Search

Traffic crashes profoundly impede traffic efficiency and pose economic challenges. Accurate prediction of post-crash traffic status provides essential information for evaluating traffic perturbations and developing effective solutions. Previous studies have established a series of deep learning models to predict post-crash traffic conditions, however, these correlation-based methods cannot accommodate the biases caused by time-varying confounders and the heterogeneous effects of crashes. The post-crash traffic prediction model needs to estimate the counterfactual traffic speed response to hypothetical crashes under various conditions, which demonstrates the necessity of understanding the causal relationship between traffic factors. Therefore, this paper presents the Marginal Structural Causal Transformer (MSCT), a novel deep learning model designed for counterfactual post-crash traffic prediction. To address the issue of time-varying confounding bias, MSCT incorporates a structure inspired by Marginal Structural Models and introduces a balanced loss function to facilitate learning of invariant causal features. The proposed model is treatment-aware, with a specific focus on comprehending and predicting traffic speed under hypothetical crash intervention strategies. In the absence of ground-truth data, a synthetic data generation procedure is proposed to emulate the causal mechanism between traffic speed, crashes, and covariates. The model is validated using both synthetic and real-world data, demonstrating that MSCT outperforms state-of-the-art models in multi-step-ahead prediction performance. This study also systematically analyzes the impact of time-varying confounding bias and dataset distribution on model performance, contributing valuable insights into counterfactual prediction for intelligent transportation systems., Comment: 13 pages, 9 figures

Urban metro systems can provide highly efficient and effective movements of vast passenger volumes in cities, but they are often affected by disruptions, causing delays, crowding, and ultimately a decline in passenger satisfaction and patronage. To manage and mitigate such adverse consequences, metro operators could benefit greatly from a quantitative understanding of the causal impact of disruptions. Such information would allow them to predict future delays, prepare effective recovery plans, and develop real-time information systems for passengers on trip re-routing options. In this paper, we develop a performance evaluation tool for metro operators that can quantify the causal effects of service disruptions on passenger flows, journey times, travel speeds and crowding densities. Our modelling framework is simple to implement, robust to statistical sources of bias, and can be used with high-frequency large-scale smart card data (over 4.85 million daily trips in our case) and train movement data. We recover disruption effects at the points of disruption (e.g. at disrupted stations) as well as spillover effects that propagate throughout the metro network. This allows us to deliver novel insights on the spatio-temporal propagation of delays in densely used urban public transport networks. We find robust empirical evidence that the causal impacts of disruptions adversely affect service quality throughout the network, in ways that would be hard to predict absent a causal model.

The paper reviews methods that seek to draw causal inference from observational data and demonstrates how they can be applied to empirical problems in engineering research. It presents a framework for causal identification based on the concept of potential outcomes and reviews core contemporary methods that can be used to estimate causal quantities. The paper has two aims: first, to provide a consolidated overview of the statistical literature on causal inference for the data centric engineering community; and second, to illustrate how causal concepts and methods can be applied. The latter aim is achieved through Monte Carlo simulations designed to replicate typical empirical problems encountered in engineering research. R code for the simulations is made available for readers to run and adapt and citations are given to real world studies. Causal inference aims to quantify effects that occur due to explicit intervention (or 'treatment') in non-experimental settings, typically for non-randomly assigned treatments. The paper argues that analyses of engineering interventions are often characterized by such conditions, and consequently, that causal inference has immediate and valuable applicability.

The ability to reduce energy loss at semiconductor surfaces through passivation or surface field engineering has become an essential step in the manufacturing of efficient photovoltaic (PV) and optoelectronic devices. Similarly, surface modification of emerging halide perovskites with quasi-2D heterostructures is now ubiquitous to achieve PV power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) > 22% and has enabled single-junction PV devices to reach 25.7%, yet a fundamental understanding to how these treatments function is still generally lacking. This has established a bottleneck for maximizing beneficial improvements as no concrete selection and design rules currently exist. Here we uncover a new type of tunable passivation strategy and mechanism found in perovskite PV devices that were the first to reach the > 25% PCE milestone, which is enabled by surface treating a bulk perovskite layer with hexylammonium bromide (HABr). We uncover the simultaneous formation of an iodide-rich 2D layer along with a Br halide gradient achieved through partial halide exchange that extends from defective surfaces and grain boundaries into the bulk layer. We demonstrate and directly visualize the tunability of both the 2D layer thickness, halide gradient, and band structure using a unique combination of depth-sensitive nanoscale characterization techniques. We show that the optimization of this interface can extend the charge carrier lifetime to values > 30 {\mu}s, which is the longest value reported for a direct bandgap semiconductor (GaAs, InP, CdTe) over the past 50 years. Importantly, this work reveals an entirely new strategy and knob for optimizing and tuning recombination and charge transport at semiconductor interfaces and will likely establish new frontiers in achieving the next set of perovskite device performance records., Comment: Main text: 16 pages, 4 figures. Supporting Information: 47 pages, 26 figures, 6 tables

