Search

The accurate extraction of surgical data from electronic health records (EHRs), particularly operative notes through manual chart review (MCR), is complex, crucial, and time-intensive, limited by human error due to fatigue and the level of training. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel Natural Language Processing (NLP) algorithm integrated with a Large Language Model (LLM; GPT4-Turbo) to automate the extraction of spinal surgery data from EHRs. The algorithm employed a two-stage approach. Initially, a rule-based NLP framework reviewed and classified candidate segments from the text, preserving their reference segments. These segments were then verified in the second stage through the LLM. The primary outcomes of this study were the accurate extraction of surgical data, including the type of surgery, levels operated, number of disks removed, and presence of intraoperative incidental durotomies. Secondary objectives explored time efficiency, tokenization lengths, and costs. The performance of the algorithm was assessed across two validation databases, analyzing metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, discrimination, F1-score, and precision, with 95% confidence intervals calculated using percentile-based bootstrapping. The NLP + LLM algorithm markedly outperformed all performance metrics, demonstrating significant improvements in time and cost efficiency. These results suggest the potential for widespread adoption of this technology., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Three column osteotomies (3CO) are a powerful tool for the correction of rigid sagittal spinal deformities. However, 3CO surgeries are technically demanding procedures that are associated with prolonged operative times, large amounts of intraoperative blood loss, and high rates of post-operative neurological and medical complications. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study is to delineate the effects of blood loss, blood transfusion, and tranexamic acid use on perioperative outcomes following 3CO., Methods: Patients undergoing 3CO between 2014 and 2021 were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes, and charts were reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics, and post-operative length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis included T -tests for continuous characteristics and χ 2 testing for categorical characteristics. Regression models were used to further investigate relationships between outcomes and variables of interest., Results: Forty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Increased intensive care unit (ICU) LOS was positively correlated with increased operative length (P=0.02), percent estimated blood volume (EBV) lost (P=0.02), and number of units of red blood cell transfusion (P<0.001). Increased hospital LOS was associated with increased number of intraoperative blood transfusions (P=0.01). Linear regression analyses controlling for age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class showed that each 21% increase in EBV loss was associated with a one day increase in ICU LOS (P=0.01). Similarly, each additional unit of packed red blood cells transfused was associated with 0.728 day increase in hospital LOS., Conclusions: Increased intraoperative blood loss was associated with longer ICU stays. Red blood cell transfusions were also associated with increased hospital and ICU LOS. No variables of interest related to intraoperative blood loss or blood transfusion were associated with readmission or reoperation at any time point. These findings highlight the need for continued focus on surgical techniques and adjuncts that can minimize blood loss and transfusion requirements., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-23-143/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

This cross-sectional study evaluates the clinical accuracy, relevance, clarity, and emotional sensitivity of responses to inquiries from patients undergoing surgery provided by large language models (LLMs), highlighting their potential as adjunct tools in patient communication and education. Our findings demonstrated high performance of LLMs across accuracy, relevance, clarity, and emotional sensitivity, with Anthropic's Claude 2 outperforming OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Bard, suggesting LLMs' potential to serve as complementary tools for enhanced information delivery and patient-surgeon interaction., (©Mert Marcel Dagli, Felix Conrad Oettl, Jaskeerat Gujral, Kashish Malhotra, Yohannes Ghenbot, Jang W Yoon, Ali K Ozturk, William C Welch. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 07.06.2024.)

