Search

Background Triage procedures have been implemented to limit hospital access and minimize infection risk among patients with cancer during the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) outbreak. In the absence of prospective evidence, we aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of a triage system in the oncological setting. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study analyzes hospital admissions to the oncology and hematology department of Udine, Italy, during the COVID‐19 pandemic (March 30 to April 30, 2020). A total of 3,923 triage procedures were performed, and data of 1,363 individual patients were reviewed. Results A self‐report triage questionnaire identified 6% of triage‐positive procedures, with a sensitivity of 66.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43.0%–85.4%), a specificity of 94.3% (95% CI, 93.5%–95.0%), and a positive predictive value of 5.9% (95% CI, 4.3%–8.0%) for the identification of patients who were not admitted to the hospital after medical review. Patients with thoracic cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.69; 95% CI, 1.13–2.53, p = .01), younger age (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.15–2.01, p < .01), and body temperature at admission ≥37°C (OR, 9.52; 95% CI, 5.44–16.6, p < .0001) had increased risk of positive triage. Direct hospital access was warranted to 93.5% of cases, a further 6% was accepted after medical evaluation, whereas 0.5% was refused at admission. Conclusion A self‐report questionnaire has a low positive predictive value to triage patients with cancer and suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) symptoms. Differential diagnosis with tumor‐ or treatment‐related symptoms is always required to avoid unnecessary treatment delays. Body temperature measurement improves the triage process's overall sensitivity, and widespread SARS‐CoV‐2 testing should be implemented to identify asymptomatic carriers. Implications for Practice This is the first study to provide data on the predictive performance of a triage system in the oncological setting during the coronavirus disease outbreak. A questionnaire‐based triage has a low positive predictive value to triage patients with cancer and suspected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) symptoms, and a differential diagnosis with tumor‐ or treatment‐related symptoms is mandatory to avoid unnecessary treatment delays. Consequently, adequate recourses should be reallocated for a triage implementation in the oncological setting. Of note, body temperature measurement improves the overall sensitivity of the triage process, and widespread testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection should be implemented to identify asymptomatic carriers., Patients with cancer are considered to be at increased risk for severe complications and death during the COVID‐19 pandemic. This article evaluates the feasibility and predictive performance of a triage system implemented in a cancer center to address this concern.

Background Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. More recently, osimertinib demonstrated improved disease control compared to other EGFR-TKIs. Multiple mechanisms of resistance have been described in T790M-positive patients who experienced treatment failure with osimertinib. Case report We report the case of a 78-year-old non-smoker woman with stage IV EGFR L858R-positive lung adenocarcinoma presented with T790M mutation after five years of treatment with gefitinib. The patient was started on osimertinib, but after two and a half years of treatment experienced disease progression. The analyses of circulating tumor DNA using next-generation sequencing showed, together with the pre-existing T790M and exon 21 L858R, the presence of the EGFR C797G resistance mutation. Conclusion Our case report revealed a rare EGFR-dependent acquired resistance mutation to osimertinib in circulating tumor DNA. Liquid biopsy appears to be a promising resource to understand the biology of osimertinib resistance by clonal evolution monitoring and the identification of novel resistance mechanisms.

The role of platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) for the treatment of older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still a matter of debate, despite the advent of immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with first-line PBC prescription and, secondly, to evaluate the impact of first-line PBC on survival, treatment intensity, risk of hospitalization, and subsequent treatments. We reviewed a consecutive series of 474 older patients (age ≥ 70 years) diagnosed with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC at the Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Italy from January 2009 to March 2017. Overall, 198 patients were deemed eligible, and 65.2% received a PBC. At multivariate analysis, older age was the only factor associated with PBC prescription. In the whole cohort, 46 patients (23.2%) were hospitalized for chemotherapy-related toxicity. Both PBC prescription (odds ratio [OR] 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–4.87, p = 0.04) and tumor burden (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.07–5.32, p = 0.03) emerged as independent risk factors for hospitalization. Moving to significant predictors of patterns of care, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status > 0 was associated with greater risk of first-line failure (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.15–4.20, p = 0.02), while bone metastases (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12–0.69, p = 0.005) and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 3 (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19–0.84, p = 0.016) independently predicted lower probability of receiving second-line therapy. Remarkably, PBC did not significantly impact overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.61–1.14, p = 0.24) and progression-free survival (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70–1.28, p = 0.73) compared to single-agent chemotherapy (SAC). However, according to an exploratory landmark analysis, patients who received four cycles of treatment or maintenance therapy experienced prolonged overall survival, regardless of PBC use. This study evaluated the real-world use of PBC in older patients with NSCLC, offering an insight into the determinants of its prescription and the pattern of care of these patients. Of note, PBC use was associated with a higher likelihood of hospitalization for chemotherapy-related toxicity, with no benefit on survival compared to SAC.

High neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are respectively associated with systemic inflammation and immune suppression and have been associated with a poor outcome. Plasmatic exosomes are extracellular vesicles involved in the intercellular communication system that can exert an immunosuppressive function. Aim of this study was to investigate the interplay between the immune system and circulating exosomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A threshold capable to classify patients according to MLR, NLR and PLR, was computed through a receiving operator curve analysis after propensity score matching with a series of female blood donors. Exosomes were isolated from plasma by ExoQuick solution and characterized by flow-cytometry. NLR, MLR, PLR and exosomal subpopulations potentially involved in the pre-metastatic niche were significantly different in MBC patients with respect to controls. MLR was significantly associated with number of sites at the onset of metastatic disease, while high levels of MLR and NLR were found to be associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, exosomal subpopulations varied according to NLR, MLR, PLR and both were associated with different breast cancer subtypes and sites of distant involvement. This study highlights the nuanced role of immunity in MBC spread, progression and outcome. Moreover, they suggest potential interaction mechanisms between immunity, MBC and the metastatic niche.

