Search

Introduction Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), due to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), comprises a broad spectrum of clinical presentation ranging from flu-like syndrome to organ failure. The risk of coinfections is high and responsible for a worse prognosis, mainly in the case of bacterial involvement and in the presence of particular comorbidity. We present the clinical, laboratory, radiologic characteristic along with therapeutic management of a patient with COVID-19 and Staphylococcus aureus coinfection. Case presentation A 55-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted to our hospital due to a two-day history of fever and acute dyspnea with severe respiratory failure worsened after the administration of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel. Her medical history comprehended a triple negative, BRCA1-related, PD-L1 positive right breast cancer with multiple bone metastasis, causing bone marrow infiltration-related severe pancytopenia. Her physical examination revealed scattered wheezes, rales, and bilateral dry crackles in the middle and lower lung fields and lower limb paresis. The body mass index was 30 kg/m2 and arterial blood gas evaluation revealed a stage III acute respiratory distress syndrome. Microbiological specimens revealed a Staphylococcus aureus positivity from endotracheal aspirate. The chest computed tomography (CT) scan showed the presence of large areas of parenchymal consolidation and aerial bronchogram, bilateral "ground glass" areas reaching the highest extension on the upper and middle zones. The high clinical and radiological suspicion of COVID-19 along with the negative result of nasopharyngeal specimen make necessary an endotracheal aspirate resulting positive for SARS-CoV2. Patient started an antimicrobial treatment and lopinavir-ritonavir plus hydroxychloroquine but, unfortunately, died five days after hospital admission. Conclusion The high risk of mortality of our patient was due to viral-bacterial coinfection, advanced cancer status with active immunotherapy. This case highlights the need for a prompt clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluation to allow a correct diagnosis and start a specific therapy.

Introduction: Thyroid ultrasound (US) is crucial for clinical decision in the management of thyroid nodules. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to test if the evaluation of thyroid nodules’ vascularization could improve the risk stratification ability of the American College of Radiology (ACR) TI-RADS classification system. Methods: A total of 873 thyroid nodules undergoing fine-needle aspiration were classified according to ACR TI-RADS US classification. Three types of vascularization were identified: type 0, no vascular signals; type 1, peripheral vascular signals; type 2, peripheral and intralesional vascular signals. Cytology specimens were evaluated conforming to the Italian Reporting System for Thyroid Cytology, and TIR3b, TIR4, and TIR5 were defined as high risk for malignancy. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUC) for high-risk cytology categories were calculated. Results: The 3 vascular patterns were differently distributed within the cytology categories: 52.4% of TIR1c, 15.9% of TIR2, 5.9% of TIR3a, 6.7% of TIR3b, 12.5% of TIR4, and 28.9% of TIR5 nodules had no vascular signals (p < 0.001). Nodule vascularity alone was not associated with a higher risk of malignant cytology (OR [95% CI] 0.75 [0.43–1.32], p = 0.32), without differences between peripheral (OR [95% CI] 0.65 [0.35–1.20]) and intranodular (OR [95% CI] 0.88 [0.48–1.62]) vascularization (p = 0.22). The ROC-AUC (95% CI) for the diagnosis of malignant cytology was similar when considering TI-RADS classification alone (0.736 [0.684–0.786]) and when considering TI-RADS classification plus the presence/absence of vascular signals (0.736 [0.683–0.789], p value for differences between the ROC-AUCs: 0.91). Among TR1, TR2, and TR3 TI-RADS classes, no nodules without vascular signals showed a malignant cytology, allowing the identification of nodules with benign cytology with 100% specificity within these US classes. Conclusions: Color Doppler study of thyroid nodules does not improve the risk stratification ability of the ACR TI-RADS US classification system.

