Search

Background: A normal luteal function is an essential factor for maintaining pregnancy; luteal phase deficiency decreases embryo implantation and pregnancy rate and increases the early miscarriage rate. In stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) patients, luteal phase support (LPS) is achieved by the exogenous supplementation with progesterone to increase endometrial receptivity and pregnancy. While several protocols exist, no commonly accepted protocol has been established for optimal luteal support after IVF-ET to date, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two different luteal phase support protocols in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technologies. Methods: In a prospective open, randomized study conducted in a private IVF Unit a total of 700 infertile patients, undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment, were recruited for this study. All patients had a mild ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist. The patients were randomized into two groups based on the type of luteal phase support route: Group A, control group (n = 310) patients received our routine LPS protocol which consists of the administration of 800 mg of micronized vaginal progesterone and Group B, study group, (n = 310) patients received a combination of oral dydrogesterone 20 mg and 90 mg of a gel of vaginal micronized progesterone Pregnancy rate, live birth rate, implantation rate and miscarriage rate were evaluated as primary endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP software (version 17; SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of pregnancy rate (Group A 34,9% vs. Group B 35,7%), live birth rate (Group A 30,6% vs. Group B 29,2%), miscarriage rate (Group A 12% vs. Group B 18%) and implantation rate (Group A 18,6% vs. Group B 17,1%). Conclusions: The combination of two different formulations of progesterone (vaginal and oral) for luteal phase support does not improve IVF outcomes when compared to the vaginal route of progesterone administration alone. Trial registration: The study has been retrospectively registered with the Clinical Trials registry reference number ISRCTN52148405 (http://isrctn.org/). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Androgen deprivation therapy consists of the cornerstone of prostate cancer medical treatment. Until recently, castration of hypothalamus-hypophysis-gonadal axial was based on injectable medical agents. A few years ago, a novel per os administered GnRH antagonist was approved leading testosterone to castration level. Relugolix was approved by FDA in 2020, and it is the first per os administered GnRH antagonist. The present study is a literature review of the efficacy, safety and clinical perspectives of relugolix. Areas covered: A literature narrative review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane library. Studies written in English language, considering efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of relugolix compared with other androgen deprivation therapies were included in the review. Expert opinion: Recent studies have examined efficacy of relugolix revealing a testosterone suppression percentage of 78.4% after 48 weeks from treatment initiation. Moreover, relugolix has been associated with less major cardiovascular events as well as better rate of testosterone recovery after treatment completion compared with the GnRH agonists. However, there is no head-to-head trial comparing relugolix with injectable GnRH antagonists, so far. As a result, a trial comparing the methods of antagonists' administration should be performed in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to report three cases of early severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a), leading to hospitalization and the need for peritoneal drainage. Additionally, a review of the existing literature on this topic is provided. Design: This is a retrospective case series and a literature review. Setting: This study was conducted at obstetrics and gynecology department of tertiary academic referral hospitals, Israel. Participants: This study included three patients presented with severe OHSS symptoms, including abdominal distension, ascites, and hemoconcentration. Main outcome measures: The main focus of the treatment was to address the symptoms and prevent any further complications. The outcome was the complete recovery of the patients. Results: The presented cases detail instances of severe OHSS following oocyte retrieval, utilizing GnRH-a for triggering. Case 1 involved a 33-year-old patient with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), Case 2 featured a 22-year-old patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and Case 3 included a 41-year-old patient with a history of depressive disorder. All patients receiving supportive care, including infusions and medications, exhibited gradual improvement during hospitalization, with complete resolution observed during the 20-day post-hospitalization check-up. Conclusions: These three cases highlight the occurrence of severe early OHSS following a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH-a in the absence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration for trigger or luteal-phase support. Clinicians must be aware that a GnRH-a trigger followed by a freeze-all approach does not guarantee the complete elimination of OHSS in all patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: No study has compared cancer regression (d) and growth (g) rates in patients with advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy. The comparison of d and g rates provides insight into the differential impact of ADT regimens on tumor dynamics, potentially guiding more personalized treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to estimate these rates and evaluate their impact on survival outcomes. Methods: Sequential prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data was obtained from the KYUCOG-1401 trial including patients with advanced CSPC randomized to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (group A) and GnRH agonist plus bicalutamide (group B). d and g rates were estimated by applying mathematical models and were compared in subgroups. PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared by lower and higher than the median of these rates. Results: Patients with higher PSA and higher extent of disease score at enrollment presented higher d rates (0.03965 vs. 0.03546, p = 0.0006) and (0.03947 vs. 0.03587, p = 0.0113) for groups A and B, respectively. The median d rate was lower for group A than group B (0.03306 vs. 0.039965, respectively [p = 0.0002]). The median g rate was higher for group A than group B (0.00016 vs. 0.00002, respectively [p = 0.0014]). The g rate, but not the d rate discriminated PSA-PFS, rPFS, and OS. Conclusion: Our results suggest that GnRH agonist plus bicalutamide reduced PSA level faster and suppressed PSA rising longer than GnRH antagonist. Moreover, measuring the g rate can predict PSA-PFS, rPFS, and OS in patients with advanced CPSC treated with androgen deprivation therapy. These findings suggest that incorporating g rate measurements into clinical practice could improve prognostic accuracy and guide treatment decisions in advanced CSPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the expression pattern of long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) mRNA in cumulus cells (CCs) isolated from metaphase II oocytes of women with unilateral endometrioma undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRHa) protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 CC samples, 30 from the affected ovary and 30 from the contralateral ovary, were collected from 12 patients with unilateral endometrioma who underwent flexible GnRHa protocol with recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (rhCG) trigger. Thirty CC samples collected from the left ovary of 12 women with male factor infertility were used as external controls. Long PTX3 mRNA expression in each group was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Relative gene expression (fold-change) was calculated according to the 2-ΔΔCt equation. Fertilization rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were recorded for each group. RESULTS: CC-PTX3 mRNA expression in the unilateral endometrioma group was significantly lower than the mRNA expression of the disease-free ovary (0.90±0.01 vs. 0.25±0.02, p<0.01). CC-PTX3 mRNA expression of MII oocytes of the disease-free ovary was found to be similar to the control group (1.02±0.03 vs. 0.90±0.01, p=0.107). A significant 3.6-fold downregulation was observed in the CC-PTX3 mRNA expression of the endometrioma group compared to the CC-PTX3 mRNA expression in the contralateral ovary. CCPTX3 mRNA expression in the endometrioma group was downregulated 4.08-fold compared to the CC-PTX3 mRNA expression of the control group (1.02±0.03 vs. 0.25±0.02, p<0.001). The cumulus morphologies of the endometrioma group with low CC-PTX3 expression and the groups with normal CC-PTX3 levels were similar. Fertilization rates of the endometrioma group were similar to the contralateral ovary and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral endometrioma reduces CC-PTX3 expression but does not affect disease-free ovaries. The GnRHa protocol improved the fertilization rates, suggesting that failed CCPTX3 expression is an in vivo pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The high prevalence of poor ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation is a main therapeutic challenge that affects pregnancy outcomes in such patients. The current clinical trial aimed to compare the pregnancy outcome of corifollitropin alfa (CFA) versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) used in the gonadotropin-realizing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in poor ovarian response patients. Materials and Methods: We performed an open-label balanced block randomized clinical trial on 117 Iranian women with poor ovarian responses who were seeking treatment for infertility. Reporting followed the CONSORT 2010 guidelines for parallel group randomized trials. Patients were randomly assigned to the CFA group (a single injection of 150 µg CFA) or the rFSH group (300 IU rFSH on a daily basis). To avoid premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges, treatment continued with a daily subcutaneous injection of 0.25 ganirelix, starting from day 6 of stimulation up to the hCG administration day. The primary investigated outcomes were the number of obtained oocytes and the number of metaphase II oocytes. Implantation rate, chemical pregnancy, and clinical pregnancy were the secondary outcomes examined, and study participants were followed up to ascertain the interested outcome. Results: The average number of mature follicles in CFA was 5.0±2.1, which was significantly higher than the rFSH group (4.2±1.7) (P = 0.021). The average number of puncture follicles and the number of embryos were significantly higher in the CFA group than in the rFSH group (P < 0.05). Chemical pregnancy was observed in 32.2% and 30.5% of patients in the CFA and recombinant-FSH groups, respectively, and the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.748). We observed no statistically significant difference despite a relatively higher clinical pregnancy in the CFA group (P = 0.398). Conclusions: A single injection of CFA and a daily injection of rFSH could improve pregnancy outcomes in women with poor ovarian responses who underwent IVF. These two alternative treatments could be used interchangeably, and we highlighted no superiority between CFA and rFSH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes for the oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist elagolix (E) to the conventionally used injectable GnRH antagonist ganirelix (G) for achieving pituitary gonadotropin suppression during a controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycle. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Private university-affiliated fertility center. Patient(s): One hundred and ninety-four infertility patients receiving either E or G for pituitary suppression during the COS cycle. Exposure: Use of E for ovulation suppression during the COS cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): Biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and cycle cancellation rates were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes included miscarriage, fertilization, and blastulation rates. Result(s): The groups did not differ in their baseline demographic characteristics (age, body mass index, hormone profiles, total dosage of gonadotropins, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of embryos transferred). The overall cycle cancellation rates were 7.0% and 4.9% for e and G, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. For the frozen embryo transfers, the biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and miscarriage rates for E were 74.5%, 51.0%, and 31.6%, respectively. For G, these were 55.9%, 39.8%, and 28.8%. Out of these outcomes, only the biochemical pregnancy rates were significantly different. For the fresh embryo transfers, biochemical pregnancy, sustained implantation, and miscarriage rates for E were 33.3%, 33.3%, and 0.0%, and for G, they were 37.5%, 25.0%, and 33.3%. None of the differences reached significance. Conclusion(s): The oral GnRH antagonist, E, may be as effective as the injected antagonist, G, regarding embryological and clinical outcomes and could offer a less invasive, more cost-effective, and “patient-friendly” approach to pituitary suppression for in vitro fertilization treatment.