Background Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are circulating biomarkers that provide information about tumor-related inflammation and immune suppression. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of MLR and LDH in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Material and Methods This multicentric study analyzed a consecutive cohort of 528 patients with mCRC treated in 2009–2017. The whole population was randomly divided in training and validation cohort. The first was used to identify a threshold for MLR and to create the prognostic model with MLR and MLR-LDH combined (group 1: MLR-LDH low; group 2: MLR or LDH high; group 3: MLR-LDH high). The second cohort was used to validate the model. Results At the median follow-up of 55 months, median overall survival (OS) was 22 months. By multivariate analysis, high MLR >0.49 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 1.39–4.04), high LDH (HR, 1.73; 95% C.I., 1.03–2.90) in the first model, group 2 (HR, 2.74; 95% C.I.; 1.62–4.66), and group 3 (HR, 3.73; 95% C.I., 1.94–7.18) in the combined model, had a worse prognosis in terms of OS. These data were confirmed both in the validation set and then in the whole cohort. Conclusion MLR and LDH are circulating cost-effective biomarkers, readily available in clinical practice, that can be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with mCRC. Implications for Practice High monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels could be a sign of a tumor's recruitment of suppressive and inflammatory cells worsening prognosis of different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Currently, no data are available for metastatic CRC regarding a cutoff definition for MLR or the prognostic impact of MLR and MLR-LDH combined. The present study showed in the training cohort and confirmed in the validation and whole cohort that MLR is a reliable and independent laboratory biomarker, which is easy to use, to predict clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC. Moreover, MLR and composite MLR-LDH could potentially result in an incremental improvement in the prognostic value of these biomarkers, being used as stratification tools for patients with mCRC.

Background: The combination of endocrine therapy with the cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib was proven to be effective for the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Although generally well tolerated, treatment delays and dose reductions are frequently observed with palbociclib, mainly due to severe neutropenia. Predictors of palbociclib-related toxicities are still unknown, as well as the clinical relevance of its relative dose intensity (RDI). Henceforth, this study aimed to identify baseline clinicopathological features associated with a RDI Methods: We reviewed data of 150 consecutive patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC patients treated with palbociclib at two Italian cancer centers from 2017 to 2019. Eligible patients must have received at least 3 cycles of treatment. Those who experienced early suspension due to unacceptable toxicities were still eligible. RDI was calculated as the ratio of actual dose intensity (cumulative administered dose/treatment duration) and planned dose intensity (cumulative planned dose/planned treatment duration). The association of both RDI Results: Overall, 142 patients were deemed eligible. Of these patients, 98 (69.0%) were treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant, 44 (31.0%) with palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors, and 73 (51.4%) in the first-line setting. The median number of administered palbociclib cycles was 8 (range: 1-24) and 61 patients (43.0%) required at least a first-level dose reduction (29 within 3 months). Furthermore, the median time to first dose reduction was 3.22 months, with neutropenia being responsible for 85.24% of first-level dose reductions. In the whole cohort, median RDI was 90.5% (95.1% for patients without dose reduction and 80% for those who had received a dose reduction). Notably, 28 patients (19.7%) experienced a RDI Conclusions: In our analysis, baseline weight and WBC were statistically associated with a RDI Citation Format: Giacomo Pelizzari, Elisa Bertoli, Marco Giavarra, Carla Corvaja, Lorenzo Gerratana, Debora Basile, Michele Bartoletti, Camilla Lisanti, Lucia Bortot, Silvia Buriolla, Mattia Garutti, Debora Avoledo, Marta Bonotto, Lucia Da Ros, Silvia Bolzonello, Mauro Mansutti, Paola Di Nardo, Gianpiero Fasola, Simon Spazzapan, Alessandro M Minisini, Fabio Puglisi. Predictors of relative dose intensity and early dose reduction in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-08.

Background Pancreatic cancer (PC) patients have multiple risk factors for sarcopenia and loss of skeletal muscle mass (LSMM), which may cause greater treatment toxicities, reduced response to cancer therapy, prolonged hospitalization, impaired quality of life, and worse prognosis. Methods This is a retrospective study on advanced PC patients treated at the Department of Oncology of Udine, Italy, from January 2012 to November 2017. Among 162 patients who received chemotherapy, 94 consecutive patients with an available computed tomography (CT) scan were retrospectively analyzed. The primary objective of our study was to explore if an early LSMM ≥ 10% (measured at first radiological evaluation and compared with baseline) and/or baseline sarcopenia may impact prognosis. Baseline sarcopenia was defined according to Prado's criteria. Skeletal muscle area was measured as cross-sectional areas (cm2 ) using CT scan data through the Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image system. Results In the whole cohort, 48% of patients were ≤70 years old, and 50% had metastatic disease. At baseline, 73% of patients had sarcopenia, and 16% presented a visceral fat area ≥ 44 cm2 /m2 . Overall, 21% experienced an early LSMM ≥ 10%. Approximately 33% of sarcopenic patients at baseline and ~35% of patients with early LSMM ≥ 10% had a body mass index > 25 kg/m2 . Of note, 71% of patients were evaluated by a nutritionist, and 56% received a dietary supplementation (oral and/or parenteral). After a median follow-up of 30.44 months, median overall survival (OS) was 11.28 months, whereas median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.72 months. By multivariate analysis, early LSMM ≥ 10% was significantly associated with worse OS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-3.78; P = 0.007] and PFS (HR: 2.31; 95% CI 1.30-4.09; P = 0.004). Moreover, an exploratory analysis showed that inflammatory indexes, such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio variation, impact early LSMM ≥ 10% (odds ratio 1.31, 95% CI 1.06-1.61, P = 0.010). Conclusions Early LSMM ≥ 10% has a negative prognostic role in advanced PC patients. Further prospective investigations are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Approximately 40% of unselected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients develop brain metastases (BMs) during their disease, with considerable morbidity and mortality. The management of BMs in patients with NSCLC is a clinical challenge and requires a multidisciplinary approach to gain effective intracranial disease control. Over the last decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a game-changer in the treatment landscape of advanced NSCLC, with significant improvements in survival outcomes, although patients with BMs are mostly underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. Moreover, the safety and activity of ICIs and radiotherapy combinations compared with single-agent or sequential modalities is still under evaluation to establish the optimal management of these patients. The aim of this review is to summarize the state-of-the-art of clinical evidence of ICIs intracranial activity and the main challenges of incorporating these agents in the treatment armamentarium of NSCLC patients with BMs.

