition by the DM compounds and PAM-4 differ from those mediating the action of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We have synthesized and characterized the actions of novel acrylamide-derived compounds on the mammalian GABA A receptor. We show that the compounds have concurrent potentiating effects mediated by the classic anesthetic binding sites, and inhibitory actions that bear mechanistic resemblance to but do not share binding sites with, the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate., (Copyright © 2023 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

The positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of the α7 nicotinic receptor N -(5-Cl-2-hydroxyphenyl)- N '-[2-Cl-5-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-urea (NS-1738) and ( E )-3-(furan-2-yl)- N -( p -tolyl)-acrylamide (PAM-2) potentiate the α1β2γ2L GABA A receptor through interactions with the classic anesthetic binding sites located at intersubunit interfaces in the transmembrane domain of the receptor. In the present study, we employed mutational analysis to investigate in detail the involvement and contributions made by the individual intersubunit interfaces to receptor modulation by NS-1738 and PAM-2. We show that mutations to each of the anesthetic-binding intersubunit interfaces (β+/α-, α+/β-, and γ+/β-), as well as the orphan α+/γ- interface, modify receptor potentiation by NS-1738 and PAM-2. Furthermore, mutations to any single interface can fully abolish potentiation by the α7-PAMs. The findings are discussed in the context of energetic additivity and interactions between the individual binding sites.

The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (ALLO) and pregnanolone (PREG), are equally effective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of GABA A receptors. Interestingly, the PAM effects of ALLO are strongly enantioselective, whereas those of PREG are not. This study was aimed at determining the basis for this difference in enantioselectivity. The oocyte electrophysiology studies showed that ent -ALLO potentiates GABA-elicited currents in α 1 β 3 GABA A receptors with lower potency and efficacy than ALLO, PREG or ent -PREG. The small PAM effect of ent -ALLO was prevented by the α 1 (Q242L) mutation in the intersubunit neurosteroid binding site between the β 3 and α 1 subunits. Consistent with this result, neurosteroid analogue photolabeling with mass spectrometric readout, showed that ent -ALLO binds weakly to the β 3 -α 1 intersubunit binding site in comparison to ALLO, PREG and ent -PREG. Rigid body docking predicted that ent -ALLO binds in the intersubunit site with a preferred orientation 180° different than ALLO, PREG or ent -PREG, potentially explaining its weak binding and effect. Photolabeling studies did not identify differences between ALLO and ent -ALLO binding to the α 1 or β 3 intrasubunit binding sites that also mediate neurosteroid modulation of GABA A receptors. The results demonstrate that differential binding of ent -ALLO and ent -PREG to the β 3 -α 1 intersubunit site accounts for the difference in enantioselectivity between ALLO and PREG.

Background and Purpose: Positive allosteric modulators of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptor (α7-PAMs) possess promnesic and procognitive properties and have potential in the treatment of cognitive and psychiatric disorders including Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia. Behavioural studies in rodents have indicated that α7-PAMs can also produce antinociceptive and anxiolytic effects that may be associated with positive modulation of the GABA A receptor. The overall goal of this study was to investigate the modulatory actions of selected α7-PAMs on the GABA A receptor., Experimental Approach: We employed a combination of cell fluorescence imaging, electrophysiology, functional competition and site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the functional and structural mechanisms of modulation of the GABA A receptor by three representative α7-PAMs., Key Results: We show that the α7-PAMs at micromolar concentrations enhance the apparent affinity of the GABA A receptor for the transmitter and potentiate current responses from the receptor. The compounds were equi-effective at binary αβ and ternary αβγ GABA A receptors. Functional competition and site-directed mutagenesis indicate that the α7-PAMs bind to the classic anaesthetic binding sites in the transmembrane region in the intersubunit interfaces, which results in stabilization of the active state of the receptor., Conclusion and Implications: We conclude that the tested α7-PAMs are micromolar-affinity, intermediate- to low-efficacy allosteric potentiators of the mammalian αβγ GABA A receptor. Given the similarities in the in vitro sensitivities of the α7 nACh and α1β2γ2L GABA A receptors to α7-PAMs, we propose that doses used to produce nACh receptor-mediated behavioural effects in vivo are likely to modulate GABA A receptor function., (© 2022 British Pharmacological Society.)