Objectives: The high prevalence of poor ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation is a main therapeutic challenge that affects pregnancy outcomes in such patients. The current clinical trial aimed to compare the pregnancy outcome of corifollitropin alfa (CFA) versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) used in the gonadotropin-realizing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in poor ovarian response patients. Materials and Methods: We performed an open-label balanced block randomized clinical trial on 117 Iranian women with poor ovarian responses who were seeking treatment for infertility. Reporting followed the CONSORT 2010 guidelines for parallel group randomized trials. Patients were randomly assigned to the CFA group (a single injection of 150 µg CFA) or the rFSH group (300 IU rFSH on a daily basis). To avoid premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges, treatment continued with a daily subcutaneous injection of 0.25 ganirelix, starting from day 6 of stimulation up to the hCG administration day. The primary investigated outcomes were the number of obtained oocytes and the number of metaphase II oocytes. Implantation rate, chemical pregnancy, and clinical pregnancy were the secondary outcomes examined, and study participants were followed up to ascertain the interested outcome. Results: The average number of mature follicles in CFA was 5.0±2.1, which was significantly higher than the rFSH group (4.2±1.7) (P=0.021). The average number of puncture follicles and the number of embryos were significantly higher in the CFA group than in the rFSH group (P

Objective To disclose the relationships between serum LH and reproductive outcomes in Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol pretreated with luteal estradiol.Methods 371 patients, pretreated with estradiol, followed the GnRH antagonist protocol. They were divided into four groups based on the quartiles of serum LH levels on the day of gonadotropin (Gn) initiation(LHGI) and trigger (LHtrigger). Data on various pregnancy outcomes were collected.Results As serum LHGI increased, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, antral follicle count (AFC), LHtrigger, estradiol (E2) and P on the trigger day, E2/oocytes, and oocyte numbers increased and peaked in Q4, while Gn dose decreased. Good-quality embryo and blast formation rates increased and peaked in Q3. LHGI

Abstract Background The oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist relugolix, which temporarily stops menstruation, is used to treat heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure, and low back pain in women with uterine fibroids. Treatment can also help women recover from low hemoglobin levels and possibly shrink the fibroids. However, evidence of preoperative use of relugolix before laparoscopic myomectomy is limited. Nevertheless, the treatment could reduce interoperative blood loss, decrease the risk of developing postoperative anemia, and shorten the operative time. Thus, we aim to test whether 12-week preoperative treatment with relugolix (40 mg orally, once daily) is similar to or not worse than leuprorelin (one injection every 4 weeks) to reduce intraoperative blood loss. Methods Efficacy and safety of preoperative administration of drugs will be studied in a multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority trial enrolling premenopausal women ≥ 20 years of age, diagnosed with uterine fibroids and scheduled for laparoscopic myomectomy. Participants (n = 80) will be recruited in the clinical setting of participating institutions. The minimization method (predefined factors: presence or absence of fibroids ≥ 9 cm and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] type 1–5 fibroids) with randomization is used in a 1:1 allocation. Relugolix is a 40-mg oral tablet taken once a day before a meal, for 12 weeks, up to the day before surgery. Leuprorelin is a 1.88 mg, or 3.75 mg subcutaneous injection, given in three 4-week intervals during patient visits before the surgery. For the primary outcome measure of intraoperative bleeding, the blood flow is collected from the body cavity, surgical sponges, and collection bag and measured in milliliters. Secondary outcome measures are hemoglobin levels, myoma size, other surgical outcomes, and quality-of-life questionnaire responses (Kupperman Konenki Shogai Index and Uterine Fibroid Symptoms—Quality of Life). Discussion Real-world evidence will be collected in a clinical setting to use pre-treatment with an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist to reduce intraoperative bleeding in women who undergo laparoscopic myomectomy. Trial registration jRCTs031210564 was registered on 19 January 2022 in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://jrct.niph.go.jp ).

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol in ovarian stimulation. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 804 patients who were treated between January 1st, 2022, and July 1st, 2023. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation were compared between the PPOS (n = 206) and GnRH-ant (n = 598). The primary outcome was the number of good cleavage embryos. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, the mean number of good cleavage embryos in PPOS (6.33) was non-inferior to GnRH-ant (6.44; unadjusted ratio of two means 1.02, 95%CI 0.92, 1.13). The trigger-day estradiol level in patients with PPOS was higher than in patients with GnRH-ant (4,420 vs 3,830 pg/ml, respectively) despite similar total follicle stimulating hormone dose and fewer days of ovarian stimulation. The number of oocytes, MII oocytes, cleavage and blastocyst embryos were comparable between the two protocols. After the first transfer of embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in the PPOS group, while the pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were not significantly different. None of the PPOS patients had an unexpected LH surge, and serum LH levels decreased slightly during ovarian stimulation. Conclusions: The PPOS protocol with dydrogesterone provided similar embryo outcomes to the GnRH-ant protocol, with notable distinctions in clinical pregnancy and implantation rate. The serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation using PPOS was well-controlled.