Study Design: : Retrospective Chart Review., Objectives: Incidental durotomies (IDs) are common spine surgery complications. In this study, we present a review on the most commonly utilized management strategies, report our institutional experience with case examples, and describe a stepwise management algorithm., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the electronic medical records of all patients who underwent a thoracolumbar or lumbar spine surgery between March 2017 and September 2019. Additionally, a literature review of the current management approaches to treat IDs and persistent postoperative CSF leaks following lumbar spine surgeries was performed., Results: We looked at 1133 patients that underwent posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery. There was intraoperative evidence of ID in 116 cases. Based on our cohort and the current literature, we developed a progressive treatment algorithm for IDs that begins with a primary repair, which can be bolstered by dural sealants or a muscle patch. If this fails, the primary repair can be followed by a paraspinal muscle flap, as well as a lumbar drain. If the patient cannot be weaned from temporary CSF diversion, the final step in controlling postoperative leak is longterm CSF diversion via a lumboperitoneal shunt. In our experience, these shunts can be weaned once the patient has no further clinical or radiographic signs of CSF leak., Conclusions: There is no standardized management approach of IDs and CSF leaks in the literature. This article intends to provide a progressive treatment algorithm and contribute to the development process of a treatment consensus., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Augmented reality (AR) is an emerging technology that may accelerate skill acquisition and improve accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placements. We aimed to quantify the relative assistance of AR compared with freehand (FH) pedicle screw accuracy across different surgical experience levels., Methods: A spine fellowship-trained and board-certified attending neurosurgeon, postgraduate year 4 neurosurgery resident, and second-year medical student placed 32 FH and 32 AR-assisted thoracolumbar pedicle screws in 3 cadavers. A cableless, voice-activated AR system was paired with a headset. Accuracy was assessed using χ 2 analysis and the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Angular error, distance error, and time per pedicle screw were collected and compared., Results: The attending neurosurgeon had 91.6% (11/12) clinically acceptable (Gertzbein-Robbins scale A or B) insertion in both FH and AR groups; the resident neurosurgeon had 100% (9/9) FH and AR in both cases; the medical student had 72.3% (8/11) FH accuracy and 81.8% (9/11) AR accuracy. The medical student displayed significantly lower ideal (Gertzbein-Robbins scale A) FH accuracy compared with the resident neurosurgeon (P = 0.017) and attending neurosurgeon (P = 0.005), but no difference when using AR. FH screw placement was faster by both the attending neurosurgeon (median 46 seconds vs. 94.5 seconds, P = 0.0047) and the neurosurgery resident neurosurgeon (median 144 seconds vs. 140 seconds, P = 0.05). Total clinically acceptable AR and FH accuracy was 90.6% (29/32) and 87.5% (28/32), respectively (P = 0.69)., Conclusions: AR screw placement allowed an inexperienced medical student to double their accuracy in 1 training session. With subsequent iterations, this promising technology could serve as an important tool for surgical training., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ewing's sarcoma is an uncommon, aggressive malignancy that typically presents as an osseous lesion, most commonly in children and adolescents. Very rarely Ewing's sarcoma can present as an intradural extramedullary mass mimicking more common tumors., Observations: A 32-year-old female had a left L3 nerve root-associated lesion identified in the setting of recent-onset radiculopathy. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine was favored to demonstrate a schwannoma or neurofibroma. Hemilaminectomy, facetectomy, and resection of the mass led to improved radiculopathy and a tissue diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma. Immediate referral to medical oncology facilitated expeditious initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation., Lessons: The differential diagnosis for newly identified nerve root-associated tumors should remain broad, including common benign pathologies and rare malignant entities. Tissue remains the gold standard for diagnosis, as preoperative imaging suggested a nerve sheath tumor. Malignant pathologies such as Ewing's sarcoma must be considered, especially in the setting of rapidly progressive symptoms or interval growth on serial imaging. Early diagnosis allows for the timely initiation of comprehensive oncological care. Long-term multidisciplinary follow-up is necessary for the surveillance of disease progression.

Background and Objectives: Smartphone activity data recorded through high-fidelity accelerometry can provide accurate postoperative assessments of patient mobility. The "big data" available through smartphones allows for advanced analyses, yielding insight into patient well-being. This study compared rate of change in functional activity data between lumbar fusion (LF) and lumbar decompression (LD) patients to determine preoperative and postoperative course differences., Methods: Twenty-three LF and 18 LD patients were retrospectively included. Activity data (steps per day) recorded in Apple Health, encompassing over 70 000 perioperative data points, was classified into 6 temporal epochs representing distinct functional states, including acute preoperative decline, immediate postoperative recovery, and postoperative decline. The daily rate of change of each patient's step counts was calculated for each perioperative epoch., Results: Patients undergoing LF demonstrated steeper preoperative declines than LD patients based on the first derivative of step count data (P = .045). In the surgical recovery phase, LF patients had slower recoveries (P = .041), and LF patients experienced steeper postoperative secondary declines than LD patients did (P = .010). The rate of change of steps per day demonstrated varying perioperative trajectories that were not explained by differences in age, comorbidities, or levels operated., Conclusion: Patients undergoing LF and LD have distinct perioperative activity profiles characterized by the rate of change in the patient daily steps. Daily steps and their rate of change is thus a valuable metric in phenotyping patients and understanding their postsurgical outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to expand upon these data and establish causal links between preoperative patient mobility, patient characteristics, and postoperative functional outcomes., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: Occipital neuralgia (ON) is a debilitating headache disorder. Due to the rarity of this disorder and lack of high-level evidence, a clear framework for choosing the optimal surgical approach for medically refractory ON incorporating shared decision making with patients does not exist., Methods: A literature review of studies reporting