Search

This article describes how the Common Core Look-fors application for the iPad was used to help preservice early childhood education and elementary/special education teachers learn to look for and recognize student enactment of the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics' Standards for Mathematical Practice. After using the iPad application for one semester in their college course and in their internships, the pre-service teachers reported that the application helped them to understand and identify the Standards for Mathematical Practice. (Contains 2 figures.)

Whether they are acknowledged or not, resources such as textbooks, curriculum guides, assessments, and professional development programs present messages about what is most important for students to learn and how students can best learn this. At times teachers feel obligated to enact these messages, but at other times they feel free to ignore these messages. When do teachers feel obligated to follow messages that they interpret from resources and when do they feel that they can ignore these messages? Through survey, observation, and interview this qualitative study explored this question. The messages that five experienced, elementary certified, middle school mathematics teachers interpreted and the ways in which these messages related to their beliefs and practices were studied. When the teachers were in agreement with their interpretations of the messages, they usually followed through with these messages in their practices. Surprisingly, when the teachers disagreed with the messages, their practices were still sometimes reflective of these messages. It seemed that this was because the teachers felt obligated to enact these messages. This sense of obligation was most apparent when there were clear and consistent messages both within and across resources. Teachers felt that they could use their discretion and ignore vague, inconsistent, and controversial messages. (Contains 1 table and 7 footnotes.)

Whether they are acknowledged or not, resources such as textbooks, curriculum guides, assessments, and professional development programs present messages about what is most important for students to learn and how students can best learn this. At times teachers feel obligated to enact these messages, but at other times they feel free to ignore these messages. When do teachers feel obligated to follow messages that they interpret from resources and when do they feel that they can ignore these messages? Through survey, observation, and interview this qualitative study explored this question. The messages that five experienced, elementary certified, middle school mathematics teachers interpreted and the ways in which these messages related to their beliefs and practices were studied. When the teachers were in agreement with their interpretations of the messages, they usually followed through with these messages in their practices. Surprisingly, when the teachers disagreed with the messages, their practices were still sometimes reflective of these messages. It seemed that this was because the teachers felt obligated to enact these messages. This sense of obligation was most apparent when there were clear and consistent messages both within and across resources. Teachers felt that they could use their discretion and ignore vague, inconsistent, and controversial messages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]