GABA A receptors are a major contributor to fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. The receptors are activated upon binding the transmitter GABA or allosteric agonists including a number of GABAergic anesthetics and neurosteroids. Functional receptors can be formed by various combinations of the nineteen GABA A subunits cloned to date. GABA A receptors containing the ε subunit exhibit a significant degree of constitutive activity and have been suggested to be unresponsive to allosteric agents. In this study, we have characterized the functional properties of the rat α1β2ε GABA A receptor. We confirm that the α1β2ε receptor exhibits a higher level of constitutive activity than typical of GABA A receptors and show that it is inefficaciously activated by the transmitter and the allosteric agonists propofol, pentobarbital, and allopregnanolone. Manipulations intended to alter ε subunit expression and receptor stoichiometry were largely without effect on receptor properties including sensitivity to GABA and allosteric agonists. Surprisingly, amino acid substitutions at the conserved 9' and 6' positions in the second transmembrane (TM2) domain in the ε subunit did not elicit the expected functional effects of increased constitutive activity and resistance to the channel blocker picrotoxin, respectively. We tested the accessibility of TM2 residues mutated to cysteine using the cysteine-modifying reagent 4-(hydroxymercuri)benzoic acid and found a unique pattern of water-accessible residues in the ε subunit.

(+)-Catharanthine, a coronaridine congener, potentiates the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA A R) and induces sedation through a non-benzodiazepine mechanism, but the specific site of action and intrinsic mechanism have not beendefined. Here, we describe GABA A R subtype selectivity and location of the putative binding site for (+)-catharanthine using electrophysiological, site-directed mutagenesis, functional competition, and molecular docking experiments. Electrophysiological and in silico experiments showed that (+)-catharanthine potentiates the responses to low, subsaturating GABA at β2/3-containing GABA A Rs 2.4-3.5 times more efficaciously than at β1-containing GABA A Rs. The activity of (+)-catharanthine is reduced by the β2(N265S) mutation that decreases GABA A R potentiation by loreclezole, but not by the β3(M286C) or α1(Q241L) mutations that reduce receptor potentiation by R(+)-etomidate or neurosteroids, respectively. Competitive functional experiments indicated that the binding site for (+)-catharanthine overlaps that for loreclezole, but not those for R(+)-etomidate or potentiating neurosteroids. Molecular docking experiments suggested that (+)-catharanthine binds at the β(+)/α(-) intersubunit interface near the TM2-TM3 loop, where it forms H-bonds with β2-D282 (TM3), β2-K279 (TM2-TM3 loop), and β2-N265 and β2-R269 (TM2). Site-directed mutagenesis experiments supported the in silico results, demonstrating that the K279A and D282A substitutions, that lead to a loss of H-bonding ability of the mutated residue, and the N265S mutation, impair the gating efficacy of (+)-catharanthine. We infer that (+)-catharanthine potentiates the GABA A R through several H-bond interactions with a binding site located in the β(+)/α(-) interface in the transmembrane domain, near the TM2-TM3 loop, where it overlaps with loreclezole binding site., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The GABA A receptor is inhibited by the endogenous sulfated steroids pregnenolone sulfate (PS) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). It has been proposed in previous work that these steroids act by enhancing desensitization of the receptor. Here, we have investigated the modulatory effects of the steroids on the human α 1 β 3 γ 2L GABA A receptor. Using electrophysiology and quantitative model-based data analysis, we show that exposure to the steroid promotes occupancy of a nonconducting state that retains high affinity to the transmitter but whose properties differ from those of the classic, transmitter-induced desensitized state. From the analysis of the inhibitory actions of two combined steroids, we infer that PS and DHEAS act through shared or overlapping binding sites. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Previous work has proposed that sulfated neurosteroids inhibit the GABA A receptor by enhancing the rate of entry into the desensitized state. This study shows that the inhibitory steroids pregnenolone sulfate and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate act through a common interaction site by stabilizing a distinct nonconducting state., (Copyright © 2022 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Background: In electrophysiological experiments, inhibition of a receptor-channel, such as the GABAA receptor, is measured by co-applying an agonist producing a predefined control response with an inhibitor to calculate the fraction of the control response remaining in the presence of the inhibitor. The properties of the inhibitor are determined by fitting the inhibition concentration- response relationship to the Hill equation to estimate the midpoint (IC50) of the inhibition curve Objective: We sought to estimate sensitivity of the fitted IC50 to the level of activity of the control response Methods: The inhibition concentration-response relationships were calculated for models with distinct mechanisms of inhibition. In Model I, the inhibitor acts allosterically to stabilize the resting state of the receptor. In Model II, the inhibitor competes with the agonist for a shared binding site. In Model III, the inhibitor stabilizes the desensitized state., Results: The simulations indicate that the fitted IC50 of the inhibition curve is sensitive to the degree of activity of the control response. In Models I and II, the IC50 of inhibition was increased as the probability of being in the active state (PA) of the control response increased. In Model III, the IC50 of inhibition was reduced at higher PA., Conclusion: We infer that the apparent potency of an inhibitor depends on the PA of the control response. While the calculations were carried out using the activation and inhibition properties that are representative of the GABAA receptor, the principles and conclusions apply to a wide variety of receptor- channels., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