pain outcomes of patients who underwent surgical treatment for ON was performed, as well as a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent surgery for ON within our institution., Results: Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. A majority of the articles were retrospective case series (22/32). The mean number of patients across the studies was 34 (standard deviation (SD) 39). Among the 13 studies that reported change in pain score on 10-point scales, a study of 20 patients who had undergone C2 and/or C3 ganglionectomies reported the greatest reduction in pain intensity after surgery. The studies evaluating percutaneous ablative methods including radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation showed the smallest reduction in pain scores overall. At our institution from 2014 to 2023, 11 patients received surgical treatment for ON with a mean follow-up of 187 days (SD 426)., Conclusion: Based on these results, the first decision aid for selecting a surgical approach to medically refractory ON is presented. The algorithm prioritizes nerve sparing followed by non-nerve sparing techniques with the incorporation of patient preference. Shared decision making is critical in the treatment of ON given the lack of clear scientific evidence regarding the superiority of a particular surgical method., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients often undergo circumferential (anterior and posterior) spinal fusions to maximize adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction and achieve adequate fusion. Currently, such procedures are performed in staged (ST) or same-day (SD) procedures with limited evidence to support either strategy. This study aims to compare perioperative outcomes and costs of ST vs SD circumferential ASD corrective surgeries., Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing circumferential ASD surgeries between 2013 and 2018 in a single institution. Patient characteristics, preoperative comorbidities, surgical details, perioperative complications, readmissions, total hospital admission costs, and 90-day postoperative care costs were identified. All variables were tested for differences between ST and SD groups unadjusted and after applying inverse probability weighting (IPW), and the results before and after IPW were compared., Results: The entire cohort included a total of 211 (ST = 50, SD = 161) patients, 100 of whom (ST = 44, SD = 56) underwent more than 4 levels fused posteriorly and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Although patient characteristics and comorbidities were not dissimilar between the ST and SD groups, both the number of levels fused in ALIF and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were significantly different. Thus, using IPW, we were able to minimize the cohort incongruities in the number of levels fused in ALIF and PSF while maintaining comparable patient characteristics. In both the whole cohort and the long segment fusions, postoperative pulmonary embolism was more common in ST procedures. After adjustment utilizing IPW, both groups were not significantly different in disposition, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations. However, within the whole cohort and the long segment fusion cohort, the ST group continued to show significantly increased rates of pulmonary embolism, longer length of stay, and higher hospital admission costs compared with the SD group., Conclusions: Adjusted comparisons between ST and SD groups showed staging associated with significantly increased length of stay, risk of pulmonary embolism, and admission costs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Introduction: Technological advancements are reshaping medical education, with digital tools becoming essential in all levels of training. Amidst this transformation, the study explores the potential of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence model by OpenAI, in enhancing neurosurgical board education. The focus extends beyond technology adoption to its effective utilization, with ChatGPT's proficiency evaluated against practice questions from the Primary Neurosurgery Written Board Exam., Methods: Using the Congress of Neurologic Surgeons (CNS) Self-Assessment Neurosurgery (SANS) Exam Board Review Prep questions, we conducted 3 rounds of analysis with ChatGPT. We developed a novel ChatGPT Neurosurgical Evaluation Matrix (CNEM) to assess the output quality, accuracy, concordance, and clarity of ChatGPT's answers., Results: ChatGPT achieved spot-on accuracy for 66.7% of prompted questions, 59.4% of unprompted questions, and 63.9% of unprompted questions with a leading phrase. Stratified by topic, accuracy ranged from 50.0% (Vascular) to 78.8% (Neuropathology). In comparison to SANS explanations, ChatGPT output was considered better in 19.1% of questions, equal in 51.6%, and worse in 29.3%. Concordance analysis showed that 95.5% of unprompted ChatGPT outputs and 97.4% of unprompted outputs with a leading phrase were aligned., Conclusions: Our study evaluated the performance of ChatGPT in neurosurgical board education by assessing its accuracy, clarity, and concordance. The findings highlight the potential and challenges of integrating AI technologies like ChatGPT into medical and neurosurgical board education. Further research is needed to refine these tools and optimize their performance for enhanced medical education and patient care., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are 2 commonly used surgical approaches to address cervical radiculopathy. Demonstrating superiority in clinical outcomes and durability of one of the approaches could change clinical practice on a large scale. This is the largest reported single-institutional retrospective cohort of single-level PCFs compared with single-level ACDFs for cervical radiculopathy., Methods: Patients undergoing either ACDF or PCF between 2014 and 2021 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics, and reoperations. Statistical analysis included t tests for continuous characteristics and c 2 testing for categorical characteristics., Results: In total, 236 single-level ACDFs and 138 single-level PCFs were included. There was no significant difference in age (51.0 vs 51.3 years), body mass index (BMI; 28.6 vs 28.1), or Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.89 vs 1.68) between patients who underwent ACDF and those who underwent PCF. There was no difference in the rate of reoperation (5.1% vs 5.1%), time to reoperation (247 vs 319 days), or reoperation for recurrent symptoms (1.7% vs 2.9%) for ACDF vs PCF. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was longer for ACDF compared with PCF (1.65 vs 1.35 days, P = 0.041), and the overall readmission rate after ACDF was 20.8% vs 10.9% after PCF ( P = 0.014)., Conclusions: Overall reoperation rates or reoperation for recurrent symptoms between ACDF and PCF were not significantly different, demonstrating that either procedure effectively addresses the indication for surgery. There was a significantly longer LOS after ACDF than PCF, and readmission rates at 90 days and 1 year were higher after ACDF., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2023 ISASS. To see more or order reprints or permissions, see http://ijssurgery.com.)

