Search

Background: Bevacizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody which targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has shown promising anti-tumour effect when given concurrently with taxane-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. However two neoadjuvant breast cancer trials have produced conflicting results. The GEPARQUINTO trial reported significant benefit only in the triple negative patients (pCR 27.8% vs 36.4% p = 0.021). The NSABP-B40 study showed significant benefit for bevacizumab only in the ER+ve patients (pathological complete response (pCR) in ER+ve population 15.2% vs 23.3%, p = 0.008). Trial design: ARTemis is a phase III randomised trial to determine whether the addition to neo -adjuvant chemotherapy of bevacizumab is more effective than standard chemotherapy alone in patients with HER2-negative early breast cancer. A total of 400 patients will be randomised into each of the two treatment arms which will allow an absolute difference in the pCR rates in excess of 10% to be detected at the 5% (2-sided) level of significance with an 85% power. Primary outcome is pathological complete response rates after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, i.e. no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast, and no evidence of metastatic disease within the lymph nodes. Secondary outcomes are disease free survival, overall survival, complete pathological response rates in breast alone, radiological response after 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy and rate of breast conservation and toxicities. Translational work (ARTemis-Science): collection of blood samples, and paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed and fresh tissue samples to investigate whether markers for chemotherapy response/resistance, and pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic markers can be correlated with outcomes (pathCR and RFS) in patients randomised to receive bevacizumab versus those that do not. Eligibility criteria: Histologically confirmed HER2-negative invasive breast cancer; T2 to T4 tumour and/or large/fixed axillary nodes (>20mm/clinical N2 or N3), or inflammatory disease; suitable for, and fit to receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and an anti-angiogenic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), which is reflected in diverse drug responses, interplays with tumor evolution. Here, we developed a preclinical experimental and analytical framework using treatment-naive TNBC patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDTX) to test their predictive value in personalized cancer treatment approaches. Patients and their matched PDTX exhibited concordant drug responses to neoadjuvant therapy using two trial designs and dosing schedules. This platform enabled analysis of non-genetic mechanisms involved in relapse dynamics. Treatment resulted in permanent phenotypic changes with functional and therapeutic consequences. High throughput drug screening methods in ex vivo patient derived tumor xenograft cells (PDTCs) revealed patient-specific drug response changes dependent on first-line therapy. This was validated in vivo, as exemplified by a change in olaparib sensitivity in tumors previously treated with clinically relevant cycles of standard-of-care chemotherapy. In summary, PDTXs provide a robust tool to test patient drug responses and therapeutic regimens and to model evolutionary trajectories. However, high inter-model variability and permanent non-genomic transcriptional changes constrain their use for personalized cancer therapy. This work highlights important considerations associated with preclinical drug response modeling and potential uses of the platform to identify efficacious and preferential sequential therapeutic regimens.

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) provides comprehensive, individualised cancer genomic information. However, routine tumour biopsies are formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), damaging DNA, historically limiting their use in WGS. Here we analyse FFPE cancer WGS datasets from England's 100,000 Genomes Project, comparing 578 FFPE samples with 11,014 fresh frozen (FF) samples across multiple tumour types. We use an approach that characterises rather than discards artefacts. We identify three artefactual signatures, including one known (SBS57) and two previously uncharacterised (SBS FFPE, ID FFPE), and develop an "FFPEImpact" score that quantifies sample artefacts. Despite inferior sequencing quality, FFPE-derived data identifies clinically-actionable variants, mutational signatures and permits algorithmic stratification. Matched FF/FFPE validation cohorts shows good concordance while acknowledging SBS, ID and copy-number artefacts. While FF-derived WGS data remains the gold standard, FFPE-samples can be used for WGS if required, using analytical advancements developed here, potentially democratising whole cancer genomics to many., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