The Cl - permeable GABA A receptor is a major contributor to cellular inhibition in the brain. The receptor is normally activated by synaptically-released or ambient GABA but is sensitive to a number of physiological compounds such as β-alanine, taurine, and neurosteroids that, to various degrees, activate the receptor and modulate responses either to the transmitter or to each other. Here, we describe α1β2γ2L GABA A receptor activation and modulation by combinations of orthosteric and allosteric activators. The overall goal was to gain insight into how changes in the levels of endogenous agonists modulate receptor activity and influence cellular inhibition. Experimental observations and simulations are described in the framework of a cyclic concerted transition model. We also provide general analytical solutions for the analysis of electrophysiological data collected in the presence of combinations of active compounds.

Prior work employing functional analysis, photolabeling, and X-ray crystallography have identified three distinct binding sites for potentiating steroids in the heteromeric GABA A receptor. The sites are located in the membrane-spanning domains of the receptor at the β - α subunit interface (site I) and within the α (site II) and β subunits (site III). Here, we have investigated the effects of mutations to these sites on potentiation of the rat α 1 β 2 γ 2L GABA A receptor by the endogenous neurosteroid allopregnanolone (3 α 5 α P). The mutations were introduced alone or in combination to probe the additivity of effects. We show that the effects of amino acid substitutions in sites I and II are energetically additive, indicating independence of the actions of the two steroid binding sites. In site III, none of the mutations tested reduced potentiation by 3 α 5 α P, nor did a mutation in site III modify the effects of mutations in sites I or II. We infer that the binding sites for 3 α 5 α P act independently. The independence of steroid action at each site is supported by photolabeling data showing that mutations in either site I or site II selectively change steroid orientation in the mutated site without affecting labeling at the unmutated site. The findings are discussed in the context of linking energetic additivity to empirical changes in receptor function and ligand binding. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Prior work has identified three distinct binding sites for potentiating steroids in the heteromeric γ -aminobutyric acid type A receptor. This study shows that the sites act independently and additively in the presence of the steroid allopregnanolone and provide estimates of energetic contributions made by steroid binding to each site., (Copyright © 2021 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Synaptic GABA A receptors are alternately exposed to short pulses of a high, millimolar concentration of GABA and prolonged periods of low, micromolar concentration of the transmitter. Prior work has indicated that exposure to micromolar concentrations of GABA can both activate the postsynaptic receptors generating sustained low-amplitude current and desensitize the receptors, thereby reducing the peak amplitude of subsequent synaptic response. However, the precise relationship between tonic activation and reduction of peak response is not known. Here, we have measured the effect of prolonged exposure to GABA or the combination of GABA and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone, which was intended to desensitize a fraction of receptors, on a subsequent response to a high concentration of agonist in human α 1 β 3 γ 2L receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. We show that the reduction in the peak amplitude of the post-exposure test response correlates with the open probability of the preceding desensitizing response. Curve fitting of the inhibitory relationship yielded an IC 50 of 12.5 µM and a Hill coefficient of -1.61. The activation and desensitization data were mechanistically analyzed in the framework of a three-state Resting-Active-Desensitized model. Using the estimated affinity, efficacy, and desensitization parameters, we calculated the amount of desensitization that would accumulate during a long (2-minute) application of GABA or GABA plus allopregnanolone. The results indicate that accumulation of desensitization depends on the level of activity rather than agonist or potentiator concentration per se. We estimate that in the presence of 1 µM GABA, approximately 5% of α 1 β 3 γ 2L receptors are functionally eliminated because of desensitization. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: We present an analytical approach to quantify and predict the loss of activatable GABA A receptors due to desensitization in the presence of transmitter and the steroid allopregnanolone. The findings indicate that the peak amplitude of the synaptic response is influenced by ambient GABA and that changes in ambient concentrations of the transmitter and other GABAergic agents can modify tonically and phasically activated synaptic receptors in opposite directions., (Copyright © 2020 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Muscimol is a psychoactive isoxazole derived from the mushroom Amanita muscaria and a potent orthosteric agonist of the GABA A receptor. The binding of [ 3 H]muscimol has been used to evaluate the distribution of GABA A receptors in the brain, and studies of modulation of [ 3 H]muscimol binding by allosteric GABAergic modulators such as barbiturates and steroid anesthetics have provided insight into the modes of action of these drugs on the GABA A receptor. It has, however, not been feasible to directly apply interaction parameters derived from functional studies to describe the binding of muscimol to the receptor. Here, we employed the Monod-Wyman-Changeux concerted transition model to analyze muscimol binding isotherms. We show that the binding isotherms from recombinant α 1 β 3 GABA A receptors can be qualitatively predicted using electrophysiological data pertaining to properties of receptor activation and desensitization in the presence of muscimol. The model predicts enhancement of [ 3 H]muscimol binding in the presence of the steroids allopregnanolone and pregnenolone sulfate, although the steroids interact with distinct sites and either enhance (allopregnanolone) or reduce (pregnenolone sulfate) receptor function. We infer that the concerted transition model can be used to link radioligand binding and electrophysiological data. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The study employs a three-state resting-active-desensitized model to link radioligand binding and electrophysiological data. We show that the binding isotherms can be qualitatively predicted using parameters estimated in electrophysiological experiments and that the model accurately predicts the enhancement of [ 3 H]muscimol binding in the presence of the potentiating steroid allopregnanolone and the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate., (Copyright © 2020 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