Study Design: This article is a research methodology study., Objective: We summarize current ambiguities and inaccuracies regarding lumbar interbody fusion nomenclature and propose a standardized reporting method to improve the clarity of future research and communication among spine surgeons and researchers., Summary of Background Data: Lumbar interbody fusion techniques have seen an impressive degree of refinement over recent years. This innovation has ushered in a plethora of naming conventions for these new surgical approaches. Many of the current trends in naming lumbar fusion techniques are, however, redundant and contradictory, creating unnecessary confusion in the field., Methods: Following an extensive literature review, we developed a 4-part naming convention that highlights the crucial features of lumbar fusion surgical procedures., Results: Current literature regarding lumbar fusions is rife with inconsistent usage and privatization of terminology that can inadvertently result in ambiguous operative vocabulary, potentially compromising the accuracy of future research. We propose a 4-part naming system that highlights crucial features of lumbar interbody fusions, including (1) intra-operative repositioning, (2) patient position, (3) surgical technique, and (4) orientation of the surgical corridor to the psoas muscle., Conclusions: This study raises awareness of current inconsistencies in naming conventions and proposes a standardized system for improving the clarity of lumber interbody fusion terminology for the broader spine community., Level of Evidence: Level V., Competing Interests: J.W.Y. is a consultant for DePuy Synthes, Pacira, Biedermann Motech; direct stock ownership in Kinesiometrics Inc. and Medcyclops LLC. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the gold standard for assessing postoperative outcomes in spine surgery. However, PROMs are also limited by the inherent subjectivity of self-reported qualitative data. Recent literature has highlighted the utility of patient mobility data streamed from smartphone accelerometers as an objective measure of functional outcomes and complement to traditional PROMs. Still, for activity-based data to supplement existing PROMs, they must be validated against current metrics. In this study, the authors assessed the relationships and concordance between longitudinal smartphone-based mobility data and PROMs., Methods: Patients receiving laminectomy (n = 21) or fusion (n = 10) between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Activity data (steps-per-day count) recorded in the Apple Health mobile application over a 2-year perioperative window were extracted and subsequently normalized to allow for intersubject comparison. PROMS, including the visual analog scale (VAS), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ-5D, collected at the preoperative and 6-week postoperative visits were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record. Correlations between PROMs and patient mobility were assessed and compared between patients who did and those who did not achieve the established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each measure., Results: A total of 31 patients receiving laminectomy (n = 21) or fusion (n = 10) were included. Change between preoperative and 6-week postoperative VAS and PROMIS-PI scores demonstrated moderate (r = -0.46) and strong (r = -0.74) inverse correlations, respectively, with changes in normalized steps-per-day count. In cohorts of patients who achieved PROMIS-PI MCID postoperatively, indicating subjective improvement in pain, there was a 0.784 standard deviation increase in normalized steps per day, representing a 56.5% improvement (p = 0.027). Patients who did achieve the MCID of improvement in either PROMIS-PI or VAS after surgery were more likely to experience an earlier sustained improvement in physical activity commensurate to or greater than their preoperative baseline (p = 2.98 × 10-18) than non-MCID patients., Conclusions: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between changes in mobility data extracted from patient smartphones and changes in PROMs following spine surgery. Further elucidating this relationship will allow for more robust supplementation of existing spine outcome measure tools with analyzed objective activity data.

