Search

A relation algebra is measurable if the identity element is a sum of atoms, and the square x;1;x of each subidentity atom x is a sum of non-zero functional elements. These functional elements form a group Gx. We prove that a measurable relation algebra in which the groups Gx are all finite and cyclic is completely representable. A structural description of these algebras is also given., Comment: This is the fourth member of a series of papers on measurable relation algebras

A coset relation algebra is one embeddable into some full coset relation algebra, the latter is an algebra constructed from a system of groups, a coordinated system of isomorphisms between quotients of these groups, and a system of cosets that are used to "shift" the operation of relative multiplication. We prove that the class of coset relation algebras is equationally axiomatizable (that is to say, it is a variety), but no finite set of equations suffices to axiomatize the class (that is to say, the class is not finitely axiomatizable)., Comment: This is the fifth member of a series of papers on measurable relation algebras. Forthcoming in The Journal of Symbolic Logic. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1804.00279

Generalizing results of J\'onsson and Tarski, Maddux introduced the notion of a pair-dense relation algebra and proved that every pair-dense relation algebra is representable. The notion of a pair below the identity element is readily definable within the equational framework of relation algebras. The notion of a triple, a quadruple, or more generally, an element of size (or measure) n>2 is not definable within this framework, and therefore it seems at first glance that Maddux's theorem cannot be generalized. It turns out, however, that a very far-reaching generalization of Maddux's result is possible if one is willing to go outside of the equational framework of relation algebras, and work instead within the framework of the first-order theory. In the present paper, we define the notion of an atom below the identity element in a relation algebra having measure n for an arbitrary cardinal number n>0, and we define a relation algebra to be measurable if it's identity element is the sum of atoms each of which has some (finite or infinite) measure. The main purpose of the present paper is to construct a large class of new examples of group relation algebras using systems of groups and corresponding systems of quotient isomorphisms (instead of the classic example of using a single group and forming its complex algebra), and to prove that each of these algebras is an example of a measurable set relation algebra. In a subsequent paper, the class of examples will be greatly expanded by adding a third ingredient to the mix, namely systems of "shifting" cosets. The expanded class of examples---called coset relation algebras---will be large enough to prove a representation theorem saying that every atomic, measurable relation algebra is essentially isomorphic to a coset relation algebra., Comment: This is the first member of a series of papers on measurable relation algebras

We investigate a notion called uniqueness in power kappa that is akin to categoricity in power kappa, but is based on the cardinality of the generating sets of models instead of on the cardinality of their universes. The notion is quite useful for formulating categoricity-like questions regarding powers below the cardinality of a theory. We prove, for (uncountable) universal theories T, that if T is kappa-unique for one uncountable kappa, then it is kappa-unique for every uncountable kappa ; in particular, it is categorical in powers greater than the cardinality of T.