The ρ 1 GABA A receptor is prominently expressed in the retina and is present at lower levels in several brain regions and other tissues. Although the ρ 1 receptor is insensitive to many anesthetic drugs that modulate the heteromeric GABA A receptor, it maintains a rich and multifaceted steroid pharmacology. The receptor is negatively modulated by 5 β -reduced steroids, sulfated or carboxylated steroids, and β -estradiol, whereas many 5 α -reduced steroids potentiate the receptor. In this study, we analyzed modulation of the human ρ 1 GABA A receptor by several neurosteroids, individually and in combination, in the framework of the coagonist concerted transition model. Experiments involving coapplication of two or more steroids revealed that the receptor contains at least three classes of distinct, nonoverlapping sites for steroids, one each for the inhibitory steroids pregnanolone (3 α 5 β P), 3 α 5 β P sulfate, and β -estradiol. The site for 3 α 5 β P can accommodate the potentiating steroid 5αTHDOC. The findings are discussed with respect to receptor modulation by combinations of endogenous neurosteroids. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The study describes modulation of the ρ1 GABA A receptor by neurosteroids. The coagonist concerted transition model was used to determine overlap of binding sites for several inhibitory and potentiating steroids., (Copyright © 2020 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

This study examines how site-specific binding to three identified neurosteroid-binding sites in the α 1 β 3 GABA A receptor (GABA A R) contributes to neurosteroid allosteric modulation. We found that the potentiating neurosteroid, allopregnanolone, but not its inhibitory 3β-epimer epi-allopregnanolone, binds to the canonical β 3 (+)-α 1 (-) intersubunit site that mediates receptor activation by neurosteroids. In contrast, both allopregnanolone and epi-allopregnanolone bind to intrasubunit sites in the β 3 subunit, promoting receptor desensitization and the α 1 subunit promoting effects that vary between neurosteroids. Two neurosteroid analogues with diazirine moieties replacing the 3-hydroxyl (KK148 and KK150) bind to all three sites, but do not potentiate GABA A R currents. KK148 is a desensitizing agent, whereas KK150 is devoid of allosteric activity. These compounds provide potential chemical scaffolds for neurosteroid antagonists. Collectively, these data show that differential occupancy and efficacy at three discrete neurosteroid-binding sites determine whether a neurosteroid has potentiating, inhibitory, or competitive antagonist activity on GABA A Rs., Competing Interests: YS, WC, JB, ZC, LW, AG, SP, TS, KK, DR, DC, GA, AE No competing interests declared, (© 2020, Sugasawa et al.)

Activation of GABA A receptors consisting of α4, β2 (or β3), and δ subunits is a major contributor to tonic inhibition in several brain regions. The goal of this study was to analyze the function of the α4β2δ receptor in the presence of GABA and other endogenous and clinical activators and modulators under steady-state conditions. We show that the receptor has a high constitutive open probability (~0.1), but is only weakly activated by GABA that has a maximal peak open probability (P Open,peak ) of 0.4, taurine (maximal P Open,peak  = 0.4), or the endogenous steroid allopregnanolone (maximal P Open,peak  = 0.2). The intravenous anesthetic propofol is a full agonist (maximal P Open,peak  = 0.99). Analysis of currents using a cyclic three-state Resting-Active-Desensitized model indicates that the maximal steady-state open probability of the α4β2δ receptor is ~0.45. Steady-state open probability in the presence of combinations of GABA, taurine, propofol, allopregnanolone and/or the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate closely matched predicted open probability calculated assuming energetic additivity. The results suggest that the receptor is active in the presence of physiological concentrations of GABA and taurine, but, surprisingly, that receptor activity is only weakly potentiated by propofol.

