Search

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the gold standard after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because local and systemic ischemic complications can occur particularly in the early phase (i.e. 1-3 months) after ACS or PCI, the synergistic platelet inhibition of aspirin and a P2Y

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a serious and complex condition, for which optimal management continues to evolve rapidly. An understanding of current clinical practice guidelines is critical to effective patient care and shared decision-making. This state of the art review of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Guidelines and 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines compares their recommendations for AS based on the evidence to date. The European and American guidelines were generally congruent with the exception of three key distinctions. First, the European guidelines recommend intervening at a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55%, compared with 60% over serial imaging by the American guidelines for asymptomatic patients. Second, the European guidelines recommend a threshold of ≥65 years for surgical bioprosthesis, whereas the American guidelines employ multiple age categories, providing latitude for patient factors and preferences. Third, the guidelines endorse different age cut-offs for transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement, despite limited evidence. This review also discusses trends indicating a decreasing proportion of mechanical valve replacements. Finally, the review identifies gaps in the literature for areas including transcatheter aortic valve implantation in asymptomatic patients, the appropriateness of Ross procedures, concomitant coronary revascularization with aortic valve replacement, and bicuspid AS. To summarize, this state of the art review compares the latest European and American guidelines on the management of AS to highlight three areas of divergence: timing of intervention, valve selection, and surgical vs. transcatheter aortic valve replacement criteria.

Preserving coronary artery access is a crucial goal during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures, especially in case of self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SE-THV) implantation. In this light, a proper commissural alignment is needed to avoid the risk of coronary obstruction and to permit easy vessels re-cannulation for diagnostic and interventional purposes. New-generation SE-THVs have been furnished of different markers, able to guide operators to perform a correct commissural alignment. In this case series, we describe key procedural aspects of commissural alignment for the different available SE-THVs, providing a step-by-step tutorial for each device. Lastly, we illustrate a commissural alignment in a contrast-zero TAVR.

Aims The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on care and outcomes across non-COVID-19 cardiovascular (CV) diseases is unknown. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to quantify the effect and investigate for variation by CV disease, geographic region, country income classification and the time course of the pandemic. Methods and results From January 2019 to December 2021, Medline and Embase databases were searched for observational studies comparing a pandemic and pre-pandemic period with relation to CV disease hospitalisations, diagnostic and interventional procedures, outpatient consultations, and mortality. Observational data were synthesised by incidence rate ratios (IRR) and risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021265930). A total of 158 studies, covering 49 countries and 6 continents, were used for quantitative synthesis. Most studies (80%) reported information for high-income countries (HICs). Across all CV disease and geographies there were fewer hospitalisations, diagnostic and interventional procedures, and outpatient consultations during the pandemic. By meta-regression, in low-middle income countries (LMICs) compared to HICs the decline in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) hospitalisations (RR 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.94) and revascularisation (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.87) was more severe. In LMICs, but not HICs, in-hospital mortality increased for STEMI (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10–1.37) and heart failure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04–1.12). The magnitude of decline in hospitalisations for CV diseases did not differ between the first and second wave. Conclusions There was substantial global collateral CV damage during the COVID-19 pandemic with disparity in severity by country income classification.

