Search

Convolutional precoding in polarization-adjusted convolutional (PAC) codes is a recently introduced variant of polar codes. It has demonstrated an effective reduction in the number of minimum weight codewords (a.k.a error coefficient) of polar codes. This reduction has the potential to significantly improve the error correction performance. From a codeword formation perspective, this reduction has limitations. Capitalizing on the understanding of the decomposition of minimum-weight codewords, this paper studies reverse precoding that can effectively reduce minimum-weight codewords more than in PAC codes. We propose a look-ahead list decoding for the reverse PAC codes, which has the same order of complexity as list decoding in PAC codes. Through numerical analysis, we demonstrate a notable reduction in error coefficients compared to PAC codes and polar codes, resulting in a remarkable improvement in the block error rate, in particular at high code rates., Comment: To appear in the proceedings of ISIT'24. It contains 6 pages, 3 figures, and 1 table

Channel coding plays a pivotal role in ensuring reliable communication over wireless channels. With the growing need for ultra-reliable communication in emerging wireless use cases, the significance of channel coding has amplified. Furthermore, minimizing decoding latency is crucial for critical-mission applications, while optimizing energy efficiency is paramount for mobile and the Internet of Things (IoT) communications. As the fifth generation (5G) of mobile communications is currently in operation and 5G-advanced is on the horizon, the objective of this paper is to assess prominent channel coding schemes in the context of recent advancements and the anticipated requirements for the sixth generation (6G). In this paper, after considering the potential impact of channel coding on key performance indicators (KPIs) of wireless networks, we review the evolution of mobile communication standards and the organizations involved in the standardization, from the first generation (1G) to the current 5G, highlighting the technologies integral to achieving targeted KPIs such as reliability, data rate, latency, energy efficiency, spectral efficiency, connection density, and traffic capacity. Following this, we delve into the anticipated requirements for potential use cases in 6G. The subsequent sections of the paper focus on a comprehensive review of three primary coding schemes utilized in past generations and their recent advancements: low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, turbo codes (including convolutional codes), polar codes (alongside Reed-Muller codes). Additionally, we examine alternative coding schemes like Fountain codes and sparse regression codes. Our evaluation includes a comparative analysis of error correction performance and the performance of hardware implementation for these coding schemes, providing insights into their potential and suitability for the upcoming 6G era., Comment: 102 pages, 87 figures, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society (invited paper)

Convolutional precoding in polarization-adjusted convolutional (PAC) codes can reduce the number of minimum weight codewords (a.k.a error coefficient) of polar codes. This can result in improving the error correction performance of (near) maximum likelihood (ML) decoders such as sequential decoders and sphere decoders. However, PAC codes cannot be decoded by sphere decoding. The reason is twofold: 1) Sphere decoding of polar codes is performed from the last bit - due to the lower rectangular shape of the polar transform. Whereas the shape of PAC codes generator matrix is no longer triangular. 2) One may modify the precoding matrix to get a lower-triangular shape. However, this may reduce the minimum distance of the code due to the formation of unwanted cosets. This work proposes a selective convolutional precoding scheme with transposed precoding matrix to reduce the error coefficient while avoiding the reduction in the minimum distance. The numerical results show the improvement of block error rate by 0.2-0.6 dB, depending on the code rate, in medium and high SNR regimes.