The two-state coagonist model has been successfully used to analyze and predict peak current responses of the γ -aminobutyric acid type A (GABA A ) receptor. The goal of the present study was to provide a model-based description of GABA A receptor activity under steady-state conditions after desensitization has occurred. We describe the derivation and properties of the cyclic three-state resting-active-desensitized (RAD) model. The relationship of the model to receptor behavior was tested using concatemeric α 1 β 2 γ 2 GABA A receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The receptors were activated by the orthosteric agonists GABA or β -alanine, the allosteric agonist propofol, or combinations of GABA, propofol, pentobarbital, and the steroid allopregnanolone, and the observed steady-state responses were compared with those predicted by the model. A modified RAD model was employed to analyze and describe the actions on steady-state current of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. The findings indicate that the steady-state activity in the presence of multiple active agents that interact with distinct binding sites follows standard energetic additivity. The derived equations enable prediction of peak and steady-state activity in the presence of orthosteric and allosteric agonists, and the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The study describes derivation and properties of a three-state resting-active-desensitized model. The model and associated equations can be used to analyze and predict peak and steady-state activity in the presence of one or more active agents., (Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

The synaptic α1β2γ2 GABA A receptor is activated phasically by presynaptically released GABA. The receptor is considered to be inactive between synaptic events when exposed to ambient GABA because of its low resting affinity to the transmitter. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of physiological and/or clinical positive allosteric modulators of the GABA A receptor with ambient GABA generates measurable steady-state activity. Recombinant α1β2γ2L GABA A receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and activated by combinations of low concentrations of orthosteric (GABA, taurine) and allosteric (the steroid allopregnanolone, the anesthetic propofol) agonists, in the absence and presence of the inhibitory steroid pregnenolone sulfate. Steady-state activity was analyzed using the three-state cyclic Resting-Active-Desensitized model. We estimate that the steady-state open probability of the synaptic α1β2γ2L GABA A receptor in the presence of ambient GABA (1 μmol/L), taurine (10 μmol/L), and physiological levels of allopregnanolone (0.01 μmol/L) and pregnenolone sulfate (0.1 μmol/L) is 0.008. Coapplication of a clinical concentration of propofol (1 μmol/L) increases the steady-state open probability to 0.03. Comparison of total charge transfer for phasic and tonic activity indicates that steady-state activity can contribute strongly (~20 to >99%) to integrated activity from the synaptic GABA A receptor., (© 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.)

Neurosteroids are endogenous modulators of neuronal excitability and nervous system development and are being developed as anesthetic agents and treatments for psychiatric diseases. While gamma amino-butyric acid Type A (GABAA) receptors are the primary molecular targets of neurosteroid action, the structural details of neurosteroid binding to these proteins remain ill defined. We synthesized neurosteroid analogue photolabeling reagents in which the photolabeling groups were placed at three positions around the neurosteroid ring structure, enabling identification of binding sites and mapping of neurosteroid orientation within these sites. Using middle-down mass spectrometry (MS), we identified three clusters of photolabeled residues representing three distinct neurosteroid binding sites in the human α1β3 GABAA receptor. Novel intrasubunit binding sites were identified within the transmembrane helical bundles of both the α1 (labeled residues α1-N408, Y415) and β3 (labeled residue β3-Y442) subunits, adjacent to the extracellular domains (ECDs). An intersubunit site (labeled residues β3-L294 and G308) in the interface between the β3(+) and α1(-) subunits of the GABAA receptor pentamer was also identified. Computational docking studies of neurosteroid to the three sites predicted critical residues contributing to neurosteroid interaction with the GABAA receptors. Electrophysiological studies of receptors with mutations based on these predictions (α1-V227W, N408A/Y411F, and Q242L) indicate that both the α1 intrasubunit and β3-α1 intersubunit sites are critical for neurosteroid action., Competing Interests: DFC has equity in Sage Therapeutics, a pharmaceutical company developing neurosteroid therapeutics. Sage Therapeutics did not fund this research or have a license agreement with Washington University for the compounds reported. The authors have no other competing interests to declare.