Objective: This study aims to determine whether the live birth rates were similar between GnRH antagonist original reference product Cetrotide® and generic Ferpront®, in gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study investigates COS cycles utilizing GnRH antagonist protocols. The research was conducted at a specialized reproductive medicine center within a tertiary care hospital, spanning the period from October 2019 to October 2021. Within this timeframe, a total of 924 cycles were administered utilizing the GnRH antagonist originator, Cetrotide® (Group A), whereas 1984 cycles were undertaken using the generic, Ferpront® (Group B). Results: Ovarian reserve markers, including anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle number, and basal follicular stimulating hormone, were lower in Group A compared to Group B. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance these markers between the groups. After PSM, baseline clinical features were similar, except for a slightly longer infertile duration in Group A versus Group B (4.43 ± 2.92 years vs. 4.14 ± 2.84 years, P = 0.029). The duration of GnRH antagonist usage was slightly longer in Group B than in Group A (6.02 ± 1.41 vs. 5.71 ± 1.48 days, P < 0.001). Group B had a slightly lower number of retrieved oocytes compared to Group A (14.17 ± 7.30 vs. 14.96 ± 7.75, P = 0.024). However, comparable numbers of usable embryos on day 3 and good-quality embryos were found between the groups. Reproductive outcomes, including biochemical pregnancy loss, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate, did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses suggested that the type of GnRH antagonist did not independently impact the number of oocytes retrieved, usable embryos, good-quality embryos, moderate to severe OHSS rate, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth rate. Conclusion: The retrospective analysis revealed no clinically significant differences in reproductive outcomes between Cetrotide® and Ferpront® when used in women undergoing their first and second COS cycles utilizing the GnRH antagonist protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the effects of relugolix administration for uterine adenomyosis on uterine volume and subjective symptoms. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 30 patients with clinical symptoms of endometriosis complicated with uterine adenomyosis who were treated with 40 mg/day of relugolix orally for >16 weeks. The uterine volume was calculated pre- and post-administration, and the volume percentage post-administration. Furthermore, the presence or absence of subjective post-administration symptoms and adverse effects were also examined. Results: The median (interquartile range) long diameter, short diameter, width, and volume of the patients' uteri pre- and post-administration of relugolix significantly decreased from 9.63 (9.02–11.00) to 8.00 (6.84–9.12) cm, 6.47 (5.58–8.02) to 5.00 (4.26–5.63) cm, 6.91 (5.68–8.46) to 5.49 (4.58–6.00) cm, and 221.04 (146.52–390.26) to 111.90 (71.59–165.84) cm3, respectively (p < 0.001 for all four items). Additionally, the uterus volume post-administration was 48.30% (33.88–62.54%) of that pre-administration. Heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and chronic pelvic pain occurred in 23 (76.7%), 21 (70.0%), and 13 (43.3%) of the 30 patients, respectively; however, all patients experienced resolution of all symptoms. Nine, three, and one patients had hot flashes, mild arthralgia, and a mild headache, respectively. No cases of persistent irregular or heavy bleeding were observed during treatment. Conclusions: Relugolix contributes to volume reduction and eliminates subjective symptoms of uterine adenomyosis, suggesting that it is an effective treatment for uterine adenomyosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the live birth rate of the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) after ovarian stimulation by the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol vs. the antagonist protocol in women with an anticipated high ovarian response who were undergoing in vitro fertilization. Randomized controlled trial. A tertiary assisted reproduction center. Women with infertility aged <43 years undergoing the first in vitro fertilization cycle and having antral follicle count of >15. Medroxyprogesterone 10 mg daily was given from the start of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger in the PPOS protocol. In the antagonist protocol, an antagonist 0.25 mg daily was given from the sixth day of ovarian stimulation until the day of ovulation trigger. Blinding was not possible for women or physicians but the biostatistician was blinded to the group assignment. Live birth rate of the first FET cycle. A total of 784 women were recruited from June 2020 and October 2021 and assigned randomly in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: PPOS group (n = 392) and antagonist group (n = 392). Embryo transfer was either cancelled or postponed in 62 women (62/392, 15.8%) in the PPOS group and 65 (65/392, 16.6%) in the antagonist group because of no transferable embryos or no FET within 6 months after randomization. The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics and the numbers of oocytes obtained or fertilized, cleaving embryos, good-quality embryos at day 3, blastocysts developed, and embryos or blastocysts frozen. There was no statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of the first FET cycle between the PPOS and antagonist groups on the basis of both the intention-to-treat analysis (37.5.0% [147/392] vs. 32.7% [128/392]; relative risk, 1.148 [95% confidence interval, 0.949–1.390]) and per-protocol analysis (44.5% [147/330] vs. 39.1% [128/327]; relative risk, 1.138 [95% confidence interval, 0.950–1.364]). Both groups showed comparable clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and cumulative live birth rates. The live birth rates of the first FET following the PPOS and antagonist protocols were comparable in women with an anticipated high ovarian response. NCT04414761 (ClinicalTrials.gov). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist relugolix, which temporarily stops menstruation, is used to treat heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure, and low back pain in women with uterine fibroids. Treatment can also help women recover from low hemoglobin levels and possibly shrink the fibroids. However, evidence of preoperative use of relugolix before laparoscopic myomectomy is limited. Nevertheless, the treatment could reduce interoperative blood loss, decrease the risk of developing postoperative anemia, and shorten the operative time. Thus, we aim to test whether 12-week preoperative treatment with relugolix (40 mg orally, once daily) is similar to or not worse than leuprorelin (one injection every 4 weeks) to reduce intraoperative blood loss. Methods: Efficacy and safety of preoperative administration of drugs will be studied in a multi-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority trial enrolling premenopausal women ≥ 20 years of age, diagnosed with uterine fibroids and scheduled for laparoscopic myomectomy. Participants (n = 80) will be recruited in the clinical setting of participating institutions. The minimization method (predefined factors: presence or absence of fibroids ≥ 9 cm and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] type 1–5 fibroids) with randomization is used in a 1:1 allocation. Relugolix is a 40-mg oral tablet taken once a day before a meal, for 12 weeks, up to the day before surgery. Leuprorelin is a 1.88 mg, or 3.75 mg subcutaneous injection, given in three 4-week intervals during patient visits before the surgery. For the primary outcome measure of intraoperative bleeding, the blood flow is collected from the body cavity, surgical sponges, and collection bag and measured in milliliters. Secondary outcome measures are hemoglobin levels, myoma size, other surgical outcomes, and quality-of-life questionnaire responses (Kupperman Konenki Shogai Index and Uterine Fibroid Symptoms—Quality of Life). Discussion: Real-world evidence will be collected in a clinical setting to use pre-treatment with an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist to reduce intraoperative bleeding in women who undergo laparoscopic myomectomy. Trial registration: jRCTs031210564 was registered on 19 January 2022 in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist monotherapy to combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a GnRH agonist and bicalutamide in patients with advanced hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Methods: The study was conducted as KYUCOG‐1401 trial (UMIN000014243) and enrolled 200 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A (GnRH antagonist monotherapy followed by the addition of bicalutamide) or group B (CAB by a GnRH agonist and bicalutamide). The primary endpoint was PSA progression‐free survival. The secondary endpoints were the time to CAB treatment failure, radiographic progression‐free survival, overall survival, changes in serum parameters, including PSA, hormones, and bone and lipid metabolic markers, and adverse events. Results: PSA progression‐free survival was significantly longer in group B (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.40, 1.01–1.95, p = 0.041). The time to CAB treatment failure was slightly longer in group A (HR, 95% CI; 0.80, 0.59–1.08, p = 0.146). No significant differences were observed in radiographic progression‐free survival or overall survival. The percentage of patients with serum testosterone that did not reach the castration level was higher at 60 weeks (p = 0.046) in group A. No significant differences were noted in the serum levels of bone metabolic or lipid markers between the two groups. An injection site reaction was more frequent in group A. Conclusions: The present results support the potential of CAB using a GnRH agonist and bicalutamide as a more effective treatment for advanced HSPC than GnRH antagonist monotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the effectiveness of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol in ovarian stimulation. In this retrospective cohort study, we included 804 patients who were treated between January 1st, 2022, and July 1st, 2023. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation were compared between the PPOS (n = 206) and GnRH-ant (n = 598). The primary outcome was the number of good cleavage embryos. Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, the mean number of good cleavage embryos in PPOS (6.33) was non-inferior to GnRH-ant (6.44; unadjusted ratio of two means 1.02, 95%CI 0.92, 1.13). The trigger-day estradiol level in patients with PPOS was higher than in patients with GnRH-ant (4,420 vs 3,830 pg/ml, respectively) despite similar total follicle stimulating hormone dose and fewer days of ovarian stimulation. The number of oocytes, MII oocytes, cleavage and blastocyst embryos were comparable between the two protocols. After the first transfer of embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in the PPOS group, while the pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were not significantly different. None of the PPOS patients had an unexpected LH surge, and serum LH levels decreased slightly during ovarian stimulation. The PPOS protocol with dydrogesterone provided similar embryo outcomes to the GnRH-ant protocol, with notable distinctions in clinical pregnancy and implantation rate. The serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation using PPOS was well-controlled. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION What is the effect of pretreatment with oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) on oocyte and embryo quality and pregnancy rates in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) scheduled for IVF/ICSI cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER In women with PCOS who underwent a first or second IVF/ICSI cycle with a GnRH antagonist protocol and were randomized to start ovarian stimulation immediately, the quality of cleavage-stage embryos was non-inferior to pretreatment with OCP. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PCOS in Asian populations is characterized by high levels of circulating LH in the early follicular phase. Previous studies indicated that inappropriately high LH levels might affect oocyte maturation and fertilization rates, and impaired embryo quality, consequently resulting in higher rates of impaired pregnancy and miscarriage in women with PCOS. OCPs are frequently used as pretreatment to lower LH levels in PCOS patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed a randomized controlled trial. After informed consent, women diagnosed with PCOS scheduled for their first or second IVF/ICSI cycle with a GnRH antagonist protocol were randomized to receive OCPs (OCP group) or start ovarian stimulation immediately, regardless of the day of the menstrual cycle (non-OCP group). Using a non-inferiority hypothesis, the sample size was calculated at 242 women. The study lasted from 7 February 2018 to 31 August 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 242 infertility patients with PCOS undergoing the first or second cycle of IVF or ICSI were enrolled and randomized into two groups. In the OCP group, recombinant FSH was started on Day 7 of the washout period after pretreatment with OCP. In the non-OCP group, recombinant FSH was started immediately regardless of the day of the menstrual cycle. All participants received standardized GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation. The freeze-all strategy was applied to all participants. The primary outcome was the number of good-quality embryos on Day 3 after insemination. Secondary outcomes included the rates of blastocyst formation, implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth from the first frozen/warmed embryo transfer cycles and cumulative live birth rates. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We randomized 242 women to receive OCP (n = 121) or start immediately with ovarian stimulation (n = 121). The number of good-quality embryos on Day 3 in the OCP group was non-inferior to the non-OCP group (OCP group versus non-OCP group, 6.58 ± 4.93 versus 7.18 ± 4.39, AD −0.61, 95% CI: −1.86 to 0.65, P  =   0.34). The rates of blastocyst formation (55.4% versus 52.9%, relative risk (RR) 1.11, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.28, P  =   0.17), implantation (63.0% versus 65.5%, RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.53, P  =   0.79), clinical pregnancy (67.9% versus 68.8%, RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.71, P  =   1.0), and live birth rate (52.8% versus 55.1%, RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.56, P  =   0.79) of the first frozen/warmed embryo transfer cycles were all comparable between the OCP and non-OCP group, respectively. Cumulative live birth rates were also similar in the OCP and non-OCP groups (78.3% versus 83.5%, respectively RR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.36 to 1.42, P  =   0.39). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Only patients with PCOS in Southern China were recruited. Therefore, caution is necessary when generalizing our results to all such patients with PCOS. Also, since a freeze-only strategy was used, the results of this study are only applicable when infertile women with PCOS undergo the freeze-only method. The obvious treatment difference between the two groups meant that the study was designed as an open-label study for women and doctors. The study had a randomized controlled design that minimized bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Pretreatment with OCPs to lower LH levels in patients with PCOS before ovarian stimulation in IVF or ICSI cycles may not improve the quality of cleavage-stage embryos. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFC2705503). This study was supported in part by the Investigator-Initiated Studies Program (grant from MSD and Organon). BWM reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck. He reports consultancy from Organon and Norgine, and also reports holding stock from ObsEva. No conflicts of interest are declared for the other authors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. chiCTR1800014822). URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=25280 TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 7 February 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLLMENT 22 February 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF). The aim of PPOS is to provide an effective, patient-friendly treatment. However, studies comparing outcomes after the use of PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF have shown mixed results. This study compared ongoing pregnancy rates after the use of PPOS versus GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF. Methods: This prospective pilot study was conducted at a single IVF center. Women aged 18–35 years old with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level greater than or equal to 1.2[Formula: see text]ng/mL or an antral follicle count (AFC) greater than or equal to 5 who were undergoing their first IVF cycle were allocated to undergoing ovarian stimulation using PPOS (dydrogesterone 20[Formula: see text]mg/day started on the day of gonadotropin) or a GnRH antagonist protocol (fixed regimen from stimulation day 5). The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate (at 12 weeks’ gestation). Results: The study included 30 women (15 in each treatment group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 7/15 (46.7%) in the PPOS group and 8/15 (53.3%) in the GnRH antagonist group ([Formula: see text]); the number of oocytes retrieved and fertilization rates were also comparable between groups. One case of mild ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in the GnRH antagonist group. Conclusions: This pilot study showed similar ongoing pregnancy rates after the use of a PPOS protocol and a conventional GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation in IVF. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Importance The first meta-analysis focused only on gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, which helped determine the effect of delay trigger on pregnancy outcomes. Objective To evaluate the impact of delay trigger compared with standard trigger in normal responders undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol in improving pregnancy outcomes. Methods Studies published before April 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies conducted in normal responders reporting the efficacy of delay trigger using GnRH antagonist protocol were included. Data were combined to calculate mean differences (MD) for continuous variables and odd ratios (OR) for categorical variables with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test. Results Endpoints, including clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), the number of oocyte retrievals and embryos, and fertilization rate, were analyzed. Six (6) clinical studies (4 RCTs and 2 cohort studies) with 1,360 subjects were included. The pooled results showed that the number of oocyte retrievals (MD: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.30, p