e13537 Background: Precision oncology represents, together with immunotherapy, the leading innovation in cancer care. As a result, a growing number of patients will be treated in accordance with their disease’s specific genomic profile rather than the sole histology. At the same time, it is becoming more and more difficult to promptly adopt organizational solutions to deliver the right treatment to the right patient. In order to manage the complexity of genomic profiling and its clinical impact, Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) have been established. However, there is still broad heterogeneity among recommendations about the role and aims of MTBs worldwide. Globally, a top-down approach prevails, showing significant differences in the indication of hierarchical structure, composition, and autonomy of established MTBs. In the Hub & Spoke cluster of the academic Hospital of Udine, we adopted a contrarian, bottom-up approach to address the challenge of MTB implementation in the context of a healthcare organizational project. Methods: To face the challenges of precision oncology, an MTB was established in the Friuli Centrale Local Health Authority, North East Italy, as part of a project called “Precision Oncology Pathways”. Its implementation was derived trough a bottom-up approach, focusing on the real impact of this new activity on the hospital context. The aim of this strategy was to make issues emerging from daily practice and from direct information sharing among professionals involved in the integrated care pathways (ICPs) of cancer patients. This project involved two different departments (oncology, medical laboratory) and 8 different units. A project manager was introduced to facilitate interaction among stakeholders, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to define critical hurdles for MTB implementation. Results: A proposal for a bottom-up approach to implement precision oncology clinical pathways will be presented. Organizational findings and a decision-making workflow will be illustrated. Three main aspects turned out to be critical for MTB implementation: the communication gap among stakeholders, the clinical impact of technological innovation, and the role of MTB within ICPs. Besides, interdisciplinary study groups were set up to discuss criteria for patient's referral, the informed consent submission process, quality aspects of analytical methods, essential elements of the genomic report, criteria for the interpretation of genomic tests, and verify regulatory issues and adherence to guidelines. Conclusions: A redefinition of the whole ICP is needed for effective MTB implementation in real practice, according to local peculiarities. In our vision, MTBs represent the corner stone of a new treatment paradigm, and their activity should be patient centered, integrated within ICPs, and focused on the hurdles of tumor genomic profiling (clinical, ethical, pharmaco-economic and technological).

Background The current standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (+) metastatic breast cancer is the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and a taxane (P + T + taxane), while standard second-line is ado-trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1). The registration trial of pertuzumab, however, did not include early-relapsing patients, defined as patients experiencing tumor relapse ≤12 months from the end of (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Conversely, the pivotal trial of T-DM1 included some patients relapsing ≤6 months after the end of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Thus, a proportion of early-relapsing patients are currently eligible to receive T-DM1 as first-line treatment. Nevertheless, no direct comparison exists between the two regimens in this clinical setting. Patients and methods We retrospectively compared T-DM1 versus P + T + taxane as first-line treatment in two cohorts of early-relapsing patients in an Italian ‘real-world’ setting, involving 14 public health care institutions. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included patients' characterization, overall survival and post-progression survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. All tests were two-sided and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 1252 screened patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four (58.7%) received P + T + taxane and 31 (41.3%) received T-DM1. The two cohorts showed similar characteristics of aggressiveness and no significant differences in treatment history. T-DM1, compared with P + T + taxane was associated with worse progression-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-4.52, P = 0.021) and overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.38-11.32, P = 0.010), irrespective of previous (neo)adjuvant treatment, age, hormone receptors status, time-to-relapse (≤6 months or within 6-12 months) and presence of visceral/brain metastases. No differences were observed in post-progression survival (P = 0.095). Conclusions Our study suggests superiority for P + T + taxane over T-DM1 as up-front treatment of early-relapsing HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, which merits further assessment in larger and prospective trials., Highlights • This is the first study comparing pertuzumab + trastuzumab + taxane (P + T + taxane) with T-DM1 in early-relapsing HER2+ MBC. • The majority of early-relapsing HER2+ MBC have high-grade, node-positive, large primary tumors. • First-line T-DM1 compared with P + T + taxane is associated with worse progression-free survival. • First-line T-DM1 compared with P + T + taxane is associated with worse overall survival. • Post-progression survival does not differ between the two treatments cohorts.

Background Endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent-kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represents the standard treatment for luminal-metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, prospective head-to-head comparisons are still lacking for 1st line (L) options, and it is still crucial to define the best strategy between 1st and 2nd L. Materials and methods 717 consecutive luminal-MBC pts treated between 2008 and 2020 were analyzed at the Oncology Department of Aviano and Udine, Italy. Differences about survival outcomes (OS, PFS and PPS) were tested by log-rank test. The attrition rate (AR) between 1st and 2ndL was calculated. Results At 1stL, pts were treated with ET (49%), chemotherapy (CT) (31%) and ET-CDKi (20%) while, at 2ndL, 33% received ET, 33% CT and 8% ET-CDKi. Overall AR was 10%, 7% for CT, 8% for ET and 17% for ET-CDKi. By multivariate analysis, 1stL ET-CDK4/6i showed a better mPFS1 and OS. Moreover, 2ndL ET-CDK4/6i demonstrated better mPFS2 compared to ET and CT. Notably, 1stL ET-CDKi resulted in higher mPFS than 2ndL ET-CDKi. Intriguingly, 1stL ET-CDK4/6i was associated with worse mPPS compared to CT and ET. Secondarily, 1stL ET-CDK4/6i followed by CT had worse OS compared to 1stL ET-CDK4/6i followed by ET. Notably, none of baseline characteristics at 2ndL influenced 2ndL treatment choice (ET vs. CT) after ET-CDKi. Conclusion Our real-world data demonstrated that ET-CDKi represents the best option for 1stL luminal-MBC compared to ET and CT. Also, the present study pointed out that 2ndL ET, potentially combined with other molecules, could be a feasible option after CDK4/6i failure, postponing CT on later lines., Highlights • To define the best treatment strategy for 1st and 2nd L is crucial for luminal mBC. • 1st L CDK4/6i-based therapies represent the standard treatment in luminal mBC. • This study confirmed the key role of 1st L CDK4/6i on a real-world cohort. • This study suggested a preeminent role for ET after first-line CDK4/6i. • The 2nd line ET with other molecules could allow to further postpone CT.

Approximately 40% of malignant melanomas are diagnosed in patients older than 65 years. Elderly patients with melanoma present clinicopathological features related to a more aggressive biology, and they are often diagnosed with advanced stage of disease. Interestingly, in older patients the immune system can be altered with changes both in the innate system and in the adaptive immune system with the acquisition of a pro-inflammatory and immune suppressive phenotype. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has reshaped the treatment strategies and prognosis of patients with melanoma, and particularly, older age should not be considered a contraindication for immunotherapy. However, data regarding efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in elderly population are still limited because frail older patients are generally excluded from clinical trials. Recently, real-world data have shed light on similar efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in older population compared with younger counterpart. The aim of the present review was to summarize the available knowledge on the underlying immune system in older patients with a diagnosis of melanoma and the immunotherapeutic approaches in this population.