Under both physiologic and clinical conditions GABA A receptors are exposed to multiple agonists, including the transmitter GABA, endogenous or exogenous neuroactive steroids, and various GABAergic anesthetic and sedative drugs. The functional output of the receptor reflects the interplay among all active agents. We have investigated the activation of the concatemeric α 1 β 2 γ 2L GABA A receptor by combinations of agonists. Simulations of receptor activity using the coagonist concerted transition model demonstrate that the response amplitude in the presence of agonist combinations is highly dependent on whether the paired agonists interact with the same or distinct sites. The experimental data for receptor activation by agonist combinations were in agreement with the established views of the overlap of binding sites for several pairs of orthosteric (GABA, β -alanine, and piperidine-4-sulfonic acid) and/or allosteric agents (propofol, pentobarbital, and several neuroactive steroids). Conversely, the degree of potentiation when two GABAergic agents are coapplied can be used to determine whether the compounds act by binding to the same or distinct sites. We show that common interaction sites mediate the actions of 5 α - and 5 β -reduced neuroactive steroids, and natural and enantiomeric steroids. Furthermore, the results indicate that the anesthetics propofol and pentobarbital interact with partially shared binding sites. We propose that the findings may be used to predict the efficacy of drug mixtures in combination therapy and thus have potential clinical relevance., (Copyright © 2018 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

The co-agonist concerted transition model is a simple and practical solution to analyze various aspects of GABAA receptor function. Several model-based predictions have been verified experimentally in previous reports. We review here the practical implications of the model and demonstrate how it enables simplification of the experimental procedure and data analysis to characterize the effects of mutations or properties of novel ligands. Specifically, we show that the value of EC50 and the magnitude of current response are directly affected by basal activity, and that coapplication of a background agonist acting at a distinct site or use of a gain-of-function mutation can be employed to enable studies of weak activators or mutated receptors with impaired gating. We also show that the ability of one GABAergic agent to potentiate the activity elicited by another is a computable value that depends on the level of constitutive activity of the ion channel and the ability of each agonist to directly activate the receptor. Significantly, the model accurately accounts for situations where the paired agonists interact with the same site compared to distinct sites on the receptor., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Many GABAergic drugs are in clinical use as anesthetics, sedatives, or anxiolytics. We have investigated the actions of the combinations of the neuroactive steroid 3α-hydroxy-5α-pregnane-11,20-dione (alfaxalone) with the intravenous anesthetic propofol or the benzodiazepine diazepam. The goal of the study was to determine whether coapplication of alfaxalone reduces the effective doses and concentrations of propofol and diazepam. Behavioral effects of alfaxalone, propofol, diazepam, and the combinations of the drugs were evaluated during a 30-min activity test in mice. Functional effects of the individual drugs and drug combinations were tested by measuring the decay times of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents in rat hippocampal neurons, and peak current responses from heterologously expressed concatemeric α1β2γ2L GABA A receptors. Co-administration of alfaxalone increased the sedative actions of propofol and diazepam in mice. The combination of alfaxalone with propofol or diazepam increased the decay times of sIPSCs and shifted the concentration-response relationships for GABA-activated receptors to lower transmitter concentrations. We infer that alfaxalone acts as a co-agonist to enhance the GABAergic effects of propofol and diazepam. We propose that co-administration of alfaxalone, and possibly other neuroactive steroids, can be employed to reduce dosage requirements for propofol and diazepam.

GABA A receptors activated by the transmitter GABA are potentiated by several allosterically acting drugs, including the intravenous anesthetic propofol. Propofol can also directly activate the receptor, albeit at higher concentrations. Previous functional studies have identified amino acid residues whose substitution reduces potentiation of GABA-activated receptors by propofol while enhancing the ability of propofol to directly activate the receptor. One interpretation of such observations is that the mutation has specific effects on the sites or processes involved in potentiation or activation. We show here that divergent effects on potentiation and direct activation can be mediated by increased constitutive open probability in the mutant receptor without any specific effect on the interactions between the allosteric drug and the receptor. By simulating GABA A receptor activity using the concerted transition model, we demonstrate that the predicted degree of potentiation is reduced as the level of constitutive activity increases. The model further predicts that a potentiating effect of an allosteric modulator is a computable value that depends on the level of constitutive activity, the amplitude of the response to the agonist, and the amplitude of the direct activating response to the modulator. Specific predictions were confirmed by electrophysiological data from the binary α 1 β 3 and concatemeric ternary β 2 α 1 γ 2L+ β 2 α 1 GABA A receptors. The corollaries of reduced potentiation due to increased constitutive activity are isobolograms that conform to simple additivity and a loss of separation between the concentration-response relationships for direct activation and potentiation., (Copyright © 2018 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