Aims Guidelines recommend the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel for the reduction of ischaemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, this comes at the expense of increased bleeding. A guided selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy has the potential to overcome this limitation. We aimed at evaluating the comparative safety and efficacy of guided vs. routine selection of potent P2Y12 inhibiting therapy in patients with ACS. Methods and results We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different oral P2Y12 inhibitors currently recommended for the treatment of patients with ACS (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). RCTs including a guided approach (i.e. platelet function or genetic testing) vs. standard selection of P2Y12 inhibitors among patients with ACS were also included. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. P-scores were used to estimate hierarchies of efficacy and safety. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary safety endpoint was all bleeding. A total of 61 898 patients from 15 RCTs were included. Clopidogrel was used as reference treatment. A guided approach was the only strategy associated with reduced MACE (IRR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65–0.98) without any significant trade-off in all bleeding (IRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.96–1.55). A guided approach and prasugrel were associated with reduced myocardial infarction. A guided approach, prasugrel, and ticagrelor were associated with reduced stent thrombosis. Ticagrelor was also associated with reduced total and cardiovascular mortality. Prasugrel was associated with increased major bleeding. Prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with increased minor bleeding. The incidence of stroke did not differ between treatments. Conclusion In patients with an ACS, compared with routine selection of potent P2Y12 inhibiting therapy (prasugrel or ticagrelor), a guided selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy is associated with the most favourable balance between safety and efficacy. These findings support a broader adoption of guided approach for the selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy in patients with ACS. Study registration number This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021258603). Key Question A guided selection of P2Y12 inhibiting therapy using platelet function or genetic testing improves outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Nevertheless, the comparative safety and efficacy of a guided versus routine selection of potent P2Y12-inhibiting therapy in acute coronary syndrome has not been explored. Key Finding In a comprehensive network meta-analysis including the totality of available evidence and using clopidogrel as treatment reference, a guided approach was the only strategy associated with reduced major adverse cardiovascular events without any significant trade-off in bleeding. Prasugrel and ticagrelor increased bleeding and only ticagrelor reduced mortality. Take Home Message A guided selection of P2Y12-inhibiting therapy represents the strategy associated with the most favourable balance between safety and efficacy. These findings support a broader adoption of guided P2Y12 inhibiting therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) were individually proven to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, but the relative magnitude of benefits from these two drug classes is debated. We aimed to review current available data on GLP1-RA and SGLT2i in T2DM patients and compare their efficacy and safety in this population.We systematically searched MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Embase, www.tctmd.com, www.clinicaltrials.gov, www.clinicaltrialresults.org, from inception to September 17, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of GLP1-RA vs SGLT2i vs optimal medical therapy (OMT) in adult T2DM patients. Three authors independently screened references and extracted data using a predefined data collection form. Outcomes were analyzed using an indirect comparison meta-analysis of aggregate study-level data. The primary combined efficacy outcome comprised cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke. Secondary efficacy outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, heart failure hospitalizations (HFH), and worsening renal function (WRF).11 RCTs enrolling a total of 98572 patients were included; 56004 (57%) patients were derived from GLP1-RA RCTs and 42568 (43%) from SGLT2i RCTs. At a median follow-up of 3.0±1.3 years, compared with OMT, both GLP1-RA and SGLT2i similarly reduced the rate of the composite primary outcome (risk ratio [RR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.83-0.93 and RR 0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.95, respectively) with no difference between the drug classes (RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.92-1.10). Both classes similarly reduced MI rate, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality compared with OMT; stroke reduction was only observed with GLP1-RA with no difference in the indirect comparison with SGLT2i; conversely, only SGLT2i were effective in preventing HFH. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2i were protective against WRF, with a major efficacy of SGLT2i in the indirect comparison.This meta-analysis report that GLP1-RA and SGLT2i reduced with a similar efficacy not only MACE as MI, but also cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality at a median 3 years follow-up. SGLT2i were more protective in HFH and WRF than GLP1RA. These new data highlight the efficacy of SGLT2i not only in HF and chronic kidney disease (CKD) but also in ischemic heart diseases (IHD), with a homogeneity among the class, whereas the results observed with GLP1-RA are heterogenous. These findings will help clinical's decisions to optimize therapeutic strategies for diabetic patients.

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is the most common acute aortic syndrome. It is a life-threatening condition and surgical emergency associated with high mortality if not treated promptly. While it is well established that cardiovascular disease recognises different pathophysiological pathways between men and women, there is limited evidence of sex differences in AAS, especially in type A AAD. According to a recent synthesis of clinical studies on gender differences in type A AAD, women were found to have different baseline characteristics, presentation and outcomes, and thus sex should be considered relevant for diagnosis, risk-stratification and management of type A AAD.

BACKGROUND The radial artery is recommended by international guidelines as the default vascular access in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) managed invasively. However, crossover from radial to femoral access is required in 4-10% of cases and has been associated with worse outcomes. No standardised algorithm exists to predict the risk of radial crossover. AIMS We sought to derive and externally validate a risk score to predict radial crossover in patients with ACS managed invasively. METHODS The derivation cohort consisted of 4,197 patients with ACS undergoing invasive management via the randomly allocated radial access from the MATRIX trial. Using logistic regression, we selected predictors of radial crossover and developed a numerical risk score. External validation was accomplished among 3,451 and 491 ACS patients managed invasively and randomised to radial access from the RIVAL and RIFLE-STEACS trials, respectively. RESULTS The MATRIX score (age, height, smoking, renal failure, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, Killip class, radial expertise) showed a c-index for radial crossover of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.75) in the derivation cohort. Discrimination ability was modest in the RIVAL (c-index: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.59-0.67) and RIFLE-STEACS (c-index: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.57-0.75) cohorts. A cut-off of ≥41 points was selected to identify patients at high risk of radial crossover. CONCLUSIONS The MATRIX score is a simple eight-item risk score which provides a standardised tool for the prediction of radial crossover among patients with ACS managed invasively. This tool can assist operators in anticipating and better addressing difficulties related to transradial procedures, potentially improving outcomes.