Background: Neurosurgery Awareness Month (August) was initiated by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons with the aim of bringing neurological conditions to the forefront and educating the public about these conditions. Digital media is an important tool for disseminating information and connecting with influencers, general public, and other stakeholders. Hence, it is crucial to understand the impact of awareness campaigns such as Neurosurgery Awareness Month to optimize resource allocation, quantify the efficiency and reach of these initiatives, and identify areas for improvement., Objective: The purpose of our study was to examine the digital impact of Neurosurgery Awareness Month globally and identify areas for further improvement., Methods: We used 4 social media (Twitter) assessment tools (Sprout Social, SocioViz, Sentiment Viz, and Symplur) and Google Trends to extract data using various search queries. Using regression analysis, trends were studied in the total number of tweets posted in August between 2014 and 2022. Two search queries were used in this analysis: one specifically targeting tweets related to Neurosurgery Awareness Month and the other isolating all neurosurgery-related posts. Total impressions and top influencers for #neurosurgery were calculated using Symplur's machine learning algorithm. To study the context of the tweets, we used SocioViz to isolate the top 100 popular hashtags, keywords, and collaborations between influencers. Network analysis was performed to illustrate the interactions and connections within the digital media environment using ForceAtlas2 model. Sentiment analysis was done to study the underlying emotion of the tweets. Google Trends was used to study the global search interest by studying relative search volume data., Results: A total of 10,007 users were identified as tweeting about neurosurgery during Neurosurgery Awareness Month using the "#neurosurgery" hashtag. These tweets generated over 29.14 million impressions globally. Of the top 10 most influential users, 5 were faculty neurosurgeons at US university hospitals. Other influential users included notable organizations and journals in the field of neurosurgery. The network analysis of the top 100 influencers showed a collaboration rate of 81%. However, only 1.6% of the total neurosurgery tweets were advocating about neurosurgery awareness during Neurosurgery Awareness Month, and only 13 tweets were posted by verified users using the #neurosurgeryawarenessmonth hashtag. The sentiment analysis revealed that the majority of the tweets about Neurosurgery Awareness Month were pleasant with subdued emotion., Conclusions: The global digital impact of Neurosurgery Awareness Month is nascent, and support from other international organizations and neurosurgical influencers is needed to yield a significant digital reach. Increasing collaboration and involvement from underrepresented communities may help to increase the global reach. By better understanding the digital impact of Neurosurgery Awareness Month, future health care awareness campaigns can be optimized to increase global awareness of neurosurgery and the challenges facing the field., (©Kashish Malhotra, Mert Marcel Dagli, Gabrielle Santangelo, Connor Wathen, Yohannes Ghenbot, Kashish Goyal, Ashvind Bawa, Ali K Ozturk, William C Welch. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 08.05.2023.)

Background: Lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) is traditionally performed in 2 stages: placing the interbody cage in the lateral decubitus position, then placing the percutaneous pedicle screw in the prone position. Performing interbody fusion and posterior fixation simultaneously could improve operative efficiency and clinical outcomes associated with longer operative times. We describe the operative steps and report clinical and radiographic outcomes associated with a simultaneous anterior and posterior approach (SAPA) for LLIF., Methods: Patients who underwent SAPA LLIF performed by a single surgeon over 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were analyzed, an operative guideline was created, and a learning curve was constructed using operative times., Results: SAPA LLIF was performed in 11 patients. Three patients experienced transient postoperative femoral nerve plexopathy with symptoms of ipsilateral hip flexion weakness and/or anterior thigh numbness; there were no other complications in the cohort. Radiographically, patients achieved significant increases in disc height (8.3 mm vs. 13.5 mm, P = 0.002) and foraminal height (20.2 mm vs. 25.3 mm, P = 0.0001). Patients showed significant improvements in Oswestry Disability Index (52 vs. 27.8, P = 0.002) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function (32.6 vs. 39, P = 0.048) and Pain Interference (64.9 vs. 59.6, P = 0.001) at 3 months. A downward trend in operative time was observed for 1-level SAPA LLIF., Conclusions: SAPA LLIF is a safe approach for LLIF that results in favorable clinical outcomes. This technique can potentially improve operative efficiency further along the course of a surgeon's learning curve., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Atlantooccipital