1. Grief-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Present-Centered Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Author
-
Rosner, Rita, Rau, Jörn, Kersting, Anette, Rief, Winfried, Steil, Regina, Rummel, Anna-Maria, Vogel, Anna, and Comtesse, Hannah
- Subjects
COMPLICATED grief ,COGNITIVE therapy ,COGNITIVE restructuring therapy ,GRIEF therapy ,CLINICAL trials ,COGNITIVE consistency - Abstract
This randomized clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of integrative cognitive behavioral therapy vs present-centered therapy in patients with prolonged grief disorder. Key Points: Question: Is integrative cognitive behavioral therapy for prolonged grief (PG-CBT) more effective than present-centered therapy (PCT) in patients with prolonged grief disorder (PGD)? Findings: In a multicenter randomized clinical trial with 212 participants, PG-CBT resulted in greater improvement in blinded rater-assessed PGD severity after treatment, but at follow-up, this effect was only visible on a trend level. PG-CBT was superior at follow-up in terms of reductions in self-reported comorbid symptoms. Meaning: Both treatments were shown to be effective and acceptable, showing the potential for dissemination and increasing patient choice. Importance: Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is included as a new diagnosis in international classification systems. Treatments following a cognitive behavioral model are most effective, but comparisons with active control treatments are scarce. Objective: To examine whether integrative cognitive behavioral therapy for prolonged grief (PG-CBT) is superior to present-centered therapy (PCT). Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a rater-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (stratified by center and relationship to the deceased) with enrollment from April 2017 to May 2022. The setting included 4 university outpatient clinics in Germany. Eligible participants were aged 18 to 75 years and had PGD based on the Prolonged Grief Disorder 13 (PG-13) interview. Participants were randomized 1:1 to PG-CBT and PCT. Interventions: PG-CBT focused on the exposure to the worst moment of the loss and cognitive restructuring of grief-related cognitions in combination with solution-focused and experiential methods (eg, walk to the grave exercise). PCT was adapted in session length and number to PG-CBT and focused on a supportive relationship and coping with daily problems that may have arisen from the loss or grief symptoms. Main Outcomes and Measures: All outcomes were assessed at baseline, after treatment, and 12 months after randomization at follow-up. The primary outcome was a blinded assessment of the PG-13 severity score at follow-up. Secondary outcomes were self-reported depressive, somatic, and overall psychopathological symptoms. Results: Of 544 treatment-seeking individuals experiencing bereavement, 212 eligible participants (mean [SD] age, 51.8 [13.3] years; 173 female [82%]) with PGD based on the PG-13 interview were randomized to PG-CBT and PCT (n = 106 in each condition). In the intention-to-treat analysis, both treatments yielded high reductions in PGD severity at follow-up (PG-CBT: Cohen d = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.31-1.97; PCT: Cohen d = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66). After treatment, participants receiving PG-CBT demonstrated significantly greater reductions in PGD severity than those receiving PCT (Cohen d = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.03-0.57). At follow-up, this effect was only visible on a trend level (Cohen d = 0.28; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.57), whereas participants in the PG-CBT group had significantly less depressive and general psychopathological symptoms. Twenty-three participants (20%) discontinued PG-CBT treatment, and 17 participants (16%) discontinued PCT. Conclusion and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that PG-CBT was superior to PCT after treatment and at follow-up with regard to comorbid symptoms. Both treatments were shown to be effective and acceptable, showing the potential for dissemination and increasing patient choice. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) identifier: DRKS00012317 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF