Search

The complement (C) system is implicated in the etiopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there is a lack of studies characterizing all three C pathways in RA patients. This study aimed to evaluate the association between an in-depth examination of the C system and RA patient characteristics, focusing on disease activity and the presence of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPA). In a cohort of 430 RA patients, functional assays of the three C pathways (classical, alternative, and lectin) and serum levels of their components were assessed. Components included C1q (classical); factor D and properdin (alternative); lectin (lectin); C1-inhibitor; C2, C4, and C4b (classical and lectin); C3, C3a, and C4b (common); and C5, C5a, and C9 (terminal). A multivariable linear regression analysis showed significant positive correlations between C-reactive protein and C system proteins and functional assays, especially in the terminal and common pathways. Disease activity, measured by scores with or without acute phase reactants, positively correlated with the classical pathway functional test and terminal pathway products. Conversely, rheumatoid factor or ACPA presence was associated with lower classical pathway values and decreased C3a and C4b levels, suggesting complement depletion. In conclusion, RA disease activity increases C molecules and functional complement assays, while rheumatoid factor or ACPA positivity is linked to C consumption. Our study offers a detailed analysis of the complement system's role in RA, potentially guiding the development of more targeted and effective treatment strategies.

Autosomal polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common genetic form of kidney failure, reflecting unmet needs in management. Prescription of the only approved treatment (tolvaptan) is limited to persons with rapidly progressing ADPKD. Rapid progression may be diagnosed by assessing glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline, usually estimated (eGFR) from equations based on serum creatinine (eGFRcr) or cystatin-C (eGFRcys). We have assessed the concordance between eGFR decline and identification of rapid progression (rapid eGFR loss), and measured GFR (mGFR) declines (rapid mGFR loss) using iohexol clearance in 140 adults with ADPKD with ≥3 mGFR and eGFRcr assessments, of which 97 also had eGFRcys assessments. The agreement between mGFR and eGFR decline was poor: mean concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) between the method declines were low (0.661, range 0.628 to 0.713), and Bland and Altman limits of agreement between eGFR and mGFR declines were wide. CCC was lower for eGFRcys. From a practical point of view, creatinine-based formulas failed to detect rapid mGFR loss (-3 mL/min/y or faster) in around 37% of the cases. Moreover, formulas falsely indicated around 40% of the cases with moderate or stable decline as rapid progressors. The reliability of formulas in detecting real mGFR decline was lower in the non-rapid-progressors group with respect to that in rapid-progressor patients. The performance of eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys equations was even worse. In conclusion, eGFR decline may misrepresent mGFR decline in ADPKD in a significant percentage of patients, potentially misclassifying them as progressors or non-progressors and impacting decisions of initiation of tolvaptan therapy.