Search

Objective:To evaluate whether incorporating mandatory prior authorization for Clostridioides difficile testing into antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow could reduce testing in patients with alternative etiologies for diarrhea.Design:Single center, quasi-experimental before-and-after study.Setting:Tertiary-care, academic medical center in Ann Arbor, Michigan.Patients:Adult and pediatric patients admitted between September 11, 2019 and December 10, 2019 were included if they had an order placed for 1 of the following: (1) C. difficile enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in patients hospitalized >72 hours and received laxatives, oral contrast, or initiated tube feeds within the prior 48 hours, (2) repeat molecular multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GIPAN) testing, or (3) GIPAN testing in patients hospitalized >72 hours.Intervention:A best-practice alert prompting prior authorization by the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) for EIA or GIPAN testing was implemented. Approval required the provider to page the ASP pharmacist and discuss rationale for testing. The provider could not proceed with the order if ASP approval was not obtained.Results:An average of 2.5 requests per day were received over the 3-month intervention period. The weekly rate of EIA and GIPAN orders per 1,000 patient days decreased significantly from 6.05 ± 0.94 to 4.87 ± 0.78 (IRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56–0.93; P = .010) and from 1.72 ± 0.37 to 0.89 ± 0.29 (IRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37–0.77; P = .001), respectively.Conclusions:We identified an efficient, effective C. difficile and GIPAN diagnostic stewardship approval model.

CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 are the predominant enzymes responsible for tacrolimus metabolism; however only a proportion of the population expresses CYP3A5 secondary to genetic variation. CYP3A5 is expressed in both the intestine and the liver and has been shown to impact both the bioavailability and metabolism of orally administered tacrolimus. Increasing the initial tacrolimus dose by 50% to 100% is recommended in patients who are known CYP3A5 expressers; however, whether this dose adjustment is appropriate for i.v. tacrolimus administration is unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CYP3A5 genotype as well as other pharmacogenes on i.v. tacrolimus exposure to determine whether the current genotype-guided dosing recommendations are appropriate for this formulation. In addition, this study aimed to investigate dose conversion requirements among CYP3A5 genotypes when converting from i.v. to p.o. tacrolimus. This study is a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation at Michigan Medicine between June 1, 2014, and March 1, 2018, who received i.v. tacrolimus at the time of their transplantation. Secondary use samples were obtained for genotyping CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1. Patient demographic information, tacrolimus dosing and trough levels, and concomitant medications received at the time of tacrolimus trough were collected retrospectively from the patients’ medical records. The i.v. dose-controlled concentration (C/D) and the i.v.:p.o. exposure ratio was calculated for all tacrolimus doses and patients, respectively. The impact of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 genotypes on the i.v. C/D were evaluated with linear mixed modeling. The impact of CYP3A5 genotype on the i.v.:p.o. ratio was evaluated while controlling for age and concomitant use of an azole inhibitor. CYP3A5 and CYP3A4 genotypes were significantly associated with the i.v. C/D, with CYP3A5 expressers and CYP3A4 rapid metabolizers having 20% lower tacrolimus exposure. Neither genotype remained significant in the multivariable model, although age, hematocrit, and concomitant use of strong azole inhibitors were associated with increased i.v. C/D. When controlling for patient age and sex, CYP3A5 expressers had significantly higher i.v.:p.o. ratios than CYP3A5 nonexpressers (3.42 versus 2.78; P = .04). Post hoc analysis showed that the i.v.:p.o. ratio may differ among different CYP3A5 genotypes and azole inhibitor combinations. This study demonstrates that the current genotype-guided tacrolimus dose adjustment recommendations are inappropriate for CYP3A5 expressers receiving i.v. tacrolimus. Although CYP3A5 genotype is likely a minor contributor to i.v. tacrolimus exposure, genotype, in addition to capturing concomitant CYP3A inhibitors, would likely improve i.v.:p.o. dose conversion selection. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Secondary AML is associated with a disproportionately poor prognosis, consistently shown to exhibit inferior response rates, event-free survival, and overall survival in comparison with de novo AML. Secondary AML may arise from the evolution of an antecedent hematologic disorder, or it may arise as a complication of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the case of therapy-related AML. Because of the high frequency of poor-risk cytogenetics and high-risk molecular features, such as alterations in TP53, leukemic clones are often inherently chemoresistant. Standard of care induction had long remained conventional 7 + 3 until its reformulation as CPX-351, recently FDA approved specifically for secondary AML. However, recent data also suggests relatively favorable outcomes with regimens based on high-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents. With several investigational agents being studied, the therapeutic landscape becomes even more complex, and the treatment approach involves patient-specific, disease-specific, and therapy-specific considerations.

