Search

Supplementary table 3. Multivariate model for Overall Survival (Cytotoxic Agents)

Supplementary Figure 1. Study flowchart

Supplementary table 1. Main characteristics of patients receiving different dose levels

Introduction: Because a dose–response relationship is characteristic of conventional chemotherapy, this concept is widely used for the development of novel cytotoxic (CTX) drugs. However, the need to reach the MTD to obtain optimal benefit with molecularly targeted agents (MTA) is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between dose and efficacy in a large cohort of phase I patients with solid tumors.Experimental Design: We collected data on 1,182 consecutive patients treated in phase I trials in 14 European institutions in 2005–2007. Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated within completed single-agent studies in which a maximum-administered dose was defined and (ii) RECIST/survival data available.Results: Seventy-two percent of patients were included in trials with MTA (N = 854) and 28% in trials with CTX (N = 328). The objective response (OR) rate was 3% and disease control at 6 months was 11%. OR for CTX was associated with higher doses (median 92% of MTD); this was not the case for MTA, where patients achieving OR received a median of 50% of MTD. For trials with MTA, patients treated at intermediate doses (40%–80%) had better survival compared with those receiving low or high doses (P = 0.038). On the contrary, there was a direct association between higher dose and better OS for CTX agents (P = 0.003).Conclusion: Although these results support the development of novel CTX based on MTD, we found no direct relationship between higher doses and response with MTA in unselected patients. However, the longest OS was seen in patients treated with MTA at intermediate doses (40%–80% of MTD). Clin Cancer Res; 20(22); 5663–71. ©2014 AACR.

Supplementary table 2. Multivariate model for overall survival (Molecularly Targeted Agents).

Background Standard-of-care treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM), consisting of surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ), has improved outcomes compared with RT alone; however, prognosis remains poor. Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with high-grade gliomas. Methods In this phase Ib, dose-escalation study (NCT04324840), we investigated trotabresib 15, 30, and 45 mg combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and trotabresib 15 and 30 mg combined with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting in patients with ndGBM. Primary endpoints were to determine safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. Secondary endpoints were assessment of preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamics were investigated as an exploratory endpoint. Results The adjuvant and concomitant cohorts enrolled 18 and 14 patients, respectively. Trotabresib in combination with TMZ or TMZ+RT was well tolerated; most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. Trotabresib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both settings were consistent with previous data for trotabresib monotherapy. The RP2D of trotabresib was selected as 30 mg 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At last follow-up, 5 (28%) and 6 (43%) patients remain on treatment in the adjuvant and concomitant settings, respectively, with 1 patient in the adjuvant cohort achieving complete response. Conclusions Trotabresib combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting was safe and well tolerated in patients with ndGBM, with encouraging treatment durations. Trotabresib 30 mg was established as the RP2D in both settings.