GABA A receptors can be directly activated and potentiated by the intravenous anesthetic propofol. Previous photolabeling, modeling, and functional data have identified two binding domains through which propofol acts on the GABA A receptor. These domains are defined by the β (M286) residue at the β "+"- α "-" interface in the transmembrane region and the β (Y143) residue near the β "-" surface in the junction between the extracellular and transmembrane domains. In the ternary receptor, there are predicted to be two copies of each class of sites, for a total of four sites per receptor. We used β 2 α 1 γ 2L and β 2 α 1 concatemeric constructs to determine the functional effects of the β (Y143W) and β (M286W) mutations to gain insight into the number of functional binding sites for propofol and the energetic contributions stemming from propofol binding to the individual sites. A mutation of each of the four sites affected the response to propofol, indicating that each of the four sites is functional in the wild-type receptor. The mutations mainly impaired stabilization of the open state by propofol, i.e., reduced gating efficacy. The effects were similar for mutations at either site and were largely additive and independent of the presence of other Y143W or M286W mutations in the receptor. The two classes of sites appeared to differ in affinity for propofol, with the site affected by M286W having about a 2-fold higher affinity. Our analysis indicates there may be one or two additional functionally equivalent binding sites for propofol, other than those modified by substitutions at β (Y143) and β (M286)., (Copyright © 2018 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