Introduction: Targeted agents such as bevacizumab (BEV) or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) which have been added as concomitant or maintenance therapies have been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PS rOC). In the absence of direct comparison, we performed a network meta-analysis considering BRCA genes status. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE for trials involving patients with PS rOC treated with BEV or PARPi. Different comparisons were performed for patients included in the PARPi trials, according to BRCA genes status as follows: all comers (AC) population, BRCA 1/2 mutated (BRCAm), and BRCA wild type patients (BRCAwt). Results: In the overall population, PARPi prolonged PFS with respect to BEV (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70, 95% CI 0.54&ndash, 0.91). In the BRCA mutated carriers, the PFS improvement in favor of PARPi appeared to be higher (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.36&ndash, 0.59) while in BRCAwt patients the superiority of PARPi over BEV failed to reach a statistically significance level (HR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.63&ndash, 1.20), however, according to the SUCRA analysis, PARPi had the highest probability of being ranked as the most effective therapy (90% and 60%, for PARPi and BEV, respectively). Conclusions: PARPi performed better as compared with BEV in terms of PFS for the treatment of PS rOC, especially in BRCAm patients who had not previously received PARPi.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer diagnosed among women. The development of new personalized therapeutic strategies has reshaped the landscape in this field. However, BC is still the first cause of death among women. Interestingly, several preclinical studies and some clinical evidences are focused their attention on the role of immune system and immunotherapy on cancer control, also in BC. Areas covered: Usually, BC has been considered a not immunogenic tumor for its low mutational load. However, recent studies have evidenced that some subtypes, triple negative and HER-2 positive BC, are 'hot' tumors, thus more immunogenic. Moreover, the presence of immune infiltrate is positively associated with favorable prognosis. Therefore, the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors seems to be an encouraging treatment option also in BC. Among these drugs, atezolizumab is an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody with a particular structure that reduce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against T cells, increasing quantitatively and qualitatively the effective response. Expert opinion: The use of immunotherapy is a promising option for BC. However, at the same time it still raises many doubts. Surely, the research and the validation of immune biomarkers can permit to identify patients who more benefit from these drugs.

Aim: Discordance between primary tumor and paired metastases biology has been widely detected in metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 discordance. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 544 patients affected by metastatic breast cancer. Variation in ER, PR, Ki67 and HER2 expression between primary site and recurrence was tested through the McNemar test. Results: A significant variation was observed in respect to ER, PR and Ki67 status (12.65%, p = 0.0072; 49.71%, p

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is strongly suggested to define the proper drug dosage to overcome inter- and intra-patient variability in drug exposure, which is typically observed with oral anticancer agents, such as palbociclib (PALBO), ribociclib (RIBO) and letrozole (LETRO), all approved for the treatment of HR+, HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). Optimal TDM implementation requires a blood sampling organization that can be hampered by limited availability of health and laboratory personnel. Dried Blood Spot (DBS) sampling is proposed to overcome such limitations. The aim of this work was the development of a new LC-MS/MS method to analyze DBS samples containing PALBO, RIBO, and LETRO. Analytes extraction from DBS was performed by adding a methanolic solution containing the corresponding internal standards. LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using a LC Nexera (Shimadzu) system coupled with an API 4000 QTrap (SCIEX) mass spectrometer. The chromatographic separation was performed on a Luna Omega Polar C18 column (Phenomenex). The method was applied to 38 clinical samples collected by finger prick. The influence of hematocrit and spot size, sample homogeneity, stability, and correlation between finger prick and venous DBS measurement were assessed. The analytical validation was performed according to EMA and FDA guidelines. The analytical range of the method was 1 to 250 ng/mL for PALBO, 40 to 10000 ng/mL for RIBO, and 2 to 500 ng/mL for LETRO, where linearity was assessed, obtaining mean coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.9979 for PALBO, 0.9980 for RIBO, and 0.9987 for LETRO). The LC-MS/MS method runtime was 6.6 min. Incurred sample reanalysis demonstrated reproducibility, as the percentage difference between the two quantifications was lower than 20% for 100% of PALBO, 81.8% of RIBO, and 90.9% of LETRO paired samples. Intra- and inter-day precision (CV (%)) was lower than 11.4% and intra- and inter-day accuracy was between 90.0 and 106.5%. DBS sample stability at room temperature was confirmed for 2.5 months. A positive correlation was observed between DBS and plasma concentrations for the 3 drugs, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients obtained by DBS normalization applying a selected strategy were 0.958 for PALBO, 0.957 for RIBO, and 0.963 for LETRO. In conclusion, a fast, easy, and reproducible DBS LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of palbociclib; ribociclib and letrozole was developed to be used in clinical practice.

Background: The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the associated COVID-19 pneumonia have dramatically disrupted the delivery of cancer care worldwide. Indeed, this crisis has raised the urge of thoughtfully balancing the risk of delaying potentially curative treatments against the harm of developing a life-threatening respiratory infection. In this study, we report the experience of an Italian Reference Cancer Center, where strict triage procedures had to be promptly adopted. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 787 cancer patients (pts) who accessed the Day Hospital (DH) of the Oncology Department of Udine from April 6th to June 19th 2020. Screening NP swabs and RT-PCR analysis were performed at every access in pts who, after passing the triage, were admitted to receive intravenous therapies. Clinicopathological data were collected from electronic health records and include sex, age, tumor type, disease stage, type of treatment, number of swabs received and RT-PCR results. Results: Overall, 2602 NP swabs were performed in a population of 787 cancer pts receiving intravenous therapies, including 55.7% female and 44.3% male pts, respectively, with 54.9% aged ≥65. Of note, 28.2% of pts had gastrointestinal tumors, 23% breast cancer, 19.8% lung cancer and 14.2% tumors of the genitourinary tract. Approximately 32% of pts had early-stage disease whereas 68% of them was receiving therapies for advanced disease. Treatments most frequently included chemotherapy (60%), immunotherapy (14.7%) and target therapies (9.8%) whereas 11.1% of swabs were performed in pts entering the premises for supportive therapy. The median number of SARS-CoV-2 tests per patient was 3 and 26% of pts received ≥5 swabs. In the whole population, only 10 SARS-CoV-2 tests (1.3%) resulted positive and were promptly isolated. Conclusions: In the pandemic context, the adoption and gradual refinement of rigorous procedures aimed at minimizing COVID-19 diffusion among pts and healthcare professionals are mandatory to ensure continuity of care. In our experience systematic triage, sequential screening with NP swabs and the prompt identification of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers limited COVID-19 spread among cancer pts accessing the Oncology DH. Legal entity responsible for the study: ASUFC. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Aim: A monitoring strategy for metastatic breast cancer patients (M-MBC) has been little studied. Materials & methods: This retrospective study analyzed a consecutive cohort of 382 MBC patients to analyze different M-MBC strategies to identify factors influencing intensive M-MBC. Results: Elevated baseline serum tumor markers (STM) was the strongest factor associated with increased use of STM tests. Having more frequent oncology office visits was associated with more intensive chemotherapy/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using. Increased use of imaging tests was associated with participation to clinical trial. Single and elderly patients were less likely to have frequent testing. Having clinically measurable disease was less likely to have more intensive M-MBC. Conclusion: STM testing and scans were frequently ordered in M-MBC. In the present study, strategies are little influenced by clinico-pathological characteristics.