Recent trials demonstrated the clinical efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with heart failure (HF), regardless of the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes. These data may allow the use of this innovative drug class in clinical routine for treating these patients.We aimed at further clarifying the role of SGLT2i in patients with diagnosis of HF, capitalizing on pooled sample size and heightened power for clinically relevant safety and efficacy outcomes.We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, reference lists of relevant articles, and Medline database from inception until March 1, 2021.This meta-analysis was completed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched for randomized trials that evaluated the cardiovascular effects of SGLT2i in patients with HF. Three investigators independently assessed study eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed risk of bias. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled and meta-analyzed using a random-effect model. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) with the relative 95% CIs were also calculated. The primary outcome was a composite of HF hospitalization or an urgent visit for worsening HF and cardiovascular death.Three trials were included in the study. Overall, treatment with SGLT2i was associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome [hazard ratios 0.73, 95% CI (0.67-0.80), NNT = 11.3]. Similarly, there was a significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular death, all-cause death, HF hospitalization and need for urgent treatment for HF, and HF hospitalization.Therefore, the available evidence supports the routine use of these drugs as standard-of-care, also given the highly favorable NNTs.

Background: Oxidative stress and impaired autophagy are directly and indirectly implicated in exercise-mediated muscle injury. Trehalose, spermidine, nicotinamide, and polyphenols possess pro-autophagic and antioxidant properties, and could therefore reduce exercise-induced damage to skeletal muscle. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a mixture of these compounds was able to improve muscle injury biomarkers in endurance athletes through the modulation of oxidative stress and autophagic machinery. Methods and Results: sNOX2-dp; H2O2 production; H2O2 breakdown activity (HBA); ATG5 and p62 levels, both markers of autophagic process; and muscle injury biomarkers were evaluated in five endurance athletes who were allocated in a crossover design study to daily administration of 10.5 g of an experimental mixture or no treatment, with evaluations conducted at baseline and after 30 days of mixture consumption. Compared to baseline, the mixture intake led to a remarkable reduction of oxidative stress and positively modulated autophagy. Finally, after the 30-day supplementation period, a significant decrease in muscle injury biomarkers was found. Conclusion: Supplementation with this mixture positively affected redox state and autophagy and improved muscle injury biomarkers in athletes, allowing for better muscle recovery. Moreover, it is speculated that this mixture could also benefit patients suffering from muscle injuries, such as cancer or cardiovascular patients, or elderly subjects.

Background: Cangrelor, the first intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12-I), has been approved on the basis of three large RCTs from the CHAMPION program which nevertheless have been criticized for the low bleeding risk of the enrolled patients, the large quote of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), and the use of Clopidogrel as control arm even in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to investigate, in the setting of ACS, the comparative performance of Cangrelor in terms of in-hospital ischemic and haemorrhagic outcomes compared with the current gold-standard of oral P2Y12-I. Methods: The study retrospectively enrolled 686 consecutive patients admitted to the Divisions of Cardiology of Policlinico of Bari and L. Bonomo Hospital of Andria for ACS and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The study population was divided according to the P2Y12-I treatment strategy in two groups: patients given an oral P2Y12-I and patients receiving Cangrelor in the CathLab followed by an oral P2Y12-I. Clinical endpoints included death, ischemic and bleeding events occurring during hospital stay. Results: Cangrelor treated patients presented higher clinical risk profile at presentation and faced higher death rate. However, after PS matching, in-hospital mortality resulted comparable between the groups and Cangrelor use was associated with reduced in-hospital definite stent thrombosis (p=0.03). Conclusions: Data from our real-world registry highlight that, in the setting of ACS, Cangrelor is prevalently used in patients with very challenging clinical presentations. The adjusted analysis provides for the first time promising data on stent thrombosis reduction associated with Cangrelor use.

Gender-specific data addressing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) in female patients are scarce and based on small sample size studies.We aimed to analyze gender-differences regarding in-hospital clinical outcomes after CTO-PCI.Data from 35,449 patients enrolled in the prospective European Registry of CTOs were analyzed. The primary outcome was the comparison of procedural success rate in the two cohorts (women vs. men), defined as a final residual stenosis less than 20%, with Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade flow = 3. In-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and procedural complications were deemed secondary outcomes.Women represented 15.2% of the entire study population. They were older and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes, and renal failure, with an overall lower J-CTO score. Women showed a higher procedural success rate (adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.115, confidence interval [CI]: 1.011-1.230, p = 0.030). Apart from previous myocardial infarction and surgical revascularization, no other significant gender differences were found among predictors of procedural success. Antegrade approach with true-to-true lumen techniques was more commonly used than retrograde approach in females. No gender differences were found regarding in-hospital MACCEs (0.9% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.766), although a higher rate of procedural complications was observed in women, such as coronary perforation (3.7% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001) and vascular complications (1.0% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001).Women are understudied in contemporary CTO-PCI practice. Female sex is associated with higher procedural success after CTO-PCI, yet no sex differences were found in terms of in-hospital MACCEs. Female sex was associated with a higher rate of procedural complications.