Background Current literature has demonstrated the utility of the MRSA nasal screen as a de-escalation tool to decrease unnecessary anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy. However, data on the applicability of this test in patients with hematologic malignancy is lacking. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with or without history of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), with pneumonia and MRSA nasal screening with respiratory cultures obtained. The primary outcome was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA nasal screen for MRSA pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of the MRSA nasal screen and prevalence of MRSA pneumonia. Results Of 98 patients with AML and pneumonia, the prevalence of MRSA pneumonia was 4.1% with confirmed positive MRSA respiratory cultures observed in 4 patient cases. In patients with confirmed MRSA pneumonia, 3 had positive MRSA nasal screens while 1 had a false negative result, possibly due to a long lag time (21 days) between MRSA nasal screen and pneumonia diagnosis. Overall, the MRSA nasal screen demonstrated 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 98.9%. Conclusions Given the low prevalence, empiric use of anti-MRSA therapy in those AML and HCT patients with pneumonia may not be warranted in clinically stable patients. For patients in whom empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics are initiated, nasal screening for MRSA may be utilized to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in patients with AML with or without HCT.

The 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients ≥ 60 years old with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains

Background: SARS-CoV-2 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and profound dysregulation of the thrombotic/fibrinolytic pathway, with thrombotic complications common in affected patients (pts). Fibrin deposition may be a key feature of the pathobiology, with markedly elevated levels of PAI-1 reported. Defibrotide (DF), a polyanionic naturally-derived polydeoxyribonucelotide with endothelial stabilizing activity, has fibrinolytic, antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory properties, with known activity in reducing PAI-1 levels and inhibiting heparanase. We now report a prospective, open label, safety and tolerability trial of defibrotide for the management of patients with advanced SARS-CoV-2 related ARDS. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were ≥18 years in age, with clinical and radiographic signs of ARDS, no signs of active bleeding, a serum D-Dimer > 2X ULN, and a positive PCR-based assay for SARS-CoV-2. Concomitant use of systemic anticoagulants or fibrinolytics was initially precluded, with the study amended to allow prophylactic doses of systemic heparin in its latter stages. Defibrotide (6.25 mg/kg/dose IV q. 6 hours) was administered for a planned 7-day course, with day 1 defined as the first day of study therapy. Therapy was able to be discontinued prior to day 7 in pts who met the pulmonary response parameter at that earlier timepoint. Patients with a partial response to therapy (> 20% reduction in FiO2) by day 7 were allowed to receive an additional 7 days of therapy (14 days total). Response was defined as complete cessation of supplemental O2 support, or ≥ 2 point reduction in WHO ordinal score for 48 consecutive hours by day 7. Patients were recruited from a single center between October 2020 and March 2021. Results: Twelve pts (median 63 years, range 35-73 years) were treated, with 10 of 12 pts on mechanical ventilation (median FiO2 55%, PEEP 18 mmHg), and six on vasopressor support at the time of study entry. Baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratios ranged from 82 - 200 mmHg. The median D-Dimer was 3.25 mcg/ml (range 1.33-12.3 mcg/ml), and fibrinogen 637 mg/dl (range 250-1208 mg/dl) at study entry. Dexamethasone and remdesivir had been administered prior to DF in all pts, with no other SARS-CoV-2 targeted treatment given during DF therapy. Eleven pts received ≤7 days of therapy, with one pt receiving 14 days. The first 9 pts received DF without other concomitant anticoagulants, with the last 3 pts concurrently receiving prophylactic heparin plus DF. No hemorrhagic or bleeding complications occurred during DF therapy, including the 3 pts receiving concurrent heparin prophylaxis. Likewise, no thrombotic complications developed during study therapy, including the 9 patients in which DF was their sole anti-coagulant. All 12 patients were evaluable for response. Four pts met the day 7 pulmonary response parameter, with 2 pts having a complete cessation of O2 support within this period. Three pts died from progressive pulmonary disease, at 11, 17 and 34 days from study entry. The 3 pts (who died) had the lowest baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratios (82-115 mmHg) of all study subjects. Nine pts (75%) remain alive, 64 to 174 days from study entry, all 9 discharged from their primary hospitalization. Day 30 all-cause mortality was 17% (95%CI: 0-35%). Serial coagulation and fibrinolytic assays were available in 7 patients. Total PAI-1 levels decreased from a median 167 ng/ml (range 105-264 ng/ml) to a median 104 ng/ml (range 55-166 ng/ml) by day 4 of therapy, with all 7 subjects showing a decline in PAI-1 levels at that time point. Total tPA levels increased from a median 3.02 ng/ml (range 0.72 - 36.1 ng/ml) at baseline to 4.5 ng/ml (range 1.1-8.2 ng/ml) by day 4 in study subjects. Allowing for the small sample size, baseline PAI-1, tPA or D-Dimer levels did not impact response. One of two patients with a baseline D-Dimer > 10 mcg/ml responded, while both patients with a baseline D-Dimer Conclusion: The use of DF for the management of SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS proved safe and tolerable in a prospective, open label trial. No hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications were reported during therapy. Outcomes were promising, including an overall survival of 75% in a patient population with a historically high mortality rate. (The study was supported by a research grant from Jazz Pharmaceuticals) Disclosures Yanik: Jazz Pharmaceutical: Research Funding. Pipe: Sangamo Therapeutics: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; ASC Therapeutics: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Apcintex: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Biomarin: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Freeline: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; HEMA Biologics: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy; uniQure: Consultancy. Sisson: Translatebio: Other: Data Safety Committee member. Richardson: Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Regeneron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lawrence: MDI Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Defibrotide: Off label use for ARDS