Background T-DXd is a novel antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-HER2 antibody, cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and membrane-permeable topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. In a phase 2 study in patients (pts) with HER2+ (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+), unresectable or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), the confirmed ORR (cORR) with T-DXd was 60.9% and median PFS (mPFS) was 16.4 mo (Modi NEJM 2020). In pts with HER2-low (IHC 2+/ISH−, IHC 1+) advanced BC, cORR was 37.0% and mPFS 11.1 mo in a phase 1 study (Modi J Clin Oncol 2020). Recently, T-DXd was approved for the treatment of adult pts with HER2+, unresectable or MBC who have received ≥ 2 prior anti-HER2-based regimens (US) or had prior chemotherapy and are refractory to or intolerant of standard treatments (Japan). In preclinical models, T-DXd combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody had greater efficacy than either agent alone (Iwata Mol Cancer Ther 2018). We conducted a phase 1b, open-label, multicenter, 2-part study of T-DXd in combination with nivolumab (Nivo) in pts with HER2-expressing (by centrally testing) MBC or advanced urothelial cancer (DS8201-A-U105; NCT03523572); interim results for the BC cohorts are presented. Methods Pts were aged ≥18 y and immune checkpoint inhibitor naive. Pts were enrolled in the United States and Europe. In part 1 (dose escalation), pts received T-DXd 3.2 or 5.4 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (q3w) and Nivo 360 mg IV q3w to determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). In part 2, the RDE was given to 2 MBC cohorts: HER2+ (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH+) disease that progressed on prior T-DM1 or HER2 low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH−) disease that progressed on prior standard treatments. The primary efficacy endpoint is cORR by independent central review (ICR) per RECIST version 1.1 in part 2. Additional endpoints include duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), PFS, OS, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results 52 pts with MBC were enrolled. In part 1, 4 pts received T-DXd 3.2 mg/kg (HER2+, n=3; HER2 low, n=1), 3 pts received 5.4 mg/kg (all HER2+). In part 2, 45 pts received the RDE of T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg and Nivo 360 mg (HER2+, n=29; HER2 low, n=16 [13 HR+]); median follow-up time was 7.0 and 6.9 mo, respectively. All pts (n=48) who received RDE were female; median duration of follow-up was 6.9 mo. HER2+ pts had a median age of 55 y and median of 5 prior lines of metastatic/locally advanced therapy. At data cutoff (June 8, 2020), 56.3% of pts remained on treatment (median treatment duration: T-DXd, 6.5 mo; Nivo, 5.2 mo). HER2 low pts had a median age of 47 y, median of 4 prior lines, and 50.0% remained on treatment (median: T-DXd, 6.3 mo; Nivo, 4.9 mo). In pts treated at RDE, the cORR by ICR in the HER2+ cohort was 59.4% (19/32, 18 PR) and for the HER2 low cohort was 37.5% (6/16, all PR). The DCR was 90.6% and 75.0% in the HER2+ and HER2-low cohorts, respectively. Median DOR was not reached in either cohort; median PFS was 8.6 mo (95% CI, 5.4-NE) for the HER2+ cohort and 6.3 mo (95% CI, 2.3-NE) for the HER2 low cohort. Adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 occurred in 43.8% (18.8% related to T-DXd, 18.8% to Nivo) of pts treated at RDE (n=48); anemia (16.7%) and transaminase increase (6.3%) were most common. Nausea (54.2%), fatigue (45.8%), and alopecia (41.7%) were the most common any-grade AEs. 5 pts (10.4%, all HER2+) had treatment-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) as adjudicated by an independent committee (grade 5, n=1; grade 2, n=4). No other deaths associated with a drug-related AE occurred. Conclusions In pts with HER2-expressing MBC, T-DXd plus Nivo demonstrated antitumor activity consistent with prior studies of T-DXd and had an acceptable safety profile in this interim analysis; whether adding IO therapy to T-DXd benefits pts requires longer follow-up and additional studies. Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Charles L Shapiro, Daniel Petrylak, Valentina Boni, Miguel Martin, Gianluca Del Conte, Javier Cortes, Laila Agarwal, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Antoinette R. Tan, Philip Debruyne, Anna Minchom, Annemie Rutten, Frances Valdes-Albini, Evan Y Yu, Bincy Augustine, Anthony D'Amelio, Jr., Daniel Barrios, Sara A. Hurvitz. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) with nivolumab in patients with HER2-expressing, advanced breast cancer: A 2-part, phase 1b, multicenter, open-label study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-07.

Background: MEN1611 (MEN) is an oral PI3K inhibitor active on the p110α mutant and wild type, β and γ isoforms, while sparing the δ. B-PRECISE-01 is an open-label, 2-arm, phase 1b study investigating MEN1611 in combination with trastuzumab ± fulvestrant in patients with HER2 positive/PIK3CA mutated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the dose-escalation step and MEN1611 48 mg BID was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for cohort expansion (CE). Methods: Eligible patients had HER2+/PIK3CA-mutated MBC and were treated with at least 2 prior lines of anti-HER2-based therapy in the advanced/metastatic setting including trastuzumab. Patients received MEN1611 + trastuzumab (MEN+T); hormone receptor positive (HR+) postmenopausal women received M+ T + fulvestrant (MEN+T+F). Recruitment was closed in December 2021. Pooled safety and efficacy data from the two subpopulations of CE are presented herein. Results: As of June 2022, 62 female patients were treated: 56 of them with MEN1611 48 mg BID (25 MEN+T and 31 MEN+T+F). Median age 55.5 years (range 34-78), 21% premenopausal, ECOG PS 0-1: 95.2%. Median metastatic regimens 4; 71.0% had prior pertuzumab and 91.9% had prior T-DM1. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥20%) were diarrhea 66.1%, nausea 45.2%, hyperglycemia 43.6%, anemia 35.5%, asthenia 29.0%, decreased appetite 27.4%, rash 25.8%, aspartate aminotransferase increased 22.6%, vomiting 22.6%, and pyrexia 22.6%. Common TEAEs with CTCAE grade ≥3 (≥10%) were hyperglycemia (22.6%) and diarrhea (11.3%). Most treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reversible and manageable by supportive care. TEAEs leading to permanent treatment discontinuation occurred in 9 patients (14.5%), the only TEAE occurring in more than one patient was lipase increased (3.2%). TEAEs caused temporary treatment interruptions in 32 patients (51.6%), the most common being hyperglycemia (21.0%) and diarrhea (9.7%). TEAEs leading to dose reduction occurred in 14 patients (22.6%), the most common being diarrhea (6.5%), hyperglycemia (3.2%) and stomatitis (3.2%). Serious TRAEs were experienced by 12 patients (19.4%): hyperglycemia 6 patients, diarrhea 3 patients, anemia, general physical health deterioration, generalized edema, lipase increased, ketoacidosis and pneumonitis (1 patient each). In the efficacy-evaluable population at the RP2D (n=41) 14 patients (34.1%) showed partial response (MEN+T 5/15, MEN+T+F 9/26), 1 patient (2.4%) had a complete response (MEN+T 1/15) and 23 patients (56.1%) had stable disease (MEN+T 6/15, MEN+T+F 17/26) as best response. At the RP2D, the median (95% CI) overall survival (OS) was 21.9 (11.9, NE) months and the median (95% CI) progression free survival (PFS) 5.6 (3.7, 7.2) months. In the MEN+T group, the median OS was 11.9 (5.7, NE) months and median PFS 3.9 (2.3, 6.7) months. In the MEN+T+F group the median OS was 21.9 (16.9, NE) months and median PFS 5.7 (3.7, 11.5) months. Five patients continue on treatment. Conclusions: Updated results from B-PRECISE-01 demonstrated that MEN1611 combined with trastuzumab ± fulvestrant continued to show a manageable safety profile with encouraging anti-tumor activity and duration of response in heavily pre-treated patients with HER2+/PIK3CA-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Citation Format: Martine Piccart, Audrey Hennequin, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Santiago Escrivá-de-Romani, Anja Williams, Begoña Jiménez Rodríguez, Gianluca Del Conte, Sacha J. Howell, Michela Palleschi, Matteo Simonelli, Francois P. Duhoux, Diego Tosi, Bernard Doger de Speville Uribe, Yolanda Jerez Gilarranz, Pierfrancesco Tassone, Giuseppe Curigliano, Simon Waters, Philippe Aftimos, Hans Wildiers, Simona Scartoni, Bartomeu Piza Vallespir, Ram Charan Shankaraiah, Krzysztof Grzegorzewski, Nassir Habboubi. MEN1611, a PI3K inhibitor, combined with trastuzumab ± fulvestrant for HER2+/PIK3CA mutant advanced or metastatic breast cancer: updated safety and efficacy results from the ongoing phase 1b study (B-PRECISE-01) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD18-05.