Summary Background Body composition, has been established as a risk factor for colorectal cancer diagnosis and disease progression. Aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of adiposity, especially visceral fat (VAT), in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Material and methods A retrospective cohort of 71 MCRC pts treated between 2013 and 2017 was evaluated. VAT was measured as cross-sectional (cm2) area at the L3 level divided by the square of the height (m2). A ROC analysis was performed to define a prognostic threshold according to VAT. Results Before first-line therapy start, 40 pts (56%) had a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m2. The obtained cut-off value for VAT was 44. Median OS was 30.97 months. At univariate analysis, primary tumor resection (HR 0.40, p = 0.029), VAT>44 (HR 2.85, p = 0.011) and metastasectomy (HR 0.22, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with OS. By multivariate analysis, VAT>44 (HR 2.6; p = 0.020) and metastasectomy were still significantly associated with OS. Conclusion This exploratory study suggests a prognostic role for VAT in MCRC pts, with higher VAT values predicting worse outcome.

Background: ‘Drug holidays’ (DH) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were introduced to preserve quality of life. We studied factors associated to a DH offer in first line. Materials & methods: We retrospectively analyzed 754 consecutive patients treated with chemotherapy for mCRC in two Italian institutions between 2005 and 2017. Associations between baseline clinical-pathological factors and DH (56 or more days of treatment interruption) were investigated. Results: In 754 patients, previous metastasectomy, previous thermoablation and previous surgery of primary tumor were independently associated with DH. Excluding procedures or clinical trials: primary rectal cancer and resection of primary tumor were significantly associated to DH. Conclusions: DH was offered to patients with lower burden of disease, but further investigations are needed to safely guide a holiday strategy.

Introduction/Background Women aged ≥65 represent nearly 50% of ovarian cancer (OC) patients (pts). However, elderly OC pts are less likely to receive optimal treatment. Furthermore, they are significantly under-represented in clinical trials and multidimensional geriatric assessment is still underused. The present study aims to provide an overview of real-life treatment strategies for elderly advanced-OC pts and to investigate clinico-pathological features that could potentially drive choice of first-line treatment. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted on a consecutive series of 45 OC pts aged ≥69 treated with first-line chemotherapy (1L_CT) from 2011 to 2018 at CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute (Italy). Factors associated with treatment choice and rate of adverse events were investigated through Fisher-exact test; differences in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested by log-rank test. Results 67% of pts received 1L_CT with a standard carboplatin-paclitaxel combination (CPC). Conversely, 33% received a monotherapy (MT) (31% with carboplatin, 2% with paclitaxel). ECOG PS ≥1 was the only factor significantly associated with choice of MT (P=0.021). No differences were observed between CPC and CPC with dose reductions (CPCdr), neither in terms of PFS (HR=1.29 P=0.59) nor OS (HR=1.40 P=0.56). On the other hand, MT was associated with shorter PFS (HR=4.35 P=0.001) and OS (HR=4.48 P=0.005). No differences in treatment discontinuation rate, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, constipation, diarrhoea and asthenia in CPC, CPCdr and MT were detected (P>0.05). Conclusion The present study confirms CPC as the standard first-line chemotherapy also in advanced OC elderly pts and suggests that CPCdr is preferable to MT regimens. Notwithstanding the limitations due to the small sample size, the evaluated regimens showed a comparable toxicity profile. Notably, clinical decision-making was mainly driven by PS ECOG highlighting the pivotal role of multidimensional geriatric assessment for pts stratification. Further prospective studies are needed to investigate improved tailored strategies. Disclosure Nothing to disclose.

Introduction/Background Patients (pts) with ovarian cancer experiencing a platinum-sensitive (PS) recurrence are generally re-exposed to platinum agents (PCT). The addition of bevacizumab (BEV) or PARP inhibitors (PARPi) as concomitant and/or maintenance therapy has shown to improve progression free survival (PFS). In the absence of direct comparisons coming from randomized trials (RCTs), we have performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate differences in terms of efficacy between BEV and PARPi in pts with PS recurrent ovarian cancer (rOC), according to BRCA status. Methodology We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline for RCTs involving pts with PS rOC treated with BEV (n=3, 1563 pts) or PARPi (n=5, 1839 pts). Only trials with PFS as primary endpoint were included. Analyses have been done pooling pts who had received PARPi in three groups, according to the available data on BRCA genes status: all comers (AC), BRCA mutated pts (BRCAm) and BRCA wild-type pts (BRCAwt). A frequentist approach has been used with R statistical software. To rank the effect size of treatments, surface under the cumulative ranking value (SUCRA) has been applied. Results In AC pts, PARPi improved PFS compared to BEV (hazard ratio [HR]=0.70, 95% CI 0.54–0.91). In BRCAm pts the gain in PFS for PARPi was even higher compared to BEV (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.36–0.59). In BRCAwt pts the benefit of PARPi over BEV was not statistically significant (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.63–1.20) but PARPi had the highest likelihood of being ranked as the best treatment in terms of efficacy according to SUCRA (90% and 60%, respectively for PARPi and BEV). Conclusion According to indirect comparisons, PARPi performed the best for the treatment of PS rOC, especially in BRCAm pts who had not previously received PARPi. BEV could be still an option in BRCAwt pts. Disclosure Fabio Puglisi: Roche, AstraZeneca (honoraria and research founding). No conflict of interest is to be declared for the remaining authors. The authors receive no financial support for this study.

A novel LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantification of the new cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) palbociclib and ribociclib and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole used in combinatory regimen. The proposed method is appropriate to be applied in clinical practice due to the simple and fast sample preparation based on protein precipitation, the low amount of patient sample necessary for the analysis (10 μL) and the total run time of 6.5 min. It was fully validated according to FDA and EMA guidelines on bioanalytical method validation. The linearity was assessed (R2 within 0.9992-0.9983) over the concentration ranges of 0.3-250 ng/mL for palbociclib, 10-10000 ng/mL for ribociclib and 0.5-500 ng/mL for letrozole that properly cover the therapeutic plasma concentrations. A specific strategy was implemented to reduce the carryover phenomenon, formerly known for these CDKIs. This method was applied to quantify the Cmin of palbociclib, ribociclib and letrozole in plasma samples from patients enrolled in a clinical study. The same set of study samples was analysed twice in separate runs to assess the reproducibility of the method by means of the incurred samples reanalysis. The results corroborated the reliability of the analyte concentrations obtained with the bioanalytical method, already proved by the validation process. The percentage differences were always within ±10% for all the analytes and the R2 of the correlation graph between the two quantifications was equal to 0.9994.

