Search

We report on the results of a study comparing mianserin with amitriptyline and placebo, in outpatients with major depression (DSM-III 296.2 or 296.3). One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized to mianserin (n = 50), amitriptyline (n = 50) or placebo (n = 49). Medication was taken in a nightly (qhs) dose. During Week 1, the maximum dose was 60 mg mianserin, 120 mg amitriptyline or two placebo capsules. Beginning at Day 7 (through Day 42) maximum dosages were 150 mg mianserin, 300 mg amitriptyline or five placebo capsules. At multiple weeks and endpoint, statistically significant reductions in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) 17- and 21-item scores were recorded for both active drugs compared with placebo. Positive results with the HAM-D were corroborated by other measures of efficacy. There were no statistically significant differences between mianserin and amitriptyline in terms of efficacy; however, the results do suggest a more rapid therapeutic response for mianserin compared with amitriptyline, in terms of percentage of patients showing > or = 50% improvement at Weeks 2 (30% vs 23%) and 4 (61% vs 44%). The most common adverse experiences were somnolence (amitriptyline and mianserin 60%, placebo 31%) and dry mouth (amitriptyline 76%, mianserin 30% and placebo 20%). Our results indicate that mianserin is clearly superior to placebo, compares favorably with amitriptyline, and is a safe, well-tolerated, effective medication in the treatment of depressed outpatients.

The effects of i.v. administered flumazenil (3.0 mg) were studied in healthy male subjects who received pretreatment with p.o. placebo or lorazepam. The duration of placebo or lorazepam (3.0 mg single p.o. daily dose) pretreatment before a flumazenil or placebo injection was 1, 3, 7 or 14 days in four sequential groups of subjects. Initial administration of lorazepam produced a classic sedative profile of effects on various psychomotor/behavioral performance, observer-rated and subject-rated measures. Tolerance to repeated daily administration of lorazepam was suggested by a progressive diminution of performance disrupting effects. In subjects pretreated with placebo, flumazenil increased subject-ratings of dizziness over preinjection ratings. Flumazenil produced an immediate reversal of lorazepam effects in subjects who were not tolerant to lorazepam (1- and 3-day pretreatment groups). Flumazenil did not precipitate withdrawal symptoms in subjects who received a single administration of lorazepam. Precipitated withdrawal symptoms were evident after 3 and 7 days of lorazepam pretreatment, and there was a tendency toward precipitated withdrawal symptoms (that included one panic attack) after 14 days of lorazepam pretreatment. Precipitated withdrawal was characterized by an elevation in subject-rated symptoms including dizziness, tenseness, tachycardia, perceptual disturbance and sweating. Symptoms were maximal immediately after injection, usually mild in severity and usually resolved within 1 hr. There was no evidence of precipitated withdrawal on psychomotor/behavioral performance or observer ratings. The present study provides the strongest human experimental evidence to date that flumazenil can precipitate withdrawal symptoms after a history of repeated benzodiazepine exposure.

The effects of orally administered placebo, diphenhydramine, lorazepam, methocarbamol and placebo were studied in volunteers with histories of recreational substance abuse including sedative/hypnotics. Placebo, diphenhydramine (100, 200 and 400 mg), lorazepam (1 and 4 mg) and methocarbamol (2.25 and 9 g) were tested in a randomized, double-blind crossover study using 14 subjects. Psychomotor and cognitive performance and subject- and observer-rated responses were measured daily before and for 5.5 hr after drug administration. The results showed that each of the drugs exhibited a different profile of effects on the test battery. Lorazepam produced significant increases in subjects' ratings of drug effect and liking, increases in measures of sedation and impairment of psychomotor performance. Methocarbamol also produced significant increases in subjects' ratings of drug effect and liking and measures of sedation, but it produced only minor impairment of psychomotor and cognitive performance. Diphenhydramine increased subjects' and observers' ratings of drug effect and measures of sedation, but it produced less psychomotor performance impairment and liking than lorazepam. Diphenhydramine produced the most side effects. The present study clearly differentiated the behavioral and subjective profiles of diphenhydramine, lorazepam and methocarbamol. Consistent with its recognized low abuse liability, diphenhydramine produced fewer increases in measures of positive mood and more adverse effects. The considerable overlap in subjective effect measures of positive mood make further differentiation with respect to abuse liability difficult.

Midazolam is a new ultra short-acting benzodiazepine whose physical dependence properties have not been well characterized. Our laboratory has demonstrated previously that physical dependence to the long-acting chlordiazepoxide in the rat is inducible by a single intoxicating dose, whereas maximal dependence required chronically equivalent maximally tolerable dosing b.i.d. for 5 weeks. Based on the methods developed in our laboratory to quantify benzodiazepine intoxication and withdrawal, Trs were designed to evaluate midazolam's capacity to induce dependence in the rat after definable acute (120 mg/kg p.o.), sub-acute (120 mg/kg q.i.d. x 3 days) and chronic (120-180 mg/kg bid. x 5 weeks) dosing that was near maximally tolerable. A single dose of midazolam failed to produce withdrawal signs. Tolerance and dependence increased as a function of midazolam dose and duration of Tr.

