Search

Aims: The prognostic value of 'high dose' loop diuretics in advanced heart failure outpatients is unclear. We aimed to assess the prognosis associated with loop diuretic dose in ambulatory patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT)., Methods and Results: All ambulatory patients (n = 700, median age 55 years and 70% men) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 were included. Patients were divided into 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' loop diuretics corresponding to furosemide equivalent doses of ≤40, 40-250, and >250 mg, respectively. The primary outcome was a combined criterion of waitlist death and urgent HT. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, creatinine levels, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and pulmonary pressures gradually increased with higher diuretic dose. At 12 months, the risk of waitlist death/urgent HT was 7.4%, 19.2%, and 25.6% (P = 0.001) for 'low dose', 'intermediate dose', and 'high dose' patients, respectively. When adjusting for confounders, including natriuretic peptides, hepatic, and renal function, the 'high dose' group was associated with increased waitlist mortality or urgent HT [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 1.33 to 3.73; P = 0.002] and a six-fold higher risk of waitlist death (adjusted HR 6.18, 2.16 to 17.72; P < 0.001) when compared with the 'low dose' group. 'Intermediate doses' were not significantly associated with these two outcomes in adjusted models (P > 0.05)., Conclusions: A 'high dose' of loop diuretics is strongly associated with residual congestion and is a predictor of outcome in patients awaiting HT despite adjustment for classical cardiorenal risk factors. This routine variable may be helpful for risk stratification of pre-HT patients., (© 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: The value of Forrester's perfusion/congestion profiles assessed by invasive catheter evaluation in non-inotrope advanced heart failure patients listed for heart transplant (HT) is unclear. We aimed to assess the value of haemodynamic evaluation according to Forrester's profiles to predict events on the HT waitlist., Methods and Results: All non-inotrope patients (n = 837, 79% ambulatory at listing) registered on the French national HT waiting list between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2019 with right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. The primary outcome was a combined criteria of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent HT or left ventricular assist device implantation. Secondary outcome was waitlist death. The 'warm-dry', 'cold-dry', 'warm-wet', and 'cold-wet' profiles represented 27%, 18%, 27%, and 28% of patients, respectively. At 12 months, the respective rates of primary outcome were 15%, 17%, 25%, and 29% (P = 0.008). Taking the 'warm-dry' category as reference, a significant increase in the risk of primary outcome was observed only in the 'wet' categories, irrespectively of 'warm/cold' status: hazard ratios, 1.50; 1.06-2.13; P = 0.024 in 'warm-wet' and 1.77; 1. 25-2.49; P = 0.001 in 'cold-wet'., Conclusions: Haemodynamic assessment of advanced HF patients using perfusion/congestion profiles predicts the risk of the combine endpoint of waitlist death, delisting for aggravation, urgent heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation. 'Wet' patients had the worst prognosis, independently of perfusion status, thus placing special emphasis on the cardinal prominence of persistent congestion in advanced HF., (© 2022 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Previous studies have shown that pulmonary hypertension is a predictor of mortality in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). Persistent pulmonary hypertension after a reactivity test is associated with a worse outcome after transplantation. Recent studies have shown the utility of different haemodynamic parameters., Aims: To define best haemodynamic parameters for risk stratification in patients with advanced systolic heart failure., Methods: We included 425 consecutive patients who underwent a right heart catheterization with an inotropic challenge if indicated., Results: During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 1.67 (0.49-4.49) years, there were 151 major cardiac events (126 cardiovascular deaths and 25 postoperative deaths after ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation). The most powerful independent predictors of major cardiac events were baseline right atrial pressure (RAP) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.12; P<0.0001) and baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.17; P=0.002). After inotropic challenge, the only independent predictor was mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09; P<0.0001). The combination of PVR (≤or>3 Wood units), RAP (30mmHg) was the best predictor of major events., Conclusion: We suggest using a simple algorithm based on baseline PVR, baseline RAP and mPAP after the inotropic challenge for the risk stratification of stable patients with advanced systolic heart failure., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