Background: Elevated plasmatic lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are associated with worse prognosis in various malignancies, including metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Nevertheless, no data are available on the prognostic role of LDH as a dynamic biomarker during first-line treatment in unselected MBC. Methods: We reviewed data of 392 women with MBC to evaluate the association between LDH variation after 12 weeks of first-line treatment and survival. The prognostic impact was tested by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: Plasmatic LDH was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor in MBC. Patients who maintained elevated LDH levels after 12 weeks of first-line treatment experienced worse progression-free survival (PFS, HR 2.88, 95% CI: 1.40&ndash, 5.89, p = 0.0038) and overall survival (OS, HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.16&ndash, 5.86, p = 0.02) compared to patients with stable normal LDH levels, even after adjustment for other prognostic factors. Notably, LDH low-to-high variation emerged as an unfavorable prognostic factor for PFS (HR 3.96, 95% CI 2.00&ndash, 7.82, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Plasmatic LDH and its variation during first-line treatment predict PFS and OS in MBC, providing independent prognostic information. It would be worthwhile to prospectively evaluate the association between LDH variation and therapeutic benefit in MBC, and explore how it may affect treatment strategies.

Different de-escalation strategies have been proposed to limit the risk of cumulative toxicity and guarantee quality of life during the treatment trajectory of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Programmed treatment interruptions, defined as drug holidays (DHs), have been implemented in clinical practice. We evaluated the association between DHs and overall survival (OS). This was a retrospective study, conducted at the University Hospital of Udine and the IRCCS CRO of Aviano. We retrieved records of 608 consecutive patients treated for mCRC from 1 January 2005 to 15 March 2017 and evaluated the impact of different de-escalation strategies (maintenance, DHs, or both) on OS through uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. We also looked at attrition rates across treatment lines according to the chosen strategy. In our study, 19.24% of patients received maintenance therapy, 16.12% DHs, and 9.87% both, while 32.07% continued full-intensity first-line treatment up to progression or death. In uni- and multivariate analyses first-line continuous treatment and early discontinuation (treatment for less than 3 months) were associated to worse OS compared to non-continuous strategies (HR, 1.68, 95% CI, 1.22–2.32, p = 0.002 and HR,4.89, 95% CI, 3.33–7.19, p &lt, 0.001, respectively). Attrition rates were 22.8%, 20.61%, and 19.64% for maintenance, DHs, or both, respectively. For continuous therapy and for treatment of less than 3 months it was 21.57% and 49%. De-escalation strategies are safe and effective options. DHs after initial induction chemotherapy may be considered in clinically selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

The mechanism of action of pertuzumab, a recombinant anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody, is complementary to trastuzumab's. On 8 June 2012, the Food and Drug Administration approved the combination of pertuzumab with trastuzumab and docetaxel as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, pertuzumab is the first drug to be approved in the neoadjuvant setting using a pathological complete response as an endpoint. Areas covered: The review provides insights into the main mechanisms of action of pertuzumab. In addition, it gives complete coverage of the landmark clinical and translational trials for this agent. Expert opinion: The new therapeutic algorithm in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced disease and the awaited results of the Aphinity trial are expected to impact the sequence of anti-HER2 treatment. Accordingly, the value of pertuzumab beyond progression needs to be properly studied. Furthermore, to improve the toxicity profile and efficacy of future treatment, new pertuzumab-based regimens are being investigated.

Background: The recent COVID-19 outbreak in Italy required timely adoption of efficient triage procedures (TPs) with the aim to minimize the risk of infection spreading in the hospitals We developed a written questionnaire (items explored: fever, respiratory symptoms, previous contacts or personal positivity for COVID-19) together with body temperature (BT) measurement, to intercept patients (pts) with suspect of COVID-19 infection Methods: We conducted a monocentric observational study of a consecutive series of outpatients with diagnosis of solid tumor, accessing the Day Unit of Oncology Department at Udine Academic Cancer Center (Northern Italy) from 30 March 2020 to 30 April 2020 In this abstract we present the preliminary results of the TPs performed until 10 April 2020 Results: 1054 TPs were performed out of 586 pts, with a median of 2 TPs per pt Median age was 64 9 years, males were 35 4% Overall, 82 5% of TPs were made because of access for therapy, 10 7% for programmed procedures, radiological exams or non-oncological consultations, 1 2% for unplanned presentation (e g urgencies) The stage of neoplasm was early in 30 7% and advanced in 69 3% of pts TPs were made in pts receiving chemotherapy (58 2%), immunotherapy (10 8%), targeted therapy (18 9%), other therapies (5 2%) and in pts without active oncological therapy (6 9%) The questionnaires resulted positive in 5 5% of cases;2 9% were positive for fever, 2 9% for respiratory symptoms, 0 1% for previous contact with a case of COVID-19 Concomitant presence of 2 or more items was observed in 0 5% of questionnaires Of note, 6 TPs required medical evaluation despite a negative questionnaire and were considered to be clinically suspect BT≥37°C was observed in 7 TPs Overall, the oncologic program was postponed in 0 9% of the TPs, while in 0 5% a test for SARS-CoV-2 was performed for clinical suspect: no one resulted positive At multivariate analysis, factors associated with positive triage were diagnosis of thoracic cancer (OR 2 06;95%CI 1 02-4 12;p=0 04) and prior test for SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2 81;95%CI 1 46-5 41;p=0 001) Conclusions: A well-structured triage for COVID-19 could reduce the risk for further spreading of infection in Oncology facilities with limited impact on scheduled activities Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors Funding: Has not received any funding Disclosure: F Puglisi: Honoraria (self): MSD;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Eli Lilly;Honoraria (self): Takeda;Pfizer;Advisory/Consultancy: Amgen;Novartis;Pierre Fabre;Research grant/Funding (self): Astrazeneca;Eisai;Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Celgene;Servier C Andreetta: Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca;GlaxoSmithKline;MSD A M Minisini: Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis;MSD;Pierre Fabre G Fasola: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb srl;Eli Lilly SpA ;Servier Italia SpA ;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Astrazeneca;Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Sharp and Dohme S p A ;Boehringer-Ingelheim S p A All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest

Mucositis is one of the most common debilitating side effects related to chemotherapy (CT), radiation therapy (RT), targeted agents and immunotherapy. It is a complex process potentially involving any portion of the gastrointestinal tract and injuring the mucosa, leading to inflammatory or ulcerative lesions. Mechanisms and clinical presentation can differ according both to the anatomic site involved (oral or gastrointestinal) and the treatment received. Understanding the pathophysiology and management of mucosal injury as a secondary effect of anti-cancer treatment is an important area of clinical research. Prophylaxis, early diagnosis, and adequate management of complications are essential to increase therapeutic success and, thus, improve the survival outcomes of cancer patients. This review focuses on the pathobiology and management guidelines for mucositis, a secondary effect of old and new anti-cancer treatments, highlighting recent advances in prevention and discussing future research options.