A rat model of phenobarbital tolerance and physical dependence has been developed based on the 'maximally tolerable, chronically equivalent' dosing paradigm. Sodium phenobarbital was administered orally twice daily for 35 days in individually adjusted doses to achieve mean daily peak CNS depression culminating in severe ataxia. Dose to dose continuity of CNS depression was maintained throughout treatment. At the time of dosing rats were mildly ataxic. Following abrupt termination of chronic treatment, an abstinence syndrome characterized by CNS hyperexcitability was observed, which demonstrates physical dependence. Signs, which included motor, autonomic, and behavioral manifestations, appeared from 12-24 h and animals recovered by 12 days. Although tolerance development was nearly complete on day 10 of treatment, the abstinence syndrome observed was more severe following 35 than after 10 days of chronic treatment. Characteristics of tolerance and physical dependence are similar to those described for other species including humans.

A single intoxicating dose of chlordiazepoxide HCl (p.o.) in the rat can induce quantifiable manifestations of physical dependence. Dependence was revealed by antagonist precipitation (Ro 15-1788, CGS-8216) as well as spontaneous emergence of neurobehavioral signs of withdrawal observed by multiple raters blind to treatments. Ro 15-1788 was 45% more effective than CGS-8216 in both reversing chlordiazepoxide intoxication and expressing withdrawal signs. The severity of Ro 15-1788-precipitated withdrawal varied with chlordiazepoxide dose, Ro 15-1788 dose and the agonist-antagonist dose interval. Maximal precipitated dependence was evoked 3 days after chlordiazepoxide HCl (450 mg/kg) by Ro 15-1788 (25 mg/kg i.p.). The precipitated syndrome consisted of tail erection, reduced motor activity, high step, curled claw, arched back, muscle hypertonus and piloerection. Ro 15-1788-precipitated dependence emerged between 28 and 52 hr, peaked at 76 hr and disappeared by 124 hr. Spontaneous withdrawal had emerged from 100 to 124 hr and then faded gradually. The neurobehavioral expression of central nervous system depression and its reversal were necessary but not sufficient conditions for the induction and expression of acute chlordiazepoxide dependence. These results suggest caution in reviving acute benzodiazepine-overdosed patients to avoid iatrogenic withdrawal analogous to naloxone for opiates.

The subjective and behavioral effects of p.o. administered methocarbamol, lorazepam and placebo were studied in a nonresidential group of adult male volunteers with histories of recreational substance abuse including sedative/hypnotics. In the first phase of the investigation, a dose run-up of methocarbamol (up to 12 g) was conducted in six subjects to determine appropriate doses. In the second phase, a randomized block cross-over study using 14 subjects was conducted. The following drug conditions were tested in the cross-over phase: placebo, lorazepam 1, 2 and 4 mg, and methocarbamol 2.25, 4.5 and 9 g. Drug conditions were tested under double-blind conditions. Psychomotor and cognitive performance measures and subject- and observer-rated behavioral responses were measured daily before dosing and for 5.5 hr after drug administration. The results showed that both lorazepam and methocarbamol produced statistically significant dose-related increases in subjects' ratings of drug effect and liking, although only lorazepam increased morphine-benzedrine group (MGB) scale scores. Methocarbamol also increased ratings on measures indicating the emergence of dysphoric and other side effects at high doses. Both drugs impaired psychomotor and cognitive performance, with lorazepam generally producing greater effects than methocarbamol. The results indicate that methocarbamol, at doses well above those used therapeutically, has some potential to be abused by persons with histories of sedative/hypnotic abuse; however, this potential for abuse is probably decreased by the accompanying side effects at high doses and is probably less than that of lorazepam.

A sustained increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity was induced by substituting a 10% sucrose solution for the drinking water of rats fed laboratory chow ad libitum. The effects of increased SNS activity on alpha 1-adrenergic processes in liver were examined by evaluating three alpha 1-responses, namely, phenylephrine-stimulated ouabain-sensitive 86Rb+ uptake, 45Ca2+ efflux, and glucose release. Sucrose feeding abolished phenylephrine stimulation of ouabain-sensitive 86Rb+ uptake and 45Ca2+ efflux and induced a three- to fourfold reduction in the ability of phenylephrine to stimulate glucose release from liver slices. Pretreatment with 6-hydroxydopamine markedly reduced liver norepinephrine content. When 6-hydroxydopamine was used to prevent the sucrose-induced increase in SNS activity, the changes in 86Rb+ uptake, 45Ca2+ efflux, and glucose release that otherwise followed sucrose feeding were not observed. Sucrose feeding did not alter binding of the alpha 1-antagonist [3H]prazosin to liver cell membrane alpha 1-receptors or displacement of [3H]prazosin by the alpha-agonist epinephrine. These observations suggest that sustained increases in SNS activity may have profound effects on liver alpha 1-adrenergic events that occur subsequent to hormone-receptor interaction.