46 Background: Bone is frequently involved in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DW-MRI) is a promising imaging technique for the assessment of bone response in prostate cancer. It is not known whether the addition of antiresorptive agents can improve disease response in bone in mHSPC patients undergoing next generation hormonal agents. Methods: In this multicenter phase II study patients with de novo or relapsed mHSPC and bone metastases at bone scan were randomly allocated with a 1:1 ratio to receive either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus Enzalutamide (E arm) or the same combination with the addition of Zoledronic Acid (EZ arm). The study was designed to observe a significant increase in bone response rate in the experimental arm after 12 months of treatment, as assessed through WB-DW-MRI. WB-DW-MRI was performed centrally at baseline and after 6 and 12 months and images were evaluated by the same radiologist. Results: From February 2018 to June 2021, 126 mHSPC patients were randomized, 64 in EZ arm and 62 in E arm. A total of 111 patients, 54 from E arm and 57 from EZ arm, were eligible for WB-DW-MRI assessment (15 patients were excluded because of the absence of bone target lesions at MRI or specific contraindications to MRI). Bone response at 6 months was observed in 41 patients (76%) in E arm and 41 patients (72%) in EZ arm; the corresponding bone response at 12 months were 44 (82%) and 44 (77%), respectively (OR 0.77; 95%IC 0.30-1.93; p = 0.6). Complete response was the best overall bone response after 12 months in 9 patients (17%) from E arm and in 11 patients (19%) from EZ arm. In the same period, treatment was interrupted due to disease progression in 7 (13%) and 7 (12%) patients in E and EZ arm, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of Zoledronic Acid to Enzalutamide and ADT did not improve bone disease response in patients with mHSPC. WB-DW-MRI was able to detect bone responses in a great proportion of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03336983 .

Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal protein inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity and blood–brain barrier penetration in patients with high-grade gliomas, and enhanced the antiproliferative effects of temozolomide in preclinical models. CC-90010-GBM-002 (NCT04324840) is a phase 1b/2 study investigating the addition of trotabresib to standard-of-care (SOC) concomitant temozolomide plus radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, followed by maintenance trotabresib, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The design of the dose escalation (part A) has been described previously (Vieito M, et al. SNO 2021. Abstract CTNI-51). Primary objectives of part A were to establish the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. In part A, addition of trotabresib to SOC was safe and well tolerated in the concomitant (N = 14) and adjuvant (N = 18) cohorts; the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (7/14 and 9/18 patients, respectively). The RP2D for trotabresib was 30 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At data cutoff (February 20, 2022), median duration of treatment was 34 weeks (concomitant cohort) and 33 weeks (adjuvant cohort); progression-free survival data are not yet mature. Trotabresib plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were consistent with monotherapy. At last follow-up, 6 and 5 patients remained on treatment in the concomitant and adjuvant dose-escalation cohorts, respectively, including 1 patient in cycle 20 with ongoing complete response. The ongoing randomized phase 2 dose expansion (part B; planned N = 162) is comparing concomitant trotabresib at the RP2D + SOC followed by adjuvant trotabresib at the RP2D + SOC, followed by maintenance trotabresib 45 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off, versus SOC alone in patients with newly diagnosed IDH–wild-type glioblastoma. Key objectives are to compare progression-free and overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Longer follow-up from part A and the first disclosure of data from part B will be presented.

