Soil solarization is an “environmentally-friendly” pest and weed control method utilized in agriculture. While the use of plastic films for soil solarization provides for an increased level of agricultural productivity and a reduction in the use of chemicals, there is however a serious drawback regarding the disposal of used traditional plastic materials. A possible solution to this problem is the use of biodegradable plastics, which degrade gradually when plowed-down due to the action of microorganisms. Current trends towards the use of environmentally-friendly products have contributed to the commercial development of plastic materials based on renewable agricultural resources marketed as biodegradable. Examples are plastics based on starch, and synthetic polymers. The comparison between biodegradable, EVA based and coextruded multilayer films for soil solarization in field is the aim of this research. Field experiments were carried out from Febrary 2001 to July 2003. The climatic parameters and soil temperatures at different depths under each of these materials have been evaluated. Measuring the laceration, tensile strength and the radiometric properties every 15 days tested the performance of the materials. Soil samples were analysed in order to verify the reduction of infesting load soilborne pathogens. EVA and multilayer films produced higher soil temperatures, longer duration, and better phytopathological results were obtained in comparison to the biodegradable film. The reached thermal levels in the soil and the mortality of the pathogenic are enough comparable for the three material used. Therefore, the use of biodegradable films, if their radiometric and mechanical properties are improved, should be increased due to their high level of environmental compatibility. INTRODUCTION Plastic films are widely used in agriculture to increase growth of the crops as well as for covering greenhouses, small and large tunnels, mulching and soil solarization. The disinfection of agricultural soil is necessary in order to reduce the level of microorganisms present that can damage crops both from a quality and quantity point of view. In fact, Italy ranks second worldwide for the use of methyl bromide, which will be illegal from December 2004 (O.J. of E.U., 2000), as a fumigant in the disinfection of agricultural soil (Minuto and Gullino, 1999). As a procedure for the partial disinfection, soil solarization can be utilized in combination with other methods in order to reduce energy costs and environmental impact while reaching the required results (Lazzeri and Mancini, 2001; Picuno and Scarascia, 1993). Soil solarization is a physical method for partial disinfection of soil that consists in covering agricultural soil, which has been watered until saturated, with sheets of transparent or photoselective plastic film in the summer. The plastic film, increases superficial soil temperatures and decreases heat loss by convection, irradiation and evaporation (Scarascia et al., 1992). Soil solarization was introduced in the 1970’s (Katan, 1983) and in temperate areas is utilised in the warmer months with the highest solar radiation in order to reach the efficient thermal threshold that can vary from 38 to 43.5 °C (Stapleton et al., 1993; Bollen, 1985; Pullman et al., 1981). It has been observed that when superficial soil temperatures reach 40°C for a few hours, pathogen agents are noticeable reduced but not eliminated while, when the temperature reaches at least 50°C for at least one hour, the result is lethal for most Proc. IC on Greensys Eds.: G. van Straten et al. Acta Hort. 691, ISHS 2005 718 pathogen micro organisms (De Vay et al. 1990; Katan, 1983). In addition, solarization does not leave toxic residues in the soil and saves on irrigation seeing as it impedes the normal evaporation of water (Stapleton et al., 1993). Solarization can be carried out with either transparent or photoselective plastic films (Candura et al., 1999; Failla et al., 1990) of either single or double layer (Scarascia and Picuno, 1992) which can be left on the ground even after the end of the hot season as a form of mulch (Cascone et al., 1999). Traditional plastic films are currently on the market and provide varying results depending on the type of use and amount of time left on the soil. These films however present problems regarding their gathering and disposal after use. The disposal of traditional plastics is governed by regulations which foresee disposal at dumpsites or by incineration but unfortunately these materials are often abandoned or illegally burned on the same soil where they were utilized bringing about serious negative consequences for both man and the environment (Scarascia and Picuno, 1992). If you take into account that the use of plastic films is seasonal, with usage ranging from 1 to 3 years, it can be estimated that the total amount of agricultural plastics waste amounts to approximately 100000 t/year (Scarascia, 1995). In order to control the disposal of these materials in Italy, consortia that gather and recycle agricultural plastics have been created but they are unfortunately not present in all regions. A possible solution is the substitution of traditional materials with biodegradable plastics that would reduce the environmental damage should the physical and mechanical characteristics allow for it (Briassoulis, 2004b) but not at zero cost. In fact biodegradable plastics currently cost three times as much as traditional plastics and the current disposal costs are substituted by composting costs (Ren, 2002). Current trends towards the use of environmentally friendly products have contributed to the commercial development of plastic materials based on renewable agricultural resources marketed as biodegradable. Examples are plastics based on starch, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) and polylactides (PLA), cellulose derivatives, lignin, polyesters from vegetable oils such as poly (glutamic acid), etc. In addition to these agricultural resources, synthetic polymers are also used for biodegradable products including polyamides, polyurethanes, aromatic anhydrides, poly (vinyl alcohol) and poly (epsilon-caprolactone). Even though R&D and sales are in continuous development, the degradable films currently utilised in agriculture can be divided into three categories: starch-based polymers, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) polymers, and polylactides (PLA) (Briassoulis, 2004a). The goal of this research was to test and compare three types of plastic films for agricultural soil solarization: traditional EVA film, Polydac-photoselective film and Mater-Bi, a starch-based film not yet available commercially. EXPERIMENTAL TEST The research had the scope of providing a comparison of the thermal and biological effects of the above three film types and evaluate their mechanical and radiometric properties as well as variations over time. From February 2001 through July 2003, experiments were carried out near Foggia (Borgo Cervaro) on a total area of 5000 m (Fig. 1), that was divided into two areas of approximately 2500 m each. In February 2002, on one of the two areas 10 Kg of rape seeds (Brassica napus f. oleifera) were sown, while the other area was bare soil without sowing seeds. In May 2002 while the rape was in bloom, it was cut and plowed-down (Gamliel and Stapleton, 1997). Both areas were then treated with the same standard agricultural practices in order to refine and homogenize their structure. At the same time an experimental station was set up in order to gather climatic data such as air temperature with ventilated PT100 sensor, wind speed and direction, solar radiation with a Piranometer MS-402 (0,3-3 mm). In June 2002 after having placed the temperature probes in the soil, the areas were irrigated until they reached their water capacity and the films were then placed. The duration of the solarization has been of 25 days. Four experimental parcels of 5m x 40m (200m) were set up in each area in order to gather phyto-pathological data and statistics regarding the wear and aging of the films. Soil temperature was measured with PT100 sensors at depths of 2, 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm in the film covered parcels as well as in the uncovered parcel