Search

Food and digital culture are mutually implicated in contemporary processes of knowledge production and power contestation around the world. Our introduction and the papers in this special issue of the European Journal of Cultural Studies seek to draw out the distinctions, parallels and overlaps across food and the digital to offer critical insights into digital food culture’s capacities, paradoxes and impacts on everyday life. We ask a series of questions fundamentally focused on issues of power that signal a critical concern for the (re)production and circulation of inequality within the food and digital nexus. For us and the authors here, Cultural Studies is particularly fertile ground from which to analyse digital food culture precisely because of the discipline’s commitment to critiquing power and inequality and its subsequent capacity to illuminate everyday digital food politics and their social, cultural and ethical impacts. This article presents and highlights key questions—and introduces related concepts and theoretical debates—that drive this research agenda. In addition, we address the ways the issue’s papers connect to digital food culture and power after COVID-19. We conclude with a summary of the articles in the issue and their contributions to digital food culture research and cultural studies more broadly.

Recent scholarship on ‘urban land grabbing’ has urged researchers to take more geographically nuanced perspectives on land appropriation, especially in the global South. In this, there is the need to understand the actions of and interactions amongst a multiplicity of local actors—beyond large-scale investors and global cities—when considering land grabs in the spaces of urban development. Therefore, this paper analyses what—in building on the work of Ojeda (2016)—we conceptualise as the more ‘gradual’ and ‘ordinary’ driving factors of land use conflict and dispossession in the peri-urban spaces of the small-scale city of Sogamoso, Colombia. Based on participant observation fieldwork and 38 semi-structured key-informant interviews between 2017 and 2018, we first situate our findings within debates on peri-urban landscape governance and conflict and urban environmental politics in Latin America and Colombia. We then explore the ways that the everyday, livelihood practices of agriculture, mining and ecological conservation are in tension with urban expansionism and land grabbing within the urban and peri-urban spaces. In particular, we found that these tensions are facilitated by local policy incoherence and the failures of municipal, place-based policies and politics: Policy confusion, incoherence and capture by elites results in normative uncertainty and weak environmental governance while a lack of coordinated municipal governance in peri-urban spaces leads to further confusion and an exacerbation of already unequal, grounded power relations. Both lead to gradual and more ordinary processes of land grabbing by powerful actors in Sogamoso to the detriment of the livelihoods of citizens and ecological conservation in peri-urban spaces. In short, focusing on these often unnoticed, place-based and internally-dynamic forces of landscape conflict within the city of Sogamoso brings to the fore the everyday actions, actors and power relationships involved in urban expansionism, mining, farming and ecosystems conservation as these practices seek to coexist and compete for the same, relatively sparse amount of peri-urban space. The paper makes a substantial empirical and theory-building contribution to understanding the shifting urban geographies and environmental governance of the cities of the Global South through the day to day local scale governance of urban land use conflicts and land grabbing from the perspective of peri-urban landscapes in the small-scale city of Sogamoso, Brazil.