Objectives The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults with malignancy is 7%-14% compared with 1%-2% in the general hospitalized population. Despite the increased incidence of CDI in this population, a major concern is the propensity of CDI to recur, leading to delays in therapy impacting outcomes. We conducted a retrospective case-control study to identify risk factors for recurrent CDI (rCDI) and to determine the impact of rCDI on adult patients with a haematological malignancy. Methods Adult haematology patients with CDI from June 2010 to December 2014 were divided into two groups: rCDI and non-rCDI. Multivariable models using logistic regression were constructed to identify risk factors for rCDI. Results A total of 100 patients in our study yielded a 41% recurrence rate. CDI impacted chemotherapy significantly more in the rCDI group (53.7% versus 11.9%, P

Background Although chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) is a promising novel therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies, data on infectious complications associated with this therapy are limited. Therefore, further assessment of infections after CAR-T therapy is warranted. Methods We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed infectious complications for 6 months following CAR-T therapy infusion (CTI) in 39 adult and pediatric patients with R/R acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) at Michigan Medicine. Results Overall, 20 infections were identified in 16 of 39 patients (41%) following CTI [detailed in Table 1]; 8 (40%) infections occurred in the early period (Day 0–30) and 12 (60%) infections occurred during late period (Day 31–180). The most common infections were viral (n=10, 50%; 80% of viral infections were respiratory viruses), followed by 8 bacterial infections (40%), and 2 fungal infections (10%). More bacterial infections were seen in the early period post-CTI (30% vs. 10%, p = 0.019), whereas viral infections were more common during the late period (40% vs. 10%, p = 0.68). Antimicrobial prophylaxis prior to CTI and following CTI were similar (Table 2). The majority of patients included in the study had NHL (n=32, 82%). Mean age of the cohort was 52 ± 22 years, and 64% were male. 85% of the population developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with 67% grade 1–2 and 18% grade 3–5. As shown in Table 2, most baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without infections post CTI except infected patients were older (63.3 ± 11.3 vs. 44.8 ± 24.2, p = 0.01) and more received steroids for CRS (56% vs 17%, p = 0.02). All-cause mortality within 6 months following CTI was similar in infected and uninfected groups (38% vs 26%, p= 0.50). Table 1 Table 2 Conclusion Infectious complications are common following CAR-T therapy. We found the majority of infections to be caused by various bacteria or respiratory viruses in a cohort of patients with lymphoma as the most common underlying malignancy. Disclosures Marisa H. Miceli, MD, FIDSA, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Purpose: The shift from infusion to oral oncolytic therapy presents challenges to oncology practitioners. The purpose of this study was to describe how a statewide quality-improvement collaborative can enhance quality of care for patients receiving oral oncolytic therapy. Methods: The Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium hosted a series of learning sessions focused on oral oncolytic quality improvement, providing multiple resources to oncology community practices. The first five participating practices reported which of the evidence-based Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium resources provided were implemented at their site. They also performed prepost self-assessments in October 2013 and April 2015 and another in December 2017 to assess sustainability. Concordance with the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative oral chemotherapy standards, including documentation (five measures), patient