Background Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality, irrespective of sex. While several studies have focused on ACS at admission or long-after the acute event, limited if any research is available on sex-based comparison of patients discharged after ACS. We aimed at appraising the outlook of women discharged after ACS, exploiting a large multinational registry. Methods Details on women enrolled in the PRAISE multicenter registry, a large database spanning 23,702 patients included between 2003 and 2019, were systematically collected. We focused on patient and procedural features, medications at discharge, and 1-year outcomes. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding after discharge. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary endpoint. Results Characteristics of 17,804 men and 5,466 women discharged after ACS were collected. Several baseline differences were found, including risk factors and history of prior revascularization (all p Conclusions Women are treated less aggressively with apparently worst outcomes 2 years after discharge for ACS managed invasively. On the basis of these findings, we should change our approach and adopt a more aggressive management of women with ACS. Figure 1. Sex-based comparison of clinical outcomes 2 years after discharge for an invasively managed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (all p

Background The use of alternative smoking devices, such as heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC), is increasing on a global scale, and their impact on health is still uncertain. Objective To investigate the effects of circulating molecules in HNBC chronic smokers on the fibrotic specification and paracrine function of cardiac stromal cells (CSCs). Methods Resident CSCs were isolated from the atrial tissue of non-smokers patients with cardiovascular diseases, and exposed to the serum pools derived from 60 young healthy subjects, stratified in exclusive HNBC smokers, traditional combustion cigarette (TCC) smokers, or non-smokers (NS) as reference. Results CSCs treated with TCC serum versus NS displayed impaired 3D growth (NS 568±24 vs. TCC 442±27 spheroids/well, p≤0,01) and reduced migration after 6h (NS 0,62±0,04 vs. TCC 0,80±0,03 normalized scratch area versus t0, p≤0,01) and 10h (NS 0,49±0,03 vs. TCC 0,36±0,03 normalized scratch area versus t0, p≤0,05), as well as significantly increased expression (IL-6, IL-8) and/or release of pro-inflammatory (e.g CRP, PAI-1, CD40L, CXCL4) and pro-fibrotic cytokines (PDGFA, MMP1). CSCs cultured with HNBC serum showed significantly increased mRNA levels of pro-fibrotic genes (PDGFA, THY1, COL1A1, p Conclusion The circulating molecules in the serum of chronic HNBC smokers induce fibrotic specification in CSCs. They also reduce the beneficial paracrine effects of stromal cells on endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, albeit to a reduced extent for some features. These results point to a potential risk for atrial fibrosis development triggered by chronic HNBC use.

Background Characterization and management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain challenging, and it is unclear whether currently available clinical and procedural features can suffice to inform adequate decision making. Methods Details on patients discharged after an ACS were obtained by querying an extensive multicenter registry, detailing patient features as well as management details. Clinical outcomes included fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events at 1-year follow-up. After missing data imputation, two unsupervised machine learning approaches (k-means and Clustering Large Applications [CLARA]) were used to generate separate clusters with different features. Bivariate and multivariable-adjusted analyses were performed to compare different clusters for clinical outcomes. Findings: 23,270 patients discharged after ACS were included. Two clusters were identified by k-mean algorithm (k1 and k2), and two clusters by CLARA algorithm (C1 and C2). Differences in 2-years outcomes between k1 and k2 and between C1 and C2 were substantial. K2 cluster (N=21,988) in comparison with k1 cluster (N=1,282) had significantly higher occurrence of death (9.5% vs 3.8%, p Conclusions A machine-learning based clustering approach is effective at face value to inform on the prognosis of patients with ACS managed invasively. These findings can be leveraged to inform decision-making in this setting, but also highlight the potential role of cluster analysis in first-in-man, and preapproval studies of medical devices.