The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically impacted people's travel behaviour and out-of-home activity participation. While countermeasures are being eased with increasing vaccination rates, the demand for public transport remains uncertain. To investigate user preferences to travel by London Underground during the pandemic, we conducted a stated choice experiment among its pre-pandemic users (N=961). We analysed the collected data using multinomial and mixed logit models. Our analysis provides insights into the sensitivity of the demand for the London Underground with respect to travel attributes (crowding density and travel time), the epidemic situation (confirmed new COVID-19 cases), and interventions (vaccination rates and mandatory face masks). Mandatory face masks and higher vaccination rates are the top two drivers of travel demand for the London Underground during COVID-19. The positive impact of vaccination rates on the Underground demand increases with crowding density, and the positive effect of mandatory face masks decreases with travel time. Mixed logit reveals substantial preference heterogeneity. For instance, while the average effect of mandatory face masks is positive, preferences of around 20% of the pre-pandemic users to travel by the Underground are negatively affected. The estimated demand sensitivities are relevant for supply-demand management in transit systems and the calibration of advanced epidemiological models.

The fundamental relationship of traffic flow is empirically estimated by fitting a regression curve to a cloud of observations of traffic variables. Such estimates, however, may suffer from the confounding/endogeneity bias due to omitted variables such as driving behaviour and weather. To this end, this paper adopts a causal approach to obtain an unbiased estimate of the fundamental flow-density relationship using traffic detector data. In particular, we apply a Bayesian non-parametric spline-based regression approach with instrumental variables to adjust for the aforementioned confounding bias. The proposed approach is benchmarked against standard curve-fitting methods in estimating the flow-density relationship for three highway bottlenecks in the United States. Our empirical results suggest that the saturated (or hypercongested) regime of the estimated flow-density relationship using correlational curve fitting methods may be severely biased, which in turn leads to biased estimates of important traffic control inputs such as capacity and capacity-drop. We emphasise that our causal approach is based on the physical laws of vehicle movement in a traffic stream as opposed to a demand-supply framework adopted in the economics literature. By doing so, we also aim to conciliate the engineering and economics approaches to this empirical problem. Our results, thus, have important implications both for traffic engineers and transport economists.

In the usual Bayesian setting, a full probabilistic model is required to link the data and parameters, and the form of this model and the inference and prediction mechanisms are specified via de Finetti's representation. In general, such a formulation is not robust to model mis-specification of its component parts. An alternative approach is to draw inference based on loss functions, where the quantity of interest is defined as a minimizer of some expected loss, and to construct posterior distributions based on the loss-based formulation; this strategy underpins the construction of the Gibbs posterior. We develop a Bayesian non-parametric approach; specifically, we generalize the Bayesian bootstrap, and specify a Dirichlet process model for the distribution of the observables. We implement this using direct prior-to-posterior calculations, but also using predictive sampling. We also study the assessment of posterior validity for non-standard Bayesian calculations, and provide an efficient way to calibrate the scaling parameter in the Gibbs posterior so that it can achieve the desired coverage rate. We show that the developed non-standard Bayesian updating procedures yield valid posterior distributions in terms of consistency and asymptotic normality under model mis-specification. Simulation studies show that the proposed methods can recover the true value of the parameter efficiently and achieve frequentist coverage even when the sample size is small. Finally, we apply our methods to evaluate the causal impact of speed cameras on traffic collisions in England.

