Search

Background: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) progression is well documented; WMH regression is more contentious, which might reflect differences in defining WMH change. We compared four existing WMH change definitions in one population to determine the effect of definition on WMH regression., Methods: We recruited patients with minor non-disabling ischaemic stroke who underwent MRI 1-3 months after stroke and 1 year later. We assessed WMH volume (in absolute mL and % intracranial volume) and applied four different definitions, including two thresholds (based on SD or mL), percentile and quintile approaches., Results: In 198 participants, mean age 65.5 (SD=11.13), baseline WMH volume was 15.46 mL (SD=19.2), the mean net WMH volume change was 0.98 mL (SD=2.84), range -7.98 to +12.84 mL. Proportion regressing/stable/progressing WMH were threshold 1 (SD), 29.8%/55.6%/14.6%; threshold 2(mL), 29.8%/16.7%/53.5%; percentile approach, 28.3%/21.2%/50.5%. The quintile approach includes five groups with quintile 3 reflecting no change (N=40), quintiles 1 and 2 any WMH decrease (N=80) and quintiles 4 and 5 any WMH increase (N=78)., Conclusions: Different WMH change definitions cause big differences in how participants are categorised; additionally, non-normal WMH distribution precludes use of some definitions. Consistent use of an appropriate definition would facilitate data comparisons, particularly in clinical trials of potential WMH treatments., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

White matter hyperintensities (WMH), a common feature of cerebral small vessel disease, are related to worse clinical outcomes after stroke. We assessed the impact of white matter hyperintensity changes over 1 year after minor stroke on change in mobility and dexterity, including differences between the dominant and non-dominant hands and objective in-person assessment versus patient-reported experience. We recruited participants with lacunar or minor cortical ischaemic stroke, performed medical and cognitive assessments and brain MRI at presentation and at 1 year. At both time points, we used the timed-up and go test and the 9-hole peg test to assess mobility and dexterity. At 1 year, participants completed the Stroke Impact Scale. We ran two linear mixed models to assess change in timed-up and go and 9-hole peg test, adjusted for age, sex, stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), dependency (modified Rankin Score), vascular risk factor score, white matter hyperintensity volume (as % intracranial volume) and additionally for 9-hole peg test: Montreal cognitive assessment, hand (dominant/non-dominant), National Adult Reading Test (premorbid IQ), index lesion side. We performed ordinal logistic regression, corrected for age and sex, to assess relations between timed-up and go and Stroke Impact Scale mobility, and 9-hole peg test and Stroke Impact Scale hand function. We included 229 participants, mean age 65.9 (standard deviation = 11.13); 66% male. 215/229 attended 1-year follow-up. Over 1 year, timed-up and go time increased with aging (standardized β [standardized 95% Confidence Interval]: 0.124[0.011, 0.238]), increasing National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (0.106[0.032, 0.180]), increasing modified Rankin Score (0.152[0.073, 0.231]) and increasing white matter hyperintensity volume (0.176[0.061, 0.291]). Men were faster than women (-0.306[0.011, 0.238]). Over 1 year, slower 9-hole peg test was related to use of non-dominant hand (0.290[0.155, 0.424]), aging (0.102[0.012, 0.192]), male sex (0.182[0.008, 0.356]), increasing National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (0.160 [0.094, 0.226]), increasing modified Rankin Score (0.100[0.032, 0.169]), decreasing Montreal cognitive assessment score (-0.090[-0.167, -0.014]) and increasing white matter hyperintensity volume (0.104[0.015, 0.193]). One year post-stroke, Stroke Impact Scale mobility worsened per second increase on timed-up and go, odds ratio 0.67 [95% confidence interval 0.60, 0.75]. Stroke Impact Scale hand function worsened per second increase on the 9-hole peg test for the dominant hand (odds ratio 0.79 [0.71, 0.86]) and for the non-dominant hand (odds ratio 0.88 [0.83, 0.93]). Decline in mobility and dexterity is associated with white matter hyperintensity volume increase, independently of stroke severity. Mobility and dexterity declined more gradually for stable and regressing white matter hyperintensity volume. Dominant and non-dominant hands might be affected differently. In-person measures of dexterity and mobility are associated with self-reported experience 1-year post-stroke., Competing Interests: The authors report no competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Background: White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) might regress and progress contemporaneously, but we know little about underlying mechanisms. We examined WMH change and underlying quantitative magnetic resonance imaging tissue measures over 1 year in patients with minor ischemic stroke with sporadic cerebral small vessel disease., Methods and Results: We defined areas of stable normal-appearing white matter, stable WMHs, progressing and regressing WMHs based on baseline and 1-year brain magnetic resonance imaging. In these areas we assessed tissue characteristics with quantitative T1, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (baseline only). We compared tissue signatures cross-sectionally between areas, and longitudinally within each area. WMH change masks were available for N=197. Participants' mean age was 65.61 years (SD, 11.10), 59% had a lacunar infarct, and 68% were men. FA and MD were available for N=195, quantitative T1 for N=182, and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging for N=174. Cross-sectionally, all 4 tissue classes differed for FA, MD, T1, and Neurite Density Index. Longitudinally, in regressing WMHs, FA increased with little change in MD and T1 (difference estimate, 0.011 [95% CI, 0.006-0.017]; -0.002 [95% CI, -0.008 to 0.003] and -0.003 [95% CI, -0.009 to 0.004]); in progressing and stable WMHs, FA decreased (-0.022 [95% CI, -0.027 to -0.017] and -0.009 [95% CI, -0.011 to -0.006]), whereas MD and T1 increased (progressing WMHs, 0.057 [95% CI, 0.050-0.063], 0.058 [95% CI, 0.050 -0.066]; stable WMHs, 0.054 [95% CI, 0.045-0.063], 0.049 [95% CI, 0.039-0.058]); and in stable normal-appearing white matter, MD increased (0.004 [95% CI, 0.003-0.005]), whereas FA and T1 slightly decreased and increased (-0.002 [95% CI, -0.004 to -0.000] and 0.005 [95% CI, 0.001-0.009])., Conclusions: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging shows that WMHs that regress have less abnormal microstructure at baseline than stable WMHs and follow trajectories indicating tissue improvement compared with stable and progressing WMHs.