LVAD implantation in patients with a recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy has been poorly investigated. This work aims at describing the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving a LVAD within 30 days following the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. Patients from the ASSIST-ICD study was divided into recently and remotely diagnosed cardiomyopathy based on the time from initial diagnosis of cardiomyopathy to LVAD implantation using the cut point of 30 days. The primary end point of the study was all-cause mortality at 30-day and during follow-up. A total of 652 patients were included and followed during a median time of 9.1 (2.5 to 22.1) months. In this population, 117 (17.9%) had a recently diagnosed cardiomyopathy and had LVAD implantation after a median time of 15.0 (9.0 to 24.0) days following the diagnosis. This group of patients was significantly younger, with more ischemic cardiomyopathy, more sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) events at the time of the diagnosis and were more likely to receive temporary mechanical support before LVAD compared with the remotely diagnosed group. Postoperative in-hospital survival was similar in groups, but recently diagnosed patients had a better long-term survival after hospital discharge. SCA before LVAD and any cardiac surgery combined with LVAD implantation were identified as 2 independent predictors of postoperative mortality in recently diagnosed patients. In conclusion, rescue LVAD implantation for recently diagnosed severe cardiomyopathy is common in clinical practice. Such patients experience a relatively low postoperative mortality and have a better long-term survival compared with remotely diagnosed patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may be an attractive alternative therapeutic option for elderly patients with heart failure who are ineligible for heart transplantation., Aim: We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients (i.e. aged≥70 years) receiving an LVAD., Methods: This observational study was conducted in 19 centres between 2006 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups-younger (aged<70 years) and elderly (aged≥70 years), based on age at time of LVAD implantation., Results: A total of 652 patients were included in the final analysis, and 74 patients (11.3%) were aged≥70 years at the time of LVAD implantation (maximal age 77.6 years). The proportion of elderly patients receiving an LVAD each year was constant, with a median of 10.6% (interquartile range 8.0-15.4%) per year, and all were implanted as destination therapy. Elderly and younger patients had similar durations of hospitalization in intensive care units and total lengths of hospital stays. Both age groups experienced similar rates of LVAD-related complications (i.e. stroke, bleeding, driveline infection and LVAD exchange), and the occurrence of LVAD complications did not impact survival in the elderly group compared with the younger group. Lastly, when compared with younger patients implanted as destination therapy, the elderly group also exhibited similar mid-term survival., Conclusion: This work strongly suggests that selected elderly adults can be scheduled for LVAD implantation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

We aimed at characterizing the impact of low and high body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery and define the predictors of mortality in patients with abnormal BMI (low/high). This study was conducted in 19 centers from 2006 to 2016. Patients were divided based on their baseline BMI into 3 groups of BMI: low (BMI ≤18.5 kg/m²); normal (BMI = 18.5 to 24.99 kg/m²) and high (BMI ≥25 kg/m²) (including overweight (BMI = 25 to 29.99 kg/m²), and obesity (BMI ≥30 Kg/m²)). Among 652 patients, 29 (4.4%), 279 (42.8%) and 344 (52.8%) had a low-, normal-, and high BMI, respectively. Patients with high BMI were significantly more likely men, with more co-morbidities and more history of ventricular/supra-ventricular arrhythmias before LVAD implantation. Patients with abnormal BMI had significantly lower survival than those with normal BMI. Notably, those with low BMI experienced the worst survival whereas overweight or obese patients had similar survival. Four predictors of mortality for LVAD candidates with abnormal BMI were defined: total bilirubin ≥16 µmol/L before LVAD, hypertension, destination therapy, and cardiac surgery with LVAD. Depending on the number of predictor per patients, those with abnormal BMI may be divided in 3 groups of 1-year mortality risk, i.e., low (0 to 1 predictor: 29% and 31%), intermediate (2 to 3 predictors, 51% and 52%, respectively), and high (4 predictors: 83%). In conclusion, LVAD recipients with abnormal BMI experience lower survival, especially underweight patients. Four predictors of mortality have been identified for LVAD population with abnormal BMI, differentiating those a low-, intermediate-, and high risks of death., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The impact of uncommon etiology cardiomyopathies on Left-ventricular assist device (LVAD)-recipient outcomes is not very well known. This study aimed to characterize patients with uncommon cardiomyopathy etiologies and examine the outcomes between uncommon and ischemic/idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. This observational study was conducted in 19 centers between 2006 and 2016. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients with uncommon etiology were compared to patients with idiopathic dilated/ischemic cardiomyopathies. Among 652 LVAD-recipients included, a total of 590 (90.5%) patients were classified as ischemic/idiopathic and 62 (9.5%) patients were classified in the "uncommon etiologies" group. Main uncommon etiologies were: hypertrophic (n = 12(19%)); cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) (n = 12(19%)); myocarditis (n = 11(18%)); valvulopathy (n = 9(15%)) and others (n = 18(29%)). Patients with uncommon etiologies were significantly younger with more female and presented less co-morbidities. Additionally, patients with uncommon cardiomyopathies were less implanted as destination therapy compared with ischemic/idiopathic group (29% vs 38.8%). During a follow-up period of 9.1 months, both groups experienced similar survival. However, subgroup of hypertrophic/valvular cardiomyopathies and CTRCD had significantly higher mortality compared to the ischemic/idiopathic or myocarditis/others cardiomyopathies. Conversely, patients with myocarditis/others etiologies experienced a better survival. Indeed, the 12-months survival in the myocarditis/others; ischemic/idiopathic and hypertrophic/CTRCD/valvulopathy group were 77%; 65%, and 46% respectively. In conclusion, LVAD-recipients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and CTRCD experienced the higher mortality rate., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Assessment of potential donors is an essential part of heart transplantation. Despite the shortage of donor hearts, donor heart procurement from brain-dead organ donors remains low in France, which may be explained by the increasing proportion of high-risk donors, as well as the mismatch between donor assessment and the transplant team's expectations. Improving donor and donor heart assessment is essential to improve the low utilization rate of available donor hearts without increasing post-transplant recipient mortality. This document provides information to practitioners involved in brain-dead donor management, evaluation and selection, concerning the place of medical history, electrocardiography, cardiac imaging, biomarkers and haemodynamic and arrhythmia assessment in the characterization of potential heart donors., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Severe pulmonary hypertension is a usual contraindication to heart transplantation. A few studies have found that sildenafil has a favourable effect on haemodynamic variables in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction., Aim: To report our clinical experience of sildenafil in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and severe pulmonary hypertension., Methods: All patients underwent echocardiography, radionuclide angiography, a cardiopulmonary exercise test and right heart catheterization before and after treatment with sildenafil. All patients were clinically stable and were receiving maximal tolerated doses of recommended drugs., Results: We included 18 patients, with a mean±standard deviation age of 47±13 years. After a median of 8.7 months (interquartile range, 4.4-13.5 months) on sildenafil, there was a significant improvement in New York Heart Association classification (P=0.02) and mean right ventricular ejection fraction (from 26±7% to 30±9%; P=0.008), with a decrease in the VE/VCO2 slope (from 52±11 to 44±11; P=0.009) and in pulmonary vascular resistance (from 5.3±1.9 Wood units to 3.3±1.8 Wood units; P=0.01). During follow-up, three patients had urgent heart transplantation, two had non-urgent transplantation and six had left ventricular assist device implantation. All patients with pulmonary vascular resistance<3 Wood units after sildenafil were alive, compared with four in the other subgroup (44% survival)., Conclusion: In patients with pulmonary hypertension related to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, sildenafil seems to improve cardiac haemodynamics., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Some patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) have a dramatic improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after β-blockade. No study has analyzed the long-term echocardiographic and clinical follow-up of this subgroup of patients., Methods