438 Background: HER2 overexpression has been found in invasive UC, suggesting a role for HER2 in disease progression and prognosis (Kruger Int J Oncol 2002). T-DXd is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising an anti-HER2 antibody, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. Preclinical models showed that T-DXd combined with an anti-PD-1 antibody had greater efficacy versus either agent alone (Iwata Mol Cancer Ther 2018). We conducted a phase 1b, 2-part, open-label, multicenter study of T-DXd in combination with nivo in pts with HER2-expressing advanced/metastatic UC (NCT03523572). Methods: Pts aged ≥18 y had pathologically documented advanced/metastatic UC with centrally confirmed HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+/3+ (cohort 3; high expression) or IHC 1+ (cohort 4; low expression) who received prior platinum-based therapy with documented progression. Pts received T-DXd at 5.4 mg/kg and nivo 360 mg IV every 3 weeks (recommended dose for expansion). The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent central review (ICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary endpoints (assessed by ICR) included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At the primary analysis data cutoff (July 22, 2021), 34 pts (cohort 3, n = 30; cohort 4, n = 4) received T-DXd and nivo. Median age was 70.9 y (range, 41.4-80.5), 88.2% were male, 61.8% received ≥1 prior regimens for locally advanced/metastatic disease, and 26.5% had a history of liver metastases. Median treatment duration (all pts) was 3.2 mo (range, 1-21) for T-DXd and 4.1 mo (range, 1-20) for nivo. In cohort 3, ORR by ICR was 36.7% (95% CI, 19.9-56.1; complete response, 13.3%; partial response, 23.3%), median DOR was 13.1 mo (95% CI, 4.1- NE), median PFS was 6.9 mo (95% CI, 2.7-14.4), median TTR was 1.9 mo (range 1.2-6.9), and median OS was 11.0 mo (95% CI, 7.2-NE). Grade (G) ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 73.5% of all pts (44.1% related to T-DXd; 26.5% related to nivo). TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 32.4% of all pts (17.6% related to T-DXd; 23.5% related to nivo). The most common any-grade TEAEs were nausea (73.5%), fatigue (52.9%), and vomiting (44.1%). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis occurred in 23.5% of all pts (2 G1; 4 G2; 1 G3; 1 G5). Conclusions: T-DXd combined with nivo showed antitumor activity in pts with high-expressing HER2 UC. The safety profile was consistent with prior studies for T-DXd in other indications and nivo monotherapy in UC pts. Adjudicated ILD/pneumonitis was within the range observed in other T-DXd monotherapy studies. Ongoing clinical trials are further exploring T-DXd in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03523572.

2524 Background: The phase I GATTO study explored the feasibility, tolerability and preliminary activity of combining gatipotuzumab (GAT), a novel humanized monoclonal antibody binding to the tumor-associated epitope of mucin-1 (TA-MUC1) and an anti-EGFR antibody. Preclinical evidence suggests a complex interaction between TA-MUC1 and EGFR on the cell surface of epithelial tumors driving carcinogenesis processes and synergistic antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity activity with the dual targeting. Methods: Initially the study enrolled in a primary phase (PP) 20 patients with EGFR positive metastatic solid tumors, for whom no standard treatment was available. The first 6 patients were enrolled into a safety run-in phase and the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) was evaluated, in order to de-escalate the doses if needed. Patients received GAT administered at 1400 mg Q2W in combination with the glyco-optimized anti-EGFR antibody tomuzotuximab (TOM) at 1200 mg Q2W. Due to the risk of infusion related reactions (IRR), the first dose of TOM was reduced to 720 mg split over 2 consecutive days and three cycles of TOM monotherapy were given before start of treatment with GAT. As this regimen was proven safe, no DLT was observed and the initial dose remained unchanged, the study was amended to enroll in an expansion phase (EP) 30 additional patients with refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck and breast cancers. TOM and GAT were given at the same doses and GAT treatment started already one week after the first dose of the anti-EGFR antibody. Additionally investigator had the choice to use a commercial anti-EGFR antibody in place of TOM. Results: By the time of the final analysis in January 2021, 52 refractory patients were enrolled and 50 received at least one dose of both GAT and anti-EGFR antibodies. Panitumumab (PAN) was used in 9 CRC patients. Because of the difference in treatment schedule, results are summarized separately for the 20 and 30 patients in PP and EP. Overall, the combined treatment was well tolerated and no DLT was observed in the whole study, nor related SAE or death. There were no treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to dose interruptions or reductions in the PP and 2/30 (6.7%) patients in EP stopped both TOM and GAT. 16 IRRs were reported in 8/20 (40%) PP patients, and 40 IRRs in 10 (33.3%) EP patients. Only one event of chills was severe and only 6 events were related to GAT in the EP, all others to TOM. Other frequent TEAEs were those commonly observed with anti-EGFR treatment such as skin toxicity in 17 (85%) PP and 26 (86.7%) EP patients and hypomagnesemia in 10 (50%) PP and 7 (23.3%) EP patients. Conclusions: Combination of TA-MUC1 and EGFR targeting antibody is safe and feasible. Future studies should test this combination together with chemotherapy Clinical trial information: NCT03360734.