ObjectiveThe prevalence of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) has increased over the last decade, reaching levels as high as 23% in certain patient populations. Active surveillance cultures (ASC) represent a valuable tool to identify patients colonized with MDRO to apply preventive measures, reduce transmission, and guide empiric antimicrobial therapy. There is a paucity of data evaluating the impact of admission ASCs to predict future infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between ASCs results and the development of clinical infection by the same microorganism identified in the surveillance swab (“swab-related infection”), in hospitalized septic patients, and to evaluate the presence of specific risk factors associated with the development of a swab-related infection.MethodsAll adults admitted to the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department of the University Hospital Campus Bio-Medico of Rome with a diagnosis of infection or any other medical reason with admission surveillance swabs (rectal or nasal) between January 2018 and February 2021 were included in the study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients that developed infections with concordant MDROs identified on ASC, and the risk factors for swab-related infection. Secondary outcomes were need of intensive care unit transfer, length of stay, sepsis or septic shock development, and all-cause mortality.ResultsA total of 528 patients were included in the study, of which 97 (18.3%) had a positive surveillance swab. Among patients with positive surveillance swabs, 18 (18.5%) developed an infection with the same microorganism recovered from the swab, 57 (58.8%) developed an infection with a different microorganism than that recovered from the surveillance swab, and 22 (22.7%) did not develop an infection during hospitalization. The number of colonized sites, an interventional procedure within the previous 3 months, a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score ≥ 2, and a quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (q-SOFA) score ≥ 2 were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing a swab-related infection. SIRS and q-SOFA scores ≥ 2 and procalcitonin ≥ 0.43 ng/ml help for identifying patients with a swab-related infection.ConclusionPatients with positive surveillance swabs were at increased risk for development of infections by the same MDRO identified in surveillance swabs (swab-related infection). This study is the first to show that the positivity of surveillance swabs, in combination with anamnestic data, PCT values, and SIRS or q-SOFA scores, serves as a valuable tool to help clinicians predict patients at higher risk for swab-related infection development and guide the administration of appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy in septic patients.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) ratios and to compare them with other biomarkers and clinical scores of sepsis outside the intensive care unit. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 251 patients with sepsis and 126 patients with infection other than sepsis were enrolled. NLR and PLR were calculated as the ratio between absolute values of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets by complete blood counts performed on whole blood by Sysmex XE-9000 (Dasit, Italy) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Results: The best NLR value in diagnosis of sepsis was 7.97 with sensibility, specificity, AUC, PPV, and NPV of 64.26%, 80.16%, 0.74 (p &lt, 0.001), 86.49%, and 53.18%, respectively. The diagnostic role of NLR significantly increases when PLR, C-reactive protein (PCR), procalcitonin (PCT), and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) values, as well as systemic inflammatory re-sponse syndrome (SIRS), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and quick-sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores, were added to the model. The best value of NLR in predicting 90-day mortality was 9.05 with sensibility, specificity, AUC, PPV, and NPV of 69.57%, 61.44%, 0.66 (p &lt, 0.0001), 28.9%, and 89.9%, respectively. Sensibility, specificity, AUC, PPV, and NPV of NLR increase if PLR, PCR, PCT, MR-proADM, SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA scores are added to NLR. Conclusions: NLR and PLR represent a widely useful and cheap tool in diagnosis and in predict-ing 90-day mortality in patients with sepsis.

Background Acute pericarditis may occur frequently after viral infections. To our knowledge, influenza B virus infection complicated by pericarditis without myocardial involvement has never been reported. We report the first case of life-threatening pericarditis caused by influenza B virus infection. Case presentation A 48-years-old woman with trisomy 21 and ostium primum atrial septal defect was transferred from Cardiology to our Internal Medicine Department for severe pericardial effusion unresponsive to ibuprofen and colchicine. Based on the recent patient history of flu-like syndrome, and presence of pleuro-pericardial effusion, a viral etiology was suspected. Laboratory evaluation and molecular assay of tracheal aspirate identified influenza B virus. Therefore, the ongoing metilprednisolone and colchicine therapy was implemented with oseltamivir with progressive patient improvement and no evidence of pericardial effusion recurrence during follow-up. Conclusions Especially in autumn and winter periods, clinicians should include Influenza B virus infection on differential diagnosis of pericarditis with large pericardial effusion.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is defined as an acute kidney failure following iodine-based contrast medium administration determining relevant health and socio-sanitary implications. Knowledge of pathophysiology, early diagnosis, and prevention in patients at risk are critical points in CI-AKI management. Determination of risk and functional kidney evaluation must precede every iodine-based contrast medium (CM) administration in order to eventually introduce medical prophylaxis. Furthermore, early laboratoristic evaluation after iodine-based CM exposure should be performed for a prompt identification of acute kidney injury. Therefore, clinicians must know and strictly follow valid recommendations to minimize the development of complications.

RATIONALE Marfan syndrome is a rare cause of heart failure due to primary or secondary cardiomyopathy. Recently, sacubitril/valsartan-an angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor-has been added in clinical practice as a standard therapy for heart failure. To our knowledge, there are no data on sacubitril/valsartan's effects on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Marfan syndrome. PATIENT CONCERNS A 24-year-old man was admitted to our Internal Medicine Department due to dyspnea, ascites, and leg swelling. Arterial blood gas analysis revealed severe hypoxemia with respiratory and metabolic alkalosis. Hilar congestion was highlighted on chest x-ray. DIAGNOSES Recurrent acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction despite optimal medical therapy in Marfan-related cardiomyopathy. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES Sacubitril/valsartan was added to optimal medical therapy after hemodynamic stabilization allowing progressive clinical, laboratoristic, and echocardiographic improvement. Patient maintained a free survival from heart failure and a good quality of life until 9-month follow-up. LESSONS Sacubitril/valsartan should be effective on pathophysiologic mechanisms and cardiovascular outcomes of Marfan syndrome-related cardiovascular complications.