and Results: We included in this analysis 174 consecutive patients with LVSD who had an LVEF≥45% after β-blockade. We performed a long-term echocardiographic follow-up (median 7.7 [4-9.9] years) and clinical follow-up (median 9.2 [7.2-10.8] years). LVEF improved from 33±8% to 54±6% after β-blockade (P<0.0001). At the last echocardiographic evaluation, 26% of the patients had an LVEF<45% (mean±SD: 34±6%), whereas 74% still had an LVEF≥45% (mean±SD: 54±6%). Independent predictors of LVEF deterioration were a low LVEF, a high left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and a low heart rate after β-blockade, and the presence of a complete left bundle-branch block. In the overall study population, survival rates were 90% at 5 years and 75% at 10 years. Cardiovascular death rate was 9%, noncardiovascular death rate was 11%, and unknown death rate was 3%. Patients with subsequent LVEF deterioration had a higher cardiovascular mortality compared with patients with sustained recovered LVEF (22% versus 4%)., Conclusions: The long-term survival of patients with LVSD and with near-normal LVEF after β-blockade is good. However, a quarter of these patients may experience a subsequent degradation of LVEF. These patients are at higher risk of cardiovascular mortality., (© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Purpose: This study aims to study the clinical implications of the concomitant use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)., Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent LVAD (Heart Mate II) implantation with concomitant ICD therapy at our institution between June 2007 and August 2012 were included. We sought to investigate (1) the electromagnetic interference between LVAD and ICD telemetry, (2) the effect of LVAD implantation on right ventricular (RV) lead parameters and (3) the ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VAs) that occur post-LVAD implantation., Results: Of the 23 patients (53 ± 9 years, 73 % male, LVEF 19 ± 9 %) included, ICD telemetry was lost in four patients post-LVAD implantation (Saint-Jude-Medical Atlas V-193, V-240, V-243, and Sorin CRT-8750), prompting either use of a metal shield (n = 1), a change in position of the programmer head (n = 1) or ICD replacement (n = 2). LVAD implantation was associated with a decrease in both RV signal amplitude (p = 0.04) and RV impedance (p < 0.01), and a trend towards an increased RV pacing threshold (p = 0.08), without affecting clinical outcome. Eleven patients (47.8 %) experienced VAs after LVAD implantation, which on the whole were well tolerated. Their occurrence was strongly linked to a history of VAs before device implantation (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Electromagnetic interference between LVADs and ICD telemetry may necessitate ICD replacement. LVAD placement is associated with significant changes in RV lead parameters that have minimal clinical significance. VAs occur in approximately half of LVAD patients seen and their occurrence is strongly related to a history of VAs prior to LVAD implantation.

Aims: Previous studies have demonstrated that the radionuclide right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (RVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and tissue Doppler peak systolic tricuspid annular velocity (STr) were independent predictors of cardiac survival in stable patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). No study has compared the prognostic value of these three RV parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of RVEF, TAPSE, and STr in a large group of patients with LVSD., Methods and Results: We analysed 527 consecutive patients who underwent an extensive prognostic evaluation (clinical data, biological data, radionuclide angiography, echoDopplercardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise test). Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and STr were weakly correlated with RVEF (r = 0.20). During a follow-up period of 1268 days (802-1830), there were 121 cardiovascular deaths. Best cut-off values were 37%, 9.7 cm/s, and 18.5 mm for RVEF, STr, and TAPSE, respectively. Right ventricular ejection fraction was a powerful independent predictor of cardiac survival [relative risk (RR): 2.05 (1.29-3.26), P = 0.002]. Peak systolic tricuspid annular velocity added a modest prognostic information [RR: 1.56 (1.02-2.39), P = 0.04]. However, the combination of STr with RVEF was the most powerful predictor of cardiovascular death. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion was not an independent predictor of cardiac survival., Conclusions: Right ventricular systolic function remains a powerful independent predictor of the clinical outcome. Even in the context of a complete echocardiographic assessment, radionuclide RVEF continues to be the most powerful RV systolic parameter for cardiac survival prediction. However, the determination of STr, in addition to RVEF, could improve risk stratification.