Search

Your search keyword '"Griffin, Olly"' showing total 9 results
Start Over Author "Griffin, Olly"
9 results on '"Griffin, Olly"'

2. Where will the dhole survive in 2030? Predicted strongholds in mainland Southeast Asia

Author

Tananantayot, Jiratchaya, primary, Agger, Cain, additional, Ash, Eric, additional, Aung, Saw Soe, additional, Baker‐Whatton, Megan C., additional, Bisi, Francesco, additional, Clements, Gopalasamy Reuben, additional, Cremonesi, Giacomo, additional, Crouthers, Rachel, additional, Frechette, Jackson L., additional, Gale, George A., additional, Godfrey, Alexander, additional, Gray, Thomas N. E., additional, Greenspan, Evan, additional, Griffin, Olly, additional, Grindley, Mark, additional, Hashim, Abdul Kadir Bin Abu, additional, Jenks, Kate E., additional, Say K'lu, Saw, additional, Lam, Wai Yee, additional, Lynam, Antony J., additional, McCann, Gregory Edward, additional, Mohamad, Shariff Wan, additional, Petersen, Wyatt Joseph, additional, Sivayogam, Charina Pria, additional, Rayan, Darmaraj Mark, additional, Riggio, Alex Michael, additional, Saosoong, Sutasinee, additional, Savini, Tommaso, additional, Seuaturien, Naret, additional, Shwe, Nay Myo, additional, Siripattaranukul, Kittiwara, additional, Steinmetz, Robert, additional, Suksavate, Sasi, additional, Sukumal, Niti, additional, Tantipisanuh, Naruemon, additional, Vinitpornsawan, Supagit, additional, and Ngoprasert, Dusit, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Long-term monitoring of wildlife populations for protected area management in Southeast Asia

Author

Nuttall, Matthew N, Griffin, Olly, Fewster, Rachel M, McGowan, Philip J K, Abernethy, Katharine, O'Kelly, Hannah, Nut, Menghor, Sot, Vandoeun, and Bunnefeld, Nils

Subjects
yellow-cheeked crested gibbon, abundance estimates, black-shanked douc, density surface model, distance sampling, Cambodia, Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary, population trends
Abstract

Long-term monitoring of biodiversity in protected areas (PAs) is critical to assess threats, link conservation action to species outcomes, and facilitate improved management. Yet, rigorous longitudinal monitoring within PAs is rare. In Southeast Asia (SEA), there is a paucity of long-term wildlife monitoring within PAs, and many threatened species lack population estimates from anywhere in their range, making global assessments difficult. Here, we present new abundance estimates and population trends for 11 species between 2010 and 2020, and spatial distributions for 7 species, based on long-term line transect distance sampling surveys in Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary in Cambodia. These represent the first robust population estimates for four threatened species from anywhere in their range and are among the first long-term wildlife population trend analyses from the entire SEA region. Our study revealed that arboreal primates and green peafowl (Pavo muticus) generally had either stable or increasing population trends, whereas ungulates and semiarboreal primates generally had declining trends. These results suggest that ground-based threats, such as snares and domestic dogs, are having serious negative effects on terrestrial species. These findings have important conservation implications for PAs across SEA that face similar threats yet lack reliable monitoring data.

Published
2022

7. Estimating hunting prevalence and reliance on wild meat in Cambodia's Eastern Plains.

Author

Ibbett, Harriet, Keane, Aidan, Dobson, Andrew D.M., Griffin, Olly, Travers, Henry, and Milner-Gulland, E.J.

Subjects
HUNTING dogs, DOGS, HUNTING, WILDLIFE refuges, ENVIRONMENTAL degradation
Abstract

Hunting is a primary driver of biodiversity loss across South-east Asia. Within Cambodia, the use of wire snares to capture wildlife is a severe threat in protected areas but there have been few studies of the behaviour of hunters from local communities. Here, we combine the unmatched count technique with direct questioning to estimate the prevalence of hunting behaviours and wildlife consumption amongst 705 households living within Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary, Cambodia. We assessed respondents' knowledge of rules, and their perceptions of patrols responsible for enforcing rules. Estimates of hunting behaviour were variable: results from the unmatched count technique were inconclusive, and direct questioning revealed 9% of households hunted, and 20% set snares around farms to prevent wildlife eating crops. Hunting with domestic dogs was the method most commonly used to catch wildlife (87% of households owned dogs). Wild meat was consumed by 84% of households, and was most frequently bought or caught, but also gifted. We detected a high awareness of conservation rules, but low awareness of punishments and penalties, with wildlife depletion, rather than the risk of being caught by patrols, causing the greatest reduction in hunting. Our findings demonstrate the challenges associated with reliably estimating rule-breaking behaviour and highlight the need to incorporate careful triangulation into study design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results