Search

Cutaneous dystrophic calcification as a late change of radiation therapy is a rarely reported finding. Initially, it was almost exclusively described as occurring on the chest wall in breast cancer patients but has since been described in several other malignancies. We describe the first reported case of radiotherapy-induced calcinosis cutis occurring at the site of a previous liposarcoma. Review of the literature including risk factors, similar cases, pathophysiology, and management is also explored.

Background: Ongoing controversy exists regarding terminology used to describe atypical melanocytic nevi. Efforts to standardize nomenclature, including the 1992 NIH consensus conference, have been largely unsuccessful. Significant advances have revealed an increasingly detailed genetic picture of melanocytic neoplasms, including strong evidence for the existence of those with "intermediate" behavior. Methods: We sent an electronic survey to dermatopathologists (n = 846) to assess trends in nomenclature usage and attitudes toward developing new consensus nomenclature for atypical melanocytic nevi. Results: There were 229 complete responses (27.1% response rate). The most used/preferred nomenclature was "dysplastic nevus" (43%/39%, respectively), followed by the NIH‐recommended terminology (28%/26%). Three‐tier grading systems were most heavily used/preferred (79%/63%). Dermatopathologists based in New England were most likely to use the NIH terminology; on the other hand, "dysplastic nevus" or "other" were most used elsewhere (p = 0.029). Most (76%) expressed at least "moderate" enthusiasm for developing consensus nomenclature, with 47% "very" or "extremely" enthusiastic. Conclusion: Little has changed with the wide variation in terminology for atypical melanocytic nevi. There continues to be no one dominant terminology in use. However, there is enthusiasm for standardization. A new attempt at updated consensus nomenclature may be fruitful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]