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is present throughout the natural follicular phase. However, the debate is still not settled on whether LH is needed during ovarian stimulation in IVF. This commentary looks at the evolution of this debate, mentioning three elephants in the room that were ignored by the Pharma industry, professional organizations, and clinicians alike: The different endocrinology between the long agonist and the antagonist protocols. The fixed dose of the two most widely commercially available antagonist preparations, namely cetrorelix and ganirelix. The fact that most research in this area uses population-based criteria, ignoring endocrine parameters. Individual genetics of the LH receptor gene may also serve to individualize LH needs during stimulation; however, the jury is still out regarding this approach. Conclusions: Individual endocrine and genetics parameters may shed meaningful light on the question of LH supplemental during ovarian stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endometriosis is a chronic condition affecting fertile women with many adverse effects. Subfertility is one of the main issues. The ovarian reserve (OR) gradually decreases due to physical and immunological factors associated with endometriosis. Hence, early and prompt treatment of endometriosis and subfertility caused by endometriosis can improve a woman’s quality of life. The article aims to shed light on the currently available options for fertility-preserving management of endometriosis. Endometriosis-related subfertility should be managed judiciously and individually according to age, parity, the extent of the disease, and the patient’s social aspect. Subfertility management is approached by medical management but sometimes demands a surgical approach. But, surgery is very detrimental to OR. That is why, while managing endometriosis, one should aim to protect fertility potential. To approach fertility protection, suppressive therapy, which halts the disease process and prevents follicular loss due to “OMA,” is an option for adolescents and women who want to postpone pregnancy for a certain period. If one needs surgical intervention for treatment, a modified surgical approach to minimize follicular loss would be preferable to protect the OR. Also, while treating subfertility, the approach should be to reduce the time to live birth to avoid the consequences of the recurrence of the disease. And finally, in adolescent endometriosis and women who need repeated surgery, fertility preservation by tissue freezing might help them for future fertility in the present day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of adjuvant letrozole administration during ovarian stimulation using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol on treatment outcomes in women categorized into POSEIDON groups 3 and 4. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from patients classified into POSEIDON groups 3 and 4 who underwent fresh embryo transfer subsequent to intracytoplasmic sperm injection following a GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol between January 2017 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: the GnRH-LZ group, who received letrozole at a dosage of 5 mg/day for five consecutive days, and the GnRH-ant group, who did not receive adjuvant letrozole. The primary outcome measure of the study was a comparative analysis of live birth rates between the two groups. Results: A total of 449 patients were deemed suitable for final analysis and were allocated into two groups: 281 patients in the GnRH-ant group and 168 patients in the GnRH-LZ group. Live birth rates were found to be comparable in both groups (11% vs. 9%, p = 0.497). Letrozole administration significantly reduced the total amount of gonadotropins required (2606.2 ± 1284.5 vs. 3097.8 ± 1073.3, p < 0.001), the duration of ovarian stimulation (11.2 ± 3.9 vs. 10.2 ± 3, p = 0.005), and the serum peak estradiol concentration (901.4 ± 599.6 vs. 463.8 ± 312.3, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Adjuvant letrozole administration did not demonstrate a significant impact on live birth rates among women categorized into POSEIDON groups 3 and 4. However, this approach may offer potential cost reductions by diminishing the necessity for exogenous gonadotropins and shortening the duration of ovarian stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The proportion of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) is increasing, but effective treatment remains a challenge. To control the hidden peaks of luteinizing hormone (LH) and premature ovulation for poor responders, this study investigated the efficacy of flexible short protocol (FSP) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) on trigger day. Methods: The 662 cycles of POR patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cohort was divided into control and intervention groups. The intervention group (group A) with 169 cycles received a GnRH-ant given on trigger day. The control (group B) with 493 cycles received only FSP. The clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results: Compared with group B, with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) on trigger day in group A the incidences of spontaneous premature ovulation decreased significantly (2.37% vs. 8.72%, P < 0.05). The number of fresh embryo-transfer cycles was 45 in group A and 117 in group B. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and the cumulative live birth rate (12.0% vs. 9.34%; 22.22% vs. 21.93%; 17.78% vs. 14.91%; 20.51% vs. 20%, respectively; P > 0.05) between the two group. Conclusion: FSP with GnRH-ant addition on trigger day had no effect on clinical outcomes, but could effectively inhibit the hidden peaks of luteinizing hormone (LH) and spontaneous premature ovulation in POR. Therefore, it is an advantageous option for POR women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Luteinizing hormoneereleasing hormone (LHRH) agonists are believed to have higher cardiovascular risk relative to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists. However, previous studies have not consistently demonstrated this. We used real-world clinical practice data to evaluate differences in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk between LHRH agonists compared to a GnRH antagonist following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) initiation. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data in the Decision Resources Group (now Clarivate) Real World Evidence repository, which represents >300 million US patients from 1991 to 2020 across all US regions. Patients with prostate cancer who received at least 1 injection of ADT were included. The risks of MACE and all-cause mortality as independent endpoints were evaluated, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed, and associations between MACE and all available confounding risk factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Results: A total of 45,059 men with prostate cancer treated with ADT were analyzed. Overall, the risks of MACE and all-cause mortality were slightly lower in the first year after ADT initiation compared to subsequent years. MACE risk was higher for the GnRH antagonist compared to LHRH agonists (HR[1.62; 95% CI 1.21-2.18, P = .001). The risk of all-cause mortality was also higher for the GnRH antagonist vs LHRH agonists (HR[1.87; 95% CI 1.39-2.51, P < .001). Conclusions: The adjusted incidence of MACE was higher for men treated with the GnRH antagonist compared to the LHRH agonists. The demographic and risk factors with the greatest impact on MACE risk were higher age, baseline metastasis, oncology (vs urology) setting, personal MACE history, antagonist (vs agonist), tobacco history, White (vs Black) race, and lower BMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This retrospective cohort study investigated trigger day progesterone to total oocyte count (P/OTotal) and progesterone to MII oocyte count (P/OMII) as potential predictors of live birth rate (LBR). Methods: First cycles of 1,258 infertile patients who attended to the İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital in vitro fertilization unit (IVF) between March 1, 2010 and November 1, 2016 and underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment following controlled ovarian stimulation + GnRH antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer were investigated. Results: LBR for cycles with P levels ≤0.5, 0.5-1.5 and >1.5 ng/mL were 16.3% (50/307 cycles), 23.0% (180/783), and 19.6% (33/168), respectively. LBR was significantly lower in ≤0.5 ng/mL P level group than the 0.5-1.5 ng/mL group. After the exclusion of cycles with ≤0.5 ng/mL P level, P/OTotal and P/OMII ratios were found to have significant area under the curve values (0.544, p=0.049; 0.552, p=0.022, respectively) for predicting LBR, whereas P levels (0.509, p=0.686) on its own was not a significant predictor. In ROC models adjusted for cycle characteristics, P/OTotal and P/OMII ratio values showed neither better nor weaker prediction performance (0.608, p

