Search

Abstract Background Reactive case detection (RACD) for malaria control has been found effective in low transmission settings, but its impact and cost-effectiveness in moderate-to-high transmission settings are unknown. We conducted an economic evaluation alongside an empirical trial of a modified RACD strategy (1,7-mRCTR) in three moderate-to-high malaria transmission districts in Tanzania. Methods The costs and cost savings associated with the intervention relative to passive case detection alone were estimated in the study sites of Kilwa, Kibiti, and Rufiji districts in Tanzania from 2019–2021. Empirical cost data were collected using household surveys. The incremental costs of the intervention were calculated from under a societal perspective. Costs are reported in 2022 US dollars. Trial data and malaria registers from health facilities were used to calculate the number of malaria cases detected. We simulated unobserved and distal health effects of the intervention to assess cost-effectiveness in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Propagated uncertainty was assessed via second-order Monte Carlo simulation, including bootstrapping of empirical data distributions. Incremental costs per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted were compared to a willingness-to-pay threshold based on estimated opportunity costs of healthcare spending in Tanzania. Results The programmatic cost of the 1,7-mRCTR intervention was 5327 United States Dollars (USD) per 1000 population. The combination of reactive and passive case detection in the intervention arm resulted in an additional 445 malaria cases detected per 1000 compared to passive detection alone, yielding an incremental cost per additional case detected of 12.0 USD. Based on modelling results, for every percentage point decline in malaria prevalence, the intervention averted 95.2 cases and 0.04 deaths per 1000 population. On average, the 1,7-mRCTR intervention averted 19.1 DALYs per 1000 population. Compared to passive malaria detection, the ICERs for the 1,7-mRCTR intervention were 7.3 USD per case averted, 16,884 USD per death averted, and 163 USD per DALY averted. Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates that the 1,7-mRCTR intervention appears to be cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay threshold of 417 USD per DALY averted, showing that modified RACD strategies can provide value for money in moderate-to-high transmission settings. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background Progress in malaria control has stalled in recent years and innovative surveillance and response approaches are needed to accelerate malaria control and elimination efforts in endemic areas of Africa. Building on a previous China-UK-Tanzania pilot study on malaria control, this study aimed to assess the impact of the 1,7-malaria Reactive Community-Based Testing and Response (1,7-mRCTR) approach implemented over two years in three districts of Tanzania. Methods The 1,7-mRCTR approach provides community-based malaria testing via rapid diagnostic tests and treatment in villages with the highest burden of malaria incidence based on surveillance data from health facilities. We used a difference-in-differences quasi-experimental design with linear probability models and two waves of cross-sectional household surveys to assess the impact of 1,7-mRCTR on malaria prevalence. We conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results, examined how intervention effects varied in subgroups, and explored alternative explanations for the observed results. Results Between October 2019 and September 2021, 244,771 community-based malaria rapid tests were completed in intervention areas, and each intervention village received an average of 3.85 rounds of 1-7mRCTR. Malaria prevalence declined from 27.4% at baseline to 11.7% at endline in the intervention areas and from 26.0% to 16.0% in the control areas. 1,7-mRCTR was associated with a 4.5-percentage-point decrease in malaria prevalence (95% confidence interval: − 0.067, − 0.023), equivalent to a 17% reduction from the baseline. In Rufiji, a district characterized by lower prevalence and where larviciding was additionally provided, 1,7-mRCTR was associated with a 63.9% decline in malaria prevalence. Conclusions The 1,7-mRCTR approach reduced malaria prevalence. Despite implementation interruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and supply chain challenges, the study provided novel evidence on the effectiveness of community-based reactive approaches in moderate- to high-endemicity areas and demonstrated the potential of South-South cooperation in tackling global health challenges. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background In 2015, a China-UK-Tanzania tripartite pilot project was implemented in southeastern Tanzania to explore a new model for reducing malaria burden and possibly scaling-out the approach into other malaria-endemic countries. The 1,7-malaria Reactive Community-based Testing and Response (1,7-mRCTR) which is a locally-tailored approach for reporting febrile malaria cases in endemic villages was developed to stop transmission and Plasmodium life-cycle. The (1,7-mRCTR) utilizes existing health facility data and locally trained community health workers to conduct community-level testing and treatment. Methods The pilot project was implemented from September 2015 to June 2018 in Rufiji District, southern Tanzania. The study took place in four wards, two with low incidence and two with a higher incidence. One ward of each type was selected for each of the control and intervention arms. The control wards implemented the existing Ministry of Health programmes. The 1,7-mRCTR activities implemented in the intervention arm included community testing and treatment of malaria infection. Malaria case-to-suspect ratios at health facilities (HF) were aggregated by villages, weekly to identify the village with the highest ratio. Community-based mobile test stations (cMTS) were used for conducting mass testing and treatment. Baseline (pre) and endline (post) household surveys were done in the control and intervention wards to assess the change in malaria prevalence measured by the interaction term of ‘time’ (post vs pre) and arm in a logistic model. A secondary analysis also studied the malaria incidence reported at the HFs during the intervention. Results Overall the 85 rounds of 1,7-mRCTR conducted in the intervention wards significantly reduced the odds of malaria infection by 66% (adjusted OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.26,0.44, p