Consumer preference elicitation is critical to devise effective policies for the diffusion of electric vehicles (EVs) in India. This study contributes to the EV demand literature in the Indian context by (a) analysing the EV attributes and attitudinal factors of Indian car buyers that determine consumers' preferences for EVs, (b) estimating Indian consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) to buy EVs with improved attributes, and c) quantifying how the reference dependence affects the WTP estimates. We adopt a hybrid choice modelling approach for the above analysis. The results indicate that accounting for reference dependence provides more realistic WTP estimates than the standard utility estimation approach. Our results suggest that Indian consumers are willing to pay an additional USD 10-34 in the purchase price to reduce the fast charging time by 1 minute, USD 7-40 to add a kilometre to the driving range of EVs at 200 kilometres, and USD 104-692 to save USD 1 per 100 kilometres in operating cost. These estimates and the effect of attitudes on the likelihood to adopt EVs provide insights about EV design, marketing strategies, and pro-EV policies (e.g., specialised lanes and reserved parking for EVs) to expedite the adoption of EVs in India.

Congestion; operational delays due to a vicious circle of passenger-congestion and train-queuing; is an escalating problem for metro systems because it has negative consequences from passenger discomfort to eventual mode-shifts. Congestion arises due to large volumes of passenger boardings and alightings at bottleneck stations, which may lead to increased stopping times at stations and consequent queuing of trains upstream, further reducing line throughput and implying an even greater accumulation of passengers at stations. Alleviating congestion requires control strategies such as regulating the inflow of passengers entering bottleneck stations. The availability of large-scale smartcard and train movement data from day-to-day operations facilitates the development of models that can inform such strategies in a data-driven way. In this paper, we propose to model station-level passenger-congestion via empirical passenger boarding-alightings and train flow relationships, henceforth, fundamental diagrams (FDs). We emphasise that estimating FDs using station-level data is empirically challenging due to confounding biases arising from the interdependence of operations at different stations, which obscures the true sources of congestion in the network. We thus adopt a causal statistical modelling approach to produce FDs that are robust to confounding and as such suitable to properly inform control strategies. The closest antecedent to the proposed model is the FD for road traffic networks, which informs traffic management strategies, for instance, via locating the optimum operation point. Our analysis of data from the Mass Transit Railway, Hong Kong indicates the existence of concave FDs at identified bottleneck stations, and an associated critical level of boarding-alightings above which congestion sets-in unless there is an intervention.

Transit operators need vulnerability measures to understand the level of service degradation under disruptions. This paper contributes to the literature with a novel causal inference approach for estimating station-level vulnerability in metro systems. The empirical analysis is based on large-scale data on historical incidents and population-level passenger demand. This analysis thus obviates the need for assumptions made by previous studies on human behaviour and disruption scenarios. We develop four empirical vulnerability metrics based on the causal impact of disruptions on travel demand, average travel speed and passenger flow distribution. Specifically, the proposed metrics based on the irregularity in passenger flow distribution extends the scope of vulnerability measurement to the entire trip distribution, instead of just analysing the disruption impact on the entry or exit demand (that is, moments of the trip distribution). The unbiased estimates of disruption impact are obtained by adopting a propensity score matching method, which adjusts for the confounding biases caused by non-random occurrence of disruptions. An application of the proposed framework to the London Underground indicates that the vulnerability of a metro station depends on the location, topology, and other characteristics. We find that, in 2013, central London stations are more vulnerable in terms of travel demand loss. However, the loss of average travel speed and irregularity in relative passenger flows reveal that passengers from outer London stations suffer from longer individual delays due to lack of alternative routes.

Spatial count data models are used to explain and predict the frequency of phenomena such as traffic accidents in geographically distinct entities such as census tracts or road segments. These models are typically estimated using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation methods, which, however, are computationally expensive and do not scale well to large datasets. Variational Bayes (VB), a method from machine learning, addresses the shortcomings of MCMC by casting Bayesian estimation as an optimisation problem instead of a simulation problem. Considering all these advantages of VB, a VB method is derived for posterior inference in negative binomial models with unobserved parameter heterogeneity and spatial dependence. P\'olya-Gamma augmentation is used to deal with the non-conjugacy of the negative binomial likelihood and an integrated non-factorised specification of the variational distribution is adopted to capture posterior dependencies. The benefits of the proposed approach are demonstrated in a Monte Carlo study and an empirical application on estimating youth pedestrian injury counts in census tracts of New York City. The VB approach is around 45 to 50 times faster than MCMC on a regular eight-core processor in a simulation and an empirical study, while offering similar estimation and predictive accuracy. Conditional on the availability of computational resources, the embarrassingly parallel architecture of the proposed VB method can be exploited to further accelerate its estimation by up to 20 times.