Aim: to assess the effects of a dual trigger by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with normal ovarian response.Materials and Methods. This case-control analysis comprised 118 patients who responded normally to ovarian stimulation with a GnRH antagonist protocol at Hue Center for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Vietnam, between January 2018 and October 2019. Recruitment was achieved through case-control matching: a case (with Dual trigger – group A) was paired with control (with hCG trigger – group B) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary markers of success were the retrieval of oocytes and embryological data, the pregnancy rate, and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).Results. 59 patients in group A and 59 women in group B were recruited. Two groups had comparable patient characteristics and ovarian reserve. The initial dose, total dose, duration of gonadotropin administration, and peak of estradiol level were not statistically different across groups. The number of recovered oocytes (10.3 ± 4.2 vs. 10.0 ± 3.3; p = 0.663), mature oocytes (8.6 ± 3.7 vs.8.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.346), and high-quality embryos (56.2 ± 28.9 vs. 59.8 ± 35.9; p = 0.555) was equivalent. Fertilization, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates were comparable between the dual trigger and hCG groups. In neither group were any occurrences of OHSS seen.Conclusion. Dual trigger may substitute hCG for final oocyte maturation and fresh embryo transfer in patients with normal responses to GnRH antagonist protocol-induced ovarian stimulation without compromising IVF outcomes.

Background: Ovarian reactivity to gonadotrophin stimulation varies, and individual adjustments to the timing and dose of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration are necessary to prevent excessive increases and decreases in luteinizing hormone (LH) levels in patients with different ovarian response following the GnRH antagonist (GnRH-A) protocol. The present study aims to investigate optimal LH suppression thresholds for patients with normal ovarian response (NOR), high ovarian response (HOR), and poor ovarian response (POR) following the GnRH-A protocol respectively. Methods: A total of 865 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles using a flexible or fixed GnRH-A protocol were included. Patients were categorized into the HOR, NOR, or POR group according to their anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. Then, patients in each group were stratified into one of four subgroups according to the quartile (Q1-Q4) of the basal LH level to LH on triggering day ratio (bLH/hLH). The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates, and the secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, two pronucleus (2PN) embryos, and good-quality embryos. Results: There were 526 patients with NOR, 180 with HOR, and 159 with POR. Basal LH level, LH on triggering day and bLH/hLH were identified as independent predictors of clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate by logistics regression analysis. Compared to those with NOR, patients with POR had the lowest embryo implantation rate (22.6% vs. 32.8%, P

