Search

Clinical results with acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) in periodontal surgeries suggest that the material is incorporated by the host tissues. However, histologic studies of the ADMG incorporation process are limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incorporation of ADMG into gingival tissues in a dog model. Gingival recession-type defects were created at the canines of six dogs. After 6 weeks, periodontal surgeries to repair the defects were performed using ADMG. Two animals each were sacrificed after 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At 4 weeks, thick collagen fibers from the ADMG were clearly seen in the connective tissue, and some blood vessels were penetrating into the ADMG. At 8 weeks, blood vessel penetration was enhanced, and collagen fiber bundles from the ADMG were seen sending branches into the connective tissue in all directions. After 12 weeks, the ADMG and the connective tissue seemed to be well integrated into a single highly vascularized structure, indicating almost complete incorporation of the ADMG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: The aim of this randomized, controlled, clinical study was to compare two surgical techniques with the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) to evaluate which technique could provide better root coverage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with bilateral Miller Class I gingival recession areas were selected. In each patient, one recession area was randomly assigned to the control group, while the contra-lateral recession area was assigned to the test group. The ADMG was used in both groups. The control group was treated with a broader flap and vertical-releasing incisions, and the test group was treated with the proposed surgical technique, without releasing incisions. The clinical parameters evaluated before the surgeries and after 12 months were: gingival recession height, probing depth, relative clinical attachment level and the width and thickness of keratinized tissue. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for all parameters at baseline. After 12 months, there was a statistically significant reduction in recession height in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the techniques with regard to root coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques provided significant reduction in gingival recession height after 12 months, and similar results in relation to root coverage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Juvenile spongiotic gingival hyperplasia (JSGH) is a benign proliferation of non-keratinised stratified squamous epithelium with evident spongiosis, exocytosis leukocytes and dilated vessels with varying numbers of inflammatory cells. Although uncertain, it has been suggested that the epithelial proliferation is probably related to trauma and local irritants. It emerges as a painless erythematous patch or papule with an irregular surface., Case Reports: We present a series of eight cases and a literature review of the clinical presentation and treatment approaches for JSGH. This series includes four females and four males with a mean age of 11.6 years, all complaining of injury to the gums. All lesions were painless and not bleeding. One patient associated the lesion with the onset of trauma and another with a previous history of an eruption cyst. Periapical radiographs of the adjacent area did not show any alteration of bone or teeth. Based on these findings, the diagnostic hypotheses were a non-neoplastic proliferative process or a factitious injury. Incisional biopsy was performed and histopathologic diagnosis was conclusive for JSGH. Surgical excision was conducted in three cases, and the other five cases were supported by clinical observation and plaque control in order to prevent gingival recession defects. After a follow-up period of 11 months (mean), no recurrence was observed for surgically treated cases and mild improvement was achieved with periodontal treatment., Conclusion: This case series illustrates the importance of diagnosis and follow-up of patients with JSGH. A conservative approach consisting of basic periodontal support instead of surgical excision may be indicated because of the risk of aesthetic defects at the involved areas.