Crowding valuation of subway riders is an important input to various supply-side decisions of transit operators. The crowding cost perceived by a transit rider is generally estimated by capturing the trade-off that the rider makes between crowding and travel time while choosing a route. However, existing studies rely on static compensatory choice models and fail to account for inertia and the learning behaviour of riders. To address these challenges, we propose a new dynamic latent class model (DLCM) which (i) assigns riders to latent compensatory and inertia/habit classes based on different decision rules, (ii) enables transitions between these classes over time, and (iii) adopts instance-based learning theory to account for the learning behaviour of riders. We use the expectation-maximisation algorithm to estimate DLCM, and the most probable sequence of latent classes for each rider is retrieved using the Viterbi algorithm. The proposed DLCM can be applied in any choice context to capture the dynamics of decision rules used by a decision-maker. We demonstrate its practical advantages in estimating the crowding valuation of an Asian metro's riders. To calibrate the model, we recover the daily route preferences and in-vehicle crowding experiences of regular metro riders using a two-month-long smart card and vehicle location data. The results indicate that the average rider follows the compensatory rule on only 25.5% of route choice occasions. DLCM estimates also show an increase of 47% in metro riders' valuation of travel time under extremely crowded conditions relative to that under uncrowded conditions.

Transport operators have a range of intervention options available to improve or enhance their networks. Such interventions are often made in the absence of sound evidence on resulting outcomes. Cycling superhighways were promoted as a sustainable and healthy travel mode, one of the aims of which was to reduce traffic congestion. Estimating the impacts that cycle superhighways have on congestion is complicated due to the non-random assignment of such intervention over the transport network. In this paper, we analyse the causal effect of cycle superhighways utilising pre-intervention and post-intervention information on traffic and road characteristics along with socio-economic factors. We propose a modeling framework based on the propensity score and outcome regression model. The method is also extended to the doubly robust set-up. Simulation results show the superiority of the performance of the proposed method over existing competitors. The method is applied to analyse a real dataset on the London transport network. The methodology proposed can assist in effective decision making to improve network performance.

This paper quantifies the effect of speed cameras on road traffic collisions using an approximate Bayesian doubly-robust (DR) causal inference estimation method. Previous empirical work on this topic, which shows a diverse range of estimated effects, is based largely on outcome regression (OR) models using the Empirical Bayes approach or on simple before and after comparisons. Issues of causality and confounding have received little formal attention. A causal DR approach combines propensity score (PS) and OR models to give an average treatment effect (ATE) estimator that is consistent and asymptotically normal under correct specification of either of the two component models. We develop this approach within a novel approximate Bayesian framework to derive posterior predictive distributions for the ATE of speed cameras on road traffic collisions. Our results for England indicate significant reductions in the number of collisions at speed cameras sites (mean ATE = -15%). Our proposed method offers a promising approach for evaluation of transport safety interventions.

This paper develops a multiply robust (MR) dose-response estimator for causal inference problems involving multivalued treatments. We combine a family of generalised propensity score (GPS) models and a family of outcome regression (OR) models to achieve an average potential outcomes estimator that is consistent if just one of the GPS or OR models in each family is correctly specified. We provide proofs and simulations that demonstrate multiple robustness in the context of multivalued causal inference problems.

This paper constructs a doubly robust estimator for continuous dose-response estimation. An outcome regression model is augmented with a set of inverse generalized propensity score covariates to correct for potential misspecification bias. From the augmented model we can obtain consistent estimates of mean average potential outcomes for distinct strata of the treatment. A polynomial regression is then fitted to these point estimates to derive a Taylor approximation to the continuous dose-response function. The bootstrap is used for variance estimation. Analytical results and simulations show that our approach can provide a good approximation to linear or nonlinear dose-response functions under various sources of misspecification of the outcome regression or propensity score models. Efficiency in finite samples is good relative to minimum variance consistent estimators.