The concerted transition model for multimeric proteins is a simple formulation for analyzing the behavior of transmitter-gated ion channels. We used the model to examine the relationship between the EC 50 for activation of the GABA type A (GABA A ) receptor by the transmitter GABA and basal activity employing concatemeric ternary GABA A receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Basal activity, reflecting the receptor function in the absence of the transmitter, can be changed either by mutation to increase constitutive activity or by the addition of a second agonist (acting at a different site) to increase background activity. The model predicts that either mechanism for producing a change in basal activity will result in identical effects on the EC 50 We examined receptor activation by GABA while changing the level of basal activity with the allosterically acting anesthetics propofol, pentobarbital, or alfaxalone. We found that the relationship between EC 50 and basal activity was well described by the concerted transition model. Changes in the basal activity by gain-of-function mutations also resulted in predictable changes in the EC 50 Finally, we altered the number of GABA-binding sites by a mutation and again found that the relationship could be well described by the model. Overall, the results support the idea that interactions between the transmitter GABA and the allosteric agonists propofol, pentobarbital, or alfaxalone can be understood as reflecting additive and independent free energy changes, without assuming any specific interactions., (Copyright © 2017 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Drug interactions are often analyzed in terms of isobolograms. In the isobologram, the line connecting the axial points corresponding to the concentrations of two different drugs that produce an effect of the same magnitude is termed an isobole of additivity. Although the isobole of additivity can be a straight line in some special cases, previous work has proposed that it is curvilinear when the two drugs differ in their maximal effects or Hill slopes. Modulators of transmitter-gated ion channels have a wide range of maximal effects as well as Hill slopes, suggesting that the isoboles for drug actions on ion channel function are not linear. In this study, we have conducted an analysis of direct activation and potentiation of the human α 1 β 2 γ 2L GABA A receptor to demonstrate that: 1) curvilinear isoboles of additivity are predicted by a concerted transition model where the binding of each GABAergic drug additively and independently reduces the free energy of the open receptor compared with the closed receptor; and 2) experimental data for receptor activation using the agonist pair of GABA and propofol or potentiation of responses to a low concentration of GABA by the drug pair of alfaxalone and propofol agree very well with predictions. The approach assuming independent energetic contributions from GABAergic drugs enables, at least for the drug combinations tested, a straightforward method to accurately predict functional responses to any combination of concentrations., (Copyright © 2017 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Physostigmine can potentiate and inhibit neuronal nicotinic receptors, in addition to inhibiting the activity of acetylcholinesterase. We found that receptors containing three copies of the α 2 subunit are inhibited by low concentrations of physostigmine in contrast to receptors containing three copies of the α 4 subunit that are potentiated. We exploited this observation to determine the regions required for the actions of physostigmine. Chimeric constructs of the α 2 and α 4 subunits located two regions in the extracellular amino-terminal domain of the subunit: the E loop (a loop of the transmitter-binding domain) and a region closer to the amino-terminus that collectively could completely determine the different effects of physostigmine. Point mutations then identified a single residue, α 2(I92) versus α 4(R92), that, when combined with transfer of the E loop, could convert the inhibition seen with α 2 subunits to potentiation and the potentiation seen with α 4 subunits to inhibition. In addition, other point mutations could affect the extent of potentiation or inhibition, indicating that a more extensive set of interactions in the amino-terminal domain plays some role in the actions of physostigmine., (Copyright © 2017 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Physostigmine is a well known inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase, which can also activate, potentiate, and inhibit acetylcholine receptors, including neuronal nicotinic receptors comprising α4 and β2 subunits. We have found that the two stoichiometric forms of this receptor differ in the effects of physostigmine. The form containing three copies of α4 and two of β2 was potentiated at low concentrations of acetylcholine chloride (ACh) and physostigmine, whereas the form containing two copies of α4 and three of β2 was inhibited. Chimeric constructs of subunits indicated that the presence of inhibition or potentiation depended on the source of the extracellular ligand binding domain of the subunit. Further sets of chimeric constructs demonstrated that a portion of the ACh binding domain, the E loop, is a key determinant. Transferring the E loop from the β2 subunit to the α4 subunit resulted in strong inhibition, whereas the reciprocal transfer reduced inhibition. To control the number and position of the incorporated chimeric subunits, we expressed chimeric constructs with subunit dimers. Surprisingly, incorporation of a subunit with an altered E loop had similar effects whether it contributed either to an intersubunit interface containing a canonical ACh binding site or to an alternative interface. The observation that the α4 E loop is involved suggests that physostigmine interacts with regions of subunits that contribute to the ACh binding site, whereas the lack of interface specificity indicates that interaction with a particular ACh binding site is not the critical factor., (Copyright © 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Background and Purpose: Glycine receptors are important players in pain perception and movement disorders and therefore important therapeutic targets. Glycine receptors can be modulated by the intravenous anaesthetic propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol). However, the drug is more potent, by at least one order of magnitude, on GABA A receptors. It has been proposed that halogenation of the propofol molecule generates compounds with selective enhancement of glycinergic modulatory properties., Experimental Approach: We synthesized 4-bromopropofol, 4-chloropropofol and 4-fluoropropofol. The direct activating and modulatory effects of these drugs and propofol were compared on recombinant rat glycine and human GABA A receptors expressed in oocytes. Behavioural effects of the compounds were compared in the tadpole loss-of-righting assay., Key Results: Concentration-response curves for potentiation of homomeric α1, α2 and α3 glycine receptors were shifted to lower drug concentrations, by 2-10-fold, for the halogenated compounds. Direct activation by all compounds was minimal with all subtypes of the glycine receptor. The four compounds were essentially equally potent modulators of the α1β3γ2L GABA A receptor with EC 50 between 4 and 7 μM. The EC 50 for loss-of-righting in Xenopus tadpoles, a proxy for loss of consciousness and considered to be mediated by actions on GABA A receptors, ranged from 0.35 to 0.87 μM., Conclusions and Implications: We confirm that halogenation of propofol more strongly affects modulation of homomeric glycine receptors than α1β3γ2L GABA A receptors. However, the effective concentrations of all tested halogenated compounds remained lower for GABA A receptors. We infer that 4-bromopropofol, 4-chloropropofol and 4-fluoropropofol are not selective homomeric glycine receptor modulators., (© 2016 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Propofol is a sedative agent that at clinical concentrations acts by allosterically activating or potentiating the γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor. Mutational, modeling, and photolabeling studies with propofol and its analogues have identified potential interaction sites in the transmembrane domain of the receptor. At the "+" of the β subunit, in the β-α interface, meta-azipropofol labels the M286 residue in the third transmembrane domain. Substitution of this residue with tryptophan results in loss of potentiation by propofol. At the "-" side of the β subunit, in the α-β interface (or β-β interface, in the case of homomeric β receptors), ortho-propofol diazirine labels the H267 residue in the second transmembrane domain. Structural modeling indicates that the β(H267) residue lines a cavity that docks propofol with favorable interaction energy., Method: We used two-electrode voltage clamp to determine the functional effects of mutations to the "+" and "-" sides of the β subunit on activation of the α1β3 GABAA receptor by propofol., Results: We found that while the individual mutations had a small effect, the combination of the M286W mutation with tryptophan mutations of selected residues at the α-β interface leads to strong reduction in gating efficacy for propofol., Conclusion: We conclude that α1β3 GABAA receptors can be activated by propofol interactions with the β-β, α-β, and β-α interfaces, where distinct, non-equivalent regions control channel gating. Any interface can mediate activation, hence substitutions at all interfaces are required for loss of activation by propofol.