1. Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols
- Author
-
La, Neefjes, Rossi A, Ts, Genders, Nieman K, Sl, Papadopoulou, As, Dharampal, Cj, Schultz, Ac, Weustink, Ml, Dijkshoorn, Gj, Ten Kate, Dedic A, van Straten M, Filippo Cademartiri, Mg, Hunink, Gp, Krestin, Pj, Feyter, Nr, Mollet, Neefjes, La, Rossi, Alexia, Genders, T, Nieman, K, Papadopoulou, Sl, Dharampal, A, Schultz, Cj, Weustink, Ac, Dijkshoorn, Ml, Ten Kate, Gj, Dedic, A, van Straten, M, Cademartiri, F, Hunink, Mg, Krestin, Gp, de Feyter, Pj, and Mollet, Nr
- Subjects
CT coronary angiography ,Radiation dose ,Image quality - Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic performance and radiation exposure of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography (CTCA) protocols to detect coronary stenosis with more than 50 % lumen obstruction. METHODS: We prospectively included 459 symptomatic patients referred for CTCA. Patients were randomized between high-pitch spiral vs. narrow-window sequential CTCA protocols (heart rate below 65 bpm, group A), or between wide-window sequential vs. retrospective spiral protocols (heart rate above 65 bpm, group B). Diagnostic performance of CTCA was compared with quantitative coronary angiography in 267 patients. RESULTS: In group A (231 patients, 146 men, mean heart rate 58 ± 7 bpm), high-pitch spiral CTCA yielded a lower per-segment sensitivity compared to sequential CTCA (89 % vs. 97 %, P = 0.01). Specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (95 %, 62 %, 99 % vs. 96 %, 73 %, 100 %, P > 0.05) but radiation dose was lower (1.16 ± 0.60 vs. 3.82 ± 1.65 mSv, P 0.05). Radiation dose of sequential CTCA was lower compared to retrospective CTCA (6.12 ± 2.58 vs. 8.13 ± 4.52 mSv, P
- Published
- 2013