PARTNER is a prospective, phase II-III, randomized controlled clinical trial that recruited patients with triple-negative breast cancer 1,2 , who were germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 wild type 3 . Here we report the results of the trial. Patients (n = 559) were randomized on a 1:1 basis to receive neoadjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel with or without 150 mg olaparib twice daily, on days 3 to 14, of each of four cycles (gap schedule olaparib, research arm) followed by three cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy before surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) 4 , and secondary end points included event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) 5 . pCR was achieved in 51% of patients in the research arm and 52% in the control arm (P = 0.753). Estimated EFS at 36 months in the research and control arms was 80% and 79% (log-rank P > 0.9), respectively; OS was 90% and 87.2% (log-rank P = 0.8), respectively. In patients with pCR, estimated EFS at 36 months was 90%, and in those with non-pCR it was 70% (log-rank P < 0.001), and OS was 96% and 83% (log-rank P < 0.001), respectively. Neoadjuvant olaparib did not improve pCR rates, EFS or OS when added to carboplatin-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer who were germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 wild type. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03150576 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The ARTemis Trial tested standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy±bevacizumab in the treatment of HER2-negative early breast cancer. We compare data from central pathology review with report review and also the reporting behavior of the two central pathologists. Eight hundred women with HER2-negative early invasive breast cancer were recruited. Response to chemotherapy was assessed from local pathology reports for pathological complete response in breast and axillary lymph nodes. Sections from the original core biopsy and surgical excision were centrally reviewed by one of two trial pathologists blinded to the local pathology reports. Pathologists recorded response to chemotherapy descriptively and also calculated residual cancer burden. 10% of cases were double-reported to compare the central pathologists' reporting behavior. Full sample retrieval was obtained for 681 of the 781 patients (87%) who underwent surgery within the trial and were evaluable for pathological complete response. Four hundred and eighty-three (71%) were assessed by JSJT, and 198 (29%) were assessed by EP. Residual cancer burden calculations were possible in 587/681 (86%) of the centrally reviewed patients, as 94/681 (14%) had positive sentinel nodes removed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy invalidating residual cancer burden scoring. Good concordance was found between the two pathologists for residual cancer burden classes within the 65-patient quality assurance exercise (kappa 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69)). Similar results were obtained for the between-treatment arm comparison both from the report review and the central pathology review. For pathological complete response, report review was as good as central pathology review but for minimal residual disease, report review overestimated the extent of residual disease. In the ARTemis Trial central pathology review added little in the determination of pathological complete response but had a role in evaluating low levels of residual disease. Calculation of residual cancer burden was a simple and reproducible method of quantifying response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as demonstrated by performance comparison of the two pathologists.

Background: The ARTemis trial was developed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative early breast cancer., Methods: In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled women (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed HER2-negative early invasive breast cancer (radiological tumour size >20 mm, with or without axillary involvement), at 66 centres in the UK. Patients were randomly assigned via a central computerised minimisation procedure to three cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) once every 21 days) followed by three cycles of fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)), epirubicin (100 mg/m(2)), and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) once every 21 days (D-FEC), without or with four cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) (Bev+D-FEC). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response, defined as the absence of invasive disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes, analysed by intention to treat. The trial has completed and follow-up is ongoing. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2008-002322-11), ISRCTN (68502941), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01093235)., Findings: Between May 7, 2009, and Jan 9, 2013, we randomly allocated 800 participants to D-FEC (n=401) and Bev+D-FEC (n=399). 781 patients were available for the primary endpoint analysis. Significantly more patients in the bevacizumab group achieved a pathological complete response compared with those treated with chemotherapy alone: 87 (22%, 95% CI 18-27) of 388 patients in the Bev+D-FEC group compared with 66 (17%, 13-21) of 393 patients in the D-FEC group (p=0·03). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported at expected levels in both groups, although more patients had grade 4 neutropenia in the Bev+D-FEC group than in the D-FEC group (85 [22%] vs 68 [17%])., Interpretation: Addition of four cycles of bevacizumab to D-FEC in HER2-negative early breast cancer significantly improved pathological complete response. However, whether the improvement in pathological complete response will lead to improved disease-free and overall survival outcomes is unknown and will be reported after longer follow-up. Meta-analysis of available neoadjuvant trials is likely to be the only way to define subgroups of early breast cancer that would have clinically significant long-term benefit from bevacizumab treatment., Funding: Cancer Research UK, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis., (Copyright © 2015 Earl et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)