Search

96 Background: Radium-223 represents an option for symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after demonstrated an overall survival improvement in the ALSYMPCA trial. Radium-223 real-life experiences are scarce, particularly after the results of the ERA-223 trial. To describe Radium-223 outcomes in real life practice, and specifically those related with bone health, sequence of treatment, and prognostic factors. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of a cohort of 143 patients with mCRPC treated with Radium-223 in either the second line or third line of therapy or beyond in the context of routine clinical practice between 11 March 2013 and 26 July 2022, in seven Galician hospitals. Survival estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate factors independently associated with OS. Between March 11, 2013, and July 26, 2022, 143 patients were enrolled from 5 Galician hospitals. With a median follow-up of 9.68 months. All patients signed an informed consent form agreeing to participate in this observational study, that was approved by the Galician Ethics Committee, registration code 2018/282. Results: Baseline patient and disease characteristics are summarized. Median follow-up was 9.68 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (95% CI 9.7 – 16.0). Best OS outcomes were achieved in second and third line, 18 months (95% CI 12.0 – 26.0) and 9.4 months (95% CI 8.0 – 12.0) months, respectively. Among those baseline clinic-analytical factors analyzed, only alkaline phosphatase level >354 UI/L was correlated with a worse OS (HR 2.56 (95% CI 1.39 – 4.72; p=0.003) and the number of cycles of Radium-223 received (HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.54 – 0.73; p

371 Background: Inflammation plays a key role in the pathophysiology of many diseases, including cancer. Systemic inflammatory factors have been validated as indicators of ongoing systemic inflammation that could be predictive markers of poor prognosis for oncological outcomes. However, it is unknown the prognostic impact of systemic inflammation markers in patients with GEP-NETs treated with PRRT. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric study of 40 patients with GEP-NET treated with PRRT belonging to GGNET (Galician Research Group on Neuroendocrine Tumors) network at Nuclear Medicine Department of Santiago de Compostela University Hospital (Spain). The systemic inflammatory markers were calculated as follows: NLR = neutrophil count/lymphocyte count, PLR = platelet count/lymphocyte count, MLR= monocyte count/lymphocyte count, ALB= albumin levels and dNLR = neutrophil count/ (leucocytes count – neutrophils count). For the calculation of the different ratios, baseline analysis and after the second dose were used. The cut-off values were determined as the median of each values, correlating them with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Data from 40 patients (pts) treated between 2016 and 2020 were recorded. Median age was 63.5 years (range 41-85) and 55% were male. Baseline ECOG PS 0/1/2 was 15 (37.5%)/16 (40%)/9 (22.5%). Tumor location was intestinal 26 pts (65%), pancreas 11 pts (27.5%) and unknown origin 3 pts (7.5%). 15 pts (37.5%) were functioning. Tumor grade G1/G2/G3 were 17 pts (42.5%)/ 20 pts (50%)/ 3 pts (7.5%), and Ki 67 20%/unknown were 11 pts (27.5%)/ 21 pts (52.5%)/ 3 pts (7.5%)/ 5 pts (12.5%), respectively. The most frequent site of metastasis was liver 32 pts (80%), lymph nodes 19 pts (47.5%), peritoneum 11 pts (27.5%) and bone 10 pts (25%). Surgery: 22 pts (55%) primary tumor surgery and 8 pts (20%) metastasectomy. Previous systemic treatments included somatostatin analogs (SSA) 40 pts (100%), everolimus 26 pts (65%) and sunitnib 11 pts (27.5%), others 7 pts (17.5%). The baseline cutoff-values for NLR was 2.61, for PLR 110.14, for MLR 0.31, for ALB 4.2. and for dNLR 1.71. The cutoff-values after the 2nd dose for NLR was 2.3, for PLR 2.15, for MLR 0.3, for ALB 4.2 and for dNLR 1.48. With a median follow up of 21 months, 14 pts (35%) had died. Median PFS was 27.2 m (95% CI 16.0-38.4m) and OS was not reached (NR). Pts with baseline higher NLR (>2.61 vs. 1.71 vs.