The aims of the research were (i) to compare the clinical outcome of IVF using follicular-phase depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (depot agonist) protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with repeated IVF failure (RIF), (ii) to discover the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for this group of low prognosis patients. 801 RIF patients with normal ovarian reserve receiving in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 492 patients were treated with the depot agonist protocol, and the remaining 309 patients with the antagonist protocol. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to find the predictor(s) of the chance of live birth. Higher live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles were associated with the use of depot agonist compared with the antagonist protocols (44.81% vs. 27.27%, 54.64% vs. 34.93%, respectively; both p < 0.01) and depot agonist protocol was a strong predictor of live birth (OR = 2.182, 95% CI 1.355–3.514, p < 0.01). The CPR in thawed ET cycles was not significantly different between the two groups (38.12% vs. 45.26%, p > 0.05). A higher cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was achieved in the depot agonist group (46.59% vs. 35.21%, p < 0.01). Beneficial endometrial receptivity in the depot agonist protocol contributed to a higher LBR in fresh ET cycles, rendering this protocol the preferred option in the treatment of RIF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study elucidated the efficacy of Relugolix (REL) on the reduction of uterine volume and clinical symptoms for the treatment of adenomyosis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received REL (40 mg for about 20 weeks) and who underwent a hysterectomy for adenomyosis or fibroids. We divided patients into two groups: adenomyosis coexisting with fibroids (Group A) and fibroids only (Group B); the groups were determined by a postoperative pathological examination. The primary end points were the percent reduction in uterine volume, adenomyotic lesion, and the largest fibroid volume at week 16. The secondary end points were the rate of amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia at week 12. A total of 56 patients participated in the current study: 20 in Group A and 36 in Group B. Regarding the largest fibroid volume, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Uterine volume after REL treatment was significantly decreased in Group A (43%), as compared to Group B (27%) (p =.00972), In Group A, adenomyotic lesion was decreased by 61%. Irrespective of the group, adenomyosis showed a significant reduction compared to uterine fibroids (p <.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the mitigation of symptoms (amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia) between the two groups. REL is more effective in reducing adenomyotic lesion than uterine fibroids and in relieving symptoms (amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia). It can be expected that REL will also be used as a preoperative treatment for adenomyosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare endometrial receptivity and pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed ET after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in normal ovarian responders. The patients were divided into two groups: the fresh ET group and the frozen-thawed ET group. Uterine artery resistance index (RI) and endometrial thickness were lower in the frozen-thawed ET group. The proportion of detectable endometrial–subendometrial flow was significantly higher in the frozen-thawed ET group. There was no significant difference in miscarriage rate between the two groups. Frozen-thawed ET group had a significantly higher CPR (56.0% vs. 48.1%), implantation rate (32.2% vs. 26.4%), and LBR (45.4% vs. 36.5%) than the fresh ET group. In GnRH antagonist protocol, elective frozen-thawed ET should be ideally taken, as this could improve embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, thus presenting an effective strategy to enhance the embryo utilization rate. What is already known on this subject? The clinical pregnancy rate following fresh embryo transfer (ET) was lower than frozen-thawed ET after GnRH antagonist protocol. IVF success depends on embryo quality, embryo-endometrium interaction and endometrial receptivity. A good blood supply toward the endometrium is generally considered a requirement for implantation. What do the results of this study add? Uterine artery RI and endometrial thickness were significantly lower in the frozen-thawed ET group. The proportion of detectable endometrial–subendometrial flow was significantly higher in the frozen-thawed ET group. Frozen-thawed ET group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate than the fresh ET group after GnRH antagonist protocol. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In GnRH antagonist protocol, elective frozen-thawed ET should be ideally taken, as this could improve embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate, thus presenting an effective strategy to enhance the embryo utilization rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uterine fibroids are the most common noncancerous tumors in women of childbearing age. This review was developed to evaluate the current role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists in the therapy of symptomatic uterine fibroids. There is a great need for alternative methods for surgical treatment of uterine fibroids. Hormonal therapy remains the first-line treatment option for most patients. GnRH analogs (agonists and antagonists) modulate the pulsatile release of GnRH. This review summarizes the available literature concerning pharmacologic principles underlying the mechanism of action of GnRH and its analogs, as well as individual therapeutic applications to which these drugs have been applied. In many cases, it is possible to try to treat uterine fibroids pharmacologically. Both groups of GnRH analogs are used in therapy, agonists instead as a preparation for surgery, and antagonists as a drug for long-term use. It is essential to develop this path further and look for at least long-term-release systems or new methods of administering these drugs. It is also important from the patient's perspective to search for possible drugs that may have an additive effect of decreasing side effects when combined with GnRH analogs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of elagolix, a GnRH antagonist, to treat polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Design: A phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient and academic medical centers. Patient(s): One hundred fourteen women with PCOS (aged 18–35 years, body mass index 18.5–38 kg/m2). Intervention(s): Patients were randomized 2:2:2:2:2:3 to elagolix (25 mg twice daily, 50 mg once daily, 75 mg twice daily, 150 mg once daily, and 300 mg twice daily) or placebo. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary endpoint was menstrual cycle normalization (defined as 2 menstrual cycles 21–35 days in length during the 4-month treatment period). The secondary endpoint was change from baseline to week 1 in the area under the luteinizing hormone (LH) serum concentration-time curve (AUC). Additional endpoints included change from baseline in serum hormone levels. Result(s): No significant improvement in restoring normal menstrual cycles was observed in treated subjects; 3 of 114 patients met the primary endpoint. Six patients experienced progesterone elevations indicative of ovulation. The LH levels decreased from baseline to week 16, and LH AUC was significantly reduced from baseline to week 1 in all elagolix treatment groups (P

Objective: To study the clinical use of elagolix in ovarian stimulation and its effect on premature ovulation in a cohort of women undergoing oocyte donation. Design: A prospective cohort study with the use of historical controls. Setting: A private reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinic. Patient(s): Seventy-five oocyte donors and 75 historical donors, aged 21–30 years, who had each passed Food and Drug Administration and American Society for Reproductive Medicine-approved oocyte donor screening. Intervention(s): Administration of elagolix 200 mg orally every night at bedtime with development of a follicular size of ≥14 mm for ovulation suppression compared with ganirelix 250 μg every night at bedtime. Main Outcome Measure(s): Premature ovulation rate, total oocytes, mature oocytes, maximum estradiol, luteinizing hormone, and progesterone levels. Result(s): Oocytes were available in all retrievals because there were no instances of premature ovulation in either the elagolix or ganirelix groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in baseline demographics. Both groups had the same amounts of gonadotropins consumed and days of stimulation. The average number of total oocytes was similar between the control group and elagolix group (30.55 vs. 30.31). Furthermore, the average number of mature oocytes was similar between the control and study groups (25.42 vs. 24.73). An analysis of the 580 fresh oocytes in the elagolix group and the 737 fresh oocytes in the ganirelix group showed similar outcomes with fertilization rates of 79.7% and 84.6%, respectively. Blastocyst development rates were also similar: 62.9% in the elagolix group and 57.3% in the ganirelix group. Conclusion(s): Compared with a historical control group using ganirelix, patients receiving elagolix demonstrated a similar number of oocytes and mature oocytes with on average 4.2 fewer injections per cycle and average per-cycle patient savings of $289.10. Clinical Trial Registration Number: Western IRB Pr. No.: 20191163, April 11, 2019. First enrollment June 20, 2019.

Treatment of uterine fibroids (UF) and endometriosis (EM) has relied on the surgical skills of gynecologists to improve symptoms and potentially alter the course of these debilitating diseases. Medical management of symptoms for both diseases leverages combined hormonal contraceptives used off label as a first-line treatment, with nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids to manage pain as needed. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor agonists (peptide analogs) have been used as short-term therapy to manage severe symptoms of UF or EM, treat anemia, and reduce fibroid size before surgery. The introduction of oral GnRH receptor antagonists opened the door for the development of new treatment options for UF, EM, and other estrogen-driven diseases.Relugolix is an orally active, nonpeptide, GnRH receptor antagonist that competitively binds to GnRH receptors, preventing the release of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (LH) into the systemic circulation. In women, the reduction in follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations prevents natural follicular development, suppressing ovarian production of estrogen, and together with reductions in LH concentrations, prevent ovulation, corpus luteum formation, and, thereby, the production of progesterone (P). By reducing circulating concentrations of estradiol (E2) and P, relugolix improves heavy menstrual bleeding and other symptoms associated with UF and moderate to severe pain associated with EM, including dysmenorrhea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) and dyspareunia. However, as monotherapy, the use of relugolix is associated with signs and symptoms of a hypoestrogenic state, including bone mineral density loss and vasomotor symptoms. The clinical development of relugolix incorporated the addition of a 1 mg dose of E2 and a 0.5-mg dose of norethindrone acetate (NETA) to achieve systemic E2 concentrations that remain in a therapeutic range while mitigating the risk for bone mineral density loss and vasomotor symptoms, enabling the longer-term treatment and reducing the impact of symptoms on quality of life, and potentially delaying or preventing the need for surgery.Relugolix 40 mg in combination with estradiol (E2) 1 mg and NETA 0.5 mg as a single fixed-dose combination tablet (relugolix combination therapy [relugolix-CT]) approved in the United States as MYFEMBREE is the first and only once daily oral GnRH antagonist combination therapy indicated for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with UF and moderate to severe pain associated with EM. In the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK), relugolix-CT is approved as RYEQO for the management of symptoms associated with UF. In Japan, relugolix 40 mg, as monotherapy, was the first GnRH receptor antagonist approved to improve symptoms associated with UF or pain associated with EM under the brand name RELUMINA.In men, relugolix suppresses testosterone production. Relugolix 120 mg (ORGOVYX) was developed by Myovant Sciences and is approved in the United States, EU, and UK as the first and only oral androgen-deprivation therapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.This review is focused on the development of relugolix and relugolix-CT in women’s health indications.