Background Several trials evaluated the role of ovarian function suppression for the adjuvant treatment of premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Based on the results of the SOFT and TEXT trials, international guidelines recommend the addition of ovarian function suppression to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients at higher risk of relapse. Methods The ERA project (Evaluation of Risk factors in the Adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in premenopausal patients) was devised with the objective of obtaining a consensus on the identification of risk factors and the use of ovarian function suppression in the adjuvant treatment of these women. To this aim, a panel of 31 Italian oncologists with expertise in breast cancer participated in a Delphi consensus study in June 2017. Results A total of 29 statements related to prognostic factors, therapeutic strategies and ovarian function suppression were defined and voted to gain final consensus. For each topic we report data supporting the acquired consensus and the relevant issues discussed. Conclusions The SOFT and TEXT trials have changed the standard adjuvant treatment of premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer, but the available treatment options require a careful risk assessment and toxicities evaluation to ensure the greatest clinical benefit for each patient.

Cancer patients (CP) typically experiment cachexia and malnutrition due to cancer type and systemic inflammation, that may cause greater treatment toxicities, impacting on prognosis, response to treatment, hospitalization and quality of life. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive data of 190 CP treated from February 2017 to July 2018 at the Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit of National Cancer Institute, Aviano. At nutritional assessment we evaluated the rate of weight loss (WL) compared to self-reported usual weight (UW) and at 6 and 1 months before the visit, performed by an expert physician and a certified dietitian. We explored the association of WL≥10% with inflammation biomarkers, total protein, albumin, diagnosis and nutritional intervention through chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis test, as statistically appropriate (Tab.2). Patients’ characteristics were summarized through descriptive analysis (Tab.1). Noteworthy 48% of CP was ≥65 years old, 20% had BMI Prevention and treatment of cachexia still remain a critical need in CP. Therefore, integrating nutritional supportive care to oncologic treatments is crucial.

Overweight is an established risk factor of the colorectal cancer initiation and progression. Aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of visceral fat (VAT) in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). We retrospectively analyzed 71 consecutive MCRC patients (2013-2017) at the Oncology Department of CRO Aviano (Italy). VAT area was measured as of cross-sectional area (cm2) at the L3 level divided by the square of the height (m2). A ROC analysis was performed to define a threshold capable to identify distinct prognostic categories of patients according to VAT. Subsequently, the value of VAT in predicting overall survival (OS) was evaluated with uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses and estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Patients’ characteristics before first-line chemotherapy are reported in table 1. Interestingly, 40 pts (56%) had a body mass index (BMI)>25 and 42 (59%) had median VAT of 51.94. LDH level>=480 UI/L was recorded in 12 patients (27%) reflecting the inflammatory response. The optimal cut-off value for VAT was 44. Median OS was 30.97 months. At univariate analysis, older age (HR 2.46, p=0.013), primary tumor resection (HR 0.40, p=0.029), VAT>=44 (HR 2.85, p=0.011) and metastasectomy (HR 0.22, p=0.005), were significantly associated with OS (Table 2 and Figure1). By multivariate analysis, only VAT>=44 (HR2.64; p=0.030) was significantly associated with OS (Table 2). This exploratory study supported the prognostic role of VAT evaluation in patients with MCRC. In particular, high VAT was predictor of worse outcome. Further investigations are needed to confirm these preliminary data.

Background The optimal strategy for monitoring metastatic breast cancer (M-MBC) is unclear. Nevertheless, M-MBC influences patient's quality of life and it affects the use of resources in terms of both drugs and diagnostic exam prescription. We aim to disclose oncologists' approach on M-MBC, identifying controversial areas. Methods An anonymous online survey was conducted among GIM members who, based on their on-field experience, shared their own method for M-MBC planning. Chi-square tests and Fisher exact tests were used as appropriate. Results The survey was completed by 256 recipients (51%). The majority of them were medical oncologists. Approximately 50% of respondents reported that M-MBC was primarily based on the monitoring strategies used in clinical trials, and for 70% of them M-MBC should be evidence-based. Areas of controversies included the primary goal of M-MBC, the use of tumour markers, the optimal timing for baseline assessment and frequency of repeating testing. Respondents agreed on planning M-MBC before treatment's start and on discussing with the patient about the M-MBC strategy and on choosing CT-scan as the preferred reassessment imaging method. The most relevant factors influencing the M-MBC strategy were performance status, triple negative histology, exam's contraindication, the presence of clinically measurable disease, and treatment safety profile; on the contrary, patients' socio-economic status, exam's cost, and hospital's logistic limits were less relevant. Experienced oncologists seemed less prone to intensive follow-up. Conclusion M-MBC strategy still has controversial issues and its potential clinical effects for breast cancer patients need ad hoc studies.