Background It is unclear which diagnostic strategy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) yields better outcomes. We aimed to compare the clinical accuracy and efficacy of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic strategies for the initial assessment of patients with suspected stable CAD. Methods On March 16, 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomised controlled trials comparing diagnostic strategies for CAD detection among patients with symptoms suggestive of stable CAD. Diagnostic modalities included coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), exercise electrocardiography, invasive coronary angiography (ICA), single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI), and stress echocardiography. Functional tests were grouped into a single node for the primary analyses, while being analysed as separate nodes for the secondary analyses. Frequentist random-effect network meta-analyses were conducted to summarise the evidence. GRADE frameworks were applied to rate the certainty of findings. The primary efficacy outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary accuracy outcome was the rate of unnecessary angiography. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022329635). Results Twenty trials (n=27753 participants) were included. Compared with direct-ICA referral, CCTA and functional testing provided no significant difference in the risk of MACE (incidence rate ratios [IRRs] 0·87 [95% CI 0·65-1·17] and 1·19 [95% CI 0·87-1·62], respectively; moderate certainty) and a large reduction in the rate of unnecessary angiography (odds ratios 0·04 [95% CI 0·02-0·09] and 0·08 [95% CI 0·03-0·18], respectively; high certainty). Among non-invasive diagnostic strategies, CCTA significantly reduced the risk of MACE compared with functional testing (IRR 0·73, 95% CI 0·57-0·95; high certainty). The worse prognostic performance of functional testing was mainly driven by the poor efficacy of exercise electrocardiography (high certainty) and stress echocardiography (moderate to low certainty), whose risk of MACE was significantly reduced by CCTA (IRRs 0·56 [95% CI 0·42-0·75] and 0·59 [95% CI 0·42-0·81], respectively), SPECT-MPI (IRRs 0·56 [95% CI 0·41-0·77] and 0·59 [95% CI 0·43-0·81], respectively), and direct-ICA referral (IRRs 0·64 [95% CI 0·45-0·91] and 0·67 [95% CI 0·48-0·92], respectively), while non-significantly reduced by CMR (IRRs 0·71 [95% CI 0·47-1·06] and 0·74 [95% CI 0·53-1·04], respectively). Conclusion In patients with suspected stable CAD, an initial assessment with non-invasive diagnostic strategies is safe and addresses the low diagnostic yield of direct-ICA referral. CCTA is among the most effective strategies in terms of both clinical accuracy and efficacy. Among functional non-invasive tests, exercise electrocardiography and stress echocardiography may not be deemed effective diagnostic alternatives, while SPECT-MPI and CMR are valuable and feasible options, respectively.

Radial artery occlusion after transradial procedures is a frequent iatrogenic thrombotic process. The impact on prognosis has not been investigated. This study sought to investigate whether radial artery occlusion is related to increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary revascularization.Eight hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a transradial coronary procedure had patency of radial artery checked at 24 hours. Radial artery occlusion occurred in 41 over 837 patients (4.8%); 764 (91.2%) were available for planned follow-up at 1 year and were included in the analysis. Event-free survival rate between patients with and without radial artery occlusion was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors.At a median 370-day follow-up (IQR: 366-375 days), adverse events occurred in 37 patients (4.8%), 2 in patients with radial artery occlusion and 35 in patients without. One-year survival rate was 94.9% vs. 95% (unadjusted HR=1.026, 95% CI: 0.24 to 4.6, P=0.9). After multivariable modeling, age and coronary artery disease extension was associated with increased risk of adverse events.Age and coronary artery disease extension were independent predictors of adverse events at follow-up. RAO had no prognostic impact. (NCT02762344).

Conventional angioplasty balloon catheter, drug coated balloon (DCB), or angioplasty with drug eluting stent (DES) have been used on the percutaneous treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Currently available DCBs are paclitaxel eluting balloon (PEB), very recently, sirolimus eluting balloon (SEB). Although endovascular revascularization with balloon resulted in improvement of ED, there have been no prior reports on the feasibility of SEB treatment for ED.We present an observational, retrospective-prospective multicentre registry in patients evaluating the use of SEB for the treatment of de novo stenosis in native internal pudendal arteries. We will include 100 patients affected by vasculogenic ED non responder to PDE5i with up to two lesions requiring treatment. ED patients should present a IIEF-5 Score15, positive dynamic doppler (PSV25 cm/s) and/or evidence at basal CT angiography. At 30 days, 180, 240, and 365 days following the index procedure, IIEF-5 score will be assessed, and medication regimen and adverse event monitoring will be assessed. At 8 months a dynamic Doppler will be performed. Patients will be followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoints are the Delta IIEF-5 Score and a Delta PSV between basal and 8 months follow up. The secondary endpoint is the incidence of major adverse event (MAE), binary restenosis and late loss in patients who will repeat control angiography if clinically indicated.Considering the limitations and safety concerns of PEB, POBA and DES used so far in ED clinical investigations, we hypothesize that sirolimus nanocarriers-coated balloon can potentially be an improved next-generation treatment for ED patients.