dislocation (AOD) is a highly unstable and often neurologically devastating injury to the craniocervical junction that typically results from high-energy trauma. Management of these devastating injuries is complex, with prognostication difficult due to high rates of concomitant intracranial and systemic injuries. This report highlights advances in management of AOD and appropriate implementation of operative adjuncts including neuronavigation and the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring., Methods: All patients with AOD presenting to a high-volume, level 1 trauma center between January 2015 and August 2021 were retrospectively identified through a prospectively maintained database of patients presenting with traumatic spine injuries. Medical records, including imaging reports, clinical documentation, and intraoperative neurophysiological reports were reviewed., Results: A total of 11 patients were identified with patterns of injury consistent with AOD. Fifty-five percent of patients survived until discharge. 73% of patients underwent surgery for stabilization. All 4 patients with preoperative neurologic deficits who underwent surgery had monitorable transcranial motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. Two experienced significant motor recovery postoperatively, and 2 did not survive to discharge. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries were identified in 73% of patients., Conclusion: AOD is encountered with increasing frequency. The identification and management of this specific injury is complicated by the volume and severity of associated injuries, especially concomitant traumatic brain injury. Timely recognition is critical and the use of surgical adjuncts including intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring and surgical navigation can increase the safety and success of these procedures while also providing prognostic information on potential for motor recovery., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a deformity in the curvature of the adult spine. ASD includes a range of pathology that leads to decreased quality of life for patients as well as debilitating morbidities. Treatment can range from nonoperative management to long-segment surgical corrections and depends greatly on the deformity and patient profiles. If surgical treatment is indicated, circumferential (a combined anterior and posterior approach) fusion is one of the tools in the spine surgeon's armamentarium. Depending on the complexity, the procedure is either completed on the same day or staged. Determining whether to perform a circumferential surgery in a staged fashion is based largely on the surgeon's preference and perception of the individual case complexity; at present, there is no high-quality evidence that can be used to support that decision., Objective: This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to investigate the differences between same-day versus staged circumferential fusion surgery in ASD both in patient selection and in outcomes., Methods: Searches will be performed on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Gray literature and the reference lists of articles included in the full-text screening will also be screened for inclusion. Results will be exported to Covidence. Data will be collected on demographics, type of procedures performed, surgery levels, blood loss, total operation time, length of stay, disposition, readmissions (30 days and 90 days), and perioperative complications. Patient-reported outcomes will also be assessed. Data quality assessment of randomized controlled trials will be performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials, and nonrandomized studies will be assessed with the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions) tool. All screening, quality assessment, and data extraction will be done by 2 independent reviewers. A descriptive synthesis will be performed, and data will be evaluated for further analysis., Results: This study is currently in the screening phase. There are no results yet. The search strategy has been developed and documented. Information has been exported to Covidence. Upon conclusion of the critical appraisal stage, screening and extraction, as well as a synthesis of the results, will be performed., Conclusions: The intended review will summarize the differences in perioperative outcomes and complications between same-day and staged (circumferential) fusion surgery in adult spinal deformity. It will also describe the patients selected for such procedures based on their demographics and pathology. Identified gaps in knowledge will provide insight into current limitations and guide further studies on this topic., Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022339764; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display&#95;record.php?RecordID=339764., International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/42331., (©Mert Marcel Dagli, Shivek Narang, Kashish Malhotra, Gabrielle Santangelo, Connor Wathen, Yohannes Ghenbot, Dominick Macaluso, Ahmed Albayar, Ali Kemal Ozturk, William C Welch. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 28.11.2022.)