Background Advances in therapy, surgery and loco-regional procedures improved survival of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Interruptions, defined Drug Holidays (DH), could reduce toxicity in pts with stable disease. We evaluated the association between DH and overall survival (OS). Methods 754 consecutive pts treated for mCRC, at University Hospital of Udine and IRCCS CRO of Aviano from 1/1/2005 to 15/03/2017, were included. DH was defined as 56 or more consecutive days of interruption, during first line. The association of DH to OS was evaluated through uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses. OS was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves. Results Overall, 459 (60.9%) pts received continuous treatment while 255 (33.8%) a DH (5.3% missing data). After median follow-up of 68.6 months, median OS was 23.15 months. By univariate analysis, KRAS (HR 1.39; 95%CI 1.17-1.66; p 1 metastatic sites (HR 1.61;95%CI 1.36-1.91; p Conclusions DH was independently associated with better prognosis. Probably, DH is a proxy of better prognosis that clinicians intercept. Therefore, in accurately selected pts, DH can be safely offered. Legal entity responsible for the study Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure F. Puglisi: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Hoffmann-La Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pierre-Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) are commonly acknowledged as a good clinical practice. One of the roles of MDMs is to identify the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients (pts) with new diagnosis of early breast cancer (EBC). In this setting, the purpose of the study was to define whether there was agreement between the planned program (i.e. MDMs-based decision) and that actually applied (i.e. actual therapeutic choice, ATC). In addition, the study explored factors associated with discordance. Methods We conducted a monocentric retrospective study of a consecutive series of 291 pts with new diagnosis of EBC, discussed at MDMs at the University Hospital of Udine (Italy), from January 2017 to June 2018. Results Median age was 62 years (range 27-88 years). Among invasive EBC patients, the most frequent phenotype was luminal-A (38%), followed by luminal-B (33%), HER2-positive (12%) and triple negative (5%). Thirty-four pts (12%) had diagnosis of in situ carcinoma (DCIS). Median time from MDMs discussion to first oncological examination was two weeks. Rate of discordance between MDMs-based decision and final choice, during face to face consultation with the oncologist, was 15.8% (46/291). Among cases with discordance, 19 pts (41.3%) had age > 70 years; 8 pts (17%) had a diagnosis of DCIS, 13 pts (28%) luminal-B carcinoma, 12 pts (26%) luminal-A, 9 pts (20%) HER2-positive and 4 pts (9%) triple negative EBC. The most frequent reason for changing the MDMs-based program was clinical decision by the oncologist at the first evaluation (87%). Follow-up was preferred to the chemotherapy proposed within the MDMs by 15% of pts, and to the endocrine therapy in 39% cases (among these, 44.5% had diagnosis of DCIS). In our study 16/46 pts (35%) had a therapeutic change from chemotherapy to endocrine therapy: among these pts, 7/16 had a luminal-B and 6/16 had a HER2-positive disease. Further analysis aiming at evaluating variables which could predict discordance between MDMs proposal and face to face oncological consultation are ongoing. Conclusions The results of our study could be useful for enhance the role of MTD and identify unmet needs in decision making process in EBC. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background High BMI is associated with better survival in metastatic melanoma patients (MM pts), while sarcopenia is linked to poorer outcome in pts with stage III. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic impact of body-mass index (BMI), baseline sarcopenia, loss of skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) on overall survival (OS) in MM pts who received immunotherapy (IT). Methods The retrospective series included 42 consecutive MM pts (Jan 2011-Dec 2018) treated with IT in a single referral center. Sarcopenia was defined according to Prado’s criteria. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated as cross-sectional-area of muscle (cm2), using CT-scan, at the L3 level divided by the square of the height (m2). Early LSMM, during IT, was defined as a decrease in SMI > =10% from baseline at first evaluation. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2) and categorized according to standard WHO definitions. Weight loss was analyzed as continuous variable. Results At baseline, 27 pts (64,3%) were male, 26 pts (61.9%) were =25. Out of 42 pts, 30 (71.4%) had a CT-scan at first evaluation, and 30% of them had an early LSMM. Median OS was 11.38 months. Both in univariate and multivariate analysis, ECOG PS > =1, and early LSMM > =10% were significantly associated with worse OS. Conversely, pts with weight loss had better OS (Table). Table . 1367P OS univariate analysis OS multivariate analysis Factors HR p 95% Confidence Interval HR p 95% Confidence Interval PS ECOG³1 3.02 0.01 (1.29-7.08) 3.99 0.043 (1.04-15.31) Weight loss 0.88 0.03 (0.78-0.98) 0.85 0.02 (0.74-0.97) Early LSMM > =10% 4.24 0.006 (1.50-11.97) 3.09 0.04 (1.04-9.22) Conclusions Early LSMM > =10% and ECOG PS > =1 may negatively influence the outcome of MM pts treated with IT. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data. Legal entity responsible for the study Maria Grazia Vitale. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (BM) have a historically poor prognosis, with a reported median overall survival (mOS) of 4-6 months. Aim of this study is to evaluate predictive factors of survival in pts with melanoma BM. Secondly, a multivariate model was used to define groups with distinct prognosis. Methods Consecutive pts with melanoma BM treated in two Italian cancer centers were included in this 10-year retrospective cohort study (2008-2018). Baseline clinicopathological factors, systemic and loco-regional treatments were registered. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox model were used to analyze the association of prognostic factors and OS. Results 150 pts with melanoma BM were enrolled in this study: 42% with a single BM, 51.3% with ≥ 3 extracranial metastatic sites and 38% with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0. About 50.7% of pts had a BRAF mutation. Notably, 56% of pts were asymptomatic at BM diagnosis, and 40% presented high LDH levels at baseline. Overall, mOS after BM diagnosis was 5.78 months (95% CI 4.80-6.67), and median intracranial progression-free survival was 4.63 months (95% CI 3.81-5.12). According to treatment modality, stereotactic radiosurgery/neurosurgery plus systemic therapy showed the best outcome (mOS 12.32 months, 95% CI 7.92-25.30). A multivariate model was used to identify baseline prognostic factors independently associated with OS (Table). Conversely, sex and symptomatic BM did not significantly impact on OS. Predicted survival functions defined 3 distinct prognostic groups (P Table . 1363P Covariates HR 95% CI P Points BRAF wild type 1.95 1.22-3.12 1 BM > 1 2.20 1.35-3.59 1 LDH ≥ 2 x upper normal limit 1.83 1.07-3.11 0.026 1 ECOG PS > 0 2.68 1.62-4.43 0.0001 1 Extracranial metastatic sites ≥ 3 1.91 1.17-3.1 1 Age ≥ 65 1.86 1.15-3.02 0.012 1 Conclusions This score can be useful for stratifying prognosis in pts with melanoma BM. Prospective studies are needed to validate this score and to explore how it may guide treatment strategy. Legal entity responsible for the study Dipartimento di Oncologia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure F. Puglisi: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Research grant / Funding (self): Astrazeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent oncologic cause of death among women and the improvement of its treatments is compelling. Platinum salts (e.g., carboplatin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin) are old drugs still used to treat BC, especially the triple-negative subgroup. However, only a subset of patients see a concrete benefit from these drugs, raising the question of how to select them properly. Therefore, predictive biomarkers for platinum salts in BC still represent an unmet clinical need. Here, we review clinical and preclinical works in order to summarize the current evidence about predictive or putative platinum salt biomarkers in BC. The association between BRCA1/2 gene mutations and platinum sensitivity has been largely described. However, beyond the mutations of these two genes, several other proteins belonging to the homologous recombination pathways have been linked to platinum response, defining the concept of BRCAness. Several works, here reviewed, have tried to capture BRCAness through different strategies, such as homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score and genetic signatures. Moreover, p53 and its family members (p63 and p73) might also be used as predictors of platinum response. Finally, we describe the mounting preclinical evidence regarding base excision repair deficiency as a possible new platinum biomarker.