1. Safety and efficacy of mass drug administration with a single-dose triple-drug regimen of albendazole plus diethylcarbamazine plus ivermectin for lymphatic filariasis in Papua New Guinea: An open-label, cluster-randomised trial
- Author
-
Walker, M, Tavul, L, Laman, M, Howard, C, Kotty, B, Samuel, A, Bjerum, C, O'Brian, K, Kumai, S, Amuga, M, Lorry, L, Kerry, Z, Kualawi, M, Karl, S, Makita, L, John, LN, Bieb, S, Wangi, J, Weil, GJ, Goss, CW, Tisch, DJ, Pomat, W, King, CL, Robinson, LJ, Walker, M, Tavul, L, Laman, M, Howard, C, Kotty, B, Samuel, A, Bjerum, C, O'Brian, K, Kumai, S, Amuga, M, Lorry, L, Kerry, Z, Kualawi, M, Karl, S, Makita, L, John, LN, Bieb, S, Wangi, J, Weil, GJ, Goss, CW, Tisch, DJ, Pomat, W, King, CL, and Robinson, LJ
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: Papua New Guinea (PNG) has a high burden of lymphatic filariasis (LF) caused by Wuchereria bancrofti, with an estimated 4.2 million people at risk of infection. A single co-administered dose of ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (IDA) has been shown to have superior efficacy in sustained clearance of microfilariae compared to diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (DA) in small clinical trials. A community-based cluster-randomised trial of DA versus IDA was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of IDA and DA for LF in a moderately endemic, treatment-naive area in PNG. METHODOLOGY: All consenting, eligible residents of 24 villages in Bogia district, Madang Province, PNG were enrolled, screened for W. bancrofti antigenemia and microfilaria (Mf) and randomised to receive IDA (N = 2382) or DA (N = 2181) according to their village of residence. Adverse events (AE) were assessed by active follow-up for 2 days and passive follow-up for an additional 5 days. Antigen-positive participants were re-tested one year after MDA to assess treatment efficacy. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of the 4,563 participants enrolled, 96% were assessed for AEs within 2 days after treatment. The overall frequency of AEs were similar after either DA (18%) or IDA (20%) treatment. For those individuals with AEs, 87% were mild (Grade 1), 13% were moderate (Grade 2) and there were no Grade 3, Grade 4, or serious AEs (SAEs). The frequency of AEs was greater in Mf-positive than Mf-negative individuals receiving IDA (39% vs 20% p<0.001) and in Mf-positive participants treated with IDA (39%), compared to those treated with DA (24%, p = 0.023). One year after treatment, 64% (645/1013) of participants who were antigen-positive at baseline were re-screened and 74% of these participants (475/645) remained antigen positive. Clearance of Mf was achieved in 96% (52/54) of infected individuals in the IDA arm versus 84% (56/67) of infected individuals in the DA arm (relative risk (RR) 1.15; 95%
- Published
- 2022