2522 Background: The phase I GATTO study explored the feasibility, tolerability and preliminary activity of combining Gatipotuzumab (GAT), a novel humanized monoclonal antibody binding to the tumor-associated epitope of mucin-1 (TA-MUC1), and an anti-EGFR antibody. Preclinical evidence suggests a complex interaction between TA-MUC1 and EGFR on the cell surface of epithelial tumors and synergistic antibody dependent cell cytotoxicity activity with the double targeting. Methods: Initially 20 patients with refractory metastatic disease were treated with GAT administered at 1400 mg Q2W in combination with the glyco-optimized anti-EGFR antibody Tomuzotuximab (TOM) at 1200 mg Q2W. Due to the risk of infusion related reactions, three cycles of TOM were given before start of combined treatment with GAT. After this regimen was proven safe and no DLT was observed, 30 additional patients including colorectal cancer (CRC) already treated with anti-EGFR antibodies, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), head and neck and breast cancers received TOM and GAT administered at the same doses, with GAT treatment starting already one week after the first dose of the anti-EGFR antibody. As allowed in the study expansion, Panitumumab (PAN) was used in place of TOM in 9 CRC patients at investigator’s choice. Results: By the time of the final analysis in January 2021, 52 patients were enrolled, and 50 received at least one dose of both GAT and anti-EGFR antibodies. Safety was overall good and results are reported in a separate abstract. Because of the difference in treatment schedule, activity results of the two parts of the study are summarized separately. There were 2 and 4 RECIST partial responses in the first and second part of the study, all in CRC patients. In the expansion phase, the median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of CRC patients who received TOM (10) and PAN (9) was 1.9 and 5.5 months, respectively. There were 2 responses in each subgroup and the duration of response was 3.8 and 7.2 months in patients receiving TOM and PAN, respectively. The PFS for NSCLC was 5.3 months and 2 heavily pretreated patients achieved a prolonged control of disease of 10.6 and 9.4 months. The trial was accompanied by a comprehensive translational research program for identification of biomarkers, including soluble TA-MUC1 in serum. In the extension phase patients with baseline values above median appeared to have improved PFS and overall survival; this was not the case for patients of the first part of the study who received GAT only after 3 doses of TOM. Conclusions: Combination of TA-MUC1 and EGFR targeting antibody is safe and feasible. Interesting anti-tumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated CRC and NSCLC patients. Levels of soluble TA-MUC1 may have predictive value and potentially be a companion biomarker for further development of the combination Clinical trial information: NCT03360734.

Purpose We conducted a comprehensive review of the design, implementation, and outcome of first-in-human (FIH) trials of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to clearly determine early clinical development strategies for this class of compounds. Methods We performed a PubMed search using appropriate terms to identify reports of FIH trials of mAbs published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and April 2013. Results A total of 82 publications describing FIH trials were selected for analysis. Only 27 articles (33%) reported the criteria used for selecting the starting dose (SD). Dose escalation was performed using rule-based methods in 66 trials (80%). The median number of planned dose levels was five (range, two to 13). The median of the ratio between the highest planned dose and the SD was 27 (range, two to 3,333). Although in 56 studies (68%) at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity event was reported, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 47 trials (57%). The highest planned dose was reached in all trials, but the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined in only 13 studies (16%). The median of the ratio between MTD and SD was eight (range, four to 1,000). The recommended phase II dose was indicated in 34 studies (41%), but in 25 (73%) of these trials, this dose was chosen without considering toxicity as the main selection criterion. Conclusion This literature review highlights the broad design heterogeneity of FIH trials testing mAbs. Because of the limited observed toxicity, the MTD was infrequently reached, and therefore, the recommended phase II dose for subsequent clinical trials was only tentatively defined.

Introduction: Because a dose–response relationship is characteristic of conventional chemotherapy, this concept is widely used for the development of novel cytotoxic (CTX) drugs. However, the need to reach the MTD to obtain optimal benefit with molecularly targeted agents (MTA) is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between dose and efficacy in a large cohort of phase I patients with solid tumors. Experimental Design: We collected data on 1,182 consecutive patients treated in phase I trials in 14 European institutions in 2005–2007. Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated within completed single-agent studies in which a maximum-administered dose was defined and (ii) RECIST/survival data available. Results: Seventy-two percent of patients were included in trials with MTA (N = 854) and 28% in trials with CTX (N = 328). The objective response (OR) rate was 3% and disease control at 6 months was 11%. OR for CTX was associated with higher doses (median 92% of MTD); this was not the case for MTA, where patients achieving OR received a median of 50% of MTD. For trials with MTA, patients treated at intermediate doses (40%–80%) had better survival compared with those receiving low or high doses (P = 0.038). On the contrary, there was a direct association between higher dose and better OS for CTX agents (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Although these results support the development of novel CTX based on MTD, we found no direct relationship between higher doses and response with MTA in unselected patients. However, the longest OS was seen in patients treated with MTA at intermediate doses (40%–80% of MTD). Clin Cancer Res; 20(22); 5663–71. ©2014 AACR.