Elagolix is the first oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist that entered clinical development and received regulatory approval for the management of women with endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in combination with a hormonal add-back therapy. This mini review aims to summarize the key clinical studies that led to its regulatory approval.

Ganirelix is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist with high antagonistic activity that blocks the GnRH receptor by competitive binding. A daily dose of 0.25 mg of ganirelix was sel5ected after a phase II study because it was the minimal, effective daily dose to prevent premature luteinizing hormone surges and this dose yielded the highest ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle. After subcutaneous administration, ganirelix is rapidly absorbed, reaching peak levels within 1–2 hours (tmax), and has a high absolute bioavailability (>90%). Prospective, comparative studies have demonstrated the advantages of GnRH antagonists over long GnRH agonist treatment in assisted reproduction, including the immediate reversibility of drug effects, a requirement for less follicle-stimulating hormone, a shortened duration of stimulation, a reduced incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, and reduced patient burden. Combined analyses concluded that in the general in vitro fertilization population, there is a trend for a slightly lower ongoing pregnancy rate and a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome that is largely eliminated when considering triggering with GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotropin. Regardless of all the research, it is still not fully elucidated why the long GnRH agonist protocol has a trend for higher pregnancy rates after fresh transfer of the same number of good-quality embryos.

Objective This study elucidated the efficacy of Relugolix (REL) on the reduction of uterine volume and clinical symptoms for the treatment of adenomyosis.Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who received REL (40 mg for about 20 weeks) and who underwent a hysterectomy for adenomyosis or fibroids. We divided patients into two groups: adenomyosis coexisting with fibroids (Group A) and fibroids only (Group B); the groups were determined by a postoperative pathological examination. The primary end points were the percent reduction in uterine volume, adenomyotic lesion, and the largest fibroid volume at week 16. The secondary end points were the rate of amenorrhea, pelvic pain, and anemia at week 12.Results A total of 56 patients participated in the current study: 20 in Group A and 36 in Group B. Regarding the largest fibroid volume, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Uterine volume after REL treatment was significantly decreased in Group A (43%), as compared to Group B (27%) (p = .00972), In Group A, adenomyotic lesion was decreased by 61%. Irrespective of the group, adenomyosis showed a significant reduction compared to uterine fibroids (p

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare endometrial receptivity and pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed ET after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in normal ovarian responders. The patients were divided into two groups: the fresh ET group and the frozen-thawed ET group. Uterine artery resistance index (RI) and endometrial thickness were lower in the frozen-thawed ET group. The proportion of detectable endometrial–subendometrial flow was significantly higher in the frozen-thawed ET group. There was no significant difference in miscarriage rate between the two groups. Frozen-thawed ET group had a significantly higher CPR (56.0% vs. 48.1%), implantation rate (32.2% vs. 26.4%), and LBR (45.4% vs. 36.5%) than the fresh ET group. In GnRH antagonist protocol, elective frozen-thawed ET should be ideally taken, as this could improve embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, thus presenting an effective strategy to enhance the embryo utilization rate.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? The clinical pregnancy rate following fresh embryo transfer (ET) was lower than frozen-thawed ET after GnRH antagonist protocol. IVF success depends on embryo quality, embryo-endometrium interaction and endometrial receptivity. A good blood supply toward the endometrium is generally considered a requirement for implantation. What do the results of this study add? Uterine artery RI and endometrial thickness were significantly lower in the frozen-thawed ET group. The proportion of detectable endometrial–subendometrial flow was significantly higher in the frozen-thawed ET group. Frozen-thawed ET group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate than the fresh ET group after GnRH antagonist protocol. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? In GnRH antagonist protocol, elective frozen-thawed ET should be ideally taken, as this could improve embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate, thus presenting an effective strategy to enhance the embryo utilization rate.

Introduction: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol is widely used in the world for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). However, previous studies have shown that pregnancy outcomes of fresh embryo transfer with GnRH-ant protocol are not ideal. Current studies have demonstrated the value of growth hormone (GH) in improving the pregnancy outcome of elderly women and patients with diminished ovarian reserve, but no prospective studies have confirmed the efficacy of GH in fresh embryo transfer with GnRH-ant protocol, and its potential mechanism is still unclear. This study intends to evaluate the impact of GH on IVF/ICSI outcomes and endometrial receptivity of patients undergoing GnRH-ant protocol with fresh embryo transfer, and preliminarily explore the possible mechanism. Methods: We designed a randomized controlled trial of 120 infertile patients with normal ovarian response (NOR) who will undergo IVF/ICSI from April 2023 to April 2025, at Department of Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The patients will be divided into the depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol group, GnRH-ant protocol control group, and GnRH-ant protocol plus GH intervention group at a ratio of 1:1:1 by block randomization design. Patients will be followed on enrollment day, trigger day, embryo transfer day, 7 days after oocytes pick-up, 15 days after embryo transfer, 28 days after embryo transfer, and 12 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome is the ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes include the gonadotropin dosage, duration of COH, endometrial thickness and pattern, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, progesterone level on trigger day, numbers of retrieved oocytes, high-quality embryo rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate and incidence of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The endometrium of certain patients will be collected and tested for endometrial receptivity. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology [approval number: TJ-IRB20230236; approval date: February 10, 2023]. The research results will be presented at scientific/medical conferences and published in academic journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the effect of estrogen pre-treatment in patients with different ovarian response in antagonist protocol. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies about the effect of estrogen pre-treatment in antagonist prorocol were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database. R software was used for meta-analysis. Results: Seven RCTs and two retrospective studies were included. In order to explore the source of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was used, which was mainly conducted according to the ovarian response of the included population, which were divided into low responders, non-low responders and mixed responders. In the study about gonadotropin hormone (Gn) days, patients were divided into wash-out subgroup and non-wash-out subgroup according to drug use-pattern. Meta-results showed that the number of Gn days increased significantly in the non-wash-out subgroup (WMD=1.07, 95%CI[0.83; 1.31], I²= 66%). The number of Gn days in the wash-out subgroup were not affected (WMD = -0.12, 95%CI [-0.45; 0.21], I² = 0%). In the low-response subgroup, the number of oocytes retrieved (WMD = 0.46, 95% CI [-0.23;1.16], I² = 81%), the fresh cycle clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 0.77, 95%CI [0.55; 1.06], I² = 73%) and the cycle cancellation rate (RR = 0.80, 95%CI [0.40; 1.61], I² =83%) were not significantly changed with estrogen pre-treatment. In the non-low-response subgroup, the number of oocytes obtained (WMD = 0.21, 95%CI [-0.69; 1.11], I²=2%), fresh cycle clinical pregnancy rate (RR=0.94, 95% CI [0.77; 1.14], I²=41%), live birth rate (RR=0.82, 95% CI [0.62; 1.08], I²=0%) and cycle cancellation rate (RR=0.89, 95%CI [0.54; 1.47], I²=2%) were not significantly changed with estrogen pretreatment. Conclusions: Estrogen pre-treatment (with non-wash-out period) in antagonist protocol increases Gn days, dose not improve IVF outcomes in non-low responders and low responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: Prostate cancer (PCa) is amongst the most common cancers in men worldwide. Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and CV disease (CVD) are common comorbidities in this patient population, posing a challenge for PCa-directed therapies which can cause or worsen CVRFs and CVDs. Herein, we summarize the approaches to prevent and manage CVD in patients with PCa receiving therapy. Recent Findings: While patients with locally advanced and metastatic PCa benefit from hormonal therapy, these treatments can potentially cause CV toxicity. Androgen receptor targeting therapies, such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), can induce metabolic changes and directly impact cardiovascular function, thereby reducing cardiorespiratory fitness and increasing CV mortality. Moreover, more than half of the PCa patients have poorly controlled CV risk factors at baseline. Hence, there is an urgent need to address gaps in preventing and managing CVD in PCa patients. Summary: Screening and optimizing CV risk factors and CVD in patients undergoing ADT are essential to reduce CV mortality, the leading non-cancer cause of death in PCa survivors. The risk of CV morbidity and mortality can be further mitigated by considering the patient's cardiovascular risk profile when deciding the choice and duration of ADT. A multidisciplinary team-based approach is crucial to achieve the best outcomes for PCa patients undergoing therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether serum LH levels on hCG trigger day are associated with live birth rate (LBR) after fresh embryo transfer with GnRH antagonist regimen in different populations. Methods: This study was a retrospective study. A total of 3059 fresh embryo transfers were divided into three populations: predicted normal ovarian responders (NOR) (n=2049), patients with PCOS (n=533), and predicted poor ovarian responders (POR) (n=477). Each population was stratified into three groups based on LH levels: < 25th percentile, 25-75th percentile, and > 75th percentile. The primary outcome of the study was LBR, and secondary outcomes included implantation, clinical pregnancy, and early pregnancy loss rates. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to adjust for potential confounders. Results: In NOR, compared to the reference group (>75th percentile), LBR was significantly lower in the < 25th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.662; 95%CI, 0.508-0.863) and 25-75th percentile group (adjusted OR=0.791; 95%CI, 0.633-0.988). In PCOS patients, LBR decreased significantly in the < 25th percentile group (41.4%) compared to the 25-75th percentile group (53.7%) and > 75th percentile group (56.1%). In addition, the LBR was lower in the < 25th percentile group (33.6%) compared with the 25-75th percentile group (43.4%) and the>75th percentile group (42.0%) in POR, but this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: High serum LH levels are associated with increased LBR after fresh embryo transfer in GnRH antagonist cycles, which may be attributable to higher implantation rate. LH may be a predictor of whether to schedule fresh embryo transfer in IVF cycles for better clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the impact of the progesterone concentration on the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger day on clinical outcomes with an antagonist protocol. Methods: The retrospective cohort study included a total of 1,550 fresh autologous ART cycles with one top-quality embryo transfer. Multivariate regression analysis, curve fitting, and threshold effect analysis were performed. Results: A significant association was found between the progesterone concentration and clinical pregnancy rate (adjusted OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97; P = 0.0234), especially in blastocyst transfer (adjusted OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.78; P = 0.0008). The association between the progesterone concentration and the ongoing pregnancy rate was insignificant. The clinical pregnancy rate showed a linear relationship with an increased progesterone concentration in cleavage-stage embryo transfer. In blastocyst transfer, as the progesterone concentration increased, the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates showed a parabolic reverse-U curve; the curve initially increased before declining at high progesterone concentrations. The clinical pregnancy rate increased with a progesterone concentration up to 0.80 ng/mL rather than tended to be stable. The clinical pregnancy rate significantly decreased when the progesterone concentration was =0.80 ng/mL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). It is a potentially life-threatening condition that usually occurs either after human chorionic gonadotropins (hCG) administration in susceptible patients or as a result of an implanting pregnancy, regardless of whether it was achieved by natural conception or infertility treatments. Despite many years of clinical experience regarding the adoption of preventive measures and the identification of patients at high risk, the pathophysiology of OHSS is poorly understood and no reliable predictive risk factors have been identified. Cases presentation We report about two unexpected cases of OHSS following infertility treatments, occurring after freeze-all strategy with embryo cryopreservation approaches. The first case developed spontaneous OHSS (sOHSS), despite efforts to prevent its manifestation by a segmentation approach, including frozen embryo replacement cycle. The second case developed a late form of iatrogenic OHSS (iOHSS), even though the absence of any risk factors. No mutations in the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor (FSHR)-encoding gene were detected, suggesting that the high levels of hCG due to the twin implanting pregnancies could be the only triggering factor of OHSS outbreak. Conclusion Freeze-all strategy with embryo cryopreservation cannot entirely prevent the development of OHSS, which may occur in its spontaneous form independently from the FSHR genotype. Although OHSS remains a rare event, all infertile patients requiring ovulation induction or controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) may be at potential risk of OHSS, either in the presence or in the absence of risk factors. We suggest closely monitoring cases of pregnancy following infertility treatments in order to provide early diagnosis and adopt the conservative management.

