Search

Purpose: The introduction of CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) gives hope to patients with otherwise dismal prognosis. Therapy outcomes, however, depend upon selection of patients and accurate early identification of non-responders. Patients treated with CAR-T usually undergo [18F]FDG PET-CT at time of decision (TD), time of CAR-T transfusion (TT), 1 month (M1), and 3 months (M3) post-therapy. The purpose of the current study was to identify the specific parameters that should be addressed when reporting PET-CT studies in the clinical setting of CAR-T therapy. Methods: A total of 138 PET-CT scans (30 TD, 42 TT, 44 M1, 22 M3) of 48 patients treated with CAR-T were included. SUVmax, TMTV, and TLG were calculated in all scans. Response was assessed using the Deauville scale and ΔSUVmax method. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Median follow-up was 12.8 (IQR 6.4–16.0) months from CAR-T infusion. Results: In a univariate analysis, TD-SUVmax > 17.1 and TT-SUVmax > 12.1 were associated with shorter OS (Pv < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, three factors were significantly associated with shorter OS: TD-SUVmax > 17.1 (HR 10.3; Pv < 0.01), LDH > 450 U/l (HR 7.7; Pv < 0.01), and ECOG score > 1 (HR 5.5; Pv = 0.04). Data from TD and TT PET-CT scans were not predictive of toxicity. On M1-PET-CT, patients with a Deauville score > 3 had significantly shorter OS (median 7.9 months, versus not reached, Pv < 0.01). ΔSUVmax ≤ 66% on M1-PET-CT predicted shorter OS when M1-SUVmax was compared to TD-SUVmax (Pv = 0.02) but not to TT-SUVmax (Pv = 0.38). Conclusion: Pre-treatment SUVmax may guide patient selection for CAR-T therapy. On M1-PET-CT, Deauville score and ΔSUVmax from TD may identify early therapy failure. These parameters are easy to obtain and should be included in the PET-CT report. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The characteristics of infections following chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cells targeting CD19 in real‐word population are obscure. We analyzed infections' characteristics in the first month among consecutive patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (n = 60, median age, 69.3 years), treated with commercial CAR‐T cells. ECOG performance status (PS) was 2‐3 in most patients (58%). Infections were observed in 45% of patients (16, 27%, bacterial infections, and 14, 23%, viral infections). Bacterial infection included clinically documented infection in 7 (Pneumonia, n = 5; periodontal infection, n = 1; and cellulitis, n = 1) and microbiology documented infection (MDI) in 9 patients (Gram‐negative rod, n = 5; Gram‐positive cocci, n = 3, bacteremia; polymicrobial, n = 1). The most common viral infection was cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation (n = 10, 17%) leading to initiation of anti‐CMV treatment in 6 (60%) among these patients. None had CMV disease. In univariate analysis, immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was associated with higher incidence of bacterial infection (OR=4.5, P =.018), while there was a trend for lower incidence of bacterial infections in patients with chemosensitive disease to bridging therapy (OR=0.375, P =.074). Age or PS was not associated with increased risk of bacterial infection. Increase in C‐reactive protein (CRP) prior to fever onset was associated with microbiologically documented infections. We conclude that infections are common in the first month following CAR‐T‐cell administration, however, were not increased in elderly patients or those presenting with poorer PS. Increase in CRP prior to fever onset could support infection over cytokine release syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data regarding efficacy and toxicity of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the elderly, geriatric population are insufficient. In 2019, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene-ciloleucel were commercially approved for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. From May 2019 onwards, 47 relapsed/refractory diffuse large Bcell lymphoma patients, ≥70 years underwent lymphopharesis in three Israeli centers. Elderly (n=41, mean age 76.2 years) and young (n=41, mean age 55.4 years) patients were matched based on ECOG performance status and lactose dehydrogenase levels. There were no differences in CD4/CD8 ratio (P=0.94), %CD4 naive (P=0.92), %CD8 naive (P=0.44) and exhaustion markers (both HLA-DR and PD-1) between CAR-T cell products in both cohorts. Forty-one elderly patients (87%) received CAR-T cell infusion. There were no differences in the incidence of grade ≥3 cytokine-release-syndrome (P=0.29), grade≥3 neurotoxicity (P=0.54), and duration of hospitalization (P=0.55) between elderly and younger patients. There was no difference in median D7-CAR-T cell expansion (P=0.145). Response rates were similar between the two groups (complete response 46% and partial response 17% in the elderly group, P=0.337). Non-relapse mortality at 1 and 3 months was 0 in both groups. With a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 1.3-17.2 months), 6- and 12-months progression-free and overall survival in elderly patients were 39% and 32%, and 74% and 69%, respectively. EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires, obtained at 1 month, showed worsening of disability and cancer-related-symptoms in elderly versus younger patients. We conclude that outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy are comparable between elderly, geriatric and younger patients, indicating that age as per se should not preclude CAR-T cell administration. Longer rehabilitation therapy is essential to improve disabilities and long-term symptoms.