The aim of this phase I study was to identify a feasible dose and schedule for the combination of cisplatin and trabectedin. The regimen evaluated consisted of cisplatin at a fixed dose of 75 mg/m(2) 1-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by escalating doses of trabectedin 3-hour i.v. infusion, both administered on day 1 every 3 weeks (q3wks). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), grade 4 neutropenia longer than 7 days duration and grade 3 vomiting despite standard antiemetic therapy, occurred at the starting dose of trabectedin (0.75 mg/m(2)). The immediately lower dose (trabectedin 0.60 mg/m(2)) was evaluated in a total of 8 patients; no DLTs occurred and this was declared the recommended dose (RD). The safety profile of the combination at this dose and schedule was consistent with the known side effects of each agent alone: nausea, fatigue, transient transaminase elevations and neutropenia. No new or unexpected adverse reactions were observed. Two partial responses were reported at the RD in patients with pretreated ovarian cancer. Comparison with population pharmacokinetic data suggests a PK interaction between trabectedin and cisplatin leading to increased plasma exposure of trabectedin in the first 48 h, lower platinum clearance and longer half-life. In conclusion, although the trabectedin dose achieved with this combination was low (50 % of single-agent when given q3wks), this day 1 q3wks trabectedin plus cisplatin combination showed a feasible administration, a tolerable safety profile and some antitumor activity.

Background Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an established treatment for relapsed ovarian cancer. Preclinical and clinical evidences in other tumor types suggest that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib can act synergistically with PLD. Methods Patients with relapsed ovarian cancer (N = 58), previously treated with platinum (100%) and taxane (95%), received bortezomib, 1.3 mg/m2 intravenous (days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and PLD, 30 mg/m2 intravenous (day 1), every 3 weeks. Tumor responses were assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors and Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria. An optimal 2-stage design was implemented. Gene expression profiling in peripheral blood was characterized before and during treatment in 10 platinum-sensitive patients enrolled in stage 2 of the study. Results Median number of bortezomib-PLD cycles was 3.5. Of 38 patients in the platinum-sensitive group, 9 responses were observed (median duration, 4.8 months). The platinum-resistant group was closed at stage 1 owing to lack of response. Toxicity was moderate and mainly consisted of hematologic, gastrointestinal, and mucositis events. Of the total 58 patients, peripheral neuropathy was reported in 9 patients (none were grade 3). Transcription profiling identified the prevalence of genes associated with ribonucleoprotein complexes, RNA processing, and protein translation. The gene expression changes were more robust in patients who responded or had stable disease compared with patients who had progressive disease. Conclusions The combination of bortezomib and PLD was well tolerated, but the antitumor activity is insufficient to warrant further investigation in ovarian cancer.

Purpose The appropriate selection of patients for early clinical trials presents a major challenge. Previous analyses focusing on this problem were limited by small size and by interpractice heterogeneity. This study aims to define prognostic factors to guide risk-benefit assessments by using a large patient database from multiple phase I trials. Patients and Methods Data were collected from 2,182 eligible patients treated in phase I trials between 2005 and 2007 in 14 European institutions. We derived and validated independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results The 90-day mortality was 16.5% with a drug-related death rate of 0.4%. Trial discontinuation within 3 weeks occurred in 14% of patients primarily because of disease progression. Eight different prognostic variables for 90-day mortality were validated: performance status (PS), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, number of metastatic sites, clinical tumor growth rate, lymphocytes, and WBC. Two different models of prognostic scores for 90-day mortality were generated by using these factors, including or excluding PS; both achieved specificities of more than 85% and sensitivities of approximately 50% when using a score cutoff of 5 or higher. These models were not superior to the previously published Royal Marsden Hospital score in their ability to predict 90-day mortality. Conclusion Patient selection using any of these prognostic scores will reduce non–drug-related 90-day mortality among patients enrolled in phase I trials by 50%. However, this can be achieved only by an overall reduction in recruitment to phase I studies of 20%, more than half of whom would in fact have survived beyond 90 days.

TPS2596Background: TO (CetuGEX) is a second-generation anti-EGFR antibody that specifically binds to EGFR and acts as a competitive antagonist at the ligand binding site. GAT (PankoMab-GEX) is a no...