Background: The optimal time to restart direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH) is unknown. Physicians must weigh the risk of recurrent hemorrhage against ischemic stroke. We investigated rates of stroke while holding anticoagulation, hemorrhage after anticoagulation resumption, and factors associated with the decision to restart anticoagulation., Methods: Patients presenting to our level I trauma center for tICH while on a DOAC for NVAF were retrospectively reviewed over 2 years. Age, sex, DOAC use, antiplatelet use, congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, previous stroke, vascular disease, sex score for stroke risk in NVAF, injury mechanism, bleeding pattern, Injury Severity Score, use of a reversal agent, Glasgow Coma Scale at 24 hours, hemorrhage expansion, neurosurgical intervention, Morse Fall Risk, DOAC restart date, rebleed events, and ischemic stroke were recorded to study rates of recurrent hemorrhage and stroke, and factors that influenced the decision to restart anticoagulation., Results: Twenty-eight patients sustained tICH while on a DOAC. Fall was the most common mechanism (89.3%), and subdural hematoma was the predominant bleeding pattern (60.7%). Of the 25 surviving patients, 16 patients (64%) restarted a DOAC a median 29.5 days after tICH. One patient had recurrent hemorrhage after resuming anticoagulation. One patient had an embolic stroke after 118 days off anticoagulation. Age >80, Injury Severity Score ≥16, and expansion of tICH influenced the decision to indefinitely hold anticoagulation., Conclusion: The low stroke rate observed in this study suggests that holding DOACs for NVAF for 1 month is sufficient to reduce the risk of stroke after tICH. Additional data are required to determine optimal restart timing., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Objective: A hallmark of surgical training is resident involvement in operative procedures. While resident-assisted surgeries have been deemed generally safe, few studies have rigorously isolated the impact of resident post-graduate year (PGY) level on post-operative outcomes in a neurosurgical patient population. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between resident training level and outcomes following single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion, after matching on key patient demographic/clinical characteristics and attending surgeon., Patients and Methods: This coarsened-exact matching (CEM) study analyzed 2338 consecutive adult patients who underwent single-level lumbar fusion with a resident assistant surgeon at a multi-hospital university health system from 2013 to 2019. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmissions, Emergency Department (ED) visits, reoperations, surgical complications, and mortality. First, univariate logistic regression examined the relationship between PGY level and outcomes. Then, CEM was used to control for key patient characteristics - such as race and comorbid status - and supervising attending surgeon, between the most junior (PGY-2)-assisted cases and the most senior (PGY-7)-assisted cases, thereby isolating the relationship between training level and outcomes., Results: Among all patients, resident training level was not associated with risk of adverse post-surgical outcomes. Similarly, between exact-matched cohorts of PGY-2- and PGY-7-assisted cases, no significant differences in adverse events or discharge disposition were observed. Patients with the most senior resident assistant surgeons demonstrated longer length of stay (mean 100.5 vs. 93.8 h, p = 0.022) and longer duration of surgery (mean 173.5 vs. 159.8 min, p = 0.036)., Conclusion: Training level of the resident assistant surgeon did not impact adverse outcomes provided to patients in the setting of single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion. These findings suggest that attending surgeons appropriately manage cases with resident surgeons at different levels of training., Competing Interests: Disclosures/Conflicting Interests The authors have no personal or institutional interest with regards to the authorship and/or publication of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spine surgery are a significant cause of morbidity. Surgeons often prescribe oral antibiotics in the postoperative setting for infected-appearing wounds to prevent reoperation for infection; however, the efficacy of this practice has not been well studied., Methods: Neurosurgical spine patients with clinical concerns for SSI at the University of Pennsylvania were retrospectively studied from 2014 to 2018. Clinical predictors of 90-day reoperation for infection despite antibiotic treatment and variables that influenced antibiotic prescription were analyzed., Results: Three hundred and ninety-two patients were included in the study. Preoperative albumin level, days elapsed to antibiotic prescription from index surgery, preoperative hemoglobin level, surgical location, gender, discharge disposition, and level of wound concern were significant predictors of reoperation for infection on bivariate analysis. Days elapsed to antibiotic prescription, surgical location, and level of wound concern remained significant after multivariable logistic regression. Variables that significantly predicted prescription of an antibiotic include length of stay, cerebrospinal fluid leak, race, and level of wound concern. Length of stay, race, and level of wound concern remained significant after multivariable analysis., Conclusions: Wound infection remains a challenging problem in spine surgery and it is reasonable to perform early reoperation in patients with high clinical concerns for infection, because bacterial isolates are often resistant to common oral antibiotics. Patients with wounds with low clinical concerns for infection may undergo a trial of oral antibiotics; however, duration of treatment should not be prolonged., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Many surgical options exist for multilevel lumbar interbody fusion, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). While current technique of repositioning patients between supine ALIF and lateral decubitus LLIF offers many benefits, intraoperative repositioning can be cumbersome. We present a novel approach that accomplishes both multilevel LLIF and L5-S1 ALIF in a lateral decubitus position., Methods: This case series retrospectively enrolled 12 consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 ALIF in the lateral decubitus position and anterior-to-psoas LLIF at more cranial levels as part of a multilevel lumbar interbody fusion surgery between September 2020 and December 2021. All surgeries were performed by a single spine-focused neurosurgeon at an urban academic hospital., Results: Radiographic imaging analysis demonstrated significant changes in coronal Cobb angle (-5.43° ± 3.81°; P = 0.0029), global lumbar lordosis (6.77° ± 12.04°; P = 0.0049), segmental lumbar lordosis (8.91° ± 10.21°; P = 0.0005), spinopelvic mismatch (-7.93° ± 7.91°; P = 0.0010), average disc height (5.30 ± 1.64 mm; P = 0.0005), and L5-S1 disc height (6.68 ± 2.10 mm; P = 0.0005). Two patients developed postoperative complications including wound dehiscence and grade I graft subsidence at L4-L5., Conclusions: This case series demonstrated that a combined lateral decubitus L5-S1 ALIF and LLIF at more cranial levels is a safe, efficient approach to multilevel lumbar interbody fusions. This technique significantly restored spinopelvic alignments with a low complication rate and no patient repositioning. Efficacy of this minimally invasive deformity correction technique should be further investigated through a multicenter trial., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To model the financial impact of policies governing the scheduling of overlapping surgeries, and to identify optimal solutions that maximize operating efficiency that satisfy the fiduciary duty to patients., Background: Hospitals depend on procedural revenue to maintain financial health as the recent pandemic has revealed. Proposed policies governing the scheduling of overlapping surgeries may dramatically impact hospital revenue. To date, the potential financial impact has not been modeled., Methods: A linear forecasting model based on a logic matrix decision tree enabled an analysis of surgeon productivity annualized over a fiscal year. The model applies procedural and operational variables to policy constraints limiting surgical scheduling. Model outputs included case and financial metrics modeled over 1000-surgeon-year simulations. case metrics included annual case volume, case mix, operating room (OR) utilization, surgeon utilization, idle time, and staff overtime hours. Financial outputs included annual revenue, expenses, and contribution margin., Results: The model was validated against surgical data. case and financial metrics decreased as a function of increasingly restrictive scheduling scenarios, with the greatest contribution margin loses ($1,650,000 per surgeon-year) realized with the introduction of policies mandating that a second patient could not enter the OR until the critical portion of the first surgery was completed. We identify an optimal scheduling scenario that maximizes surgeon efficiency, minimizes OR idle time and revenue loses, and satisfies ethical obligations to patients., Conclusions: Hospitals may expect significant financial loses with the introduction of policies restricting OR scheduling. We identify an optimal solution that maximizes efficiency while satisfying ethical duty to patients. This forecast is immediately relevant to any hospital system that depends upon procedural revenue., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We studied the risk of associated spinal and nonspinal injuries (NSIs) in the setting of observed thoracolumbar transverse process fracture (TPF) and examined the clinical management of TPF., Methods: Patients treated at a Level I trauma center over a 5-year period were screened for thoracolumbar TPF. Prevalence of associated spinal fractures and NSIs as well as relationship to level of TPF was explored. Clinical management and follow-up outcomes were reviewed., Results: A total of 252 patients with thoracolumbar TPFs were identified. NSIs were commonly observed (70.6%, n = 178); however, associated spinal fractures were more rarely seen (24.6%, n = 62, P < 0.0001). No patients had neurological deficits attributable to TPFs, and only 3 patients with isolated TPFs were treated with orthosis. Among patients with outpatient follow-up (70.6%, n = 178), none developed delayed-onset neurological deficits or spinal instability. Thoracic TPFs (odds ratio = 3.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-10.56) and L1 TPFs (odds ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval = 1.41-4.36) were predictive of associated thoracic NSIs. L5 TPF was associated with pelvic fractures (odds ratio = 6.30, 95% confidence interval = 3.26-12.17). There was no difference in rate of NSIs between isolated TPF (70.0%) and TPF with associated clinically relevant spinal fracture (72.6%, P = 0.70)., Conclusions: NSIs are nearly 3 times more common in patients with thoracolumbar TPFs than associated clinically relevant spinal fractures. Spine service consultation for TPF may be unnecessary unless fracture is associated with a clinically relevant spinal injury, which represents a minority of cases. However, detection of TPF should raise suspicion for high likelihood of associated NSIs., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Diverse organisms, from insects to humans, actively seek out sensory information that best informs goal-directed actions. Efficient active sensing requires congruity between sensor properties and motor strategies, as typically honed through evolution. However, it has been difficult to study whether active sensing strategies are also modified with experience. Here, we used a sensory brain-machine interface paradigm, permitting both free behavior and experimental manipulation of sensory feedback, to study learning of active sensing strategies. Rats performed a searching task in a water maze in which the only task-relevant sensory feedback was provided by intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) encoding egocentric bearing to the hidden goal location. The rats learned to use the artificial goal direction sense to find the platform with the same proficiency as natural vision. Manipulation of the acuity of the ICMS feedback revealed distinct search strategy adaptations. Using an optimization model, the different strategies were found to minimize the effort required to extract the most salient task-relevant information. The results demonstrate that animals can adjust motor strategies to match novel sensor properties for efficient goal-directed behavior., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.