Jacques Donnez,1,2 Luciana Cacciottola,3 Jean-Luc Squifflet,4 Marie-Madeleine Dolmans3,4 1Department of Gynaecology, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 2Société de Recherche pour l’Infertilité (SRI), Brussels, Belgium; 3Gynecology Research Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 4Gynecology Department, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, BelgiumCorrespondence: Marie-Madeleine Dolmans, Gynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 52, bte B1.52.02, Brussels, 1200, Belgium, Tel +32 02 764 5237, Fax +32 02 764 9507, Email marie-madeleine.dolmans@uclouvain.beAbstract: Estrogens play a critical role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and it is logical to assume that lowering estradiol levels with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists may prove effective, especially in women who fail to respond to progestogens. Indeed, due to progesterone resistance, oral contraceptives and progestogens work well in two-thirds of women suffering from endometriosis, but are ineffective in 33% of women. Oral GnRH antagonists have therefore been evaluated for management of premenopausal women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. The first publication on these drugs reported the efficacy of elagolix. The present paper is a narrative review of linzagolix, which is an orally administered GnRH receptor antagonist with low pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability. It binds to and blocks the GnRH receptor in the pituitary gland, resulting in a dose-dependent drop in luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) production. This reduction in LH and FSH levels in turn leads to a dose-dependent decline in estrogen. Phase 2 and 3 trials are reviewed and discussed here. There is a place for GnRH antagonists in the management of symptomatic endometriosis, and linzagolix with or without add-back therapy (ABT) is one option that can be used at low doses, avoiding the need for ABT, which is contraindicated in some patients.Keywords: endometriosis, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, progesterone resistance, GnRH antagonist

Abstract Background Late follicular phase progesterone elevation (LFPE) during ovarian stimulation is associated with reduced live birth rates (LBRs) after cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, due to better synchronization with a stimulated endometrium, prior studies shown that LFPE had no effect on transferring embryos at blastocyst stage. The study aim to exam whether the developmental stage of embryos and serum progesterone levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration jointly affect the odds of live birth in fresh fresh IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Methods The single-center retrospective cohort study included a total of 4,471 fresh embryo transfer cycles with 2,342 at cleavage stage versus 2,129 at blastocyst stage. Patients underwent IVF/ICSI with ovarian stimulation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. The serum progesterone level was examined both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable by quartiles. Analysis was performed using the generalized estimating equations framework and multivariate regression models. Results LBRs were inversely associated with progesterone as a continuous variable on the day of hCG in both the cleavage-stage (crude OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.73–1.03; adjusted OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.98) and the blastocyst-stage (crude OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.56–0,78; adjusted OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.50–0.73) groups. The interaction testing was highly significant (P = 0.018) indicating an effect modifying role of stage of embryos transferred on the association of pregesterone values with the LBRs in fresh cycles. A similar pattern for a greater reduction in ORs for live birth in cycles with blastocysts transfer was also observed when progesterone was analyzed by interquartile ranges. The findings remained unchanged in subgroup analysis stratified by types of ovarian response. Conclusions In fresh cycles, detrimental effect of late follicular phase progesterone elevation on live birth was more prominent in blastocyst-stage group compared with that in clevaged-stage group.

Purpose: For poor ovarian responders (PORs), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist was commonly used for prevention of premature LH surge during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) over the past two decades. The application of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) recently increased, but the role of PPOS for PORs was uncertain. We aimed to analyze the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and the outcome of oocyte retrieval among PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocol for PORs. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study, which enrolled the PORs (defined by the Bologna criteria) undergoing COS with PPOS or flexible GnRH antagonist protocol during January 2018 to December 2021. We compared the incidence of premature LH surge (LH > 10 mIU/mL) and the outcome of oocyte retrieval between the PPOS group and the GnRH antagonist group. Results: A total of 314 women were recruited, with 54 in the PPOS group and 260 in the GnRH antagonist group. The PPOS group had lower incidence of premature LH surges compared with the GnRH antagonist protocol group (5.6% vs 16.9%, P value 0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (3.4 vs 3.8, P value 0.066) and oocyte retrieval rates (88.9% vs 88.0%, P value 0.711). Conclusion: Compared with PPOS, GnRH antagonist protocol had higher risk of premature LH surges for PORs but may not affect pregnancy rates. PPOS is suitable for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, but should not totally replace GnRH antagonist protocol for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).