Purpose Preclinical evidence supports synergy between the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin and various chemotherapy agents. Ombrabulin was combined with two standard taxane/platinum doublets in a phase I study to determine the recommended combination doses. Methods Ombrabulin (30-min infusion, day 1 every 3 weeks) was escalated from 15.5 to 35 mg/m2 with two chemotherapy doublets; OCD, 75 mg/m2 cisplatin (C), day 1 (cohort 1) or day 2 (cohort 2) with 60/75 mg/m2 docetaxel (D), day 2; and OCP, AUC5/6 carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) 175 mg/m2 (cohort 3) or 200 mg/m2 (cohort 4), day 2. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response were evaluated. Results Sixty-nine patients were treated (32 OCD, 37 OCP). Four had DLTs in cycle 1, two in cohort 1 (grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 4 pulmonary embolism) and one each in cohorts 2 (grade 3 ALT elevation) and 4 (grade 3 peripheral ischemia). Ombrabulin escalation in cohorts 2, 3 and 4 was halted at the highest planned dose (35 mg/m2). Asthenia, nausea, paresthesia, alopecia, vomiting, and stomatitis were common, as was grade 3–4 neutropenia. Ombrabulin clearance was high with a short terminal half-life and a medium volume of distribution. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no clinically relevant drug interactions between the taxane-platinum doublet and ombrabulin or its active metabolite RPR258063, however docetaxel and carboplatin pharmacokinetics were slightly altered. One complete and 15 partial responses (10 OCD, 5 OCP; median duration 5.5 and 4.4 months, respectively) were reported. Conclusions The addition of ombrabulin to standard doses of cisplatin/docetaxel or carboplatin/paclitaxel proved feasible with manageable overlapping toxicities but appears to have limited impact on the efficacy of these doublets. Recommended combination doses are 35 mg/m2 ombrabulin with 75 mg/m2 cisplatin/75 mg/m2 docetaxel or 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel/AUC6 carboplatin, every 3 weeks.

First-line platinum and taxane chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), however, about 80% of patients relapse and long-term survival is poor. The development of drug resistance is the main cause of treatment failure; therefore, the identification of new compounds that interfere with tumor growth and survival is a priority.

We examined if a combination of proliferation markers and estrogen receptor (ER) activity could predict early versus late relapses in ER-positive breast cancer and inform the choice and length of adjuvant endocrine therapy., JOURNAL ARTICLE, SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

e16031Background: To assess the clinical impact of VFL in pts with mTCCU and verify the prognostic factors in a large, unselected population treated according to routine clinical practice (CP). Met...

Since 2004, four antiangiogenic drugs have been approved for clinical use in patients with advanced solid cancers, on the basis of their capacity to improve survival in phase III clinical studies. These achievements validated the concept introduced by Judah Folkman that the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis could control tumor growth. It has been suggested that biomarkers of angiogenesis would greatly facilitate the clinical development of antiangiogenic therapies. For these four drugs, the pharmacodynamic effects observed in early clinical studies were important to corroborate activities, but were not essential for the continuation of clinical development and approval. Furthermore, no validated biomarkers of angiogenesis or antiangiogenesis are available for routine clinical use. Thus, the quest for biomarkers of angiogenesis and their successful use in the development of antiangiogenic therapies are challenges in clinical oncology and translational cancer research. We review critical points resulting from the successful clinical trials, review current biomarkers, and discuss their potential impact on improving the clinical use of available antiangiogenic drugs and the development of new ones.

2535 Background: O, a vascular-disrupting agent derived from combretastatin A4-phosphate, induces rapid tumor vascular shutdown via endothelial cell damage. Resistance to O may occur by surges in circulating endothelial progenitors (CEP) that repopulate the tumor vasculature. Experimental models suggest prolonged and synergistic antitumor activity when O is combined with VEGF-blockade, with reduction in CEP surge. This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary antitumor activity of O combined with B. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors, ECOG PS ≤1, and adequate organ function were eligible. O (mg/m²) was administered intravenously (IV) on day (d)1 with B (mg/kg) IV on d2 in 21d cycles (C). A Bayesian model informed dose escalation steps. PK sampling, dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for tumor perfusion, and CEP samples were collected. Results: 39 pts (M:F 10:29; median age 51 years [range 25-75]) were treated at 12 dose levels combining O [8 to 50mg/m2] with B [5, 10, or 15mg/kg]. Ovary (16/39, 41%) and colon (4/39, 10%) were the most common primary sites. No C1 dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 37 evaluable pts. Drug-related grade 3-4 treatment emergent adverse events (AE) were hypertension (6/39, 15%), intestinal perforation (2/39, 5%), headache (1/39, 3%), myocardial infarction (1/39, 3%), and pulmonary embolism (1/39, 3%). 36 pts (14 ovarian) were evaluable for response by RECIST 1.1. Antitumor activity was observed at O 20mg/m2+ B 10mg/kg and above, with confirmed partial responses in 2/14 pts with ovarian primary (14%), CA125 responses in 2 further ovary/endometrial cancers lasting ≥ 6 months, and stable disease in 15/36 pts (42%) lasting ≥ 6 months in 3 pts. PK indicated no interactions of O+B. Analyses of CEP levels post O and paired DCE-US data are ongoing. Conclusions: The maximum administered dose (MAD) was O 50mg/m2 with B 15mg/kg, with no dose-limiting toxicities and vascular toxicity that was manageable. Promising antitumor activity was observed at doses below the MAD and warrants further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT01193595.