education (seven measures), and follow-up/monitoring (four measures), was compared. Results: All practices showed improvement between 2013 and 2015 in documentation (32% to 88%; P = .03), patient education (37% to 100%; P could not be calculated), and monitoring (40% to 80%; P > .2). Overall, a significant improvement in concordance was observed (36% to 91%; P = .03). Use of resources from each practice varied, and practices that used more resources showed greater improvements. There was a slight decrease in overall concordance between 2015 and 2017, which was not found to be significant (91% to 84%; P = .53). Conclusion: Use of tools from a quality-improvement collaborative improved concordance with national standards of care. Large-scale deployment of this model program may provide a clinically efficient and effective mechanism to enhance widespread change.

Patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) have poor outcomes, with CR/CRi rates of 25-35% with standard 7 + 3 induction chemotherapy, while single center non-comparative analyses suggest promising outcomes with FLAG. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes in treatment-naïve patients with sAML treated with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG, n = 40) compared with 7 + 3 (n = 66). Median patient age was 63 years (range: 27-82) in the FLAG group and 60 years (range: 21-76) in the 7 + 3 group (P = 0.968). Patients treated with FLAG achieved higher overall response rates (CR + CRi + MLFS) compared to 7 + 3 (70% vs. 48%, P = 0.043). FLAG was well tolerated, with only one induction death (30-day mortality rate, 3% vs. 8%, P = 0.405) and no cases of cerebellar toxicity. Duration of neutropenia was significantly shorter with FLAG (median 16 vs. 23 days, P 0.001). Half of the FLAG-treated patients proceeded to consolidative therapy compared with only 27% of those who received 7 + 3 (P = 0.022). Overall survival was comparable between groups (8.5 mos, FLAG vs. 9.1 mos, 7 + 3; P = 0.798). Thus, FLAG may represent a low-cost treatment strategy in sAML that produces higher response rates and promising survival outcomes with minimal treatment-related toxicity. Further studies are required to prospectively compare FLAG to the newly FDA-approved CPX-351 in sAML.

The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation has become perhaps the most popular practical approach for estimating renal function among health care professionals. Despite its widespread use, clinicians often overlook not only the limitations of the original serum creatinine (SCr) based equation, but also may not appreciate the validity of the many variations used to compensate for these limitations. For cirrhotic patients in particular, the underlying pathophysiology of the disease contributes to a falsely low SCr, thereby overestimating renal function with use of the CG equation in this population. We reviewed the original CG trial from 1976 along with data surrounding clinician specific alterations to the CG equation that followed through time. These alterations included different formulas for body weight in obese patients and the “rounding up” approach in patients with low SCr. Additionally, we described the pathophysiology and hemodynamic changes that occur in cirrhosis; and reviewed several studies that attempted to estimate renal function in this population. The evidence we reviewed regarding the most accurate manipulation of the original CG equation to estimate creatinine clearance (CrCl) was inconclusive. Unfortunately, the homogeneity of the patient population in the original CG trial limited its external validity. Elimination of body weight in the CG equation actually produced the estimate closest to the measure CrCl. Furthermore, “rounding up” of SCr values often underestimated CrCl. This approach could lead to suboptimal dosing of drug therapies in patients with low SCr. In cirrhotic patients, utilization of SCr based methods overestimated true renal function by about 50% in the literature we reviewed.