3080 Background: O is a vascular-disrupting agent derived from combretastatin A4-phosphate that induces rapid but transient tumor vascular shutdown. In experimental models, the combination of O with VEGF-blockade induced more regressions than O alone. This phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and assess the overall safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary antitumor activity of O plus B. Trial is funded by sanofi. Methods: Patients (pt) with advanced solid tumors, ECOG PS ≤1, and adequate organ function were eligible. Increasing doses of O (mg/m²) was administered intravenously (IV) on day (d) 1; B (5 or 10mg/kg) was administered IV on d2, in 21d cycles (C). A Bayesian design was applied to determine dose escalation steps and MTD. PK sampling was performed in C1 and C2. PD sampling for circulating endothelial cells (CEC) and progenitors (CEP) were performed throughout. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) to assess tumor perfusion was performed before and after C1 and C2 dosing. Results: 25 pts (M:F 6:19; median age 49 years [range 27-75]) have been treated at 8 dose levels of O/B: 8/5 (3), 11.5/5 (4), 11.5/10 (3), 15.5/10 (3), 20/10 (3), 25/10 (3); 35/10 (3) and 42/10 (3). Ovarian cancer was the most frequent tumor type (n=11). Median Cs received was 3 (1 to 14). No DLTs were observed during C1. Drug-related grade (g) 3-4 adverse events (AE) included hypertension in 2 pts (8/5; 11.5/5) and ileal perforation in 1 pt with peritoneal carcinomatosis at laparotomy (11.5/10). A case of duodenal perforation was unlikely related (25/10). Two pts with ovarian cancer (11.5/5; 20/10) had confirmed partial responses (4.4 months (mo) and 7+ mo). 13/23 (57%) pts with ≥ 1 tumor assessment had stable disease (n=8; median 4.3 mo [1.8-9.5]; 5 ongoing). Data from cohorts 1 and 2 demonstrated no evidence of a PK interaction.17/25 patients demonstrated a peak in CEC, and 7/9 patients a peak in CEP. 4/7 DCE-US evaluable pts had >50% drop in tumor perfusion (AUC) at Day 8 of C1. Conclusions: O combined with B is well tolerated with early evidence of clinical activity. The MTD has not been reached (current dose level 50/10); cohorts of O combined with B at 15 mg/kg will be tested.

B-cell malignancies represent a potential target for anti-cancer vaccination programs due to the expression of tumor-specific antigens. Although immunization with tumor-derived idiotype protein is a frequently used procedure, vaccination with DCs loaded with killed tumor cells may activate response to a much wider range of antigens, without requiring prior molecular identification of such determinants. Furthermore, such DC-based vaccines could be available to all patients, irrespective of the HLA type. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of this approach, 18 patients with measurable relapse/refractory follicular (FCL; n= 12) and lymphoplasmocytoid (n= 6) lymphoma have been enrolled in a phase I study. Median prior number of treatment regimens was 2 (range 1–5) comprising 4 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous stem cell transplantation. The vaccination was started after at least 6-months from the last chemotherapy treatment. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 16/18 patients for efficacy with a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range 3–29 months). Each patient received 4 intradermal/subcutaneous injections at 2-weekly intervals of 50x10e6 tumor-loaded DCs. Immature DCs were generated by 5-days culture of autologous monocytes in the presence of IL-4 and GM-CSF. After selection by immunomagnetic technique, autologous CD19+ tumor cells, harvested from lymph nodes (n= 12) and/or peripheral blood (n= 6), were heat shocked and then irradiated by UVC. DCs were loaded for 48 hrs with killed tumor cells and then, to induce their maturation, were cultured for 12 hrs in the presence of TNF-alfa. Overall, vaccinations were well tolerated and no autoimmune reactions were observed. Mild erythema in the site of injection developed in the majority of patients (12/18), but only in 2 cases induration and extended erythema was observed. Six of 16 (37.5%) evaluable patients had objective responses. Two patients had partial responses (PR). One is still in PR and the other had a PR lasting 7 months. Four patients had complete remission (CR). Two patients are still in CR and the other 2 patients had a mean CR duration of 14.5 months. The remaining 10 patients had stable disease (n=5) or progressive disease (n=5). The overall monitoring of immune responses is ongoing. However, in one patient in PR, we evaluated the frequency of anti autologous tumor-specific T cells, by ELISPOT assay for IFN-gamma, on pathologic lymph nodes harvested before and after 2 months from the last vaccination. A significant increase of specific T-cell frequency was observed in the post-vaccination lymph node, compared to the tissue sample taken before vaccination. Moreover, evaluation of CD8+ T cell maturation markers, by analysis for CCR7 and CD45RA expression, indicated a shift of tumor-infiltrating T cells towards memory and effector stages in the lymph-node isolated after vaccination. In conclusion, injection of DCs loaded with killed tumor cells is a well-tolerated procedure achieving clinical and immunological responses also in the presence of significant tumor burden. However, further strategies, following DC-vaccination, are needed to ensure durable immune and clinical responses.

8235 Background: Because of the progressive rise in the mean age of the first delivery and the progressive lowering in the age of onset of tumors, the continuous increas in the number of patients w...